HPE ProLiant DL Servers vs Oracle SPARC Servers comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Oracle are both solutions in the Rack Servers category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #2 with an average rating of 9.3, while Oracle is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 21.6% mindshare in Rack Servers, compared to Oracle’s 3.8% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

HPE ProLiant DL Servers

Read 156 HPE ProLiant DL Servers reviews

10,086 Views
8,321 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Oracle SPARC Servers

Read 7 Oracle SPARC Servers reviews

2,039 Views
1,439 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

HPE ProLiant DL Servers

Oracle SPARC Servers

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 23, 2025

HPE ProLiant DL Servers and Oracle SPARC Servers compete in the enterprise server market, each bringing distinct advantages. HPE ProLiant DL Servers might have the upper hand in budget-friendly solutions, whereas Oracle SPARC Servers provide superior performance for specific workloads.

Features: HPE ProLiant DL Servers offer flexibility and integration within diverse IT environments. They feature advanced security options, scalability, and robust iLO for remote management. Oracle SPARC Servers are designed for high performance, seamless integration with Oracle software, and unparalleled reliability for demanding applications.

Room for Improvement: HPE ProLiant DL Servers could benefit from enhanced native integration features with third-party software, reduced setup complexities, and better documentation. Oracle SPARC Servers might improve by making their deployment processes more user-friendly outside the Oracle ecosystem, revisiting their pricing model for broader accessibility, and expanding their support for diverse operating systems.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE ProLiant DL Servers are known for their straightforward deployment processes and extensive customer support, making them adaptable across different infrastructures. Oracle SPARC Servers are deployed efficiently within Oracle ecosystems and come with comprehensive vendor support, although their integration is more constrained to Oracle environments.

Pricing and ROI: HPE ProLiant DL Servers are economically advantageous with competitive initial setup costs and deliver a favorable ROI for versatile enterprise needs. Oracle SPARC Servers, while presenting higher upfront expenses, offer significant ROI through enhanced performance, suited for enterprises heavily invested in Oracle applications.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE ProLiant DL Servers vs. Oracle SPARC Servers Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

HPE ProLiant DL Servers vs. Oracle SPARC Servers

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,604 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE ProLiant DL Servers

Ranking in Rack Servers

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

156

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle SPARC Servers

Ranking in Rack Servers

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Rack Servers category, the mindshare of HPE ProLiant DL Servers is 21.6%, up from 21.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle SPARC Servers is 3.8%, up from 3.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Rack Servers

Featured Reviews

Ricardo Elorza

Expert IT Solution Architect at Nestle

Easy to deploy, stable, and scalable

I give the solution an eight out of ten. We have been having issues with HPE's road maps, which tend to be very aggressive. For example, if we have a server and then HPE announces and releases the NexGen, the previous server only has one more gear before the end of use. This can be problematic for clusters that are configured to only have the same model, as after a year we would have to do diagnostics or buy a new cluster. This is something we do not like about HPE, although other vendors may also be aggressive, HPE is really bad. It is important for new users to keep this in mind.

Read full review

Abdul-Salam

Sr. Manager - System Analyst (Datacenter Infrastructure) at Sohar International

A rock-solid OS and rich virtualization features for hosting many VMs on one box

Oracle doesn't have a good roadmap for the solution because they are moving to the x86 platform. Oracle is focusing on the cloud platform with a PCA and standard x86 architecture. Linux is their other OS and is mostly in the cloud. We don't see much development happening on Solaris even though it came as an acquisition from Sun Microsystems. Eventually, the solution and its platform will die because there has been no new development on the Solaris end and we haven't seen new servers in the last five years. At this point, we are pretty sure there is no real roadmap or future for the solution. There is a shortage of expert engineers because Oracle is not pushing the technology. It is hard for us to find engineers because the number of people supporting us has considerably reduced.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The feature that I find the most valuable is that all alerts are integrated with HPE InfoSight. Any problem related to an HPE server can be solved remotely at L1, L2 level."

"The solution is stable."

