Top 10 HPE Apollo Systems Alternatives

4.2 out of 5

22 reviews
95% willing to recommend

1,041 followers

Top HPE Apollo Systems Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to HPE Apollo Systems based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers, Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers, and IBM Power Systems. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Hewlett Packard Enterprise, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers

4.5 out of 5

Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers

4.5 out of 5

Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers excel in manageability, customization, and remote management through iDRAC. In comparison, HPE Apollo Systems focus on high-density storage and performance. Tech buyers may choose Dell for cost efficiency or HPE for robust high-performance capabilities.

Download Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers vs. HPE Apollo Systems Report

Pricing

Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers offer a competitive setup cost, providing value for businesses focused on performance, while HPE Apollo Systems present a premium setup price, reflecting their advanced capabilities geared for high-demand environments.

View comparison

Pricing

Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers

4.3 out of 5

Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers

4.3 out of 5

Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers are ideal for businesses prioritizing scalability and energy efficiency. In comparison, HPE Apollo Systems cater to those needing performance optimization and workload-specific configurations, ensuring a strong ROI through advanced features suitable for intensive data analytics tasks.

Download HPE Apollo Systems vs. Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers Report

Pricing

Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers have a higher setup cost compared to HPE Apollo Systems, offering advanced configuration and support options. HPE Apollo Systems present a more budget-friendly option with a streamlined installation process.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM Power Systems

4.4 out of 5

IBM Power Systems

4.4 out of 5

HPE Apollo Systems are favored for scalability and energy efficiency. In comparison, IBM Power Systems offer exceptional processing power. HPE Apollo is cost-effective and easy to deploy, while IBM provides robust architecture and long-term benefits. Buyers prioritize Apollo's flexibility or Power's superior performance.

Download HPE Apollo Systems vs. IBM Power Systems Report

Pricing

HPE Apollo Systems have straightforward setup costs, whereas IBM Power Systems involve more complexity in initial setup expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

HPE Apollo Systems have straightforward setup costs, whereas IBM Power Systems involve more complexity in initial setup expenses.

Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers

4.2 out of 5

Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers

4.2 out of 5

Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers attract buyers with their competitive pricing and smooth deployment, supported by reliable customer service. In comparison, HPE Apollo Systems cater to those needing high-density computing and energy efficiency, justifying their higher cost for data-intensive applications.

Download Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers vs. HPE Apollo Systems Report

Pricing

Cisco UCS C-Series Rack Servers offer lower setup costs compared to HPE Apollo Systems, providing a more budget-friendly initial investment. However, HPE Apollo Systems justify their higher setup cost with advanced features and scalability options.

View comparison

Pricing

Intel Server System

3.3 out of 5

Intel Server System

3.3 out of 5

HPE Apollo Systems excels in scalability and energy efficiency, ideal for budget-conscious buyers seeking support and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Intel Server System offers superior performance and adaptability, appealing to buyers prioritizing high-demand applications and long-term value despite a higher initial cost.

Download HPE Apollo Systems vs. Intel Server System Report

Pricing

HPE Apollo Systems offer a high setup cost with robust scalability benefits, while Intel Server System provides a more affordable setup cost with standard performance options. These differences highlight varied priorities in cost and scalability versus affordability and performance.

View comparison

Pricing

Oracle SPARC Servers

4.1 out of 5

Oracle SPARC Servers

4.1 out of 5

HPE Apollo Systems excel in scalability and affordability, appealing to users with easy deployment and strong customer service. In comparison, Oracle SPARC Servers prioritize security and reliability, attracting those valuing robust data integrity, despite higher costs and complex deployment.

Download HPE Apollo Systems vs. Oracle SPARC Servers Report

Pricing

The HPE Apollo Systems have a competitive setup cost, making them appealing for budget-conscious enterprises, while Oracle SPARC Servers require a higher investment, reflecting their premium solution which may justify the cost for high-demand applications.

View comparison

Pricing

Dell PowerEdge FX

4.3 out of 5

Dell PowerEdge FX

4.3 out of 5

HPE Apollo Systems offer excellent scalability and performance for data-intensive tasks. In comparison, Dell PowerEdge FX provides flexibility and modular design. HPE's straightforward deployment contrasts with Dell’s demanding installation. Finally, HPE is cost-effective, while Dell justifies higher prices with robust functionality.

Download Dell PowerEdge FX vs. HPE Apollo Systems Report

Pricing

HPE Apollo Systems typically involve higher setup costs, focusing on advanced scalability, while Dell PowerEdge FX offers a more budget-friendly setup, prioritizing flexibility and ease of integration.

View comparison

Pricing

Dell PowerEdge XE Servers

4.2 out of 5

Dell PowerEdge XE Servers

4.2 out of 5

HPE Apollo Systems appeal with flexible scaling and energy-efficient design, ideal for varying computational needs. In comparison, Dell PowerEdge XE Servers deliver robust performance across diverse workloads. The efficient deployment of HPE contrasts with Dell's greater ROI potential in complex environments.

Download Dell PowerEdge XE Servers vs. HPE Apollo Systems Report

Pricing

HPE Apollo Systems setup costs are higher due to customizable components, while Dell PowerEdge XE Servers offer lower initial setup costs with predefined configurations.

View comparison

Pricing

HPE Apollo Systems setup costs are higher due to customizable components, while Dell PowerEdge XE Servers offer lower initial setup costs with predefined configurations.

PowerEdge C

4.3 out of 5

PowerEdge C

4.3 out of 5

PowerEdge C help you to maximize hyperscale performance with up to 4 independent server nodes, flexible storage and shared infrastructure in a compact 2U chassis.

Download HPE Apollo Systems vs. PowerEdge C Report

Pricing

PowerEdge C is very expensive, but personally, I think it's worth the price.

The price of the solution is reasonable.

View comparison

Pricing

PowerEdge C is very expensive, but personally, I think it's worth the price.

The price of the solution is reasonable.

Lenovo High-Density Servers

1 out of 5

Lenovo High-Density Servers

1 out of 5

The Lenovo Storage D3284 delivers high-density direct-attach storage. It supports mixing-and-matching different drive types for high performance, high capacity, or a combination of the two. Affordable high-density options, combining 7,200rpm NL-SAS hard disk drives (HDDs) with high-IOPS/low-latency SAS solid-state drives (SSDs), enable a multitiered storage infrastructure in a single enclosure or daisy-chain. It supports up to 4 enclosures in a single chain. Chains can be connected to up to three servers.

View comparison

Show 1 more products

Related categories

Density Optimized Servers

Rack Servers

Converged Infrastructure