No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Elastic Search vs Meilisearch comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Elastic Search
Ranking in Indexing and Search
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
100
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Data Integration (6th), Search as a Service (1st), Vector Databases (6th)
Meilisearch
Ranking in Indexing and Search
14th
Average Rating
10.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2817942 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Software Engineer at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
Logging and vector search have transformed observability and empowered reliable ai agents
Elastic Search is not specifically being used for certain purposes. I deploy Elastic Search database on the cloud and use cloud services so that nobody can attack. However, I do not use Elastic Search to resolve attack issues. The basic main purpose of Elastic Search, as of now, I feel it can do more in the AI area. Sometime I saw that when I am developing RAG and have to generate the embeddings, which I call metadata, sometimes it tries to fail. That durability or issue handling should be improved, but apart from that, I did not find anything as of now. As per my use case, whatever I am using seems pretty good. Apart from that, some definitely improvement will be there. One improvement is that it should be faster. Whenever I am searching any logs, it takes much time. For example, if I open my log in Notepad or a similar tool, I can search the text within a second. With Elastic Search, it takes a little bit of time, ten to fifteen seconds. That can be improved. Sometimes, engineers take time to assign when I create a ticket.
reviewer2797689 - PeerSpot reviewer
CTO at a tech vendor with 1-10 employees
Improved search performance has reduced our operational costs and simplified ongoing maintenance
I use it for 50% text search and 50% vector search They drastically reduce operation costs for both human resources and compute compared to OpenSearch. Everything was an upgrade compared to Amazon OpenSearch, with the exception of resiliency. The resiliency of their service needs improvement.…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The forced merge and forced resonate features reduce the data size increasing reliability."
"There's lots of processing power. You can actually just add machines to get more performance if you need to. It's pretty flexible and very easy to add another log. It's not like 'oh, no, it's going to be so much extra data'. That's not a problem for the machine. It can handle it."
"I would say that Elasticsearch is better than all the other solutions."
"I appreciate the indexing capabilities and the speed of indexing in their product, which demonstrates how quickly logs are collected and stored."
"My favorite feature is the ease of use, particularly in how you integrate the agent; I've been using it since version 7, and we're on version 9 now, and I've seen the progress from using Beats to using the agent, making it so simple today to enroll a server with the Elastic Agent."
"It provides deep visibility into your cloud and distributed applications, from microservices to serverless architectures. It quickly identifies and resolves the root causes of issues, like gaining visibility into all the cloud-based and on-prem applications."
"X-Pack provides good features, like authorization and alerts."
"The solution is valuable for log analytics."
"Everything was an upgrade compared to Amazon OpenSearch, with the exception of resiliency."
 

Cons

"The solution has quite a steep learning curve. The usability and general user-friendliness could be improved."
"Both the graph feature and the reporting feature are a little bit lacking. The alerting also needs to be improved."
"This product could be improved with additional security, and the addition of support for machine learning devices."
"There are some features and functionality that could be enhanced in Elastic Search to improve its overall capabilities."
"What they need is to be more transparent about the actual setup of the cluster and the deployment process."
"Elastic needs to work on their Machine Learning offering because currently they have been trying to make it a black box which doesn't work for a serious user (a Data Scientist) as it doesn't give any control over the underlying algorithm."
"Elastic Search needs to improve its technical support. It should be customer-friendly and have good support."
"Maybe Elastic Search could improve the analytics part of the search so it can be more powerful to the user."
"The resiliency of their service needs improvement. There have been several outages."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are using the Community Edition because Elasticsearch's licensing model is not flexible or suitable for us. They ask for an annual subscription. We also got the development consultancy from Elasticsearch for 60 days or something like that, but they were just trying to do the same trick. That's why we didn't purchase it. We are just using the Community Edition."
"The price of Elasticsearch is fair. It is a more expensive solution, like QRadar. The price for Elasticsearch is not much more than other solutions we have."
"We are using the free open-sourced version of this solution."
"​The pricing and license model are clear: node-based model."
"To access all the features available you require both the open source license and the production license."
"An X-Pack license is more affordable than Splunk."
"We are paying $1,500 a month to use the solution. If you want to have endpoint protection you need to pay more."
"The solution is less expensive than Stackdriver and Grafana."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Indexing and Search solutions are best for your needs.
916,771 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business40
Midsize Enterprise12
Large Enterprise50
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ELK Elasticsearch?
The pricing for Elastic Search is mainly budgeted according to the organization budget, so we take it as a yearly subscription, and that is acceptable since we do get a fair discount when we are ta...
What needs improvement with ELK Elasticsearch?
When we get the logs, it is mostly about how we edit the configurations and how we make changes according to the requirements of our organization. In these cases, the logs sometimes can be a bit in...
What is your primary use case for ELK Elasticsearch?
I am the Elastic Search admin for my organization, and we are using Elastic Search to handle the traffic to GCP. The monitoring of all the clusters and all the deployments are quite good, and compa...
What needs improvement with Meilisearch?
The resiliency of their service needs improvement. There have been several outages.
What is your primary use case for Meilisearch?
I use it for 50% text search and 50% vector search.
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

Elastic Enterprise Search, Swiftype, Elastic Cloud
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

T-Mobile, Adobe, Booking.com, BMW, Telegraph Media Group, Cisco, Karbon, Deezer, NORBr, Labelbox, Fingerprint, Relativity, NHS Hospital, Met Office, Proximus, Go1, Mentat, Bluestone Analytics, Humanz, Hutch, Auchan, Sitecore, Linklaters, Socren, Infotrack, Pfizer, Engadget, Airbus, Grab, Vimeo, Ticketmaster, Asana, Twilio, Blizzard, Comcast, RWE and many others.
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic, Coveo, Glean and others in Indexing and Search. Updated: September 2026.
916,771 professionals have used our research since 2012.