Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

HPE Apollo Systems integrates seamlessly into Omni-Path architecture and is certified for Linux, offering scalable software-defined solutions.
It provides significant compute power and flexibility in configuration, supporting various storage and CPU combinations for numerous use cases like Hadoop and Ceph.
Users appreciate the all-flash drives which enhance performance, reliability with no reported failures, and cost-effectiveness in handling large data.
Technical support and documentation are highly valued, contributing to its ease of implementation and efficient operational costs.
HPE Apollo Systems supports AI initiatives with scalability and environmental efficiency, enhancing workflows with excellent quality and support.

CONS

Cooling improvements are needed due to the substantial compute power within a single rack.
Issues exist with storage expansion availability, particularly with the provision of more 8TB disks.
The network protocol flexibility is limited, lacking support for InfiniBand and faster iSCSI speeds.
Compatibility problems exist with standardization attempts, such as Ubuntu Linux lacking RAID drivers.
HPE Apollo technical support and after-sales support require enhancements to meet user expectations.
 

HPE Apollo Systems Pros review quotes

it_user321114 - PeerSpot reviewer
Executive Vice President with 501-1,000 employees
Sep 30, 2015
It's allowed us to compete with cloud storage providers like AWS to put together a scalable on-premises solution of more than 20PB at a similar pricepoint.
it_user363225 - PeerSpot reviewer
Research Support at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees
Dec 30, 2015
For us, the most valuable features are the price and density.
it_user368157 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Unix Performance Analyst at Amadeus IT Group
Jan 11, 2016
We previously used the DL380s; compared to those, Apollo has roughly four times the amount of space per server, which means we can really do a lot.
Learn what your peers think about HPE Apollo Systems. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2026.
884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
it_user332961 - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager of IT Infrastructure at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees
Dec 8, 2016
Not having to manage traditional NAS has made a big difference.
it_user364197 - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Administrator at CSC Finland
Dec 22, 2016
We are running Apollo with SL-series servers and the best thing about them is the density of the storage area available.
it_user568107 - PeerSpot reviewer
Development Manager at Thomson Reuters
Dec 8, 2016
Taking into consideration the cost, HPE gave us the ability to actually do what we wanted to do.
it_user568143 - PeerSpot reviewer
Head of Industrial Automation & Modeling at a mining and metals company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Dec 22, 2016
It is a stable product; very reliable.
it_user680184 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Director of Research at PSC
Jun 7, 2017
Absolutely being able to mount into Omni-Path architecture, HFIs on those nodes, because we were the very first site in the world
it_user683202 - PeerSpot reviewer
Professor at a university with 5,001-10,000 employees
Jun 13, 2017
It's going to meet our needs moving forward, it is scalable.
SeniorAc7315 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Account Manager
Dec 5, 2017
It enables us to implement software defined solutions very easily, because Apollo servers are certified for use with Linux systems
 

HPE Apollo Systems Cons review quotes

it_user321114 - PeerSpot reviewer
Executive Vice President with 501-1,000 employees
Sep 30, 2015
Big stability issues with the CPU on the first generation which made them virtually unusable.
it_user363225 - PeerSpot reviewer
Research Support at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees
Dec 30, 2015
The licensing could be greatly improved, I think.
it_user368157 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Unix Performance Analyst at Amadeus IT Group
Jan 11, 2016
If the workload is not purely sequential, then performance in the IO is less than optimal because it's optimized for streaming processing.
Learn what your peers think about HPE Apollo Systems. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2026.
884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
it_user332961 - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager of IT Infrastructure at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees
Dec 8, 2016
Our first batch of Apollo servers that we got were so new that it was just hard to know kind of what to expect from HPE and what they wanted to deliver to us.
it_user364197 - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Administrator at CSC Finland
Dec 22, 2016
Connectivity to the outside of the server needs to be improved at the same time the network is improving.
it_user568107 - PeerSpot reviewer
Development Manager at Thomson Reuters
Dec 8, 2016
We are struggling a little bit with some of the configuration we need to do, particularly with write capability to drives.
it_user568143 - PeerSpot reviewer
Head of Industrial Automation & Modeling at a mining and metals company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Dec 22, 2016
OpenView is a new product which does not support older versions of the hardware.
it_user680184 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Director of Research at PSC
Jun 7, 2017
What's coming out in Gen 10 is very strong in terms of additional security.
it_user683202 - PeerSpot reviewer
Professor at a university with 5,001-10,000 employees
Jun 13, 2017
Lustre seems to be just a little bit unstable overall.
SeniorAc7315 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Account Manager
Dec 5, 2017
We would like to see improved cooling because that is quite an issue. If you put that much compute power into a single rack, cooling really becomes an issue. And there is room for improvement there.