Dell PowerEdge FX vs Dell PowerEdge XE Servers comparison

Dell PowerEdge FX and Dell PowerEdge XE Servers are both solutions in the Rack Servers category. Dell PowerEdge FX is ranked #9 with an average rating of 9.0, while Dell PowerEdge XE Servers is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.5. Dell PowerEdge FX holds a 1.4% mindshare in Rack Servers, compared to Dell PowerEdge XE Servers’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Dell PowerEdge FX users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Dell PowerEdge XE Servers users who would recommend it.

Dell PowerEdge FX

Read 13 Dell PowerEdge FX reviews

771 Views
254 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Dell PowerEdge XE Servers

Read 10 Dell PowerEdge XE Servers reviews

658 Views
223 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Dell PowerEdge FX

Dell PowerEdge XE Servers

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Dell PowerEdge FX and XE Servers compete in the data center infrastructure category. PowerEdge XE appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and superior user satisfaction.

Features: PowerEdge FX enables modularity, offering flexible configurations and scalability. It's beneficial for businesses needing adaptable systems. PowerEdge XE provides high-performance computing, ideal for data-intensive environments. XE stands out for supporting large-scale applications.

Room for Improvement: PowerEdge FX could enhance cooling efficiency and power consumption. Users highlight these as primary areas needing refinement. PowerEdge XE could improve on software integration and timely firmware updates, aligning with user expectations for seamless operation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PowerEdge FX is known for its straightforward deployment and responsive service. Users find setup processes less complicated. PowerEdge XE receives mixed deployment feedback, with some finding it complex. Both systems benefit from positive customer service interactions.

Pricing and ROI: PowerEdge FX is viewed as cost-effective, offering a favorable ROI. Its pricing structure appeals to budget-conscious buyers. PowerEdge XE, despite higher initial costs, is justified by its robust capabilities that provide long-term benefits in demanding settings.

To learn more, read our detailed Dell PowerEdge FX vs. Dell PowerEdge XE Servers Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Dell PowerEdge FX vs. Dell PowerEdge XE Servers

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,632 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Dell PowerEdge FX

Ranking in Rack Servers

9th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Dell PowerEdge XE Servers

Ranking in Rack Servers

10th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Rack Servers category, the mindshare of Dell PowerEdge FX is 1.4%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Dell PowerEdge XE Servers is 1.2%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Rack Servers

Featured Reviews

MarcGaethofs

ICT manager at Thys Bouwprojecten

A highly stable product that seamlessly integrates with the storage portfolio and provides excellent technical support

We have a lot of questions during the order process. They get answered well. The machines are ready to go when we switch on the power. It will depend on our configuration. If we don't make an order with all the configuration specs in it, we’ll get nothing. We will have to do it all by ourselves. Which isn't a problem, but it will take longer. The solution is deployed on-premise, but we're transitioning to more hybrid solutions. We have a team for storage and connectivity. We also have a team for switching and networking. We need three to five enterprise system engineers to build a normal-sized cluster with 500 users. We also need a project manager.

Read full review

Muzammil Nasim

Software Architect at a manufacturing company with 501-1,000 employees

We're hardly using 15 percent of their computing power, so there's a lot left over that we could utilize

It should be easier to extend PowerEdge XE servers. We haven't architected them with an eye toward scalability. They have a fixed number of slots for hard drives, which is enough for our present use case, However, we would have more options if we could extend that. We could deploy the servers in a broader range of use cases with different requirements. It's fine for our current deployment with only a few thousand users. We're exploring other solutions like such as VxRail or PowerFlex for larger public-facing use cases.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product's initial setup phase was simple and easy."

"The product seamlessly integrates with the storage portfolio."

"It is a scalable solution. My company hasn't faced any difficulties related to the product's performance and scalability since Dell ensures to provide a high-performance service."

"The setup is straightforward. It can take anywhere from an hour to half a day."

"It has extremely high performance, and it is easy to manage."

"The most valuable feature is its stability."

"My advice to new users evaluating Dell PowerEdge FX is that it is definitely value for money, and you should consider it for purchase."

"We like PowerEdge for its high-performance computing architecture."

More Dell PowerEdge FX pros

"The most valuable feature is the trusted platform module."

"PowerEdge XE servers are high-performing. We're hardly using 15 percent of their computing power, so there's a lot left over that we could utilize."

"One of the most valuable features of Dell PowerEdge XE Servers is the ease of fixing issues if there are any."

"The solution is flexible in my experience."

"In general, it works well. We haven't had issues."

"Its reliability and consistency are most valuable."

"The strong point of this solution is its compatibility with VMware and its resilience."

"The most valuable feature of these servers is the ability to store a lot—the capacity and the number of hard disk drives."

More Dell PowerEdge XE Servers pros

Cons

"The product must provide more integration."

"The positioning of the power supply is not ideal. Both of them are on the same side, so you need to untie the cabling when you're installing the server. Another thing is storage separation. The storage can only be used by a particular server blade. I want the ability to use a storage unit for more than one server."

"I rate Dell support six out of 10. It varies. Sometimes it's good. Sometimes it's bad. The response time could be better."

"I think that Dell has full documentation on their products, but it needs to be improved for this one."

"The system is good, but compared to open-source and assembled servers, it is somewhat costly."

"There are certain shortcomings with Dell PowerEdge FX's integration capabilities with different operating systems, where improvements are needed."

