No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Dell RecoverPoint vs NetApp SnapMirror comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
8.4
Dell RecoverPoint offers high ROI and minimizes data loss, providing significant value and long-term IT security.
Sentiment score
5.1
NetApp SnapMirror enhances data replication, service availability, high availability, and disaster recovery, integrating SAN and NAS for effective ROI.
A bank experienced a disaster within ten years and was able to recover all data, avoiding substantial losses.
Team Lead of Senior Directors at Net-International
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.2
Dell RecoverPoint's support receives mixed reviews, with praised expertise but noted delays and global team's positive responsiveness.
Sentiment score
6.8
NetApp SnapMirror support is efficient and reliable, though responsiveness varies internationally, with strong internal competence reducing support needs.
Dell support is robust, with geographically distributed branches and partner support.
Consultant at TechData BIMA JSC
The engineers and software teams respond immediately once they receive a call, offering high-quality service.
Team Lead of Senior Directors at Net-International
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Dell RecoverPoint excels in scalability and data handling but may incur high costs and require significant storage.
Sentiment score
7.2
NetApp SnapMirror offers remarkable scalability and flexibility, enabling seamless data transitions and efficient performance across diverse environments.
I consider Dell RecoverPoint highly scalable, rating it as a nine out of ten.
Team Lead of Senior Directors at Net-International
Dell RecoverPoint can handle large scales of data, which is typical in the banking sector.
Consultant at TechData BIMA JSC
I consider Dell RecoverPoint to be very scalable, and I would rate it an eight out of ten.
Managing Director at Atlantic factorial
NetApp SnapMirror is very scalable, as all we need is an ONTAP cluster, starting from two nodes up to 24 nodes with NAS or 12 nodes in a SAN in an iSCSI environment.
Storage IT Specialist at a tech vendor with 201-500 employees
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.3
Dell RecoverPoint is stable with high reliability ratings; minor issues are quickly resolved, ensuring consistent performance and minimal disruptions.
Sentiment score
7.5
NetApp SnapMirror is highly rated for stability and performance, with careful setup needed for optimal data replication effectiveness.
 

Room For Improvement

Dell RecoverPoint struggles with Flash reliance, storage limits, high costs, and lacks modern features like cloud replication.
Users seek improved NetApp SnapMirror performance, simplified interfaces, better integration, cost-effective licensing, and enhanced support and functionalities.
The version designed for VMware, RecoverPoint for VMs, simplifies many problems in the VMware environment.
Managing Director at Atlantic factorial
It requires double the storage capacity for source and target storage areas, which creates a heavy burden on storage resources.
Consultant at TechData BIMA JSC
Dell RecoverPoint can be improved by virtualizing it, which would use less storage and enhance performance.
Team Lead of Senior Directors at Net-International
 

Setup Cost

Dell RecoverPoint is moderately priced, valued for ease and bundling, but costs vary for enterprise and mid-size firms.
NetApp SnapMirror pricing is debated, seen as flexible yet costly, with value depending on specific implementation and package needs.
VMware SRM was cheaper.
Manager presales at IBL-Unisys
Dell RecoverPoint requires two sets of servers for both Data Center and Disaster Recovery, which can make it more expensive than other solutions.
Consultant at TechData BIMA JSC
Dell RecoverPoint is affordable for enterprises but not for mid-size organizations due to the required network investment for bandwidth across sites.
Managing Director at Atlantic factorial
 

Valuable Features

Dell RecoverPoint provides effective data protection and recovery with low RPO, seamless replication, and automatic failover/failback features.
NetApp SnapMirror excels in data replication, ease of management, real-time integration, and reliable performance with data protection features.
This feature is crucial for maintaining zero RPO and RTO, especially during any outage or disaster.
Team Lead of Senior Directors at Net-International
It operates seamlessly and efficiently, allowing for data recovery with no downtime during the copy process.
Consultant at TechData BIMA JSC
The failover and failback options are the most impactful features of Dell RecoverPoint in terms of data protection.
Managing Director at Atlantic factorial
The best features that NetApp SnapMirror offers for me are the replication features, as we can replicate all of the data to the DR site, which is very helpful for disaster recovery.
Sr. Executive Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
 

Categories and Ranking

Dell RecoverPoint
Ranking in Data Replication
4th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
NetApp SnapMirror
Ranking in Data Replication
1st
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
5.5
Number of Reviews
27
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Data Replication category, the mindshare of Dell RecoverPoint is 5.9%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetApp SnapMirror is 7.2%, down from 17.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Replication Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
NetApp SnapMirror7.2%
Dell RecoverPoint5.9%
Other86.9%
Data Replication
 

Featured Reviews

Ayodeji  Oyewole - PeerSpot reviewer
Managing Director at Atlantic factorial
Failover and failback features enhance data protection but interfaces need improvement
I use Dell RecoverPoint as a backup and recovery device for my clients. It provides comprehensive backup and recovery solutions The failover and failback options are the most impactful features of Dell RecoverPoint in terms of data protection. Additionally, the ability to take point-in-time…
GP
Storage IT Specialist at a tech vendor with 201-500 employees
Achieves seamless business continuity with robust scalability
The features of NetApp SnapMirror that I have found most valuable include the possibility to stop synchronization in case of high network latency and to limit the bandwidth throttle. This means limiting bandwidth when less connectivity occurs or opening wide the throttling to use the full speed of network connectivity, which we can adjust according to our needs or the needs of our customers. All of this is done without limiting business continuity, so business continuity is always guaranteed. NetApp SnapMirror's data replication feature supports disaster recovery strategies, as it is incorporated into the business continuity feature. SnapMirror is strictly related to snapshot features, a core part of ONTAP, so it's very flexible. It allows us to start with just two snapshots as a simple backup and then use them as a replication point or base for both backup and business continuity. There is no right or wrong answer, it just depends on how it works for specific needs.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Replication solutions are best for your needs.
893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
17%
Marketing Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Construction Company
9%
Performing Arts
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise7
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise10
Large Enterprise10
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication?
The image backup feature is great. For example, if you set the journal to take a backup every ten minutes, it will create a snapshot or pointer every ten minutes for as long as you need.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication?
Dell RecoverPoint is affordable for enterprises but not for mid-size organizations due to the required network investment for bandwidth across sites.
What needs improvement with Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication?
The interfaces could be improved for better ease of use. There's also room for improvement in direct compatibility with other solutions. The version designed for VMware, RecoverPoint for VMs, simpl...
What needs improvement with NetApp SnapMirror?
Some areas of NetApp SnapMirror that could be improved or enhanced include synchronous SnapMirror, which needs improvement as it suffers significantly from network latency. In particular, synchrono...
What is your primary use case for NetApp SnapMirror?
I can elaborate on how I am using NetApp SnapMirror for server migration for one of my clients. We create a cluster, establish intercluster connectivity for the server migration, and then create cl...
 

Also Known As

RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication
SnapMirror
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Regis Aged Care, Cap Atlantique, Lewisville Independent School District, EnvisionRxOptions, Bar Harbor Bank & Trust, Major Boutique Hotel Chain, Riverside Health System, Panduit
University at Albany, City of Houston, Yahoo Japan, Washington Employment Security Department, DG Khan Cement Co. Ltd., AmTrust Financial Services, Sheridan College
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell RecoverPoint vs. NetApp SnapMirror and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.
893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.