Elastic Observability vs Honeycomb Enterprise comparison

Elastic and Honeycomb.io are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Elastic is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.8, while Honeycomb.io is ranked #27 with an average rating of 8.0. Elastic holds a 2.4% mindshare in APM, compared to Honeycomb.io’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Elastic users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Honeycomb.io users who would recommend it.

Elastic Observability

Read 29 Elastic Observability reviews

8,483 Views
6,702 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Honeycomb Enterprise

Read 5 Honeycomb Enterprise reviews

2,899 Views
2,493 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Elastic Observability

Honeycomb Enterprise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

Elastic Observability and Honeycomb Enterprise compete in the monitoring and data analysis category. Honeycomb Enterprise has the upper hand with its advanced feature set, making it a more comprehensive investment.

Features: Elastic Observability provides real-time monitoring, sophisticated visualization, and seamless Elasticsearch integration. Honeycomb Enterprise offers advanced tracing capabilities, powerful analytics, and detailed debugging for complex tasks.

Room for Improvement: Elastic Observability could enhance its feature maturity and expand AI integrations to improve its offerings. It could also refine its end-to-end user journeys for better customizations. Honeycomb Enterprise would benefit from increased AI-compatible features and a simplified deployment process. It could also expand its documentation for easier user navigation through its complex environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Elastic Observability is straightforward to deploy with extensive documentation and active support channels, suitable for various infrastructure sizes. Honeycomb Enterprise, although requiring a sophisticated setup, offers excellent guidance and personalized support for complex environments, facilitating a seamless integration process.

Pricing and ROI: Elastic Observability is known for its affordable setup costs, delivering significant value for standard monitoring needs. Honeycomb Enterprise, with its higher initial investment, offers substantial ROI in situations demanding in-depth analytics and high-level data handling, aligning well with its comprehensive feature benefits in demanding contexts.

To learn more, read our detailed Elastic Observability vs. Honeycomb Enterprise Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Observability vs. Honeycomb Enterprise

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Elastic Observability

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (15th), Log Management (16th), Container Monitoring (5th), Cloud Monitoring Software (10th)

Honeycomb Enterprise

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

27th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Code Assistants (11th), AI Observability (73rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Elastic Observability is 2.4%, down from 6.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Honeycomb Enterprise is 1.3%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Elastic Observability	2.4%
Honeycomb Enterprise	1.3%
Other	96.3%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Mohammed-Abdelalim

Assistant Vice President at QualityKiosk Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

Has provided powerful customization for unique monitoring needs but needs more out-of-the-box capabilities

In my opinion, the best features of Elastic Observability are their flexibility to integrate with other existing systems and the ability to build a unified monitoring tool that can integrate with existing ones and end-to-end user journeys which require a lot of customizations. The greatest feature in Elastic is the ability to customize. This is similar to my comments about customizable dashboards in Elastic because it's visible to the analyst. However, it's very great. Customizing these dashboards can meet the customer's specific use cases and specific stories that they have in their environment, their special environment that doesn't look like other environments. The dashboarding in Elastic is highly customizable to the level of logos. If the customer wants his company logo in the dashboard, it can be done.

Read full review

meetharoon

CEO at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Its pattern-matching and code transformation capabilities can be adapted for mass identification and remediation of vulnerable libraries

I asked very specific questions to Mr. Pell about consideration of code security scenarios in pattern design and rules, specifically that tuned with OWASP Top 10. I believe addition of code security focus can be a value-add, though the way Grit architecture is designed and how it works, it is and may not become an alternative choice of code security solutions. Rather, it must be treated as a powerful supplementary tool that augments the existing code security solutions (such as Snyk or Checkmarx) in a DevSecOps or Secure DevOps environment. Anyone interested in learning more on this front or have queries, can get in touch with me for a consulting.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution has been stable in our usage."

"The Elastic User Interface framework lets us do custom development when needed. You need to have some Javascript knowledge. We need that knowledge to develop new custom tests."

"I found Elk to be excellent for log analytics, security analytics, application code-level analytics, collaboration with DevOps teams, CI/CD, microservices, and Kubernetes, specifically cloud-native or cloud-specific tasks."

