Entuity vs Zenoss Cloud comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Park Place Technologies and Zenoss are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Park Place Technologies is ranked #66, while Zenoss is ranked #63. Park Place Technologies holds a 0.6% mindshare in NMS, compared to Zenoss’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Park Place Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Zenoss users who would recommend it.

Entuity

Read 11 Entuity reviews

3,664 Views
3,481 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Zenoss Cloud

Read 8 Zenoss Cloud reviews

8,128 Views
3,901 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Entuity

Zenoss Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Zenoss Cloud and Entuity are leading competitors in the network monitoring solutions category, each offering unique advantages. Zenoss Cloud tends to lead in pricing and support, making it an attractive option for many businesses. However, Entuity's strong feature set makes it compelling despite a potentially higher price point.

Features: Zenoss Cloud provides comprehensive monitoring, integration capabilities, and broad network resource visibility. Entuity offers advanced analytics, detailed network insights, and robust reporting tools.

Room for Improvement: Zenoss Cloud could enhance its network analytics, reporting detail, and on-premise control options. Entuity might work on improving its cloud-based offerings, setup simplicity, and pricing competitiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zenoss Cloud, with its cloud-based deployment model, offers simplified setup and scalability, backed by strong customer support. Entuity provides an on-premise solution requiring more initial setup but allowing greater control, with customer service also held in high regard.

Pricing and ROI: Zenoss Cloud generally has a lower setup cost and faster ROI due to scalability. Entuity may involve higher initial costs but promises substantial ROI through comprehensive analytics for long-term benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Entuity vs. Zenoss Cloud Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Entuity vs. Zenoss Cloud

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,929 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Entuity

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

66th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Zenoss Cloud

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

63rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Infrastructure (19th), Event Monitoring (14th), Server Monitoring (25th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (52nd), Container Monitoring (9th), Cloud Monitoring Software (42nd), AIOps (28th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Entuity is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zenoss Cloud is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Zenoss Cloud	0.9%
Entuity	0.6%
Other	98.5%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Ahmed Salman

Performance & Monitoring Supervisor at Saudi Telecom Company

A good solution for network monitoring and support management, but there is no centralized database

There is no centralized database. It is an issue if you use a local database and have multiple borders. However, if you have an external database, you can keep the same old data from an old border up to 100 borders. In addition, if we want to create an ABI or use an ABI to connect data, there is no competition when we ask for support. If we want to modify the calculation matrix or equation, we have to raise a professional service. Other competitors like Micro Focus, a network management system, have a new supportability matrix in the market every quarter.

Read full review

ClaudiaChen

Cloud Architect - Senior Technology Architect at Telstra

Generates close to real-time alerts so users can resolve issues, but needs more integration and public cloud monitoring features

As Zenoss Service Dynamics is more for network-centric devices and you want to monitor, for example, a server, its services, IP addresses, and interfaces, if it's a network and you're going to monitor multiple items, you'll be charged multiple times. This is what Zenoss Service Dynamics needs to improve to make sure that customers pay just one fee to monitor the entire server. What I'd like to see in Zenoss Service Dynamics in the future is a public cloud monitoring feature, particularly for the Azure public cloud. Another additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is integration with the Azure public cloud because I know that there are some services from Azure that Zenoss Service Dynamics is currently unable to monitor.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This is a very user friendly solution, that is good for user access, allowing deep dives into devices, system performance and more."

"Event management and the geographical Google API-based network topology are the most valuable features of Entuity."

"My clients have received a good return on investment."

"We are able to receive a visualized monitoring of the network infrastructure which is very helpful."

"The most valuable feature is the ease of deployment, simplicity of the end user's experience (the forms and the sheets that you use, the screens you can use to see what's going on, and overall capability), as well as the ease of integration into other solutions."

"We find the SurePath component of this solution to be very valuable, as it gives us the path to whatever we are configuring."

"The initial setup of Entuity is easy and the full process took approximately 30 minutes."

"We went for this solution because it comes with a lot of features; it's an all-in-one solution, which means we don't have to go for multiple solutions."

More Entuity pros

"They have also accommodated many state-of-the-art technologies like Docker and ZooKeeper."

"It is the most flexible solution of this type, but it takes time to adapt."

"It's easy to use."

