Dell PowerEdge FX [EOL] vs HPE Apollo Systems comparison

Dell Technologies and Hewlett Packard Enterprise are both solutions in the Rack Servers category. Additionally, 92% of Dell Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users who would recommend it.

Dell PowerEdge FX [EOL]

Read 13 Dell PowerEdge FX [EOL] reviews

92% willing to recommend

HPE Apollo Systems

Read 24 HPE Apollo Systems reviews

1,858 Views
1,635 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Dell PowerEdge FX [EOL]

HPE Apollo Systems

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 26, 2025

HPE Apollo Systems and Dell PowerEdge FX [EOL] are solutions within the data center market. HPE Apollo Systems is favored for its cost-effective pricing and superior support, whereas Dell PowerEdge FX [EOL] stands out with its robust features, though at a higher price.

Features: HPE Apollo Systems offers high-density compute capabilities, energy efficiency, and management tools aiding scalability. Dell PowerEdge FX [EOL] provides a modular architecture, flexible configuration options, and is tailored for varied workloads ensuring adaptability and performance.

Room for Improvement: HPE Apollo Systems could enhance modular options and workload-specific features. Adding flexibility to configurations might benefit some users. Dell PowerEdge FX [EOL] sees potential in improving cost-effectiveness, expanding support options, and enhancing energy efficiency even further.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Dell PowerEdge FX [EOL] offers simple deployment models and extensive service options, favoring rapid integration. HPE Apollo Systems is also easy to deploy, with commendations for its customer support's responsiveness and quality.

Pricing and ROI: HPE Apollo Systems is cost-effective initially and promises a good ROI thanks to its design and scalability. Dell PowerEdge FX [EOL], despite a higher upfront cost, assures ROI via adaptable infrastructure and long-term savings. Dell caters to performance-prioritizing buyers, while HPE suits budget-sensitive needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Rack Servers Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Rack Servers

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Dell PowerEdge FX [EOL]

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

HPE Apollo Systems

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Rack Servers (6th), Density Optimized Servers (3rd)

Featured Reviews

Mahendra Panchotiya

IT Lead at Meditab Software, Inc.

Offers a user-friendly interface and saves costs in data centers

Dell PowerEdge FX is very good and user-friendly, with a console that is easy to manage, and it is budget-friendly compared to other products. Dell PowerEdge FX has made management very good and easy for us, and we have created virtual machines on these PowerEdge servers as well. The modular design of Dell PowerEdge FX is very beneficial for our IT operations because it is small and compact, fitting easily into our data center rack while saving physical space and power. They have a capable technical support team that helps to resolve issues, and their regular updates to hardware components and communication keep us up to date with challenges. Dell PowerEdge FX has some features that we noticed for supporting AI initiatives or data-intensive applications, but we are planning to explore all the features in depth.

Read full review

Gökhan DURMAZ

Account Manager at TD SYNNEX

High-quality integration and strong support have optimized our rack server operations

HPE Apollo Systems is a good product because it has better support and best quality with integrity. When I speak about integrity, I speak about GPU integration or other integrations such as GPU integration, backup software integration, and hypervisor integration. Regarding the integration of high-speed interconnectors in HPE Apollo Systems, they impact computational tasks because the high-speed interconnect affects performance. I don't remember the specifics. Regarding the cooling technologies, they help to reduce operational costs. The positive impact I see from HPE Apollo Systems is that support is good and quality is good. In general, HPE Apollo Systems appears to be for rack servers with some optimization capabilities.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The power efficiency is very good and nice."

"We like PowerEdge for its high-performance computing architecture."

"My advice to new users evaluating Dell PowerEdge FX is that it is definitely value for money, and you should consider it for purchase."

"The console and user-friendly UI of Dell PowerEdge FX are the most valuable features. Its interface is easy to understand even for non-technical users."

"The product's initial setup phase was simple and easy."

"It has extremely high performance, and it is easy to manage."

"The most valuable feature of Dell PowerEdge FX is you can customize the solution to your specifications, such as speed. Additionally, part orders are shipped and received quickly when a part needs to be replaced."

"The features that I have found most valuable are that it has very robust servers and a very heavy load. We've been working on servers now for 10 years and those servers are still up and running. Those servers are still very powerful until today."

More Dell PowerEdge FX [EOL] pros

"It's very reliable. I haven't had a single failure at all in the year and a half; not the slightest problem with it."

