Devo vs NetCrunch comparison

Devo and AdRem Software are both solutions in the Log Management category. Devo is ranked #27 with an average rating of 8.0, while AdRem Software is ranked #52. Devo holds a 1.2% mindshare in Log Management, compared to AdRem Software’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Devo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of AdRem Software users who would recommend it.

Devo

Read 23 Devo reviews

5,226 Views
2,665 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

NetCrunch

Read 3 NetCrunch reviews

3,124 Views
1,093 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Devo

NetCrunch

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

NetCrunch and Devo are network monitoring and analysis tools competing in the same category. While Devo stands out with its advanced features, NetCrunch excels in pricing and support, providing a competitive edge due to its affordability and ease of use.

Features: NetCrunch is known for its comprehensive monitoring capabilities, robust alert system, and user-friendly interface. Devo offers advanced data analytics, impressive scalability, and extensive reporting tools, providing a competitive edge in features.

Room for Improvement: NetCrunch users highlight the need for better integration with third-party tools, enhanced reporting capabilities, and improved dashboard customization. Devo users suggest improvements in documentation, user training resources, and a more intuitive user interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NetCrunch is favored for its easy deployment and intuitive setup, along with responsive customer service. Devo, while offering powerful deployment options, requires more technical expertise but is backed by robust customer service. The simplicity of NetCrunch contrasts with the advanced deployment features of Devo.

Pricing and ROI: NetCrunch offers an attractive setup cost, often delivering faster ROI due to lower upfront investment. In contrast, Devo's higher setup costs are justified by a strong long-term ROI, driven by feature-rich offerings. Users find NetCrunch cost-effective while recognizing Devo's long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Devo vs. NetCrunch Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. NetCrunch

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,221 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Devo

Ranking in Log Management

27th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (26th), IT Operations Analytics (7th), AIOps (19th)

NetCrunch

Ranking in Log Management

52nd

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (78th), Server Monitoring (28th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (63rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Devo is 1.2%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetCrunch is 0.9%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Devo	1.2%
NetCrunch	0.9%
Other	97.9%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Francisco JavierRomo

Strategic Account Executive at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

Has improved investigative workflows with interactive dashboards and simplified data correlation

The data analytics cloud component focuses on real-time analytics, which is very impressive. The SIEM collects and correlates logs data from different sources and can integrate with ServiceNow, hardware asset management, and software asset management. The security orchestration, automation, and response (SOAR) is another valuable feature. The security data platform serves as the foundation of Devo. Regarding advanced query capabilities, Devo offers several models including query logs, visual query builder, language integrated query, and SQL, with SQL being the most frequently used querying data capability. The single pane of glass that Devo offers is the SOC. The tools in Devo's active ports are for investigating, not just viewing data. They are more interactive than other market solutions. The drill-down reports capabilities allow analysts to click on any element in a widget. When they see a spike in a line chart for a failed login, which could be a true or false attempt, they can click that spike, and a table widget on the same active board instantly populates with raw logs of data for those specific failed logins. This is particularly important for enterprise companies with numerous endpoints and users. The dynamic filtering of inputs significantly reduces the time cybersecurity analysts spend trying to figure out failed logins and identifying false positives.

Read full review

it_user1038504

Senior Systems Administrator, Technical Lead at Connectivity Wireless

A network monitoring platform with a useful reporting feature, but permission-based options could be better

The initial setup is fairly easy. Most of it's wizard-based. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to set it up. But if you don't know certain things related to protocols and everything else, it might be difficult. If you know how SNMP works, it'll be fairly simple to set up.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I'm so happy with the platform."

"Being able to build and modify dashboards on the fly with Activeboards streamlines my analyst time because my analysts aren't doing it across spreadsheets or five different tools to try to build a timeline out themselves. They can just ingest it all, build a timeline out across all the logging, and all the different information sources in one dashboard. So, it's a huge time saver. It also has the accuracy of being able to look at all those data sources in one view. The log analysis, which would take 40 hours, we can probably get through it in about five to eight hours using Devo."

