Devo vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Devo and Seceon are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. Devo is ranked #16 with an average rating of 7.9, while Seceon is ranked #44 with an average rating of 5.0. Devo holds a 1.2% mindshare in SIEM, compared to Seceon’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Devo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Seceon users who would recommend it.

Devo

Read 30 Devo reviews

8,527 Views
4,519 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Seceon Open Threat Manageme...

Read 13 Seceon Open Threat Management Platform reviews

3,324 Views
3,158 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Devo

Seceon Open Threat Manageme...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Both Devo and Seceon Open Threat Management Platform offer robust solutions in threat management. Seceon seems to have the upper hand thanks to its automation, cost-effectiveness, and smooth deployment.

Features: Devo is praised for real-time data analytics, scalability, and advanced threat detection. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is commended for comprehensive threat management, ease of use, and automation capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest Devo enhance its integration capabilities, lower resource consumption, and improve user interface. Seceon users request better documentation, more frequent updates, and enhanced reporting tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Devo users find the deployment straightforward but note occasional support complexities. Seceon is known for smooth deployment and responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Devo's setup costs are high but offer long-term ROI through enhanced security. Seceon provides a more cost-effective initial setup and strong ROI for comprehensive threat management features.

To learn more, read our detailed Devo vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Devo

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

16th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (21st), IT Operations Analytics (7th), AIOps (17th)

Seceon Open Threat Manageme...

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

44th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of Devo is 1.2%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is 0.8%, down from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Devo	1.2%
Seceon Open Threat Management Platform	0.8%
Other	98.0%

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Featured Reviews

Usama Khan

Team Lead Soc at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Advanced threat hunting has improved SOC visibility and now supports faster incident response

Devo can improve in how its connectors enhance integration with third-party tools. Devo's architecture works by having you deploy a relay server in the data center of the client side and Devo SIEM is basically on the AWS cloud. There are specific ports which are enabled on the relay server, which are 514 and 13000, 13151, 152. However, when we talk about databases and custom integrations, there are not default ports in the relay server. No default ports are defined. For JDBC drivers, the port number is 1433, but it is not in the relay server. You have to add it manually. For Oracle RDBMS, the port is 1521, and it is also not there by default. I would appreciate more third-party integrations including Fortinet and others. Machine learning models can also be improved. Playbooks in the SOAR can also be improved. Regarding playbooks for automation, we utilize playbooks for automation in SOAR for automated IOC blocking on a firewall, on a web application firewall, on DNS security, etc. The only option for us to run the playbook is to schedule the job for it. However, if I want to manually run the playbook, there is no option for doing so. This needs improvement.

Read full review

TamimKhan

Solution Architect at Tiger IT Bangladesh Limited

Customization options need improvement but valuable threat management features and reasonable pricing benefit service providers

We are a Managed Security Service Provider (MSSP), and we provide services to our customers Seceon Open Threat Management Platform offers valuable features such as XDR and EDR. I also find the SOC and SOAR features valuable. Log management is another key functionality of the product. There are…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"In traditional BI solutions, you need to wait a lot of time to have the ability to create visualizations with the data and to do searches. With this kind of platform, you have that information in real-time."

"Devo has improved our visibility, log management efficiency, and investigation capabilities positively."

"It's very, very versatile."

"Scalability is one of Devo's strengths."

"The most useful feature for us, because of some of the issues we had previously, was the simplicity of log integrations. It's much easier with this platform to integrate log sources that might not have standard logging and things like that."

"The user interface is really modern. As an end-user, there are a lot of possibilities to tailor the platform to your needs, and that can be done without needing much support from Devo. It's really flexible and modular. The UI is very clean."

"Devo saves us hours in every investigation."

"The drill-down reports capabilities allow analysts to click on any element in a widget. When they see a spike in a line chart for a failed login, which could be a true or false attempt, they can click that spike, and a table widget on the same active board instantly populates with raw logs of data for those specific failed logins."

More Devo pros

"It is effective because it has threat intelligence from across the world and constantly checks and updates for new threats."

"The solution is very cost-effective compared to Splunk and LogRhythm."

"The main thing is the value proposition. It is one of the most sophisticated yet affordable solutions that I've come across. It is also one of the easiest-to-manage yet comprehensive solutions for a SOC analyst. Its customizations are really good, and it has a lot of integrations. It is multi-tenant and very fast to onboard. Its stability is 100%. We've never had an outage with it. It doesn't require extensive hardware resources. Its level of support is also very good. They have a very responsive technical team."

"The solution is stable."

"The pricing of Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is very reasonable."

