HPE Apollo Systems vs Intel Server System comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Intel are both solutions in the Rack Servers category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0, while Intel is ranked #10. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 3.9% mindshare in Rack Servers, compared to Intel’s 3.6% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Intel users who would recommend it.

HPE Apollo Systems

Read 24 HPE Apollo Systems reviews

1,962 Views
1,707 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Intel Server System

Read 3 Intel Server System reviews

1,569 Views
1,569 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

HPE Apollo Systems

Intel Server System

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

HPE Apollo Systems and Intel Server System are key players in the server solutions market. Data shows users are mainly satisfied with HPE Apollo's pricing and support, while Intel Server System is noted for its superior features and justified pricing.

Features: HPE Apollo Systems are valued for powerful computational abilities and scalability, ideal for high-performance environments. Intel Server System is known for strong security, energy efficiency, and resource management. HPE focuses on performance, whereas Intel emphasizes security and management.

Room for Improvement: HPE Apollo feedback suggests better cooling solutions and enhanced software compatibility. Intel users want improved support for legacy systems and simpler updates. HPE clients look for hardware optimizations; Intel seeks software adaptability improvements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE Apollo is praised for easy hardware deployment, though opinions vary on management software. Intel Server System setup benefits from detailed documentation but has mixed customer service reviews. Intel shows strong deployment ease; HPE excels in hands-on setup.

Pricing and ROI: HPE Apollo offers competitive setup costs and quick ROI, appealing to budget-oriented buyers. Intel requires a higher initial investment but provides long-term savings through energy efficiency and durability. HPE is fiscally accessible; Intel focuses on long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE Apollo Systems vs. Intel Server System Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

HPE Apollo Systems vs. Intel Server System

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE Apollo Systems

Ranking in Rack Servers

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Density Optimized Servers (2nd)

Intel Server System

Ranking in Rack Servers

10th

Average Rating

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Rack Servers category, the mindshare of HPE Apollo Systems is 3.9%, down from 4.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Intel Server System is 3.6%, down from 5.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Rack Servers Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
HPE Apollo Systems	3.9%
Intel Server System	3.6%
Other	92.5%

Rack Servers

Featured Reviews

Gökhan DURMAZ

Account Manager at TD SYNNEX

High-quality integration and strong support have optimized our rack server operations

HPE Apollo Systems is a good product because it has better support and best quality with integrity. When I speak about integrity, I speak about GPU integration or other integrations such as GPU integration, backup software integration, and hypervisor integration. Regarding the integration of high-speed interconnectors in HPE Apollo Systems, they impact computational tasks because the high-speed interconnect affects performance. I don't remember the specifics. Regarding the cooling technologies, they help to reduce operational costs. The positive impact I see from HPE Apollo Systems is that support is good and quality is good. In general, HPE Apollo Systems appears to be for rack servers with some optimization capabilities.

Read full review

Sami Abughosh

Servers Senior Network Administrator at Dukat d.d.

A stable product that constantly enhances its functionalities like multithreading and caching

The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is more stable than AMD for VMware. Intel Server System has a good track record for the last 20 years. Multithreading and caching are areas where improvements keep increasing. If you look at the last four years, you will see a big difference when it comes to the area concerning processors.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is well documented in a data sheet."

"HPE Apollo's pricing is low, and implementation is very easy compared to other products."

"The cost benefit of this solution is most valuable. It is quite effective for the work for which we are using it. We are mainly running video servers on these, and we are quite happy with the resilience, density storage, and streaming capacity of the system."

"We're going to buy another Apollo 6500. We may configure it with half the number of GPUs because that may be all we need. In a sense, we can see the Apollo 6500 being so powerful that we only need half the GPU capability that we have now."

"When we moved to the Apollo and all flash drives, we gained a lot of performance."

"We usually use three blades for two-rack units, and with enough storage, it's really a small system with a powerful CPU, powerful hard drives, powerful disks."

"HPE Apollo Systems is a good product because it has better support and best quality with integrity."

"we can use the same platform for several use cases: Hadoop, Ceph, and we are considering the server for another use case right now. It's a single solution, we only have to integrate it once and we can use it for several technologies."

More HPE Apollo Systems pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is more stable than AMD for VMware."

"It uses well known architecture and it's easy to develop for."

"It is stable and easy to manage."

Cons

"The support from HPE Apollo could be better, they are making knowledgeable."

"If there could be some training for our team, we would be better equipped to promote and support HPE Apollo."

"The predictive analysis feature could be improved."

"Lustre seems to be just a little bit unstable overall."

"What's coming out in Gen 10 is very strong in terms of additional security."

"We would like to see improved cooling because that is quite an issue. If you put that much compute power into a single rack, cooling really becomes an issue. And there is room for improvement there."