"It is very cost-effective compared to the tools I worked with in the past."

"Overall, it's a great solution, and I consider it to be one of the best."

"With this solution, they can have one million users at the same time with no crashes."

"What I like most about Zenoss Service Dynamics is that it monitors the devices and gives close to real-time alerts. For example, in case the device is not available, Zenoss Service Dynamics generates an alert so my team can resolve the issue."

"Zenoss is more complex than LogicMonitor, but scalable and hugely customizable."

More Zenoss Cloud pros

Cons

"What might be improved for the user may be the depth of insight into the events that do happen and the ease of integration."

"Entuity could improve by having more integration because now network management is not a standalone solution. You have to integrate it with your network, applications, and everything else. We have to collect that information from those solutions or relevant managers. Additionally, the SLA dashboard should be improved."

"Entuity currently has APIs, but they are not straightforward. They are not flexible if an external system wants to communicate with Entuity or create an integration that is not available out of the box. Its APIs can be flexible so that they can be utilized for external integrations that are not available out of the box."

"A typical user might want to see even more depth to the standard reporting and ease of integration."

"Entuity can improve the fetching of device configuration. The solution uses scripts and I could not understand them or find any recourses on the internet to learn about the language that is used in the script. It could be more user-friendly and the device configuration management could be enhanced."

"Entuity currently has APIs, but they are not straightforward."

"The configuration of the logging could be improved because if someone deleted any note or inventory, or some change to the inventory, we are not able to identify which user or which administrator modifies these details. For example, there should be read-only locks on maps to prevent their deletion. This way people can only read and cannot delete that particular map."

"We would like the backup element of this solution to be improved as, at present, it is very limited and does not have much scope for customization."

More Entuity cons

"Now it is stable, but they should design threshold parameters in percentage instead of raw values."

"There is room for improvement with the administrative part. They introduced Control Center to manage things in Zenoss 5. The services that Zenoss provides remained the same, but the administrative part, since they introduced Docker, etc., has become a little complex"

"There was a problem with Zenoss and storage monitoring."

"Technical support is 3/10, poor: Incomplete and poor documentation Undocumented processes Inconsistent solutions to problems depending on source"

"The AI aspect needs to improve."

"It would be ideal if the product offered sound alerts."

"The inclusion of a feature to show a graphical view of the network would be a helpful improvement."

"As Zenoss Service Dynamics is more for network-centric devices and you want to monitor, for example, a server, its services, IP addresses, and interfaces, if it's a network and you're going to monitor multiple items, you'll be charged multiple times. This is what Zenoss Service Dynamics needs to improve to make sure that customers pay just one fee to monitor the entire server. What I'd like to see in Zenoss Service Dynamics in the future is a public cloud monitoring feature, particularly for the Azure public cloud. Another additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is integration with the Azure public cloud because I know that there are some services from Azure that Zenoss Service Dynamics is currently unable to monitor."

More Zenoss Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have 400 licenses and we are only using 150 licenses."

"Entuity's licensing is very highly-priced."

"Entuity is not an expensive solution."

"It can be comparatively expensive but that is because it is comprehensive."

"It varies and depends on the quantity. It's worth the cost."

"It is very cost-effective compared to the tools I worked with in the past. The company is gaining a lot with respect to the cost factor. It provides agentless monitoring and in a very cheap way."

"There are additional costs you'll have to pay apart from the license fee for Zenoss Service Dynamics. I can't remember exactly how much my company is paying because I don't handle the finance part, but the cost is paid annually. On a scale of one to five, with one being the cheapest and five being the most expensive, I'm rating the solution three out of five."

"It depends on the customer, what he wants."

"The pricing depends on the environment, the number of services, and the size of the data center. It can go from $100,000 to a million dollars."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

24%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

15%

Construction Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Transportation Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

In my experience, I worked with many monitoring software, but the one that gave me the most functionalities of a large-scale company is Zenoss, due to its ability to monitor completely hybrid and a...