"We're going to buy another Apollo 6500. We may configure it with half the number of GPUs because that may be all we need. In a sense, we can see the Apollo 6500 being so powerful that we only need half the GPU capability that we have now."

"It enables us to implement software defined solutions very easily, because Apollo servers are certified for use with Linux systems"

"Absolutely being able to mount into Omni-Path architecture, HFIs on those nodes, because we were the very first site in the world"

"The solution is well documented in a data sheet."

"we can use the same platform for several use cases: Hadoop, Ceph, and we are considering the server for another use case right now. It's a single solution, we only have to integrate it once and we can use it for several technologies."

"The technical support from HPE has always been good in my experience."

"HPE Apollo's most valuable feature is the ability to expand our storage capacity."

More HPE Apollo Systems pros

Cons

"It should have more simplified management. It is a common problem where vendors think that they have simplified a solution, but the users don't look at it in the same way. A vendor thinks that there are only ten steps for a task, but we consider them as many steps. It should also have more support for NVMe. For high performance and speed, there should also be more network cards for the fiber channel and ethernet."

"I rate Dell support six out of 10. It varies. Sometimes it's good. Sometimes it's bad. The response time could be better."

"When it comes to Dell PowerEdge FX, the area of concern revolves around the delivery time where improvements are required."

"There are certain shortcomings with Dell PowerEdge FX's integration capabilities with different operating systems, where improvements are needed."

"Before the cloud solution and virtualization, we relied on Dell hardware from specific vendors. The lifecycle for cloud infrastructure is shorter than it used to be. We need a longer lifecycle from the IT supplier providing the computing solution."

"I would prefer the next releases of Dell PowerEdge FX to be easier to use and flexible to upgrade. Sometimes, we have to do the tasks manually, but automation would be very helpful."

"The product must provide more integration."

"They could improve from a manufacturing perspective."

More Dell PowerEdge FX [EOL] cons

"One drawback which I had: When I needed to expand storage on the Apollo, I had significant problems getting disks for it. It was a very long wait-time. So, if I were to give any advice in regards to improving this product, I would say make more of the 8TB disks available quicker."

"HPE Apollo Systems is a bit expensive, and there are some issues with scalability."

"HPE Apollo's after-sales support and technical support should be improved."

"The solution's deployment, security, and scalability need improvement."

"There is a shared battery for all cache controllers in the node. When you have to replace that element, you have to take down all three nodes and not just one."

"I would want to see the flexibility of being able to run various network protocols including InfiniBand, Fibre Channel, as well as iSCSI, with iSCSI going up to 100 gigabytes per second -that would be outstanding."

"We have tried to used standardization using Ubuntu Linux and it's been hard. They had some difficulties getting the RAID configuration up and running because there are no drivers for it. It's not supported by HPE."

"What's coming out in Gen 10 is very strong in terms of additional security."

More HPE Apollo Systems cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of Dell PowerEdge FX depends on the configuration we are using. We usually pay $5,000 to $10,000 based on the configuration, including RAM and storage."

"I rate the product price a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is a high price, and ten is a low price."

"Payments are generally made towards the perpetual-based licensing costs attached to the solution, but people can also opt for subscription-based licenses."

"The price of Dell PowerEdge FX is affordable, and when compared to other solutions, such as Lenovo and HPE it is less expensive. There are any extra costs other than the standard solution."

"The price of the license is expensive."

"Compared to other brands, this solution is the cheapest. I would rate the pricing as a five out of five."

"The price of the solution is more expensive than Dell which is their main competitor. However, there are times we have managed to receive a comparable price."

"Obviously I would like to see the cost go down. That speaks for itself."

"There is an annual license required to use HPE Apollo."

"Compared to other products, HPE Apollo is not an expensive solution."

"It is an expensive solution but it is worth the money. The standard licensing cost is for the GPU and the features that someone is using. There are additional charges but they depend on the solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rack Servers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	13

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Dell PowerEdge FX?

The product's initial setup phase was simple and easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Dell PowerEdge FX?

The cost of Dell PowerEdge FX depends on the configuration we are using. We usually pay $5,000 to $10,000 based on the configuration, including RAM and storage.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Dell PowerEdge FX?

The system is good, but compared to open-source and assembled servers, it is somewhat costly. If it were cheaper, it would be even better. I would prefer the next releases of Dell PowerEdge FX to b...