"It's very easy to set up."

"The initial setup was easy."

"When we need to, we can get through to technical support and get the right person."

"It is stable."

"The ProLiant DL Servers are stable and reliable."

"It is very stable. I can rate it as a 99.99% stable server from HPE. There is zero downtime, especially in the ProLiant 380 series."

More HPE ProLiant DL Servers pros

"The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that Oracle Database functions very well with Oracle SPARC Servers."

"The performance is the best feature."

"Our customers are happy with many features in Oracle SPARC Servers, like the automatic ASR feature."

"The Oracle server is very powerful. They are more powerful and durable compared to Intel hardware. Which has been a benefit to our organization."

"I have found the LDAP facilities most valuable. In addition, I like the CPU."

"The operating system is rock solid and the best I have ever used."

"The processor is very helpful and the licensing is very flexible."

Cons

"Most of the servers we use are okay. However, sometimes, you need to change the parts. We'd like the solution to be more robust."

"The solution should work to be more scalable."

"In terms of what could be improved, if I could have faster processors with less cores, that would be good."

"The technical support is pretty good, however, they could be a bit faster and more responsive."

"It has something called WorldView. They should do some enhancement over WorldView to run an operating system as a code. Such a feature would be amazing for running multiple servers. They are already working on this, and they can enhance the existing versions for this. It should also be cheaper. It is currently expensive."

"Sometimes, there are connectivity issues and the server is not able to connect to our SAN."

"We'd like to see better processors, better Intel processors. That's the most important for us at this moment."

"If they could put a SAN storage or resend it in the same product, it would be very helpful and more powerful."

More HPE ProLiant DL Servers cons

"They need some sort of modeling because IBM has different types of models."

"They have declared the end of life of the hardware."

"Oracle SPARC Servers should be fine-tuned well enough to work with the other servers and software products in the market, as it is an area where Oracle SPARC Servers lack."

"Oracle doesn't have a good roadmap for the solution because they are moving to the x86 platform."

"Like IBM, Oracle SPARC Servers should be able to run other open operating systems like Linux."

"I would like to see a reduced price point."

"The solution could improve by giving a clear roadmap about the future. I'm not seeing a lot of improvements on the OS side of the software. They need to work more on the operating system."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is a little too high; it could be reduced."

"Proliant DL Servers have a reasonable cost. They are not as expensive as the Cisco servers. Everything is included when you purchase a server. You just have to install and configure it."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"They should reduce the prices as it is a significant concern for developing countries."

"The solution comes with a one time perpetual license which is included with the server."

"The price of the product is a little high."

"This is an expensive product and there is licensing required for iLO, which is the HPE monitoring system."

"There are less expensive solutions than HPE ProLiant DL Servers. However, there is a lot of value in this solution."

More HPE ProLiant DL Servers pricing and cost advice

"The hardware is expensive but it has very rich virtualization features that make it economical."

"My company makes yearly payments toward the licensing costs attached to the solution."

"The application running on it is very important to us and this makes the price worth it."

"The licensing is flexible."

"Oracle SPARC Servers are expensive to manage, this is because after five years Oracle will increase the support charges for the hardware. The licensing policy for Oracle is different for Intel and Sparc. It will cost you less if you use your Oracle hardware with Oracle SPARC Servers."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rack Servers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

23%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How do Lenovo ThinkSystem rack servers compare with HPE ProLiant DL servers?

Lenovo ThinkSystem rack servers offer flexibility and efficiency in order to meet mission-critical demands. I like that Lenovo blends outstanding performance, reliability, and manageability. The bi...

See all answers

What do you like most about HPE ProLiant DL Servers?

The most valuable feature of the solution is HPE Integrated Lights-Out (iLO)...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE ProLiant DL Servers?

The product is expensive. I rate the product price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price. On the needs of the customers, the product offers a lot of suppor...

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle SPARC Servers?

The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that Oracle Database functions very well with Oracle SPARC Servers.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle SPARC Servers?