See all answers

Comparisons

SolarWinds NPM vs Entuity

Compared 17% of the time

LogicMonitor vs Entuity

Compared 10% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Entuity

Compared 8% of the time

SolarWinds Network Device Monitor vs Entuity

Compared 6% of the time

NETSCOUT Network & Application Observability vs Entuity

Compared 4% of the time

More Entuity Competitors

Zabbix vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 7% of the time

Nagios XI vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

ScienceLogic vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

Microsoft System Center vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

More Zenoss Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Entuity

November 2026

Download Entuity product report

Buyer's Guide

Zenoss Cloud

October 2026

Download Zenoss Cloud product report

Also Known As

No data available

Cloud Monitoring, Zenoss Service Dynamics

Overview

Entuity offers a user-friendly interface with network mapping and integration capabilities. It provides real-time connectivity diagrams and detailed device monitoring. Automated network discovery ensures accurate topology mapping, and its updated dashboard enhances data visibility.

Entuity's focus is on network device monitoring, catering to switches, routers, access points, and firewalls. It tracks health, status, CPU, memory, and performance metrics, allowing users to set thresholds for alerts and incidents. Integration with monitoring systems enables insights and reports on connectivity and network metrics, reducing noise through event management capabilities while managing configurations and performance inventory.

What are the standout features of Entuity?

Ease of Deployment: Quickly set up with minimal effort, making it accessible for users with different technical backgrounds.
Real-Time Network Mapping: Provides live connectivity diagrams to enhance network understanding and troubleshooting.
SurePath Monitoring: Offers detailed insights into network device performance for improved oversight.
Automated Discovery: Delivers precise topology mapping for efficient network management.
Customizable Dashboard: Facilitates comprehensive data visibility tailored to specific needs.
Event Management: Streamlines alert processes to prioritize critical issues effectively.
Google API-Based Topology: Integrates with Google APIs for advanced topology visualization.

What benefits do users receive from Entuity?

Enhanced Integration: Seamlessly integrates with ticketing tools to improve functionality.
User-Friendly Interface: Enables ease of navigation and efficient management, reducing training requirements.
Stability and Updates: Continuous updates provide stable performance and feature enhancements.
Technical Support: Access to comprehensive support that aids in resolving issues promptly.

Entuity is implemented extensively in industries requiring robust network management, including telecommunications and enterprises with distributed networks. It ensures consistent monitoring and operational efficiency across locations, helping organizations maintain optimal network performance and reliability.

Park Place Technologies

Zenoss Cloud provides a comprehensive overview of IT environments, supporting cross-cloud functionality, scalability, and robust integrations. It offers dynamic monitoring through its intuitive dashboard and supports hybrid deployments across cloud and on-premises infrastructures.

Zenoss Cloud enables users to monitor network infrastructure and operator platforms efficiently. With features like agentless monitoring and real-time alerts, Zenoss Cloud integrates seamlessly with external systems such as ITSM tools. Its flexible functionality allows for the management of both on-premises and cloud infrastructures like AWS and Azure. Users benefit from easy setup and strong technical support, although they seek enhancements in AI capabilities and simpler installation. The pricing model and complexity for beginners and storage monitoring are areas for improvement.

What are the key features of Zenoss Cloud?

Dynamic Monitoring: Enhances user experience with real-time insights.
Cross-Cloud Functionality: Supports hybrid deployments across AWS and Azure.
Agentless Monitoring: Simplifies deployment with minimal overhead.
Scalability: Grows with your network's demands.
Custom Integration: Supports notifications and alerts tailored to user requirements.

What benefits should users expect from Zenoss Cloud?

Time Efficiency: Quick setup and operation save resources.
Comprehensive Support: Extensive documentation streamlines troubleshooting.
Cost-effective Monitoring: Prevents multiple charges in server monitoring.
Enhanced User Experience: Offers seamless integration with existing IT infrastructures.

Zenoss Cloud is widely used in monitoring solutions for industries including technology and data centers. It supports direct monitoring of systems like vSphere and NetApp, making it ideal for IT operations and managed services. Integration with tools such as ServiceNow and SolarWinds aligns it with diverse IT environments.

Zenoss

Sample Customers

Tait Communications, Vattenfall, Discovery, University of Minnesota, Pernod Ricard, Electric Car

2degrees, Rackspace, State of North Dakota, El Paso Independent School District, NWN Corporation

Buyer's Guide

Entuity vs. Zenoss Cloud

November 2026

Free Report: Entuity vs. Zenoss Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Entuity vs. Zenoss Cloud and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Entuity vs. Zenoss Cloud report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.