Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Decisions vs Temporal comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Decisions
Ranking in Process Automation
46th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Temporal
Ranking in Process Automation
3rd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of Decisions is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Temporal is 5.8%, up from 4.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Automation Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Temporal5.8%
Decisions0.5%
Other93.7%
Process Automation
 

Featured Reviews

Use Decisions?
Leave a review
MP
Founder & CEO at Lanzar
Automation streamlines operations and improves time and cost efficiency
My overall experience with Temporal is rated between 8 to 9, mainly due to a learning curve that only senior developers can navigate effectively, which makes it a bit challenging for junior developers. We don't have any instances of on-premise, so I cannot comment on that because we are a first company, with all services deployed on cloud infrastructure. Most of the integration is through RPC or APIs, ensuring all our systems are in cohesion. We do state persistence to a Postgres instance, and we have modified it to our use case with better indexing. And for fault tolerance, we built a queue and an alerting mechanism that notifies us if any workflows fail after specific failure points so we can act upon it. On a scale of 1-10, I rate Temporal an 8.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
29%
Computer Software Company
12%
Retailer
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise6
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Temporal?
In terms of pricing, Camunda is indeed costlier than Temporal. The cloud deployment costs differ, and while Camunda 7 can be cheaper due to its integrated setup, comparing latest versions between T...
What needs improvement with Temporal?
The only area for improvement in Temporal is the UI. I know it is a non-UI first product, but comparing Camunda versus Temporal UI, there is a difference. Moreover, n8n, being a no-code platform, i...
What is your primary use case for Temporal?
The main purposes for using Temporal are automation flows, especially financial automations and supply chain automations. Our company name is SR, we are a digital-first CPG brand making company, ma...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. Microsoft 2. IBM 3. Amazon 4. Google 5. Facebook 6. Apple 7. Intel 8. Cisco 9. Oracle 10. Adobe 11. Salesforce 12. SAP 13. Dell 14. HP 15. Accenture 16. Deloitte 17. PwC 18. Ernst & Young 19. KPMG 20. McKinsey & Company 21. Bain & Company 22. The Boston Consulting Group 23. General Electric 24. Siemens 25. Samsung 26. Sony 27. Toyota 28. Volkswagen 29. BMW 30. Coca-Cola 31. PepsiCo 32. Procter & Gamble
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, BMC, Temporal Technologies and others in Process Automation. Updated: January 2026.
881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.