Intel Server System vs Oracle SPARC Servers comparison

Intel and Oracle are both solutions in the Rack Servers category. Intel is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0, while Oracle is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0. Intel holds a 5.1% mindshare in Rack Servers, compared to Oracle’s 3.7% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of Intel users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Intel Server System

Read 3 Intel Server System reviews

1,875 Views
1,653 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Oracle SPARC Servers

Read 7 Oracle SPARC Servers reviews

1,809 Views
1,213 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Intel Server System

Oracle SPARC Servers

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 29, 2025

Intel Server System and Oracle SPARC Servers are competing products in the server solutions market. Intel Server System stands out for its affordability and customer service, while Oracle SPARC Servers provide advanced features and enterprise-level performance.

Features: Intel Server System offers versatile processor options, compatibility with numerous applications, and strong processing power. Oracle SPARC Servers are recognized for security, reliability, and processing efficiency. They offer advanced data encryption and fault management capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Intel Server System provides a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Oracle SPARC Servers require more complex setup but include comprehensive support. Intel's simplicity suits smaller teams, whereas Oracle's robust support benefits complex environments.

Pricing and ROI: Intel Server System features attractive pricing with favorable ROI due to lower initial investments. Oracle SPARC Servers have a higher setup cost, justified by superior performance and long-term operational value with substantial returns when focusing on security and performance.

To learn more, read our detailed Intel Server System vs. Oracle SPARC Servers Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Intel Server System vs. Oracle SPARC Servers

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Intel Server System

Ranking in Rack Servers

7th

Average Rating

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle SPARC Servers

Ranking in Rack Servers

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Rack Servers category, the mindshare of Intel Server System is 5.1%, up from 4.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle SPARC Servers is 3.7%, down from 3.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Rack Servers

Featured Reviews

Sami Abughosh

Servers Senior Network Administrator at Dukat d.d.

A stable product that constantly enhances its functionalities like multithreading and caching

The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is more stable than AMD for VMware. Intel Server System has a good track record for the last 20 years. Multithreading and caching are areas where improvements keep increasing. If you look at the last four years, you will see a big difference when it comes to the area concerning processors.

Read full review

Abdul-Salam

Sr. Manager - System Analyst (Datacenter Infrastructure) at Sohar International

A rock-solid OS and rich virtualization features for hosting many VMs on one box

Oracle doesn't have a good roadmap for the solution because they are moving to the x86 platform. Oracle is focusing on the cloud platform with a PCA and standard x86 architecture. Linux is their other OS and is mostly in the cloud. We don't see much development happening on Solaris even though it came as an acquisition from Sun Microsystems. Eventually, the solution and its platform will die because there has been no new development on the Solaris end and we haven't seen new servers in the last five years. At this point, we are pretty sure there is no real roadmap or future for the solution. There is a shortage of expert engineers because Oracle is not pushing the technology. It is hard for us to find engineers because the number of people supporting us has considerably reduced.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is stable and easy to manage."

"It uses well known architecture and it's easy to develop for."

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is more stable than AMD for VMware."

"The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that Oracle Database functions very well with Oracle SPARC Servers."

"The processor is very helpful and the licensing is very flexible."

"The performance is the best feature."

"I have found the LDAP facilities most valuable. In addition, I like the CPU."

"Our customers are happy with many features in Oracle SPARC Servers, like the automatic ASR feature."

"The Oracle server is very powerful. They are more powerful and durable compared to Intel hardware. Which has been a benefit to our organization."

"The operating system is rock solid and the best I have ever used."

Cons

"When you have an Intel Server System, the prices may be much higher since it is a different processor, making the solution's pricing part one of its shortcomings where improvements are required."

"The shipment time can be improved. When we order Intel products, we have to wait for a long time. They can increase the local services and engineers in China. Local engineers will be able to know and understand customer problems much better."

"We have to scale it ourselves but it scales. It depends on the software because it's mostly the hardware platform that Intel is managing."

"They need some sort of modeling because IBM has different types of models."

"Oracle doesn't have a good roadmap for the solution because they are moving to the x86 platform."