"The thing that Devo does better than other solutions is to give me the ability to write queries that look at multiple data sources and run fast. Most SIEMs don't do that. And I can do that by creating entity-based queries. Let's say I have a table which has Okta, a table which has G Suite, a table which has endpoint telemetry, and I have a table which has DNS telemetry. I can write a query that says, 'Join all these things together on IP, and where the IP matches in all these tables, return to me that subset of data, within these time windows.' I can break it down that way."

"The real-time analytics of security-related data are super. There are a lot of data feeds going into it and it's very quick at pulling up and correlating the data and showing you what's going on in your infrastructure. It's fast. The way that their architecture and technology works, they've really focused on the speed of query results and making sure that we can do what we need to do quickly. Devo is pulling back information in a fast fashion, based on real-time events."

"The user experience [is] well thought out and the workflows are logical. The dashboards are intuitive and highly customizable."

"Overall, Devo is awesome, but it's got some room to grow."

"One of the biggest features of the UI is that you see the actual code of what you're doing in the graphical user interface, in a little window on the side. Whatever you're doing, you see the code, what's happening. And you can really quickly switch between using the GUI and using the code. That's really useful."

"Because of the way Devo works, our onboarding time has shrunk by 50 percent at least."

More Devo pros

"Reporting on NetCrunch is pretty good. It's very similar to SolarWinds. It's just a different interface. The majority of everything there was beneficial."

"Reporting on NetCrunch is pretty good; it's very similar to SolarWinds, just with a different interface, and the majority of everything there was beneficial."

"The setup is very intuitive and quick - it all just took a few minutes we were done."

Cons

"An admin who is trying to audit user activity usually cannot go beyond a day in the UI. I would like to have access to pages and pages of that data, going back as far as the storage we have, so I could look at every command or search or deletion or anything that a user has run."

"Their documentation could be better. They are growing quickly and need to have someone focused on tech writing to ensure that all the different updates, how to use them, and all the new features and functionality are properly documented."

"My opinion on the solution's technical support is not as great as it could be because of the issues I have faced regarding the service management element."

"Devo has a lot of cloud connectors, but they need to do a little bit of work there."

"Technical support needs to be more direct. For example, when we submit a ticket, the support team will delegate a task to the operations team, for example, or various other teams."

"The tools in Devo's active ports need enhancement in their investigative capabilities."

"However, the incident and threat detection is not what we had hoped for."

"Some basic reporting mechanisms have room for improvement. Customers can do analysis by building Activeboards, Devo’s name for interactive dashboards. This capability is quite nice, but it is not a reporting engine. Devo does provide mechanisms to allow third-party tools to query data via their API, which is great. However, a lot of folks like or want a reporting engine, per se, and Devo simply doesn't have that. This may or may not be by design."

More Devo cons

"I didn't care for the role-based, permission-based options, which were not the best."

"Our network is made up of a lot of Cisco devices, and it needs improvements."

"I didn't care for the role-based, permission-based options, which were not the best."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our licensing fees are billed annually and per terabyte."

"I'm not involved in the financial aspect, but I think the licensing costs are similar to other solutions. If all the solutions have a similar cost, Devo provides more for the money."

"[Devo was] in the ballpark with at least a couple of the other front-runners that we were looking at. Devo is a good value and, given the quality of the product, I would expect to pay more."

"It's a per gigabyte cost for ingestion of data. For every gigabyte that you ingest, it's whatever you negotiated your price for. Compared to other contracts that we've had for cloud providers, it's significantly less."

"Be cautious of metadata inclusion for log types in pricing, as there are some "gotchas" with that."

"I rate the pricing a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"It's very competitive. That was also a primary draw for us. Some of the licensing models with solutions like Splunk and Sentinel were attractive upfront, but there were so many micro-charges and services we would've had to add on to make them what we wanted. We had to include things like SOAR and extended capabilities, whereas all those capabilities are completely included with the Devo platform. I haven't seen any additional fee."

"Devo was very cost-competitive... Devo did come with that 400 days of hot data, and that was not the case with other products."

More Devo pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

24%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Manufacturing Company

Agriculture

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	11

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?

Compared to Splunk or SentinelOne, it is really expensive. I rate the product’s pricing a nine out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Devo?

The single pane of glass that Devo offers could be improved. The tools in Devo's active ports need enhancement in their investigative capabilities. The drill-down reports capabilities, while useful...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Devo?

