Dragos vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention comparison

Why PeerSpot?

The compared Dragos and Palo Alto Networks solutions aren't in the same category. Dragos is ranked #4 in OT , with an average rating of 8.0, and holds a 7.6% mindshare in the category. Palo Alto Networks is ranked #8 in ID , with an average rating of 6.3, and holds a 4.1% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of Dragos users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Palo Alto Networks users who would recommend it.

Dragos

Read 6 Dragos reviews

3,046 Views
2,620 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Palo Alto Networks Advanced...

Read 29 Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention reviews

4,575 Views
3,843 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Dragos

Palo Alto Networks Advanced...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Dragos and Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Nozomi, Claroty, Idira by Palo Alto Networks and others in Operational Technology (OT) Security.

To learn more, read our detailed Operational Technology (OT) Security Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Operational Technology (OT) Security

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Dragos

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

4.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Operational Technology (OT) Security (4th)

Palo Alto Networks Advanced...

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) (8th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Network Security Systems solutions, they serve different purposes. Dragos is designed for Operational Technology (OT) Security and holds a mindshare of 7.6%, down 11.9% compared to last year.
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention, on the other hand, focuses on Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS), holds 4.1% mindshare, down 5.6% since last year.

Operational Technology (OT) Security Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Dragos	7.6%
Nozomi Networks	13.8%
Claroty Platform	13.1%
Other	65.5%

Operational Technology (OT) Security

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention	4.1%
Darktrace	9.8%
Fortinet FortiGate	7.9%
Other	78.2%

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

Featured Reviews

Rajesh Podishetty

Manager at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees

Risk monitoring has improved and real-time fraud detection provides transparent banking control

Dragos should be improved in deployment complexity as it requires OT engineering coordination. One needs to have proper engineering coordination to understand the system, deploy it, integrate it, and make all the complex things into one system. This is very challenging, and one should be really skillful and have experience to accomplish this. Cost is another area for improvement. The cost is higher due to site-based licensing and expert services. The licensing is very heavy, and expert services are required for deployment. Cost-wise is also challenging and needs to be improved. Integration needs alignment with IT security systems and compliance frameworks. Controlling cybersecurity where any fraudulent person or third party should not access the system is controlled, and managing that level of complexity is quite challenging. Since there is continuous monitoring, it can reduce operational risk losses by 20% to 30% annually. Controlling that huge amount of data and transactions, especially regarding storage, requires a lot of database space. The space-wise storage should be reduced.

Read full review

Partha Dash

Global Network Tech Lead at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Advanced protection enables us to confidently secure against evolving threats

Palo Alto Networks can improve Advanced Threat Prevention by catering to the growing adoption of AI and agentic tooling. The Threat Protection modules should have the necessary intelligence to protect against those types of threats, as AI will be there to do a human job; this is an evolving area. From an Advanced Threat Protection perspective, the technology associated with Palo Alto Networks, such as their sandboxing environment, is quite good. However, Palo Alto needs to focus on how to bring that technology to end users and how easy it is to use, especially in a hybrid environment where users work from various locations. While Palo Alto excels in certain setups, they need to improve the user experience in distributed working conditions.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Dragos' best features are that they are more focused towards Incident Response, so they have a dedicated playbook in their platform, making it easier for anyone investigating any incidents to investigate the alerts."

"Dragos has positively impacted my organization by aiding us to compensate our time."

"I have been working with Dragos almost since the time when they started the company."

"Dragos especially ensures systems recover quickly, providing resilience, and it handles all the operational resilience in banking with metrics of 99.9% uptime, 30 minutes recovery time, and 99% transaction accuracy."

"Dragos is more expensive than other vendors, probably about fifteen to twenty percent more, but it is generally worth the investment."

"One of the most valuable features is the anti-malware protection."

"The sandboxing tools offer great prevention for cloud feeds."

