Claroty Platform vs Dragos comparison

"The main advantage of Claroty, when compared to its competitors, is integrated secure remote access."

"The solution's asset management is really great compared to Dragos or Nozomi."

"I appreciate the active coding, deep inspection of packages, and data retrieval. The tool covers information about assets and attack vectors, which I find superior to other tools. Based on alerts, I create reports detailing how an attacker can penetrate the plant, both externally and internally."

"The solution's most valuable feature is the map, which shows everything that is connected and communicates with each other."

"The solution offers comprehensive tools that greatly enhance your IT operations if implemented correctly."

"Claroty is very beneficial for learning and adds value to your resume."

"I like how the tool does passive and active discovery and threat detection and shows risks, recommendations, and vulnerabilities. It gives risk scores and gathers everything in one place - IP, device name, etc. We can integrate it with other tools for overall network mapping. It's useful for audits, compliance, and monitoring of all devices in the industry. It provides both monitoring and control. We also have SRA for incident response, which lets us search all alerts if we deploy the Claroty Platform."

"The tool's best feature was the UI and the simplicity it offers."

"Dragos' best features are that they are more focused towards Incident Response, so they have a dedicated playbook in their platform, making it easier for anyone investigating any incidents to investigate the alerts."

"Dragos is more expensive than other vendors, probably about fifteen to twenty percent more, but it is generally worth the investment."

"The Claroty Platform becomes too noisy when it gives numerous CVEs related to vendor match. Sometimes, these CVEs are not actually related to the device in the firmware at the site."

"There is room for improvement in the user interface to make it more vibrant and interactive, similar to IT tools."

"There is room for improvement in the user interface to make it more vibrant and interactive, similar to IT tools. Improvements could also be made in the Secure Remote Access (SRA) user interaction and graphical representations of recordings."

"There should be AI security solutions implemented."

"I think the only issue is that the hardware Claroty uses is expensive."

"The product could be improved in terms of user interface design."

"There are a few protocols that Claroty doesn't currently support."

"Claroty Platform only gives the vulnerabilities based on the make and model of the devices, so it doesn't provide any resolution or any detailed explanation of how one can resolve such issues."

"Dragos could improve its asset visibility and discovery tools, as the competitor Claroty has better options in this area."

"I think Dragos can offer more flexibility similar to Nozomi and more visibility into the assets, nodes, and links, which would make it more competitive in the future."

"It's a bit expensive compared to other solutions."

"The licensing for physical devices is cheap, but the software version is expensive. The software version costs around 26-28 dollars. I was surprised and even double-checked. It was shocking."

"The tool is quite expensive."