Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ExtremeRouting vs Juniper MX Series Routers comparison

Extreme Networks and Juniper are both solutions in the Routers category. