Devo vs NetCrunch comparison

Devo and AdRem Software are both solutions in the Log Management category. Devo is ranked #28 with an average rating of 8.0, while AdRem Software is ranked #55. Devo holds a 0.8% mindshare in Log Management, compared to AdRem Software’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Devo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of AdRem Software users who would recommend it.

Devo

Read 23 Devo reviews

3,179 Views
1,590 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

NetCrunch

Read 3 NetCrunch reviews

1,665 Views
533 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Devo

NetCrunch

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

NetCrunch and Devo are network monitoring and analysis tools competing in the same category. While Devo stands out with its advanced features, NetCrunch excels in pricing and support, providing a competitive edge due to its affordability and ease of use.

Features: NetCrunch is known for its comprehensive monitoring capabilities, robust alert system, and user-friendly interface. Devo offers advanced data analytics, impressive scalability, and extensive reporting tools, providing a competitive edge in features.

Room for Improvement: NetCrunch users highlight the need for better integration with third-party tools, enhanced reporting capabilities, and improved dashboard customization. Devo users suggest improvements in documentation, user training resources, and a more intuitive user interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NetCrunch is favored for its easy deployment and intuitive setup, along with responsive customer service. Devo, while offering powerful deployment options, requires more technical expertise but is backed by robust customer service. The simplicity of NetCrunch contrasts with the advanced deployment features of Devo.

Pricing and ROI: NetCrunch offers an attractive setup cost, often delivering faster ROI due to lower upfront investment. In contrast, Devo's higher setup costs are justified by a strong long-term ROI, driven by feature-rich offerings. Users find NetCrunch cost-effective while recognizing Devo's long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Devo vs. NetCrunch Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. NetCrunch

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,665 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Devo

Ranking in Log Management

28th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (25th), IT Operations Analytics (11th), AIOps (20th)

NetCrunch

Ranking in Log Management

55th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (79th), Server Monitoring (27th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (65th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Devo is 0.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetCrunch is 0.6%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Devo	0.8%
NetCrunch	0.6%
Other	98.6%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Francisco JavierRomo

Strategic Account Executive at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

Has improved investigative workflows with interactive dashboards and simplified data correlation

The data analytics cloud component focuses on real-time analytics, which is very impressive. The SIEM collects and correlates logs data from different sources and can integrate with ServiceNow, hardware asset management, and software asset management. The security orchestration, automation, and response (SOAR) is another valuable feature. The security data platform serves as the foundation of Devo. Regarding advanced query capabilities, Devo offers several models including query logs, visual query builder, language integrated query, and SQL, with SQL being the most frequently used querying data capability. The single pane of glass that Devo offers is the SOC. The tools in Devo's active ports are for investigating, not just viewing data. They are more interactive than other market solutions. The drill-down reports capabilities allow analysts to click on any element in a widget. When they see a spike in a line chart for a failed login, which could be a true or false attempt, they can click that spike, and a table widget on the same active board instantly populates with raw logs of data for those specific failed logins. This is particularly important for enterprise companies with numerous endpoints and users. The dynamic filtering of inputs significantly reduces the time cybersecurity analysts spend trying to figure out failed logins and identifying false positives.

Read full review

it_user1038504

Senior Systems Administrator, Technical Lead at Connectivity Wireless

A network monitoring platform with a useful reporting feature, but permission-based options could be better

The initial setup is fairly easy. Most of it's wizard-based. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to set it up. But if you don't know certain things related to protocols and everything else, it might be difficult. If you know how SNMP works, it'll be fairly simple to set up.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is definitely the ability that Devo has to ingest data. From the previous SIEM that I came from and helped my company administer, it really was the type of system where data was parsed on ingest. This meant that if you didn't build the parser efficiently or correctly, sometimes that would bring the system to its knees. You'd have a backlog of processing the logs as it was ingesting them."

"The most valuable feature is that it has native MSSP capabilities and maintains perfect data separation. It does all of that in a very easy-to-manage cloud-based solution."