"Oracle SPARC Servers should be fine-tuned well enough to work with the other servers and software products in the market, as it is an area where Oracle SPARC Servers lack."

"They have declared the end of life of the hardware."

"The solution could improve by giving a clear roadmap about the future. I'm not seeing a lot of improvements on the OS side of the software. They need to work more on the operating system."

"I would like to see a reduced price point."

"Like IBM, Oracle SPARC Servers should be able to run other open operating systems like Linux."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the pricing a ten on a scale from one to ten, where one is inexpensive, and ten is very expensive."

"The price is competitive."

"It is not expensive."

"The licensing is flexible."

"My company makes yearly payments toward the licensing costs attached to the solution."

"Oracle SPARC Servers are expensive to manage, this is because after five years Oracle will increase the support charges for the hardware. The licensing policy for Oracle is different for Intel and Sparc. It will cost you less if you use your Oracle hardware with Oracle SPARC Servers."

"The hardware is expensive but it has very rich virtualization features that make it economical."

"The application running on it is very important to us and this makes the price worth it."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rack Servers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

24%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Intel Server System?

The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is more stable than AMD for VMware.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Intel Server System?

I rate the pricing a ten on a scale from one to ten, where one is inexpensive, and ten is very expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Intel Server System?

When you have an Intel Server System, the prices may be much higher since it is a different processor, making the solution's pricing part one of its shortcomings where improvements are required.

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle SPARC Servers?

The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that Oracle Database functions very well with Oracle SPARC Servers.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle SPARC Servers?

My company makes yearly payments toward the licensing costs attached to the solution. My company's clients, who have paid for the licensing costs attached to the solution, have also engaged with so...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle SPARC Servers?

Oracle products are usually fine-tuned with the software of other Oracle products, like Oracle WebLogic Server Services, Oracle Database, and Oracle Core Banking Software and Solutions, as all the ...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Power Systems vs Intel Server System

Compared 73% of the time

Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers vs Intel Server System

Compared 5% of the time

HPE ProLiant DL Servers vs Intel Server System

Compared 2% of the time

More Intel Server System Competitors

IBM Power Systems vs Oracle SPARC Servers

Compared 40% of the time

HPE ProLiant DL Servers vs Oracle SPARC Servers

Compared 12% of the time

Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers vs Oracle SPARC Servers

Compared 9% of the time

Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers vs Oracle SPARC Servers

Compared 4% of the time

Dell PowerEdge FX vs Oracle SPARC Servers

Compared 4% of the time

More Oracle SPARC Servers Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Rack Servers

June 2025

Download Intel Server System product report

Buyer's Guide

Rack Servers

June 2025

Download Oracle SPARC Servers product report

Overview

Storage is simple with the Intel Storage System JBOD2000 family, a 2U form factor system with support for twelve 3.5" LFF or twenty-four 2.5" SFF drives with a single or multi-cable connectivity. The JBOD2000 family includes redundant, hot-swap fans and the option for redundant, hot-swap power supplies. The JBOD2000S2 products support 6Gb/s SAS/SATA connectivity via industry-standard SFF-8088 connectors with the latest JBOD2000S3 version supports up to 12 Gb/s SAS connectivity via industry standard SFF-8644 connectors. All these JBOD offerings are designed to provide highly available and easily expandable storage for Intel servers at an affordable price point.

Intel

Oracle's SPARC S7, T7, and M7 Servers with always-on memory intrusion protection and comprehensive data encryption secure data with no performance penalty. Security in silicon features and Oracle Solaris protect data in memory from unauthorized access and stop malware before it gets in.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Emerson, Baosight, Pentamaster

University Hospitals Leuven, B&H Photo, Tuscon Electric Power, IS Nordic, Siemens

Buyer's Guide

Intel Server System vs. Oracle SPARC Servers

June 2025

Free Report: Intel Server System vs. Oracle SPARC Servers

Find out what your peers are saying about Intel Server System vs. Oracle SPARC Servers and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Intel Server System vs. Oracle SPARC Servers report.

See our list of best Rack Servers vendors.

We monitor all Rack Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.