During my time at MetaBase Q and as a partner integrator of ServiceNow, I had the chance to understand and be part of projects integrating SOCs, NOCs, and Security Operation Centers with Devo. Most...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo

Compared 9% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo

Compared 7% of the time

New Relic vs Devo

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

More Devo Competitors

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs NetCrunch

Compared 4% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs NetCrunch

Compared 4% of the time

Zabbix vs NetCrunch

Compared 4% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs NetCrunch

Compared 3% of the time

Checkmk vs NetCrunch

Compared 3% of the time

More NetCrunch Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Devo

May 2026

Download Devo product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

April 2026

Download NetCrunch product report

Overview

Devo offers powerful visual analytics, real-time data querying, and log integration capabilities within a cloud-native, multi-tenant architecture, supporting extended data retention ideal for long-term analysis and compliance.

Devo is recognized for its Activeboards, which facilitate visual analytics. High-speed search capabilities and real-time analytics enable efficient data manipulation and querying. Its multi-tenant architecture supports effective data segregation and customization tailored to distinct business needs, enhancing its value for handling complex log integrations. With extended data retention of 400 days and a cloud-native architecture, Devo is a robust platform for long-term analysis and compliance requirements. Though opportunities exist to improve browser stability on large searches, SOAR integrations, and its parser capabilities, Devo remains essential for incident response and security monitoring, offering centralized data storage and analysis.

What are Devo's most important features?

Activeboards: Facilitate visual analytics and data exploration.
High-Speed Search: Enables fast data querying and manipulation.
Real-Time Analytics: Supports instant insights and decision-making.
Multi-Tenant Architecture: Allows effective data segregation and customization.
Extended Data Retention: Offers 400-day log retention for compliance and analysis.
Complex Log Integration: Handles intricate data sources effortlessly.

What benefits and ROI should organizations look for in reviews?

Visual Insights: Enhance understanding through interactive dashboards.
Performance Efficiency: Saves time with high-speed data search and real-time results.
Customization Flexibility: Fits specific business requirements with multi-tenant architecture.
Long-Term Compliance: Ensures alignment with extended data retention needs.
Centralized Monitoring: Enables comprehensive incident response and security monitoring.

Devo is extensively used in industries focused on incident response and digital forensics, centralizing data for security monitoring across hybrid environments. Organizations benefit from its ability to store and analyze aggregated logs, creating alerts and dashboards to enhance visibility for network and endpoint activities in multi-domain settings.

Devo

NetCrunch is an all-in-one network and infrastructure monitoring platform offering deep visibility without operational overhead. It supports agentless monitoring for hybrid environments and leverages policy-driven architecture for automated, scalable management.

The platform is ideal for day-2 operations, providing consistent monitoring with 670+ Monitoring Packs and Sensors. It deploys a stateful alerting model and built-in automation for reduced noise and efficient workflows. NetCrunch is designed for data sovereignty, running on a single server with lightweight probes for distributed environments, supporting security and low-cost operations. It offers a node-based licensing model for predictable scaling costs.

What are NetCrunch's most important features?

Policy-driven architecture: Automates monitoring logic and alerting based on device type.
Integrated monitoring: Covers network devices, servers, virtualization, cloud platforms, traffic flows, logs, websites, and more.
Stateful alerting: Correlates events and supports closed-loop operations with built-in automation.

What benefits should users expect from NetCrunch?

Reduced operational costs: Single server deployment minimizes the need for external systems.
Scalable structure: Node-based licensing simplifies scaling with predictable costs.
Security compliance: On-premises or cloud deployment supports data sovereignty and secure environments.

In industries with regulated environments, deploying NetCrunch ensures encrypted monitoring access with no inbound ports and no data stored or processed on the cloud. Its automatic topology maps and secure dashboards enhance real-time visibility essential for sectors like finance and healthcare, where data security and timely insights are crucial.

AdRem Software

Sample Customers

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel

manufacturing, banking, utilities, energy, universities, healthcare institutions, school districts, military and police entities, non-profit organizations,

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. NetCrunch

April 2026

Free Report: Devo vs. NetCrunch

Find out what your peers are saying about Devo vs. NetCrunch and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Devo vs. NetCrunch report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.