"You can use different solutions in a single platform which is very easy and attractive for customers."

"If we compare the solution with other SIEM solutions that are also turning to artificial intelligence, this will be the number one choice."

"The most valuable features are behaviour analytics, threat intelligence, endpoint detection, and response features."

More Seceon Open Threat Management Platform pros

Cons

"There's always room to reduce the learning curve over how to deal with events and machine data. They could make the machine data simpler."

"One improvement area for Devo could be simplifying some configuration and improving the onboarding for new analysts because it is quite complex for fresher or new analysts who are handling Devo."

"Some basic reporting mechanisms have room for improvement."

"The price is one problem with Devo."

"Where Devo has room for improvement is the data ingestion and parsing. We tend to have to work with the Devo support team to bring on and ingest new sources of data."

"Both response time and support quality need attention."

"Devo has a lot of cloud connectors, but they need to do a little bit of work there."

"There is room for improvement in the ability to parse different log types. I would go as far as to say the product is deficient in its ability to parse multiple, different log types, including logs from major vendors that are supported by competitors. Additionally, the time that it takes to turn around a supported parser for customers and common log source types, which are generally accepted standards in the industry, is not acceptable. This has impacted customer onboarding and customer relationships for us on multiple fronts."

More Devo cons

"The product could be improved by including sandboxing capabilities in the next release."

"It is a standalone solution now. They need to make it into a cloud-based subscription model. It needs more compatibility for co-managed solutions. It can also have more threats and deeper integration with Microsoft."

"The management console could use some enhancements."

"The product should improve the triggering rate."

"For small to medium-sized customers, Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is good. However, for large enterprises, it is not as effective."

"It would be better if they offered global coverage."

"The dashboard has always been an issue."

"It would be ideal with the processing was more manageable."

More Seceon Open Threat Management Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Devo is definitely cheaper than Splunk. There's no doubt about that. The value from Devo is good. It's definitely more valuable to me than QRadar or LogRhythm or any of the old, traditional SIEMs."

"I rate the pricing a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"I'm not involved in the financial aspect, but I think the licensing costs are similar to other solutions. If all the solutions have a similar cost, Devo provides more for the money."

"Pricing is based on the number of gigabytes of ingestion by volume, and it's on a 30-day average. If you go over one day, that's not a big deal as long as the average is what you expected it to be."

"Devo is a hosted or subscription-based solution, whereas before, we purchased QRadar, so we owned it and just had to pay a maintenance fee. We've encountered this with some other products, too, where we went over to subscription-based. Our thought process is that with subscription based, the provider hosts and maintains the tool, and it's offsite. That comes with some additional fees, but we were able to convince our upper management it was worth the price. We used to pay under 10k a year for maintenance, and now we're paying ten times that. It was a relatively tough sell to our management, but I wonder if we have a choice anymore; this is where the market is."

"We have an OEM agreement with Devo. It is very similar to the standard licensing agreement because we are charged in the same way as any other customer, e.g., we use the backroom."

"It's very competitive. That was also a primary draw for us. Some of the licensing models with solutions like Splunk and Sentinel were attractive upfront, but there were so many micro-charges and services we would've had to add on to make them what we wanted. We had to include things like SOAR and extended capabilities, whereas all those capabilities are completely included with the Devo platform. I haven't seen any additional fee."

"It's a per gigabyte cost for ingestion of data. For every gigabyte that you ingest, it's whatever you negotiated your price for. Compared to other contracts that we've had for cloud providers, it's significantly less."

More Devo pricing and cost advice

"It has a per-asset model instead of an ingestion-based model, which gives predictable pricing. In terms of price, it is in the middle to lower range of SIEMs that it competes against. It is the most affordable solution that we have implemented so far. It was much more affordable than anything else I've implemented."

"I find Seceon OTM's pricing to be reasonable, not too high or low, just okay for the market standards. I can't disclose specific figures, we pay on a quarterly basis under a service model. I would rate it eight out of ten. As a customer, I always hope for better pricing options."

"Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is cost-effective because it's a comprehensive platform that offers high availability."

"The price is quite reasonable."

"We used the solution's trial version for two months and later purchased it."

"The solution is cheap and very competitive. It offers good tuning in terms of the pricing. Other solutions like Palo Alto and IBM are more expensive."

"The pricing is very competitive. It's not expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	15

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?

The price is considered okay.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Devo?

In terms of improvements, I think Devo falls short with their support model, as they rely mainly on their support team in Spain. Although they do have a support team in North America, they lack kno...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Devo?