"It's a monster, it's got so many beautiful features. We do deal with other firewalls and we've got a better idea of what other firewalls' capabilities are, any comparison with the Palo Alto I liked the quality of service on the applications that you can control the amount of bandwidth an application is allowed to consume. The best feature is the quality of the application quality of service."

"They're cutting edge."

"So far, there have been no security issues and we are absolutely happy with Palo Alto Networks."

"Overall, Palo Alto Threat Prevention doesn't need much more; from a general point of view, you get everything."

"I rate Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention as nine out of ten."

"It's very easy to use and configure. What is nice about Palo Alto is that even if you don't understand how to use it, you can just click on upload and upload everything that needs to be blocked."

More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention pros

Cons

"Dragos basically helped us get to know the entire infrastructure because there were many devices that not even the client themselves knew existed or that were still active, making it a very good tool; however, it requires a lot of hardware and knowledge, especially expertise from people who have worked in the industry and know security, which was lacking in the company where it was implemented, leading to lucky hits but ultimately prompting my decision to change companies."

"Dragos could improve its asset visibility and discovery tools, as the competitor Claroty has better options in this area."

"Dragos is very expensive, charging more than the OEMs. For example, if a PLC costs ten thousand dollars, a customer pays Dragos almost one to ten price in relation to what they would have spent building their plant."

"Dragos should be improved in deployment complexity as it requires OT engineering coordination."

"From my point of view, Dragos cannot be improved at the moment, but having more user-friendly platforms would be good."

"I think Dragos can offer more flexibility similar to Nozomi and more visibility into the assets, nodes, and links, which would make it more competitive in the future."

"While Palo Alto excels in certain setups, they need to improve the user experience in distributed working conditions."

"Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention could improve the commercial offing. Other solutions, such as Fortinet provide better commercial features."

"In Africa, the technical support is probably not as good as in Europe and the USA because it's a specific premium support, partner-enabled premium support and all of that. But it's really good, I don't really have any complaints, it's fairly good. I'll give them 80%."

"The pricing has improved with the newer generation of their Firewalls, but the price could always be lower. In comparison with other solutions, I believe they're quite competitive."

"The price of licenses should be lowered to make it less costly to scale our solution."

"Palo Alto's maintenance needs to be improved."

"In terms of what needs improvement, the only thing I don't like is the support."

"Mission learning techniques should continue to expand and detect unknown threats on the fly."

More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The price of the solution is higher than others on the market. A price reduction would be beneficial if it does not impact their database quality."

"The pricing could be lower."

"Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is quite competitive, offering extensive threat detection and prevention capabilities, though it is priced higher than some alternatives."

"If you want to have all of the good features then you have to pay extra for licensing."

"There is an initial, expensive investment but the return is good."

"The pricing and the licensing are pretty competitive at this stage. As a reseller, I would like to see the price come down a little bit so I can compete better against other firewalls because we do that all the time."

"The cost involves the price of the hardware, which is expensive. However, most of the Palo Alto solutions are expensive."

"The product’s pricing is expensive for small companies."

More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Operational Technology (OT) Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Energy/Utilities Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

11%

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	15

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Dragos?

Pricing-wise, I am not certain because there is a third party who handles the pricing in my company. The setup cost and licensing is quite critical. Licensing is always handled for access users, an...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Dragos?

Being able to do more tuning and investigation in the dashboard to search for interesting things, along with some threat hunting, would help identify something beyond what is already there. Dragos ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Dragos?

The main use case I had for Dragos during that period was for infrastructure monitoring and to begin detecting any incidents or problems that could arise, especially configuration failures, such as...

See all answers

Which is the best DDoS protection solution for a big ISP for monitoring and mitigating?

Arbor would be the best bid, apart from Arbor, Palo Alto and Fortinet have good solutions. As this is an ISP, I would prefer Arbor.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention?

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention requires an add-on license and is considered expensive compared to competitors like Cisco AMP and FortiGate ( /products/fortinet-fortigate-reviews ) fi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention?