My company makes yearly payments toward the licensing costs attached to the solution. My company's clients, who have paid for the licensing costs attached to the solution, have also engaged with so...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle SPARC Servers?

Oracle products are usually fine-tuned with the software of other Oracle products, like Oracle WebLogic Server Services, Oracle Database, and Oracle Core Banking Software and Solutions, as all the ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers vs HPE ProLiant DL Servers

Compared 47% of the time

Lenovo ThinkSystem Rack Servers vs HPE ProLiant DL Servers

Compared 22% of the time

HPE Synergy vs HPE ProLiant DL Servers

Compared 9% of the time

HPE Apollo Systems vs HPE ProLiant DL Servers

Compared 6% of the time

Dell XR2 Rugged Server vs HPE ProLiant DL Servers

Compared 0% of the time

More HPE ProLiant DL Servers Competitors

IBM Power Systems vs Oracle SPARC Servers

Compared 41% of the time

Intel Server System vs Oracle SPARC Servers

Compared 27% of the time

Dell PowerEdge Rack Servers vs Oracle SPARC Servers

Compared 10% of the time

Dell PowerEdge FX vs Oracle SPARC Servers

Compared 4% of the time

HPE Apollo Systems vs Oracle SPARC Servers

Compared 3% of the time

More Oracle SPARC Servers Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HPE ProLiant DL Servers

May 2025

Download HPE ProLiant DL Servers product report

Buyer's Guide

Rack Servers

May 2025

Download Oracle SPARC Servers product report

Also Known As

HP ProLiant DL series, HP ProLiant DL

No data available

Overview

HPE ProLiant DL Servers are utilized by organizations for tasks like virtualization, database hosting, and application hosting, deployed both on-premises and in private clouds for diverse needs.

Organizations depend on HPE ProLiant DL Servers for stability, performance, and reliability. They are essential for running active directories, enterprise applications, and handling high-performance computing. These servers are known for their easy setup, scalability, and extensive management capabilities like iLO. Offering compatibility with many components and energy efficiency, they provide reliable hardware and good performance under demanding conditions. However, there is a need for improved price, stability, scalability, airflow, and power consumption. Enhancements in controller cache, port sizes, SAN connectivity, support availability, and management interface are also required. Faster technical support, better documentation, simplified configurations, and enhanced monitoring features and security integration would benefit users.

What are the key features?

Easy Setup: Quick and straightforward deployment.
Scalability: Adaptable to growing business needs.
Extensive Management: Features like iLO for advanced control.
Energy Efficiency: Optimized for lower power consumption.
Compatibility: Works well with various components.
Reliable Hardware: Robust and dependable technology.
Redundancy: Ensures high availability and minimal downtime.

What are the benefits and ROI?

High Performance: Excellent for demanding computing tasks.
User-Friendly: Easy to maintain and operate.
Flexibility: Versatile for different applications.
Good Technical Support: Access to professional assistance.

HPE ProLiant DL Servers are implemented across industries like finance for active directories and payment solutions, education for virtual desktops, healthcare for database synchronization, and IT firms for high-performance computing and application hosting.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Oracle's SPARC S7, T7, and M7 Servers with always-on memory intrusion protection and comprehensive data encryption secure data with no performance penalty. Security in silicon features and Oracle Solaris protect data in memory from unauthorized access and stop malware before it gets in.

Oracle

Sample Customers

AmeriPride Services, iSource, Bolagsverket, BlueShore Financial, British Columbia Assessment Authority, National Stock Exchange, Cardlytics

University Hospitals Leuven, B&H Photo, Tuscon Electric Power, IS Nordic, Siemens

Buyer's Guide

HPE ProLiant DL Servers vs. Oracle SPARC Servers

April 2025

Free Report: HPE ProLiant DL Servers vs. Oracle SPARC Servers

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE ProLiant DL Servers vs. Oracle SPARC Servers and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE ProLiant DL Servers vs. Oracle SPARC Servers report.

See our list of best Rack Servers vendors.

We monitor all Rack Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.