Top 10 DataStax Enterprise Alternatives

Top DataStax Enterprise Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to DataStax Enterprise based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Elastic Search, MongoDB Enterprise Advanced, and Pinecone. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

DataStax Enterprise surpasses its competitors by offering advanced real-time analytics, robust scalability, and enterprise-grade security, enabling seamless management of large datasets and providing a highly reliable foundation for mission-critical applications.

DataStax Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with DataStax, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Elastic Search

4.1 out of 5

Elastic Search

4.1 out of 5

DataStax Enterprise offers robust support and advanced security, appealing to those prioritizing managed deployment and data management. In comparison, Elastic Search attracts tech buyers with its search capabilities and scalability, ideal for those seeking flexibility in analytics and real-time insights.

Pricing

DataStax Enterprise generally involves higher setup costs, offering extensive support and features, while Elastic Search typically has lower setup expenses, making it more accessible but with potentially fewer built-in features.

View comparison

Pricing

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

4.1 out of 5

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

4.1 out of 5

DataStax Enterprise attracts buyers with robust scalability and cost-effective solutions. In comparison, MongoDB Enterprise Advanced's extensive feature set and flexibility justify higher costs. Each offers unique strengths, making decisions dependent on specific business needs for functionality, cost, and system integration.

Pricing

DataStax Enterprise presents a lower setup cost than MongoDB Enterprise Advanced, which may impact initial budgeting considerations. MongoDB compensates with advanced features potentially justifying its higher setup expense.

View comparison

Pricing

Pinecone

4.0 out of 5

Pinecone

4.0 out of 5

DataStax Enterprise offers robust scalability and advanced analytics, appealing to enterprises needing comprehensive data management. In comparison, Pinecone excels with its vector database specialization and AI-focused innovation, attracting tech buyers prioritizing cutting-edge machine learning performance and simplified, rapid deployment.

Pricing

DataStax Enterprise's setup cost is notably higher, reflecting its extensive features, while Pinecone offers a more budget-friendly setup, appealing to those seeking efficiency and simplicity.

View comparison

Pricing

DataStax Enterprise's setup cost is notably higher, reflecting its extensive features, while Pinecone offers a more budget-friendly setup, appealing to those seeking efficiency and simplicity.

Cassandra

4.0 out of 5

Cassandra

4.0 out of 5

DataStax Enterprise offers advanced security and integrated solutions, making it ideal for enterprises seeking robust support. In comparison, Cassandra provides open-source flexibility and scalability, appealing to those prioritizing cost-effectiveness and independence for scalable projects.

Pricing

DataStax Enterprise features a higher setup cost with added enterprise-grade capabilities, while Cassandra offers a lower setup cost with open-source flexibility, highlighting a significant price difference for businesses prioritizing cost versus advanced features.

View comparison

Pricing

ScyllaDB

3.9 out of 5

ScyllaDB

3.9 out of 5

DataStax Enterprise shines with robust features like built-in search, making it ideal for complex workloads. In comparison, ScyllaDB's shard-per-core architecture offers impressive speed and efficiency, appealing to those prioritizing high performance with lower costs. DataStax's extensive support contrasts with ScyllaDB's simpler deployment.

Pricing

DataStax Enterprise has a higher setup cost compared to ScyllaDB, which offers a more budget-friendly initial expense.

View comparison

Pricing

DataStax Enterprise has a higher setup cost compared to ScyllaDB, which offers a more budget-friendly initial expense.

Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop

4.0 out of 5

Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop

4.0 out of 5

Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop excels with a comprehensive toolset for big data management, optimizing complex infrastructures. In comparison, DataStax Enterprise offers robust Apache Cassandra integration, emphasizing scalability and real-time performance, making it suitable for organizations prioritizing efficient distributed data handling.

Pricing

Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop has high setup costs, while DataStax Enterprise offers a more modest pricing structure, highlighting a key cost difference for potential users.

View comparison

Pricing

Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop has high setup costs, while DataStax Enterprise offers a more modest pricing structure, highlighting a key cost difference for potential users.

Neo4j Graph Database

4.3 out of 5

Neo4j Graph Database

4.3 out of 5

DataStax Enterprise excels in hybrid cloud deployment and strong security features. In comparison, Neo4j Graph Database delivers exceptional graph analytics with advanced features. A tech buyer might prefer DataStax for competitive pricing or Neo4j for specialized graph capabilities despite higher costs.

Pricing

DataStax Enterprise requires significant initial setup investment, while Neo4j Graph Database offers a lower setup cost, highlighting a major pricing difference between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

DataStax Enterprise requires significant initial setup investment, while Neo4j Graph Database offers a lower setup cost, highlighting a major pricing difference between the two solutions.

Related categories

NoSQL Databases

Vector Databases

Indexing and Search