No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

DBmaestro Database Release and Automation vs Digital.ai Release comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

DBmaestro Database Release ...
Ranking in Build Automation
38th
Ranking in Release Automation
25th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Digital.ai Release
Ranking in Build Automation
10th
Ranking in Release Automation
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
DevSecOps (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of DBmaestro Database Release and Automation is 0.9%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Digital.ai Release is 3.4%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Build Automation Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Digital.ai Release3.4%
DBmaestro Database Release and Automation0.9%
Other95.7%
Build Automation
 

Featured Reviews

Use DBmaestro Database Release and Automation?
Leave a review
reviewer1442733 - PeerSpot reviewer
Application Architect at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Standardized releases have reduced errors and now streamline our cloud resource management
To improve Digital.ai Release, I think the user interface could be improved. For example, I have a plan phase before my build phase, and sometimes the toggle button is hidden. I have to toggle it before the step can be executed, or it will be skipped. Many people who did not use Digital.ai Release before do not even know there is a toggle button, and the first time when they run into that phase, they will definitely skip that step. Regarding needed improvements, I did not do extensive reading on documentation or training material directly from Digital.ai Release. My knowledge comes from the team who has been using it. However, I would appreciate standardized training material that would give me hands-on experience.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.
913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
21%
Manufacturing Company
16%
Outsourcing Company
13%
Insurance Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise8
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Digital.ai Release ?
In terms of pricing, Digital.ai Release is more of an enterprise-level investment. It is not a low-cost tool, and the actual cost depends on factors such as the number of users, deployment needs, a...
What needs improvement with Digital.ai Release ?
A few challenges have been encountered, and from my experience, Digital.ai Release should improve the user interface. It has a lot of functionality, but some areas can be a little too complicated c...
What is your primary use case for Digital.ai Release ?
Digital.ai Release is used primarily to manage and automate the release process across software environments. Instead of having developers, testers, and operation teams coordinating every deploymen...
 

Also Known As

No data available
XL Release, XebiaLabs XL Release
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Anthem, ING Bank Turkey, Isracard, Clalbit Systems, Israel Ministry of Education
3M, GE, John Deere, Deutsche Telekom, Cable & Wireless, Xerox, and Société Générale, Liberty Mutual, EA, Rabobank
Find out what your peers are saying about Jenkins, GitHub, GitLab and others in Build Automation. Updated: September 2026.
913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.