"It should have more simplified management. It is a common problem where vendors think that they have simplified a solution, but the users don't look at it in the same way. A vendor thinks that there are only ten steps for a task, but we consider them as many steps. It should also have more support for NVMe. For high performance and speed, there should also be more network cards for the fiber channel and ethernet."

"I would prefer the next releases of Dell PowerEdge FX to be easier to use and flexible to upgrade. Sometimes, we have to do the tasks manually, but automation would be very helpful."

More Dell PowerEdge FX cons

"Dell PowerEdge XE Servers can improve by adapting HCI technology."

"I would like to have support for performing a detailed analysis of the server from a mobile device."

"The support team must improve the speed of response."

"Upgrading can be a bit difficult."

"It is mostly stable, but the usual problem would be, for example, upgrading to a newer version of VMware or dealing with compatibility issues during the process."

"We use OpenManager a lot, and that can be a bit clunky at times. They can make that better."

"It should be easier to extend PowerEdge XE servers. We haven't architected them with an eye toward scalability. They have a fixed number of slots for hard drives, which is enough for our present use case, However, we would have more options if we could extend that. We could deploy the servers in a broader range of use cases with different requirements. It's fine for our current deployment with only a few thousand users. We're exploring other solutions like such as VxRail or PowerFlex for larger public-facing use cases."

"In future releases, there should be more support options for the latest processor."

More Dell PowerEdge XE Servers cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Payments are generally made towards the perpetual-based licensing costs attached to the solution, but people can also opt for subscription-based licenses."

"The price of the license is expensive."

"Compared to other brands, this solution is the cheapest. I would rate the pricing as a five out of five."

"The cost of Dell PowerEdge FX depends on the configuration we are using. We usually pay $5,000 to $10,000 based on the configuration, including RAM and storage."

"The price of Dell PowerEdge FX is affordable, and when compared to other solutions, such as Lenovo and HPE it is less expensive. There are any extra costs other than the standard solution."

"I rate the product price a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is a high price, and ten is a low price."

"This solution is priced very reasonably."

"You always want slightly cheaper, but overall, they are quite comparable and quite neutral."

"If you want an SLA for parts and equipment then you need to purchase a support agreement."

"Dell has competitive pricing."

"There are different types of licensing available, that works well for customers. The product is not very much to purchase."

"The pricing model is quite competitive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rack Servers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,632 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Media Company

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

12%

University

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Dell PowerEdge FX?

The product's initial setup phase was simple and easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Dell PowerEdge FX?

The cost of Dell PowerEdge FX depends on the configuration we are using. We usually pay $5,000 to $10,000 based on the configuration, including RAM and storage.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Dell PowerEdge FX?

The system is good, but compared to open-source and assembled servers, it is somewhat costly. If it were cheaper, it would be even better. I would prefer the next releases of Dell PowerEdge FX to b...

See all answers

What do you like most about Dell PowerEdge XE Servers?

The resource management features are valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Dell PowerEdge XE Servers?

Dell has competitive pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Dell PowerEdge XE Servers?

The support team must improve the speed of response. The product should be promoted more in the market.

See all answers

Comparisons

Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers vs Dell PowerEdge FX

Compared 30% of the time

HPE Apollo Systems vs Dell PowerEdge FX

Compared 29% of the time

Lenovo Edge Servers vs Dell PowerEdge FX

Compared 19% of the time

Oracle SPARC Servers vs Dell PowerEdge FX

Compared 12% of the time

HPE Moonshot vs Dell PowerEdge FX

Compared 10% of the time

More Dell PowerEdge FX Competitors

HPE Apollo Systems vs Dell PowerEdge XE Servers

Compared 41% of the time

Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers vs Dell PowerEdge XE Servers

Compared 31% of the time

Dell XR2 Rugged Server vs Dell PowerEdge XE Servers

Compared 14% of the time

IBM Power Systems vs Dell PowerEdge XE Servers

Compared 13% of the time

More Dell PowerEdge XE Servers Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Dell PowerEdge FX

June 2025

Download Dell PowerEdge FX product report

Buyer's Guide

Rack Servers

June 2025

Download Dell PowerEdge XE Servers product report

Also Known As

PowerEdge FX

PowerEdge XE Servers

Overview

The PowerEdge FX converged architecture gives enterprises the flexibility to tailor their IT infrastructure to specific workloads, and the ability to scale and adapt that infrastructure as needs change over time. PowerEdge FX helps deliver the agility, flexibility and secure foundation that businesses need to simplify operations and increase business results.

Dell Technologies

Our newest addition to the Dell EMC PowerEdge family, PowerEdge XE servers are purpose-built for complex, harsh and compute-intensive workloads.

Dell Technologies

Sample Customers

Tracewell, Govers, AXA ASSISTANCE ITALIA

Epsilon, ROZETTA CORP, JIGUANG, RACKSPACE, NEW BELGIUM BREWING

Buyer's Guide

Dell PowerEdge FX vs. Dell PowerEdge XE Servers

June 2025

Free Report: Dell PowerEdge FX vs. Dell PowerEdge XE Servers

Find out what your peers are saying about Dell PowerEdge FX vs. Dell PowerEdge XE Servers and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,632 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Dell PowerEdge FX vs. Dell PowerEdge XE Servers report.

See our list of best Rack Servers vendors.

We monitor all Rack Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.