Devo vs NetCrunch comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Devo and AdRem Software are both solutions in the Log Management category. Devo is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.2, while AdRem Software is ranked #52. Devo holds a 1.4% mindshare in Log Management, compared to AdRem Software’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Devo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of AdRem Software users who would recommend it.

Devo

Read 27 Devo reviews

7,610 Views
3,957 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

NetCrunch

Read 3 NetCrunch reviews

4,702 Views
1,599 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Devo

NetCrunch

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

NetCrunch and Devo are network monitoring and analysis tools competing in the same category. While Devo stands out with its advanced features, NetCrunch excels in pricing and support, providing a competitive edge due to its affordability and ease of use.

Features: NetCrunch is known for its comprehensive monitoring capabilities, robust alert system, and user-friendly interface. Devo offers advanced data analytics, impressive scalability, and extensive reporting tools, providing a competitive edge in features.

Room for Improvement: NetCrunch users highlight the need for better integration with third-party tools, enhanced reporting capabilities, and improved dashboard customization. Devo users suggest improvements in documentation, user training resources, and a more intuitive user interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NetCrunch is favored for its easy deployment and intuitive setup, along with responsive customer service. Devo, while offering powerful deployment options, requires more technical expertise but is backed by robust customer service. The simplicity of NetCrunch contrasts with the advanced deployment features of Devo.

Pricing and ROI: NetCrunch offers an attractive setup cost, often delivering faster ROI due to lower upfront investment. In contrast, Devo's higher setup costs are justified by a strong long-term ROI, driven by feature-rich offerings. Users find NetCrunch cost-effective while recognizing Devo's long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Devo vs. NetCrunch Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. NetCrunch

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,683 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Devo

Ranking in Log Management

17th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (17th), IT Operations Analytics (7th), AIOps (16th)

NetCrunch

Ranking in Log Management

52nd

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (73rd), Server Monitoring (27th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (60th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Devo is 1.4%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetCrunch is 0.9%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Devo	1.4%
NetCrunch	0.9%
Other	97.7%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Usama Khan

Team Lead Soc at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Advanced threat hunting has improved SOC visibility and now supports faster incident response

Devo can improve in how its connectors enhance integration with third-party tools. Devo's architecture works by having you deploy a relay server in the data center of the client side and Devo SIEM is basically on the AWS cloud. There are specific ports which are enabled on the relay server, which are 514 and 13000, 13151, 152. However, when we talk about databases and custom integrations, there are not default ports in the relay server. No default ports are defined. For JDBC drivers, the port number is 1433, but it is not in the relay server. You have to add it manually. For Oracle RDBMS, the port is 1521, and it is also not there by default. I would appreciate more third-party integrations including Fortinet and others. Machine learning models can also be improved. Playbooks in the SOAR can also be improved. Regarding playbooks for automation, we utilize playbooks for automation in SOAR for automated IOC blocking on a firewall, on a web application firewall, on DNS security, etc. The only option for us to run the playbook is to schedule the job for it. However, if I want to manually run the playbook, there is no option for doing so. This needs improvement.

Read full review

it_user1038504

Senior Systems Administrator, Technical Lead at Connectivity Wireless

A network monitoring platform with a useful reporting feature, but permission-based options could be better

The initial setup is fairly easy. Most of it's wizard-based. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to set it up. But if you don't know certain things related to protocols and everything else, it might be difficult. If you know how SNMP works, it'll be fairly simple to set up.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"With Devo, we can eliminate swivel chair analysis among tools for a streamlined workflow that gives us the most direct path to the root cause."

"Even if it's a relatively technical tool or platform, it's very intuitive and graphical. It's very appealing in terms of the user interface. The UI has a graphically interface with the raw data in a table. The table can be as big as you want it, depending on your use case. You can easily get a report combining your data, along with calculations and graphical dashboards. You don't need a lot of training, because the UI is relatively very intuitive."

"The thing that Devo does better than other solutions is to give me the ability to write queries that look at multiple data sources and run fast. Most SIEMs don't do that. And I can do that by creating entity-based queries. Let's say I have a table which has Okta, a table which has G Suite, a table which has endpoint telemetry, and I have a table which has DNS telemetry. I can write a query that says, 'Join all these things together on IP, and where the IP matches in all these tables, return to me that subset of data, within these time windows.' I can break it down that way."

"Devo has a really good website for creating custom configurations."

"The strength of Devo is not only in that it is pretty intuitive, but it gives you the flexibility and creativity to merge feeds. The prime examples would be using the synthesis or union tables that give you phenomenal capabilities... The ability to use a synthesis or union table to combine all those feeds and make heads or tails of what's going on, and link it to go down a thread, is functionality that I hadn't seen before."

