Exasol Data Warehouse vs MySQL comparison

Exasol and Oracle are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. Exasol is ranked #25 with an average rating of 8.0, while Oracle is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.6. Exasol holds a 0.6% mindshare in SQL, compared to Oracle’s 8.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Exasol users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Exasol Data Warehouse

Read 8 Exasol Data Warehouse reviews

438 Views
236 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

MySQL

Read 148 MySQL reviews

7,193 Views
5,585 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Exasol Data Warehouse

MySQL

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

MySQL and Exasol Data Warehouse are competing data storage solutions. Exasol appears to have the upper hand in analytics and speed for advanced data processing, whereas MySQL is favored for its cost-effectiveness and versatility in application support.

Features: MySQL supports a wide range of platforms, is known for its integration with LAMP/WAMP stacks, and provides easy setup with Memcached, enhancing performance and scalability. It is an open-source solution offering high flexibility and support for complex querying requirements. Exasol provides excellent scalability and high-performance analytics, especially for large data sets, making it suitable for heavy analytic workloads. Its real-time analytics capabilities ensure quick data processing and insight generation.

Room for Improvement: MySQL's performance can degrade with massive data volumes, and it lacks some advanced analytics features found in purpose-built data warehouses. Its storage engine architecture, while adaptable, might benefit from additional optimization for large data sets. Exasol could enhance its flexibility for various development environments and improve ease of integration with diverse application stacks. The complexity of setting up Exasol for smaller-scale environments may be reduced to appeal to a broader range of users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MySQL benefits from a straightforward deployment process, supported by extensive community resources and documentation. Its widespread usage ensures a wealth of tutorials and support materials. Exasol deployment can be complex due to its focus on substantial analytic operations, but it offers dedicated customer support to assist users through the process.

Pricing and ROI: MySQL's open-source nature and no licensing cost result in low initial expenses and a positive ROI, especially in simpler environments. Exasol, though requiring a higher initial investment due to its premium analytic features, delivers improved ROI through efficient data processing for data-intensive operations, justifying the cost by providing valuable insights and advanced capabilities for users excited about data-driven decision-making.

To learn more, read our detailed Exasol Data Warehouse vs. MySQL Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Exasol Data Warehouse vs. MySQL

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,564 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Exasol Data Warehouse

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

25th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

MySQL

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

148

Ranking in other categories

Open Source Databases (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of Exasol Data Warehouse is 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MySQL is 8.5%, down from 8.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

Shubham-Agarwal

Manager - Projects at Cognizant

Fast query processing and easy-to-store all the data

There are very few companies that are using Exasol, but the majority of companies are using SQL Server, Cloud or IBM Db2 Database, or any other databases. Therefore, the resources are limited, which is my only concern. So if I face any issues, limited resources are available to help me resolve the issue with Exasol. From that perspective, it can be a bit of a struggle for me to find a solution. In the next release, I would like to see better compatibility issues. Currently, Exasol has limited compatibility with other software like Python and R. For example, If I talk about SQL Server, we can connect it to big data or Python, which is also compatible with different servers.

Read full review

Muzzamil Hussain

Assistant Vice President at National Bank of Pakistan

Native encryption ensures secure data management with a simple deployment

The most valuable feature is the on-premises data encryption facilities. By default, we can provide encryption, and this feature in MySQL is why we prefer it over other databases. The native encryption in MySQL encourages us to use this database model more frequently compared to Oracle and other databases. With Oracle, we have to buy another solution for encryption and masking, but MySQL supports native encryption, which enhances our return on investment. It perfectly supports our ROI, and we have no issues with its functionality.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is hands-off; you set it up insert your data and it self tunes queries."

"We mainly chose Exasol for its performance reasons."

"Its speed is great."

"The most valuable feature of Exasol is its speed."

"It is easy to scale."

"We can quickly scale the solution as it works on an MPP system."

"The speed is very good compared to other databases, like SQL Server or Oracle."

"Performance is a top priority, and it excels in this aspect."

"However, it is easy to scale MySQL using the functions provided with the product."

"I like MySQL's feature that helps to automate things."

"The feature that I have found most valuable is its ubiquity. MySQL is everywhere, so if I need to find a developer to do things to it that I don't know, it's very easy to find someone who has expertise in it."

"The solution is very stable."

"I rate the solution's stability a ten out of ten since it has been running flawlessly."

"We use it as a data store and from that perspective, we get everything we need."

"I find MySQL's relational data storage format very useful for data management. Our structure is well-defined and easy for end users and business stakeholders to read. I appreciate the tool's simplicity and ability to integrate with our backend tools."

"It is a very stable solution. I deployed the product six years ago, and it still works fine."

More MySQL pros

Cons

"You have to install Exasol drivers, and it's not easy to find or implement a driver into different systems."