"It is scalable and supports multitenancy, which is beneficial for MSPs."

"I think Elastic Observability is already in very good shape."

"The most valued feature of Elastic is its log analytics capabilities."

"The product has connectors to many services."

"Machine learning is the most valuable feature of this solution."

More Elastic Observability pros

"The solution's most valuable features are the queries for the OpenTelemetry events and all the tracing."

"Honeycomb Enterprise has positively impacted our organization by providing live alerts."

"It's very scalable since we used it for a really big organization and it worked."

"The solution's initial setup process was straightforward since we were getting enough support from Honeycomb.io's team."

"The approach offers significant benefits in terms of efficiency, consistency, and proactive security management, particularly valuable for organizations with large, distributed development teams."

Cons

"I would have preferred built-in tools to manage the indexes on deployment for better visual representation, as the initial feedback regarding system performance and data storage was fairly primitive and lacking."

"More web features could be added to the product."

"It lacked some capabilities when handling on-prem devices, like network observability, package flow analysis, and device performance data on the infrastructure side."

"Elastic Observability needs to improve the retrieval of logs and metrics from all the instances."

"Elastic Observability is difficult to use. There are only three options for customization but this can be difficult for our use case. We do not have other options to choose the metrics shown, such as CPU or memory usage."

"I am familiar with Azure Monitor, which I find more user-friendly compared to Elastic, which is a very technical tool."

"The price is the only issue in the solution. It can be made better and cheaper."

"The interface could be improved."

More Elastic Observability cons

"I rate Honeycomb Enterprise a seven out of ten because I feel a lot of the journeys could be made cleaner."

"However, the reason it's only five is because it's lagging behind in terms of AI-compatible features."

"We can make alerts based on static numbers, which may block us from building alerts that could be generic enough or could be serviced."

"The process of log scraping gets delayed on Honeycomb.io. At times, it gives false alerts to the application team."

"The way Grit architecture is designed and how it works, it is and may not become an alternative choice of code security solutions."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"So far, there are just the standard licensing fees. Several of the components are embedded in the license or are even open source. They're even free depending on what you use, which makes it even more appealing to someone that is discussing pricing of the solution."

"We will buy a premium license after POC."

"The product’s pricing needs improvement."

"Pricing is one of those situations where the more you use it, the more you pay."

"There are two types: cloud and SaaS. They charge based on data ingestion, ingest rate, hard retention, and warm retention. I believe it costs around $25,000 annually to ingest 30GB of data daily. That is the SaaS version. There is also a self-managed license where the customer manages their own infrastructure on-prem. In such cases, there are three license tiers that respectively cost $5,000 annually per node, $7,000 per node, and $12,500 per node."

"Elastic Observability is cheaper than other similar solutions, such as Dynatrace. Its license calculation is based on various factors like data volume and physical infrastructure, particularly related to RAM capacity."

"Users have to pay for some features, like the alerts on different channels, because they are unavailable in different source versions."

"Since we are a huge company, Elastic Observability is an affordable solution for us."

More Elastic Observability pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	16

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Elastic Observability?

Elastic Observability significantly improves incident response time by providing quick access to logs and data across various sources. For instance, searching for specific keywords in logs spanning...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Elastic Observability?

The problem is their licensing model, which is a bit confusing. Many customers struggle to understand their total cost of ownership because Elastic licensing is not dependent on easy, quantifiable ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Elastic Observability?

After careful consideration about areas for improvement in Elastic Observability, aspects such as pricing, customization, implementation, and scalability could be improved. As a user of the system,...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Honeycomb.io?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Honeycomb.io?

Although Grit is a tool code code migration and management of technical debt for large chunks of work, we reviewed Grit from the use case of assisting in faster remediation of vulnerable libraries....

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Honeycomb.io?