"The most powerful feature is the way the data is stored and extracted. The data is always stored in its original format and you can normalize the data after it has been stored."

"Devo has a really good website for creating custom configurations."

"The user experience [is] well thought out and the workflows are logical. The dashboards are intuitive and highly customizable."

"In traditional BI solutions, you need to wait a lot of time to have the ability to create visualizations with the data and to do searches. With this kind of platform, you have that information in real-time."

"Even if it's a relatively technical tool or platform, it's very intuitive and graphical. It's very appealing in terms of the user interface. The UI has a graphically interface with the raw data in a table. The table can be as big as you want it, depending on your use case. You can easily get a report combining your data, along with calculations and graphical dashboards. You don't need a lot of training, because the UI is relatively very intuitive."

"The thing that Devo does better than other solutions is to give me the ability to write queries that look at multiple data sources and run fast. Most SIEMs don't do that. And I can do that by creating entity-based queries. Let's say I have a table which has Okta, a table which has G Suite, a table which has endpoint telemetry, and I have a table which has DNS telemetry. I can write a query that says, 'Join all these things together on IP, and where the IP matches in all these tables, return to me that subset of data, within these time windows.' I can break it down that way."

More Devo pros

"Reporting on NetCrunch is pretty good. It's very similar to SolarWinds. It's just a different interface. The majority of everything there was beneficial."

Cons

"Where Devo has room for improvement is the data ingestion and parsing. We tend to have to work with the Devo support team to bring on and ingest new sources of data."

"Some third-parties don't have specific API connectors built, so we had to work with Devo to get the logs and parse the data using custom parsers, rather than an out-of-the-box solution."

"Some of the documentation could be improved a little bit. A lot of times it doesn't go as deep into some of the critical issues you might run into. They've been really good to shore us up with support, but some of the documentation could be a little bit better."

"The biggest area with room for improvement in Devo is the Security Operations module that just isn't there yet. That goes back to building out how they're going to do content and larger correlation and aggregation of data across multiple things, as well as natively ingesting CTI to create rule sets."

"The Activeboards feature is not as mature regarding the look and feel. Its functionality is mature, but the look and feel is not there. For example, if you have some data sets and are trying to get some graphics, you cannot change anything. There's just one format for the graphics. You cannot change the size of the font, the font itself, etc."

"We only use the core functionality and one of the reasons for this is that their security operation center needs improvement."

"Some basic reporting mechanisms have room for improvement. Customers can do analysis by building Activeboards, Devo’s name for interactive dashboards. This capability is quite nice, but it is not a reporting engine. Devo does provide mechanisms to allow third-party tools to query data via their API, which is great. However, a lot of folks like or want a reporting engine, per se, and Devo simply doesn't have that. This may or may not be by design."

"From our experience, the Devo agent needs some work. They built it on top of OS Query's open-source framework. It seems like it wasn't tuned properly to handle a large volume of Windows event logs. In our experience, there would definitely be some room for improvement. A lot of SIEMs on the market have their own agent infrastructure. I think Devo's working towards that, but I think that it needs some improvement as far as keeping up with high-volume environments."

More Devo cons

"I didn't care for the role-based, permission-based options, which were not the best."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have an OEM agreement with Devo. It is very similar to the standard licensing agreement because we are charged in the same way as any other customer, e.g., we use the backroom."

"Be cautious of metadata inclusion for log types in pricing, as there are some "gotchas" with that."

"Devo was very cost-competitive... Devo did come with that 400 days of hot data, and that was not the case with other products."

"It's very competitive. That was also a primary draw for us. Some of the licensing models with solutions like Splunk and Sentinel were attractive upfront, but there were so many micro-charges and services we would've had to add on to make them what we wanted. We had to include things like SOAR and extended capabilities, whereas all those capabilities are completely included with the Devo platform. I haven't seen any additional fee."

"I'm not involved in the financial aspect, but I think the licensing costs are similar to other solutions. If all the solutions have a similar cost, Devo provides more for the money."

