No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Dragos vs Tenable OT Security comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Dragos
Ranking in Operational Technology (OT) Security
5th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.0
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Tenable OT Security
Ranking in Operational Technology (OT) Security
4th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Operational Technology (OT) Security category, the mindshare of Dragos is 7.8%, down from 11.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable OT Security is 7.3%, down from 10.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Operational Technology (OT) Security Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Tenable OT Security7.3%
Dragos7.8%
Other84.9%
Operational Technology (OT) Security
 

Featured Reviews

Rajesh Podishetty - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
Risk monitoring has improved and real-time fraud detection provides transparent banking control
Dragos should be improved in deployment complexity as it requires OT engineering coordination. One needs to have proper engineering coordination to understand the system, deploy it, integrate it, and make all the complex things into one system. This is very challenging, and one should be really skillful and have experience to accomplish this. Cost is another area for improvement. The cost is higher due to site-based licensing and expert services. The licensing is very heavy, and expert services are required for deployment. Cost-wise is also challenging and needs to be improved. Integration needs alignment with IT security systems and compliance frameworks. Controlling cybersecurity where any fraudulent person or third party should not access the system is controlled, and managing that level of complexity is quite challenging. Since there is continuous monitoring, it can reduce operational risk losses by 20% to 30% annually. Controlling that huge amount of data and transactions, especially regarding storage, requires a lot of database space. The space-wise storage should be reduced.
AP
Senior Consultant at Payatu
Enables cost-effective asset and threat management while requiring improvements in support and training
The time it takes to train itself is a concern. Initially, it will not identify many assets, as it needs time to read the information before finding the assets. Some detections can go wrong, and it may not understand certain industrial protocols. While installation and deployment are easy, upgrading from one version to another can be challenging. When you assure clients they will receive minus two upgrades, sometimes upgrading through the cloud becomes difficult, requiring on-site upgrades. During upgrades, the previous configuration may be lost, creating support issues.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Dragos especially ensures systems recover quickly, providing resilience, and it handles all the operational resilience in banking with metrics of 99.9% uptime, 30 minutes recovery time, and 99% transaction accuracy."
"Dragos has positively impacted my organization by aiding us to compensate our time."
"Dragos' best features are that they are more focused towards Incident Response, so they have a dedicated playbook in their platform, making it easier for anyone investigating any incidents to investigate the alerts."
"Dragos is more expensive than other vendors, probably about fifteen to twenty percent more, but it is generally worth the investment."
"The biggest advantage is that with good infrastructure, you can utilize asset planning when using Nessus along with Tenable OT Security."
"The initial setup was very easy, and I would rate it a ten out of ten."
"The active query inventory is the most valuable feature."
"It's for securing the vulnerability of the OT solutions they are using. We mitigate those through patch management activities and find vulnerabilities easily with this security solution."
"The product has easy-to-manage features and components."
"I like Tenable OT Security for two main reasons. Firstly, it helps identify vulnerabilities and risks for IT and OT assets, which is crucial for our operations. Secondly, it performs external port scanning, including vulnerability scans for open ports. Compared to the Claroty Platform, the tool offers detailed asset discovery capabilities."
"The clear distinction between IT and OT that Tenable OT provides is its most valuable feature."
"The product’s price is its most valuable feature."
 

Cons

"From my point of view, Dragos cannot be improved at the moment, but having more user-friendly platforms would be good."
"I think Dragos can offer more flexibility similar to Nozomi and more visibility into the assets, nodes, and links, which would make it more competitive in the future."
"Dragos should be improved in deployment complexity as it requires OT engineering coordination."
"Dragos could improve its asset visibility and discovery tools, as the competitor Claroty has better options in this area."
"Tenable OT product is good, but OT security itself is still maturing."
"During upgrades, the previous configuration may be lost, creating support issues."
"Tenable OT Security is fine, but I find it more language-based rather than structured. It feels like something is on a web page, and the dashboards and data representations are not cool. First of all, I said that the tool view should be improved. It looks pretty old. Second, the details Tenable OT Security provides regarding the metadata they work with should be more in-depth. Its main focus is vulnerability management, which is fine, but what about threat actors? What about attack vectors and OT vulnerabilities? There are major areas, baselines, etc. that need attention."
"As an IT security professional, I would like to see automation improvements in the response part of Tenable OT Security. However, I understand that implementing automation in OT environments can be quite challenging."
"The solution could detect changes in reading variables. The support of IoT devices can be improved."
"The solution should provide more features to prevent attacks."
"Tenable.ot's integration with one of the products needs improvement."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The tool's pricing is fair enough."
"The product is inexpensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Operational Technology (OT) Security solutions are best for your needs.
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Energy/Utilities Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Outsourcing Company
6%
Healthcare Company
5%
Energy/Utilities Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Outsourcing Company
7%
Computer Software Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Large Enterprise4
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Dragos?
Pricing-wise, I am not certain because there is a third party who handles the pricing in my company. The setup cost and licensing is quite critical. Licensing is always handled for access users, an...
What needs improvement with Dragos?
From my point of view, Dragos cannot be improved at the moment, but having more user-friendly platforms would be good. Enhancing the user interface experience to be better or more smoothly would be...
What is your primary use case for Dragos?
My main use case for Dragos is for vulnerability management, which I rely on day-to-day. A quick specific example of how I use Dragos for vulnerability management in my daily work is that I made an...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tenable OT Security?
Considering the cost and that it is affordable, I would rate it at seven.
What needs improvement with Tenable OT Security?
The time it takes to train itself is a concern. Initially, it will not identify many assets, as it needs time to read the information before finding the assets. Some detections can go wrong, and it...
What is your primary use case for Tenable OT Security?
I am using it for Asset Discovery, vulnerability management and threat intel. Tenable OT Security is for asset management, vulnerability management as continuous threat detection for OT ICS environ...
 

Also Known As

Dragos Platform
Tenable.ot
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

NaturEner
Nesher Cement Enterprises, City of Raleigh
Find out what your peers are saying about Dragos vs. Tenable OT Security and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.