Devo vs ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Devo and ManageEngine are both solutions in the Log Management category. Devo is ranked #21 with an average rating of 7.9, while ManageEngine is ranked #37 with an average rating of 7.0. Devo holds a 1.4% mindshare in Log Management, compared to ManageEngine’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Devo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of ManageEngine users who would recommend it.

Devo

Read 30 Devo reviews

8,527 Views
4,349 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer

Read 12 ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer reviews

4,832 Views
3,576 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Devo

ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer and Devo are competing products in the field of log management and security information event management. Devo appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and perceived value.

Features: ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer users like its comprehensive log management capabilities, customizable dashboards, and ease of use. Devo users value its scalable architecture, real-time analytics, and extensive integrations.

Room for Improvement: ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer users suggest enhancements in third-party tool integrations, reporting features, and real-time event correlation. Devo users mention the need for better in-platform documentation, a more intuitive configuration process, and improved user interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer users report a straightforward deployment process and commendable customer service. Devo users find deployment manageable but occasionally complex, with strong customer service support.

Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer is praised for its cost-effective pricing and positive ROI. Devo, while more expensive, is considered worth the investment for its superior features and scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed Devo vs. ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Devo

Ranking in Log Management

21st

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

16th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Operations Analytics (7th), AIOps (17th)

ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer

Ranking in Log Management

37th

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

41st

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Devo is 1.4%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer is 1.2%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Devo	1.4%
ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer	1.2%
Other	97.4%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Usama Khan

Team Lead Soc at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Advanced threat hunting has improved SOC visibility and now supports faster incident response

Devo can improve in how its connectors enhance integration with third-party tools. Devo's architecture works by having you deploy a relay server in the data center of the client side and Devo SIEM is basically on the AWS cloud. There are specific ports which are enabled on the relay server, which are 514 and 13000, 13151, 152. However, when we talk about databases and custom integrations, there are not default ports in the relay server. No default ports are defined. For JDBC drivers, the port number is 1433, but it is not in the relay server. You have to add it manually. For Oracle RDBMS, the port is 1521, and it is also not there by default. I would appreciate more third-party integrations including Fortinet and others. Machine learning models can also be improved. Playbooks in the SOAR can also be improved. Regarding playbooks for automation, we utilize playbooks for automation in SOAR for automated IOC blocking on a firewall, on a web application firewall, on DNS security, etc. The only option for us to run the playbook is to schedule the job for it. However, if I want to manually run the playbook, there is no option for doing so. This needs improvement.

Read full review

Md Abdul Hakim

System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited

Efficient log management enhances activity monitoring despite VPN user issue

Last month, we faced an issue with a Hawaiian VPN user activity. It's like a Fortinet device configured for VPN users. When a VPN user logs in, it doesn't really capture the time before this. If you're testing with existing or new device integration, then the product will be good in the market.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's a core tool for us in looking at logs, because logs are the starting point in any investigation, so leveraging Devo from start to finish in any investigation is basically what we do."

"Having one integrated tool helped us by removing the multiple teams, multiple pieces of equipment, and multiple software solutions from the equation."

"The alerting is much better than I anticipated. We don't get as many alerts as I thought we would, but that nobody's fault, it's just the way it is."

"The real-time analytics of security-related data are super. There are a lot of data feeds going into it and it's very quick at pulling up and correlating the data and showing you what's going on in your infrastructure. It's fast. The way that their architecture and technology works, they've really focused on the speed of query results and making sure that we can do what we need to do quickly. Devo is pulling back information in a fast fashion, based on real-time events."

"The strength of Devo is not only in that it is pretty intuitive, but it gives you the flexibility and creativity to merge feeds. The prime examples would be using the synthesis or union tables that give you phenomenal capabilities... The ability to use a synthesis or union table to combine all those feeds and make heads or tails of what's going on, and link it to go down a thread, is functionality that I hadn't seen before."

"Devo is simpler and easier for beginners because the data ingestion is more streamlined and it includes a visual query interface, whereas Splunk is more complex but also more flexible."

"One of the biggest features of the UI is that you see the actual code of what you're doing in the graphical user interface, in a little window on the side. Whatever you're doing, you see the code, what's happening. And you can really quickly switch between using the GUI and using the code. That's really useful."

"Devo has improved our visibility, log management efficiency, and investigation capabilities positively."

More Devo pros

"ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer is easy to gather reports to give to management. My supervisor has access to the solution and he enjoys the graphs."