"There are limited resources available to help me resolve the issue with Exasol."

"It would be beneficial if the updates would occur more often."

"It's not cloud-native so many maintenance operations require downtime."

"The only area where we found it could improve was in custom role creation and security, and it was difficult to work with."

"They don't talk very well to with other products when it comes to connectivity. Integration is lacking."

"They should improve the security features for MPP processing."

"Lacks a cloud-based platform."

"MySQL's performance needs to be improved for enterprise-level applications compared to Oracle and Postgres."

"When I run into issues, I really have to research how to fix them."

"On the database side, it should be really lightweight, and the data structure should be like MongoDB."

"The analytics features are in need of improvement."

"The licensing cost of the solution is expensive, which MySQL needs to consider improving."

"There are some issues with compatibility with Java environments that need to be improved. When Oracle bought this solution there were some driver changes that caused some issues with operations."

"I would like to see more integrations of the solution with other platforms and improve the support on different data types."

"The workbench could be improved. In particular, error messages can be improved, which are horrific and completely unhelpful. I'd like to see improved parsing of errors. When you write SQL and it crashes, it usually is something completely irrelevant and not helpful. I've started to use GPT 3.5 for finding out how to do things. I got to do something a bit different, and that I found to be very useful. If there was some way to tie it into one of the new AI tools, that would probably be a good idea."

More MySQL cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's cost is mid-ranged."

"Microsoft licensing for SQL Server is probably ten times more expensive. I used to work for the government, and I remember when we were looking into upgrading to the enterprise version of SQL Server 2019, the licensing was going to cost 350,000. To get the equivalent in the cloud, it was going to be about four grand to get the same processing power and everything else. With MySQL, it was going to be about 300 for the same licensing. Cost-wise, for sure, there is a huge difference. Would you prefer to pay 300 a month or 3,000 to have the same amount of data resources? You might lose a few options that you need, but it isn't worth the price difference."

"There is no licensing fee."

"I use a free version at present."

"MySQL Enterprise Support is not cheap, though might still be cheaper than Oracle or SQL Server. They may not have local support depending on where you’re based, but there are many smaller agencies out there that will readily provide support. You’ll need to spend some time looking around."

"MySQL is released under an open-source license, so you have nothing to pay to use it."

"We do have a couple of clients who choose to use the paid, enterprise version of the solution and who take full advantage of it."

"I think that MySQL is a premium product."

"We are using the free version of MySQL. We prefer paying for a yearly license."

More MySQL pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,564 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Retailer

15%

Computer Software Company

11%

Logistics Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Exasol?

The most valuable feature of Exasol is its speed.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Exasol?

You have to use upper-column names in Exasol, which is strange. You have to install Exasol drivers, and it's not easy to find or implement a driver into different systems.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Exasol?

We implemented our data problem issues from Tableau. We inserted the data into the Exasol database in order to run 10 to 20 reports from Tableau. This was just a small but problematic report for us.

See all answers

Why are MySQL connections encrypted and what is the biggest benefit of this?

MySQL encrypts connections to protect your data and the biggest benefit from this is that nobody can corrupt it. If you move information over a network without encryption, you are endangering it, m...

See all answers

Considering that there is a free version of MySQL, would you invest in one of the paid editions?

I may be considered a MySQL veteran since I have been using it since before Oracle bought it and created paid versions. So back in my day, it was all free, it was open-source and the best among sim...

See all answers

What is one thing you would improve with MySQL?

One thing I would improve related to MySQL is not within the product itself, but with the guides to it. Before, when it was free, everyone was on their own, seeking tutorials and how-to videos onli...

See all answers

Comparisons

SAP HANA vs Exasol Data Warehouse

Compared 52% of the time

SQL Server vs Exasol Data Warehouse

Compared 48% of the time

More Exasol Data Warehouse Competitors

Firebird SQL vs MySQL

Compared 28% of the time

PostgreSQL vs MySQL

Compared 15% of the time

SAP HANA vs MySQL

Compared 8% of the time

MariaDB vs MySQL

Compared 6% of the time

Teradata vs MySQL

Compared 6% of the time

More MySQL Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Exasol Data Warehouse

April 2025

Download Exasol Data Warehouse product report

Buyer's Guide

MySQL

March 2025

Download MySQL product report

Overview

Exasol is a high-performance data warehouse solution that accelerates BI and reporting features. Its speed, stability, and self-tuning queries make it valuable, and it doesn't require a database administrator. It's a backend database for Tableau dashboards, resulting in faster report loading times and increased efficiency in querying data.

Exasol's high performance allows users to connect insights and fire queries instead of looking at cached dashboards. It has impressive aggregation capabilities that help calculate metrics on the fly based on user-selected filters.