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE Apollo?

Some features could be added to HPE Apollo Systems in the future, and I feel that some capability is needed. HPE Apollo Systems is a bit expensive, and there are some issues with scalability. Two f...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HPE Apollo?

I have been distributing this product for three years. I don't have specific use cases, and everything about the major use case for HPE Apollo Systems is good. I don't know the purpose clients are ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering HPE Apollo?

I am not using these products today, and I do not work with some specific firewalls. My company is TD Synnex, a distributor company, and I work for this company. My email is , and my first name is ...

See all answers

Comparisons

HPE Moonshot vs Dell PowerEdge FX [EOL]

Compared 17% of the time

Lenovo Edge Servers vs Dell PowerEdge FX [EOL]

Compared 17% of the time

Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers vs Dell PowerEdge FX [EOL]

Compared 16% of the time

Oracle SPARC Servers vs Dell PowerEdge FX [EOL]

Compared 12% of the time

Dell PowerEdge R-Series vs Dell PowerEdge FX [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

More Dell PowerEdge FX [EOL] Competitors

HPE ProLiant DL Servers vs HPE Apollo Systems

Compared 26% of the time

Dell PowerEdge R-Series vs HPE Apollo Systems

Compared 15% of the time

HPE Synergy vs HPE Apollo Systems

Compared 7% of the time

Dell PowerEdge XE-Series vs HPE Apollo Systems

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Power Systems vs HPE Apollo Systems

Compared 6% of the time

More HPE Apollo Systems Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Dell PowerEdge FX [EOL]

January 2026

Download Dell PowerEdge FX [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

HPE Apollo Systems

January 2026

Download HPE Apollo Systems product report

Also Known As

PowerEdge FX

HP Apollo Systems, HP ProLiant SL, HP Apollo

Overview

Dell PowerEdge FX [EOL] offers a blend of high performance, power efficiency, and scalability, featuring robust servers and seamless integration for virtualization, enterprise applications, and cloud hosting.

Dell PowerEdge FX [EOL] provides a reliable platform for Hyper-V workloads, web servers, virtual desktops, and database installations, meeting diverse sector requirements such as finance, manufacturing, and pharmaceuticals. It integrates seamlessly with storage solutions, enables quick part replacements, and supports virtualization and server consolidation, enhancing data analytics and enterprise applications. However, users seek improvements in documentation, NVMe support, network card availability, and operating system integration, while addressing concerns about power supply positioning and cost. Automation enhancements and a prolonged lifecycle are also sought-after updates.

What are the most important features of Dell PowerEdge FX?

Stability: Known for dependable operation with minimal failures, ensuring continuous uptime.
High Performance: Delivers impressive processing speeds catering to extensive workloads.
Easy Management: Features an intuitive management interface for streamlined operations.
Robust Servers: Enables stacking of blade servers within one chassis for efficient resource use.
Power Efficiency: Optimized for energy use, reducing operational costs.
High Scalability: Accommodates growing IT needs with flexible expansion options.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Ease of Customization: Adaptable to specific business needs and easy integration with existing infrastructure.
Reliable Remote Management: iDRAC interface provides dependable remote control capabilities.
Minimal Failures: Demonstrates consistent stability and reliability for critical operations.
Seamless Integration: Works well with storage solutions and enterprise applications enhancing usability.
Quick Replacement Parts: Facilitates swift maintenance and part replacement to minimize downtime.

In industries like finance, manufacturing, and pharmaceuticals, PowerEdge FX is implemented to support data analytics, enterprise applications, and server consolidation. Leveraged for hosting and virtualization, companies use it for vital applications such as SAP S/4HANA, Microsoft Exchange, and backend systems, ensuring reliable and powerful performance.

Dell Technologies

The HPE Apollo high-density server family is built for the highest levels of performance and efficiency. They are rack-scale compute, storage, networking, power and cooling – massively scale-up and scale-out – solutions for your big data analytics, object storage and high-performance computing (HPC) workloads. From water-cooling that’s 1,000X more efficient than air, to “right-sized scaling” with 2X the compute density for workgroup and private cloud workloads, the HPE Apollo line is a dense, high-performance, tiered approach for organisations of all sizes.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Sample Customers

Tracewell, Govers, AXA ASSISTANCE ITALIA

Weta Digital

Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Lenovo and others in Rack Servers. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Rack Servers vendors.

We monitor all Rack Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.