"The tool's reports show activities."

"ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer is useful for log and alert correlation and is a full-function SIEM solution."

"The most valuable features of ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer are the number of capabilities, file integration monitoring, web server log collection, and alert configuration."

"It is stable."

"Our primary use case for this solution is detecting issues to provide customers with information."

"The reporting features are noteworthy, as they provide templates that streamline the process of generating reports"

"I have made use of technical support and am certainly very satisfied with them."

More ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer pros

Cons

"Some third-parties don't have specific API connectors built, so we had to work with Devo to get the logs and parse the data using custom parsers, rather than an out-of-the-box solution."

"I have not observed a return on investment with Devo in terms of fewer employees needed, money saved, or time saved."

"They can improve their AI capabilities"

"There's always room to reduce the learning curve over how to deal with events and machine data. They could make the machine data simpler."

"Both response time and support quality need attention."

"In terms of return on investment with Devo, I'd say it has been costly due to the need for support and the overtime required for issues experienced at the beginning of the project."

"Their documentation could be better. They are growing quickly and need to have someone focused on tech writing to ensure that all the different updates, how to use them, and all the new features and functionality are properly documented."

"The cost is a little higher compared to other tools such as DataDog or Elasticsearch, so they could work on reducing costs."

More Devo cons

"Support could improve to make the solution better."

"It may not be as easy to use as Splunk."

"Last month, we faced an issue with a Hawaiian VPN user activity. It's like a Fortinet device configured for VPN users."

"The product does not have certain advantages, especially the correlation tools. It was not working as per our expectations."

"The first tier of customer service and support is not great, and additional upgrades could be included."

"There isn't good security integration when it comes to cybersecurity. The correlation of logs isn't so simple."

"The solution should improve on its log capturing capabilities, the authentication, when a person logs onto a network device."

"There's a lot to improve in terms of connectivity. Currently, we're utilizing it across various infrastructures and environments, including others' cloud. However, connecting it to our infrastructure and integrating it with some of our SMAX solutions poses difficulties."

More ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our licensing fees are billed annually and per terabyte."

"Devo is a hosted or subscription-based solution, whereas before, we purchased QRadar, so we owned it and just had to pay a maintenance fee. We've encountered this with some other products, too, where we went over to subscription-based. Our thought process is that with subscription based, the provider hosts and maintains the tool, and it's offsite. That comes with some additional fees, but we were able to convince our upper management it was worth the price. We used to pay under 10k a year for maintenance, and now we're paying ten times that. It was a relatively tough sell to our management, but I wonder if we have a choice anymore; this is where the market is."

"Devo was very cost-competitive... Devo did come with that 400 days of hot data, and that was not the case with other products."

"Devo is definitely cheaper than Splunk. There's no doubt about that. The value from Devo is good. It's definitely more valuable to me than QRadar or LogRhythm or any of the old, traditional SIEMs."

"[Devo was] in the ballpark with at least a couple of the other front-runners that we were looking at. Devo is a good value and, given the quality of the product, I would expect to pay more."

"Pricing is based on the number of gigabytes of ingestion by volume, and it's on a 30-day average. If you go over one day, that's not a big deal as long as the average is what you expected it to be."

"I rate the pricing a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"It's a per gigabyte cost for ingestion of data. For every gigabyte that you ingest, it's whatever you negotiated your price for. Compared to other contracts that we've had for cloud providers, it's significantly less."

More Devo pricing and cost advice

"There is a license required for these solutions. The customer can choose the license type, such as an annual license purchase or a perpetual license. If the customer wants maintenance they will have to pay annually."

"We paid for the license of the solution and the deployment. The price of ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer is less expensive than other solutions."

"There is a yearly subscription for the solution."

"Licensing for ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer is paid yearly."

"ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer is expensive. Its licensing costs are annual."

"ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer is a low-cost solution. It costs approximately $1,000 per month per server for a perpetual license."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	15

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?

The price is considered okay.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Devo?

In terms of improvements, I think Devo falls short with their support model, as they rely mainly on their support team in Spain. Although they do have a support team in North America, they lack kno...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Devo?

Devo is the bank's centralized log management platform that my team and I rely on the most. For centralized log management in our day-to-day work, one of the biggest data users would be our Red Hat...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer?

I find this solution useful for IT devices as a live stream to work with Syshun, serving as both the router and the target. All activities are logged, and they can be accessed within one console. T...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer?