"The most valuable feature is definitely the ability that Devo has to ingest data. From the previous SIEM that I came from and helped my company administer, it really was the type of system where data was parsed on ingest. This meant that if you didn't build the parser efficiently or correctly, sometimes that would bring the system to its knees. You'd have a backlog of processing the logs as it was ingesting them."

"Those 400 days of hot data mean that people can look for trends and at what happened in the past. And they can not only do so from a security point of view, but even for operational use cases. In the past, our operational norm was to keep live data for only 30 days. Our users were constantly asking us for at least 90 days, and we really couldn't even do that. That's one reason that having 400 days of live data is pretty huge. As our users start to use it and adopt this system, we expect people to be able to do those long-term analytics."

"The most useful feature for us, because of some of the issues we had previously, was the simplicity of log integrations. It's much easier with this platform to integrate log sources that might not have standard logging and things like that."

More Devo pros

"The setup is very intuitive and quick - it all just took a few minutes we were done."

"Reporting on NetCrunch is pretty good; it's very similar to SolarWinds, just with a different interface, and the majority of everything there was beneficial."

Cons

"My opinion on the solution's technical support is not as great as it could be because of the issues I have faced regarding the service management element."

"Some third-parties don't have specific API connectors built, so we had to work with Devo to get the logs and parse the data using custom parsers, rather than an out-of-the-box solution."

"The Activeboards feature is not as mature regarding the look and feel. Its functionality is mature, but the look and feel is not there. For example, if you have some data sets and are trying to get some graphics, you cannot change anything. There's just one format for the graphics. You cannot change the size of the font, the font itself, etc."

"An admin who is trying to audit user activity usually cannot go beyond a day in the UI. I would like to have access to pages and pages of that data, going back as far as the storage we have, so I could look at every command or search or deletion or anything that a user has run. As an admin, that would really help. Going back just a day in the UI is not going to help, and that means I have to find a different way to do that."

"The tools in Devo's active ports need enhancement in their investigative capabilities."

"From our experience, the Devo agent needs some work. They built it on top of OS Query's open-source framework. It seems like it wasn't tuned properly to handle a large volume of Windows event logs. In our experience, there would definitely be some room for improvement. A lot of SIEMs on the market have their own agent infrastructure. I think Devo's working towards that, but I think that it needs some improvement as far as keeping up with high-volume environments."

"I would like to have the ability to create more complex dashboards."

"Their documentation could be better. They are growing quickly and need to have someone focused on tech writing to ensure that all the different updates, how to use them, and all the new features and functionality are properly documented."

More Devo cons

"Our network is made up of a lot of Cisco devices, and it needs improvements."

"I didn't care for the role-based, permission-based options, which were not the best."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The way Devo prices things is based on the amount of data, and I wish the tiers had more granularity. Maybe at this point they do, but when we first negotiated with them, there were only three or four tiers."

"We have an OEM agreement with Devo. It is very similar to the standard licensing agreement because we are charged in the same way as any other customer, e.g., we use the backroom."

"Devo was very cost-competitive... Devo did come with that 400 days of hot data, and that was not the case with other products."

"I like the pricing very much. They keep it simple. It is a single price based on data ingested, and they do it on an average. If you get a spike of data that flows in, they will not stick it to you or charge you for that. They are very fair about that."

"[Devo was] in the ballpark with at least a couple of the other front-runners that we were looking at. Devo is a good value and, given the quality of the product, I would expect to pay more."

"Devo is definitely cheaper than Splunk. There's no doubt about that. The value from Devo is good. It's definitely more valuable to me than QRadar or LogRhythm or any of the old, traditional SIEMs."

"Pricing is based on the number of gigabytes of ingestion by volume, and it's on a 30-day average. If you go over one day, that's not a big deal as long as the average is what you expected it to be."

"It's very competitive. That was also a primary draw for us. Some of the licensing models with solutions like Splunk and Sentinel were attractive upfront, but there were so many micro-charges and services we would've had to add on to make them what we wanted. We had to include things like SOAR and extended capabilities, whereas all those capabilities are completely included with the Devo platform. I haven't seen any additional fee."

More Devo pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

22%

Comms Service Provider

15%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	12

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?

The price is considered okay.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Devo?

Perhaps Devo could add some features in the future on the network part. Specifically, I think they could improve network traffic analysis capabilities.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Devo?