"One drawback which I had: When I needed to expand storage on the Apollo, I had significant problems getting disks for it. It was a very long wait-time. So, if I were to give any advice in regards to improving this product, I would say make more of the 8TB disks available quicker."

"I would want to see the flexibility of being able to run various network protocols including InfiniBand, Fibre Channel, as well as iSCSI, with iSCSI going up to 100 gigabytes per second -that would be outstanding."

More HPE Apollo Systems cons

"The shipment time can be improved. When we order Intel products, we have to wait for a long time. They can increase the local services and engineers in China. Local engineers will be able to know and understand customer problems much better."

"We have to scale it ourselves but it scales. It depends on the software because it's mostly the hardware platform that Intel is managing."

"When you have an Intel Server System, the prices may be much higher since it is a different processor, making the solution's pricing part one of its shortcomings where improvements are required."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Obviously I would like to see the cost go down. That speaks for itself."

"There is an annual license required to use HPE Apollo."

"Compared to other products, HPE Apollo is not an expensive solution."

"It is an expensive solution but it is worth the money. The standard licensing cost is for the GPU and the features that someone is using. There are additional charges but they depend on the solution."

"The price of the solution is more expensive than Dell which is their main competitor. However, there are times we have managed to receive a comparable price."

"It is not expensive."

"I rate the pricing a ten on a scale from one to ten, where one is inexpensive, and ten is very expensive."

"The price is competitive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rack Servers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

University

Financial Services Firm

13%

University

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	13

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with HPE Apollo?

Some features could be added to HPE Apollo Systems in the future, and I feel that some capability is needed. HPE Apollo Systems is a bit expensive, and there are some issues with scalability. Two f...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HPE Apollo?

I have been distributing this product for three years. I don't have specific use cases, and everything about the major use case for HPE Apollo Systems is good. I don't know the purpose clients are ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering HPE Apollo?

I am not using these products today, and I do not work with some specific firewalls. My company is TD Synnex, a distributor company, and I work for this company. My email is , and my first name is ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

HPE ProLiant DL Servers vs HPE Apollo Systems

Compared 22% of the time

Dell PowerEdge R-Series vs HPE Apollo Systems

Compared 14% of the time

Dell PowerEdge XE-Series vs HPE Apollo Systems

Compared 8% of the time

HPE Synergy vs HPE Apollo Systems

Compared 7% of the time

Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers vs HPE Apollo Systems

Compared 4% of the time

More HPE Apollo Systems Competitors

IBM Power Systems vs Intel Server System

Compared 46% of the time

Oracle SPARC Servers vs Intel Server System

Compared 25% of the time

HPE ProLiant DL Servers vs Intel Server System

Compared 9% of the time

Dell PowerEdge R-Series vs Intel Server System

Compared 7% of the time

Lenovo Edge Servers vs Intel Server System

Compared 4% of the time

More Intel Server System Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HPE Apollo Systems

January 2026

Download HPE Apollo Systems product report

Buyer's Guide

Rack Servers

January 2026

Download Intel Server System product report

Also Known As

HP Apollo Systems, HP ProLiant SL, HP Apollo

No data available

Overview

The HPE Apollo high-density server family is built for the highest levels of performance and efficiency. They are rack-scale compute, storage, networking, power and cooling – massively scale-up and scale-out – solutions for your big data analytics, object storage and high-performance computing (HPC) workloads. From water-cooling that’s 1,000X more efficient than air, to “right-sized scaling” with 2X the compute density for workgroup and private cloud workloads, the HPE Apollo line is a dense, high-performance, tiered approach for organisations of all sizes.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Storage is simple with the Intel Storage System JBOD2000 family, a 2U form factor system with support for twelve 3.5" LFF or twenty-four 2.5" SFF drives with a single or multi-cable connectivity. The JBOD2000 family includes redundant, hot-swap fans and the option for redundant, hot-swap power supplies. The JBOD2000S2 products support 6Gb/s SAS/SATA connectivity via industry-standard SFF-8088 connectors with the latest JBOD2000S3 version supports up to 12 Gb/s SAS connectivity via industry standard SFF-8644 connectors. All these JBOD offerings are designed to provide highly available and easily expandable storage for Intel servers at an affordable price point.

Intel

Sample Customers

Weta Digital

Emerson, Baosight, Pentamaster

Buyer's Guide

HPE Apollo Systems vs. Intel Server System

February 2026

Free Report: HPE Apollo Systems vs. Intel Server System

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Apollo Systems vs. Intel Server System and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE Apollo Systems vs. Intel Server System report.

See our list of best Rack Servers vendors.

We monitor all Rack Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.