Digital Guardian vs Symantec Endpoint Encryption comparison

Symantec Endpoint Encryption and Digital Guardian are competitors in the security software market. Symantec is often highlighted for its superior scalability and strong encryption capabilities, while Digital Guardian is preferred for its advanced data loss prevention and classification abilities.

Features: Symantec Endpoint Encryption offers seamless endpoint integration, stability, and antivirus protection, valuable for enterprise solutions. Digital Guardian stands out with its forensic analysis, adaptive inspection, and robust endpoint detection, crucial for protecting personal identifying information.

Room for Improvement: Symantec users seek better integration with other products, enhanced technical support, and simpler upgrades. Digital Guardian users report needing improvements in Linux agent performance, cloud integration, and easier deployment procedures.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Symantec is available as on-premises and hybrid, with users noting complex deployment and varied support experiences. Digital Guardian offers on-premises and cloud solutions, but setup complexity and slower support response times are reported.

Pricing and ROI: Symantec is known for its higher cost, aligning with its enterprise-level scaling and robust security features. Digital Guardian's pricing is perceived to range mid to high, offering subscription or perpetual licenses with noted professional services costs. Both products are recognized for enhancing staff productivity and data protection, highlighting their investment value.