I have been using Devo as a partner and system integrator for three years. For log monitoring, the clients' use cases can utilize Devo perfectly. Compliance and security operation monitoring are th...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo

Compared 8% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo

Compared 6% of the time

New Relic vs Devo

Compared 4% of the time

Datadog vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Devo

Compared 2% of the time

More Devo Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs NetCrunch

Compared 5% of the time

Zabbix vs NetCrunch

Compared 4% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs NetCrunch

Compared 3% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs NetCrunch

Compared 3% of the time

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs NetCrunch

Compared 3% of the time

More NetCrunch Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Devo

September 2026

Download Devo product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

September 2026

Download NetCrunch product report

Overview

Devo offers powerful visual analytics, real-time data querying, and log integration capabilities within a cloud-native, multi-tenant architecture, supporting extended data retention ideal for long-term analysis and compliance.

Devo is recognized for its Activeboards, which facilitate visual analytics. High-speed search capabilities and real-time analytics enable efficient data manipulation and querying. Its multi-tenant architecture supports effective data segregation and customization tailored to distinct business needs, enhancing its value for handling complex log integrations. With extended data retention of 400 days and a cloud-native architecture, Devo is a robust platform for long-term analysis and compliance requirements. Though opportunities exist to improve browser stability on large searches, SOAR integrations, and its parser capabilities, Devo remains essential for incident response and security monitoring, offering centralized data storage and analysis.

What are Devo's most important features?

Activeboards: Facilitate visual analytics and data exploration.
High-Speed Search: Enables fast data querying and manipulation.
Real-Time Analytics: Supports instant insights and decision-making.
Multi-Tenant Architecture: Allows effective data segregation and customization.
Extended Data Retention: Offers 400-day log retention for compliance and analysis.
Complex Log Integration: Handles intricate data sources effortlessly.

What benefits and ROI should organizations look for in reviews?

Visual Insights: Enhance understanding through interactive dashboards.
Performance Efficiency: Saves time with high-speed data search and real-time results.
Customization Flexibility: Fits specific business requirements with multi-tenant architecture.
Long-Term Compliance: Ensures alignment with extended data retention needs.
Centralized Monitoring: Enables comprehensive incident response and security monitoring.

Devo is extensively used in industries focused on incident response and digital forensics, centralizing data for security monitoring across hybrid environments. Organizations benefit from its ability to store and analyze aggregated logs, creating alerts and dashboards to enhance visibility for network and endpoint activities in multi-domain settings.

Devo

NetCrunch by AdRem Software is commercial, self-hosted, agentless network and IT infrastructure monitoring software for Windows Server. It monitors network devices, servers, virtualization platforms, cloud services, applications, logs, websites, traffic flows, and telemetry across on-premises and hybrid IT environments.

The platform is ideal for day-2 operations, supporting 680+ monitoring targets and providing 270+ ready-to-use Monitoring Packs for devices, applications, and operating systems. NetCrunch uses correlated alerting and built-in automation to reduce alert noise and streamline monitoring workflows. Distributed Monitoring Probes extend monitoring to remote and isolated locations. Licensing is based on monitored nodes and network interfaces rather than individual sensors, checks, or metrics.

What are NetCrunch's most important features?

Policy-based monitoring: Automatically applies monitoring settings, Monitoring Packs, thresholds, and alerts to matching devices and systems.
Integrated monitoring: Covers network devices, servers, virtualization platforms, cloud services, applications, websites, logs, telemetry, and network traffic analysis using NetFlow, sFlow, IPFIX, and other flow technologies.
Correlated alerting: Reduces alert noise through event correlation, dependencies, filtering, delay rules, and escalation, with automated response actions.

What benefits should users expect from NetCrunch?

Centralized management: A self-hosted NetCrunch Server provides centralized monitoring, while optional Monitoring Probes extend coverage to remote and isolated locations.
Predictable licensing: Licensing is based on monitored nodes and network interfaces rather than individual sensors, checks, or metrics.
Self-hosted deployment: NetCrunch runs on Windows Server and can monitor infrastructure deployed on-premises, in the cloud, or across hybrid environments.

Because NetCrunch is self-hosted, organizations can keep monitoring data within customer-controlled infrastructure. This makes it suitable for organizations that prioritize data sovereignty and control over monitoring data.

AdRem Software

Sample Customers

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel

manufacturing, banking, utilities, energy, universities, healthcare institutions, school districts, military and police entities, non-profit organizations,

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. NetCrunch

September 2026

Free Report: Devo vs. NetCrunch

Find out what your peers are saying about Devo vs. NetCrunch and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Devo vs. NetCrunch report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.