See all answers

Comparisons

Nozomi Networks vs Dragos

Compared 27% of the time

Claroty Platform vs Dragos

Compared 24% of the time

Tenable OT Security vs Dragos

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Defender for IoT vs Dragos

Compared 6% of the time

More Dragos Competitors

Darktrace vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention

Compared 11% of the time

TrendAI Tipping Point vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention

Compared 8% of the time

Vectra AI vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention

Compared 8% of the time

Trellix Intrusion Prevention System vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention

Compared 6% of the time

Huawei Network Intelligent Protection vs Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention

Compared 6% of the time

More Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Dragos

September 2026

Download Dragos product report

Buyer's Guide

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention

September 2026

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention report

Download Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention product report

Also Known As

Dragos Platform

No data available

Overview

Dragos offers a comprehensive cybersecurity platform specializing in industrial control systems. It provides advanced threat detection and response capabilities tailored for sectors like energy, manufacturing, and water.

Dragos enhances security by providing specialized solutions that address the unique vulnerabilities present in industrial environments. With a robust framework, it monitors networks for threats, offers advanced analytics, and delivers actionable insights. This makes it essential for maintaining operational integrity and ensuring system protection against cyber threats.

What are the valuable features of Dragos?

Threat Detection: Identifies risks specific to industrial control systems.
Incident Response: Facilitates quick and effective handling of security breaches.
Network Monitoring: Provides continuous oversight of industrial networks for threats.
Intelligent Analytics: Offers insights through advanced data analysis.
Threat Intelligence: Delivers focused, up-to-date information on security threats.

What benefits or ROI can be expected from Dragos?

Enhanced Security: Protects critical infrastructure from cyber threats.
Operational Efficiency: Reduces downtime through rapid threat detection and response.
Cost-effective Protection: Minimizes financial impact of breaches through effective defense mechanisms.
Strategic Insights: Boosts decision-making with comprehensive analytics and reporting.

Dragos is implemented across industries such as energy, manufacturing, and water to offer tailored solutions that improve cyber resilience. By integrating industry-specific knowledge and cybersecurity practices, it supports safeguarding critical infrastructure assets effectively.

Dragos

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention provides comprehensive security with application control, real-time threat detection, and seamless integration with cloud services. Known for its high performance and ease of use, it addresses diverse security challenges for modern organizations.

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention integrates machine learning, behavioral analysis, anti-malware protection, and WildFire sandboxing to deliver proactive defense against threats. Its features include advanced firewall capabilities, comprehensive bandwidth management, and robust reporting. Integration with cloud-based URL filtering enhances organizational security efforts. While the tool offers significant protection, areas like pricing, ease of use, false positive management, and documentation clarity require improvement. Expanding AI capabilities and optimizing support will enhance threat prevention and user experience.

What are the most important features?

Application Control: Provides precise control over applications to reduce risks and ensure compliance.
Real-Time Threat Detection: Identifies and mitigates threats instantly for proactive security.
Machine Learning: Enhances threat prediction and detection by analyzing patterns.
WildFire Sandboxing: Offers advanced malware analysis and prevention.
Cloud-Based URL Filtering: Enhances network security by filtering web traffic.

What benefits should users look for?

High Performance: Ensures efficient threat interception with minimal latency.
Ease of Use: Offers a user-friendly experience with intuitive interfaces.
Comprehensive Security: Provides thorough protection through multi-layered security features.
Effective Reporting: Delivers detailed insights for better decision-making.

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is implemented across industries for server protection and LAN/WAN traffic security, providing solutions for network testing and application control. Organizations benefit from features like GlobalProtect VPN, anti-spyware, and vulnerability protections, ensuring security through efficient deployment both on-premises and in the cloud.

Palo Alto Networks

Sample Customers

NaturEner

University of Arkansas, JBG SMITH, SkiStar AB, TRI-AD, Temple University, Telkom Indonesia

Buyer's Guide

Operational Technology (OT) Security

September 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Nozomi, Claroty, Idira by Palo Alto Networks and others in Operational Technology (OT) Security. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Operational Technology (OT) Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.