"[Devo was] in the ballpark with at least a couple of the other front-runners that we were looking at. Devo is a good value and, given the quality of the product, I would expect to pay more."

"I like the pricing very much. They keep it simple. It is a single price based on data ingested, and they do it on an average. If you get a spike of data that flows in, they will not stick it to you or charge you for that. They are very fair about that."

"Our licensing fees are billed annually and per terabyte."

More Devo pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

University

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

14%

Educational Organization

10%

Agriculture

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	11

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?

Compared to Splunk or SentinelOne, it is really expensive. I rate the product’s pricing a nine out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Devo?

The single pane of glass that Devo offers could be improved. The tools in Devo's active ports need enhancement in their investigative capabilities. The drill-down reports capabilities, while useful...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Devo?

During my time at MetaBase Q and as a partner integrator of ServiceNow, I had the chance to understand and be part of projects integrating SOCs, NOCs, and Security Operation Centers with Devo. Most...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo

Compared 9% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Devo

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Devo

Compared 4% of the time

Elastic Security vs Devo

Compared 4% of the time

More Devo Competitors

Zabbix vs NetCrunch

Compared 10% of the time

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs NetCrunch

Compared 9% of the time

Checkmk vs NetCrunch

Compared 7% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs NetCrunch

Compared 6% of the time

Icinga vs NetCrunch

Compared 5% of the time

More NetCrunch Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Devo

January 2026

Download Devo product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

January 2026

Download NetCrunch product report

Overview

Devo is the only cloud-native logging and security analytics platform that releases the full potential of all your data to empower bold, confident action when it matters most. Only the Devo platform delivers the powerful combination of real-time visibility, high-performance analytics, scalability, multitenancy, and low TCO crucial for monitoring and securing business operations as enterprises accelerate their shift to the cloud.

Devo

NetCrunch is an all-in-one network monitoring platform designed for hybrid IT environments, offering comprehensive agentless monitoring of thousands of devices across different technologies and platforms.

NetCrunch streamlines network management with automated discovery, configuration, and monitoring through rule-defined policies. It covers monitoring across various environments, providing real-time dashboards, dynamic views, and topology maps. With its versatile features, it supports diverse IT ecosystems efficiently. It offers a node-based license model that enables scalable deployment on-prem, self-hosted in the cloud, or in hybrid settings.

What are NetCrunch's most important features?

Agentless Monitoring: Supports devices using SNMP, server metrics, virtualization, cloud platforms, and traffic flows.
Automated Discovery: Facilitates network configuration and monitoring via 670+ monitoring packs and sensors.
Advanced Alerting: Filters, delays, and correlates alerts to minimize false positives with configurable escalation paths.
Real-time Dashboards: Provides dynamic views and automatic topology maps reflecting device status and relationships.
Action Scripts: Offers 40+ actions like script execution and device reboot to manage network incidents.

What benefits and ROI can users expect from NetCrunch?

Scalability: Simplifies expansion with a node-based licensing model adapting to network growth.
Flexibility: Supports on-prem, cloud, or hybrid models for versatile deployment options.
Efficiency: Automates routine tasks reducing manual intervention and potential errors.
Reliability: Enhances monitoring accuracy with real-time updates and minimized false alerts.
Integration Capability: Works with email, SMS, and service integrations for streamlined communication.

NetCrunch is implemented across industries like healthcare and finance, ensuring comprehensive monitoring solutions that accommodate specific protocol and compliance requirements. It's tailored for seamless integration into various IT architectures optimizing monitoring capabilities tailored to industry standards.

AdRem Software

Sample Customers

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel

AER Kooperation, AON Corpration, Advance Financial services, Airbus SAS, Bauer Net consult, Banco Soal, Bertelsmann, Burke County public, COF training services

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. NetCrunch

December 2025

Free Report: Devo vs. NetCrunch

Find out what your peers are saying about Devo vs. NetCrunch and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Devo vs. NetCrunch report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.