We set up Honeycomb.io on all the services so that we can have all the set traces of the communication between all the services inside the company. This helps us understand where it could be failin...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs Elastic Observability

Compared 6% of the time

Sentry vs Elastic Observability

Compared 6% of the time

Grafana vs Elastic Observability

Compared 6% of the time

New Relic vs Elastic Observability

Compared 6% of the time

Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) vs Elastic Observability

Compared 2% of the time

More Elastic Observability Competitors

Sentry vs Honeycomb Enterprise

Compared 13% of the time

Grafana vs Honeycomb Enterprise

Compared 9% of the time

Splunk Observability Cloud vs Honeycomb Enterprise

Compared 7% of the time

Datadog vs Honeycomb Enterprise

Compared 6% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Honeycomb Enterprise

Compared 4% of the time

More Honeycomb Enterprise Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Observability

February 2026

Download Elastic Observability product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

February 2026

Download Honeycomb Enterprise product report

Also Known As

No data available

Grit

Overview

Elastic Observability offers a comprehensive suite for log analytics, application performance monitoring, and machine learning. It integrates seamlessly with platforms like Teams and Slack, enhancing data visualization and scalability for real-time insights.

Elastic Observability is designed to support production environments with features like logging, data collection, and infrastructure tracking. Centralized logging and powerful search functionalities make incident response and performance tracking efficient. Elastic APM and Kibana facilitate detailed data visualization, promoting rapid troubleshooting and effective system performance analysis. Integrated services and extensive connectivity options enhance its role in business and technical decision-making by providing actionable data insights.

What are the most important features of Elastic Observability?

Centralized Logging: Streamlines the collection, analysis, and storage of log data.
Powerful Search: Provides robust search capabilities for quick access to relevant information.
Scalability: Supports growing data needs across diverse environments.
Real-time Telemetry: Ensures up-to-date insights and monitoring.
Platform Integration: Seamlessly connects with services like Teams and Slack.
Data Visualization: Enhances visibility with Elastic APM and Kibana.

What benefits and ROI should users explore in reviews?

Cost-effectiveness: Offers significant savings through efficient data management.
Rapid Incident Response: Minimizes downtime with quick troubleshooting tools.
Comprehensive Insights: Supports better business decisions with detailed data analysis.
Performance Tracking: Enables assessment of system effectiveness and improvements.

Elastic Observability is employed across industries for critical operations, such as in finance for transaction monitoring, in healthcare for secure data management, and in technology for optimizing application performance. Its data-driven approach aids efficient event tracing, supporting diverse industry requirements.

Elastic

Honeycomb Enterprise is designed to optimize performance visibility, offering a robust platform for distributed system observability. It provides insights for complex data and aids in faster issue resolution, making it a valuable tool for IT professionals.

This tool is tailored for real-time data tracking and improving system performance efficiency. Enterprises benefit from its capacity to handle large-scale data, ensuring seamless operations and continuity. Honeycomb Enterprise helps teams to tackle data challenges head-on by delivering comprehensive analytics that enhance infrastructure reliability and performance metrics.

What Features Make Honeycomb Enterprise Stand Out?

High-Resolution Visibility: Enables detailed system monitoring to identify issues quickly.
Trace Analysis: Offers powerful tracing of distributed systems for in-depth insights.
Data Scalability: Manages extensive data sets effortlessly for better decision-making.
Real-Time Alerts: Provides instant alerts to preempt potential disruptions.
Collaboration Tools: Facilitates teamwork with integrated tools enhancing productivity.

What Benefits and ROI Can Users Expect?

Reduced Downtime: Faster detection and resolution of issues minimizes operational interruptions.
Cost Efficiency: Optimizes resources leading to lower operational costs.
Improved Decision Making: Enhanced data analytics lead to smarter business strategies.
Enhanced Productivity: Streamlined processes improve team efficiency and output quality.

In industries like finance, e-commerce, and technology, Honeycomb Enterprise implementations demonstrate its utility in managing complex data flows and optimizing system reliability. Businesses in these sectors leverage its capabilities to maintain high service standards and operational efficiency.

Honeycomb.io

Sample Customers

PSCU, Entel, VITAS, Mimecast, Barrett Steel, Butterfield Bank

Clover Health, Eaze, Intercom, Fender

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Observability vs. Honeycomb Enterprise

February 2026

Free Report: Elastic Observability vs. Honeycomb Enterprise

Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic Observability vs. Honeycomb Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Elastic Observability vs. Honeycomb Enterprise report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.