Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

TXOne Security Inspection vs Tenable OT Security comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Tenable OT Security
Ranking in Operational Technology (OT) Security
4th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
TXOne Security Inspection
Ranking in Operational Technology (OT) Security
10th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (61st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Operational Technology (OT) Security category, the mindshare of Tenable OT Security is 9.3%, down from 12.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TXOne Security Inspection is 2.8%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Operational Technology (OT) Security Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Tenable OT Security9.3%
TXOne Security Inspection2.8%
Other87.9%
Operational Technology (OT) Security
 

Featured Reviews

AP
Senior Consultant at Payatu
Enables cost-effective asset and threat management while requiring improvements in support and training
The time it takes to train itself is a concern. Initially, it will not identify many assets, as it needs time to read the information before finding the assets. Some detections can go wrong, and it may not understand certain industrial protocols. While installation and deployment are easy, upgrading from one version to another can be challenging. When you assure clients they will receive minus two upgrades, sometimes upgrading through the cloud becomes difficult, requiring on-site upgrades. During upgrades, the previous configuration may be lost, creating support issues.
Use TXOne Security Inspection?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Operational Technology (OT) Security solutions are best for your needs.
881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
16%
Energy/Utilities Company
15%
Computer Software Company
9%
Retailer
6%
Manufacturing Company
19%
Computer Software Company
8%
Energy/Utilities Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Large Enterprise4
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tenable OT Security?
Considering the cost and that it is affordable, I would rate it at seven.
What needs improvement with Tenable OT Security?
The time it takes to train itself is a concern. Initially, it will not identify many assets, as it needs time to read the information before finding the assets. Some detections can go wrong, and it...
What is your primary use case for Tenable OT Security?
I am using it for Asset Discovery, vulnerability management and threat intel. Tenable OT Security is for asset management, vulnerability management as continuous threat detection for OT ICS environ...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Tenable.ot
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Nesher Cement Enterprises, City of Raleigh
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Nozomi, Claroty, CyberArk and others in Operational Technology (OT) Security. Updated: January 2026.
881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.