Devo is the bank's centralized log management platform that my team and I rely on the most. For centralized log management in our day-to-day work, one of the biggest data users would be our Red Hat...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Seceon Open Threat Management Platform?

The pricing of Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is very reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Seceon Open Threat Management Platform?

There are areas for improvement in the customization options. Every ( /products/every-reviews ) quarter, they are developing the platform with new updates based on feedback provided.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Seceon Open Threat Management Platform?

We are a Managed Security Service Provider (MSSP ( /categories/managed-security-services-providers-mssp )), and we provide services to our customers.

See all answers

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo

Compared 7% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo

Compared 6% of the time

New Relic vs Devo

Compared 4% of the time

Datadog vs Devo

Compared 3% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs Devo

Compared 2% of the time

More Devo Competitors

Microsoft Sentinel vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 14% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 12% of the time

DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 5% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More Seceon Open Threat Management Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Devo

October 2026

Download Devo product report

Buyer's Guide

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

October 2026

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform report

Download Seceon Open Threat Management Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Seceon OTM, Seceon aiSIEM, aiSIEM, Seceon Open Threat Management

Overview

Devo offers powerful visual analytics, real-time data querying, and log integration capabilities within a cloud-native, multi-tenant architecture, supporting extended data retention ideal for long-term analysis and compliance.

Devo is recognized for its Activeboards, which facilitate visual analytics. High-speed search capabilities and real-time analytics enable efficient data manipulation and querying. Its multi-tenant architecture supports effective data segregation and customization tailored to distinct business needs, enhancing its value for handling complex log integrations. With extended data retention of 400 days and a cloud-native architecture, Devo is a robust platform for long-term analysis and compliance requirements. Though opportunities exist to improve browser stability on large searches, SOAR integrations, and its parser capabilities, Devo remains essential for incident response and security monitoring, offering centralized data storage and analysis.

What are Devo's most important features?

Activeboards: Facilitate visual analytics and data exploration.
High-Speed Search: Enables fast data querying and manipulation.
Real-Time Analytics: Supports instant insights and decision-making.
Multi-Tenant Architecture: Allows effective data segregation and customization.
Extended Data Retention: Offers 400-day log retention for compliance and analysis.
Complex Log Integration: Handles intricate data sources effortlessly.

What benefits and ROI should organizations look for in reviews?

Visual Insights: Enhance understanding through interactive dashboards.
Performance Efficiency: Saves time with high-speed data search and real-time results.
Customization Flexibility: Fits specific business requirements with multi-tenant architecture.
Long-Term Compliance: Ensures alignment with extended data retention needs.
Centralized Monitoring: Enables comprehensive incident response and security monitoring.

Devo is extensively used in industries focused on incident response and digital forensics, centralizing data for security monitoring across hybrid environments. Organizations benefit from its ability to store and analyze aggregated logs, creating alerts and dashboards to enhance visibility for network and endpoint activities in multi-domain settings.

Devo

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform offers a blend of cost-effectiveness and ease of use, featuring AI, real-time remediation, and endpoint detection, suitable for sectors like finance and healthcare.

Combining AI-driven analysis with real-time threat remediation, Seceon Open Threat Management Platform provides comprehensive security management. Users value its stability and the absence of hardware requirements. Its features, including XDR/EDR and SOC/SOAR, focus on improving response times and lowering costs. The platform's integration capabilities and genuine alert customization enhance its effectiveness. Designed with businesses in mind, it requires no coding for its pre-built features, streamlining processes like threat hunting and incident monitoring through a single license. However, cloud model development and enhanced training are needed, and it entails high costs for smaller enterprises.

What are the most important features?

Artificial Intelligence: Improves threat detection accuracy.
Real-Time Remediation: Automates threat response actions.
Behavior Analytics: Identifies abnormal activities efficiently.
Endpoint Detection: Guards against endpoint vulnerabilities.
Integration Capabilities: Connects with a range of security tools.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Cost Reduction: Lowers operational expenses via AI automation.
Quick Onboarding: Accelerated deployment process.
Improved Response Time: Faster threat mitigation.
Minimized Hardware Needs: Decreases infrastructure costs.

Banks and managed security service providers deploy Seceon Open Threat Management Platform to centralize threat management and analysis. In healthcare and finance, it streamlines SIEM management and ensures compliance, leveraging its AI capabilities to provide efficient endpoint protection and enhance security operations. Despite needing better global coverage and management enhancements, it helps manage security events quickly and effectively.

Seceon

Sample Customers

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel

Caduceus, SUNY

Buyer's Guide

Devo vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

September 2026

Free Report: Devo vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Devo vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Devo vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform report.

See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.