Exasol

MySQL is a cost-efficient and scalable relational database management system widely used in web, mobile applications, and academic projects.

MySQL is utilized for backend operations, data analysis, reporting, financial transactions, and ERP databases. It supports deployment on local servers, Cloud, and Kubernetes. Its free, open-source nature along with strong community support make it popular among companies. MySQL's compatibility with multiple platforms and programming languages enhances its appeal. While it remains stable and easy to use, areas such as replication, clustering, and backup require improvement to better serve enterprise applications. Enhanced security, error messages, and monitoring tools are also desired for a better user experience.

What are the most important features of MySQL?

Free and Open-Source: No licensing costs, perfect for budget-conscious projects.
Compatibility: Works with multiple platforms and programming languages.
High Performance: Efficient performance across large datasets.
Scalability: Easily scales to meet growing business needs.
Clustering and Replication: Ensures data availability and redundancy.
Easy Installation: Quick setup process on various operating systems.
Community Support: Extensive resources and community assistance.
Cross-Platform: Operates seamlessly on different operating systems.
Data Management Interface: Simplifies data handling and manipulation.

What are the benefits of using MySQL?

Cost Efficiency: Reduce expenses with a free, open-source database.
Scalability: Adapt to increasing data demands effortlessly.
Performance: Handle large datasets with ease and speed.
Community Support: Access a vast pool of knowledge and resources.
Flexibility: Integrate with various platforms and languages for diverse use cases.
Data Reliability: Clustering and replication for high data availability.

In multiple industries, MySQL supports internal applications, billing systems, academic teaching purposes, and ERP databases. Companies leverage MySQL for Cloud and local deployments, ensuring effective data manipulation and backend operations in diverse projects. Its role in financial transactions and reporting further emphasizes its versatility.

Oracle

Sample Customers

1&1 Internet SE 11880 Internet Services AG AB Svenska Spel Accarda AG Aera Technology Inc. AGRAVIS Raiffeisen AG Apotheken-Rechen-Zentrum GmbH AQR Capital Management, LLC arvato distribution GmbH ARZ Allgemeines Rechenzentrum GmbH Badoo Limited Baur Versand (GmbH & Co. KG) BIScience Ltd Blocket Blue Yonder GmbH Codilink UK Ltd T/A Coniq crealytics GmbH dailyme TV GmbH Dailymotion S.A. Dataforce Verlagsgesellschaft für Business Information mbH Deutsche Postbank AG Digitales Rezept Zentrum GmbH DIKW Groep direct services Gütersloh GmbH DR Technologies Ltd. dress-for-less GmbH econda GmbH emetriq GmbH empiriecom GmbH & Co. KG Flaconi GmbH Fresenius Netcare GmbH Fyber GmbH GfK SE Grant Street Group, Inc. Gruner + Jahr GmbH Gymshark UK Hahn Air Lines GmbH Hermes Einrichtungs Service GmbH & Co. KG INNOVATIVE SCHEDULING, LLC internetstores GmbH INTERSPORT Deutschland eG IQVIA Commercial GmbH & Co. OHG IQVIA Commercial Sp. z o.o. IQVIA Incorporated iVantage Health Analytics K - Mail Order GmbH & Co. KG LIQ CORP SA Manor AG Basel Match2Lists Limited MEDION AG Midasplayer AB Monsoon Accessorize Limited m-pathy GmbH msales Ltd. MTG Modern Services AB MW Aviation GmbH & Co. KG Myntra Designs Pvt Ltd Netzeffekt GmbH New Company Services Ltd. NOVENTI HealthCare GmbH Olympus Europa SE & Co. KG Operation Fistula OpsDataStore OTTO (GmbH & Co KG) Panda Retail Co. PAPSTAR GmbH Piedmont Healthcare, Inc. Questback GmbH RatePAY GmbH Revolut Ltd. Saarland-Sporttoto GmbH Sagarmatha Ltd. SIA Damara Technologies Supermärkte Nord Vertriebs GmbH & Co. KG The National Research Center for College & University Admissions, Inc. United Utilities Water Ltd. Verlag C.H. Beck oHG Vocal Planet Ltd. Vodafone Group Services GmbH Webtrekk GmbH wer liefert was? GmbH Windeln.de SE Wooga GmbH XING SE Zalando SE

Facebook, Tumblr, Scholastic, MTV Networks, Wikipedia, Verizon Wireless, Sage Group, Glassfish Open Message Queue, and RightNow Technologies.

Buyer's Guide

Exasol Data Warehouse vs. MySQL

April 2025

Free Report: Exasol Data Warehouse vs. MySQL

Find out what your peers are saying about Exasol Data Warehouse vs. MySQL and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,564 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Exasol Data Warehouse vs. MySQL report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.