I rate the solution at seven out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo

Compared 7% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo

Compared 6% of the time

New Relic vs Devo

Compared 4% of the time

Datadog vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs Devo

Compared 2% of the time

More Devo Competitors

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer

Compared 15% of the time

ManageEngine Log360 vs ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer

Compared 12% of the time

Graylog Enterprise vs ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer

Compared 5% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer

Compared 4% of the time

More ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Devo

October 2026

Download Devo product report

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer

October 2026

Download ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer product report

Also Known As

No data available

EventLog Analyzer

Overview

Devo offers powerful visual analytics, real-time data querying, and log integration capabilities within a cloud-native, multi-tenant architecture, supporting extended data retention ideal for long-term analysis and compliance.

Devo is recognized for its Activeboards, which facilitate visual analytics. High-speed search capabilities and real-time analytics enable efficient data manipulation and querying. Its multi-tenant architecture supports effective data segregation and customization tailored to distinct business needs, enhancing its value for handling complex log integrations. With extended data retention of 400 days and a cloud-native architecture, Devo is a robust platform for long-term analysis and compliance requirements. Though opportunities exist to improve browser stability on large searches, SOAR integrations, and its parser capabilities, Devo remains essential for incident response and security monitoring, offering centralized data storage and analysis.

What are Devo's most important features?

Activeboards: Facilitate visual analytics and data exploration.
High-Speed Search: Enables fast data querying and manipulation.
Real-Time Analytics: Supports instant insights and decision-making.
Multi-Tenant Architecture: Allows effective data segregation and customization.
Extended Data Retention: Offers 400-day log retention for compliance and analysis.
Complex Log Integration: Handles intricate data sources effortlessly.

What benefits and ROI should organizations look for in reviews?

Visual Insights: Enhance understanding through interactive dashboards.
Performance Efficiency: Saves time with high-speed data search and real-time results.
Customization Flexibility: Fits specific business requirements with multi-tenant architecture.
Long-Term Compliance: Ensures alignment with extended data retention needs.
Centralized Monitoring: Enables comprehensive incident response and security monitoring.

Devo is extensively used in industries focused on incident response and digital forensics, centralizing data for security monitoring across hybrid environments. Organizations benefit from its ability to store and analyze aggregated logs, creating alerts and dashboards to enhance visibility for network and endpoint activities in multi-domain settings.

Devo

ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer provides comprehensive event log monitoring and analysis, ensuring efficient integration within IT environments. It streamlines log management and supports IT operations with features like report generation and alert configuration.

ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer simplifies IT infrastructure monitoring by centralizing logs for easier management. Its interface facilitates seamless integration with applications, enhancing user accessibility and ease of use. Featuring capabilities like file monitoring, web server log collection, and support for automated alerts, it supports enterprises in managing their environments. Quick installation, easy learning, and modular options enhance user experience, while the stable functionality aids threat detection and network data analysis. However, areas like log capturing, security integration, and customer support need improvement. Users desire more automation and better data collection, especially for integration with SMAX solutions.

What are the key features of ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer?

File Integration Monitoring: Ensures vigilance over critical file changes.
Web Server Log Collection: Gathers logs from servers for detailed insights.
Alert Configuration: Automated alerts for proactive management.
Ticketing Features: Facilitates issue tracking and resolutions.
Easy Report Generation: Simplifies data reporting tasks.
Graph Visualization: Enhances data understanding through visual representation.

What benefits can users expect from reviews?

Ease of Management: Centralizes log data for streamlined processes.
Efficiency: Reduces time spent on report and alert configurations.
Support Accessibility: Offers accessible support for prompt assistance.
Integration Capabilities: Smoothly integrates with enterprise-level applications.

ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer sees application in IT sectors for monitoring and analyzing event logs. It assists in detecting network issues, ensuring identity management, and observing user activities. Organizations use it for remote logging, PCI DSS compliance, and maintaining IT asset integrity, supporting centralized server environments.

ManageEngine

Sample Customers

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel

Moody National Bank, EnCircle, Goldleaf Financial Solutions, Inc, IBM, Ernst & Young, Micro Linear, Silverbeck-Rymer Solicitors, Provincial Court of British Columbia, Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida, OGILVY & MATHER, E! Entertainment, Tribune-Review Publishing Co.

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer

September 2026

Free Report: Devo vs. ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer

Find out what your peers are saying about Devo vs. ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Devo vs. ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors and best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.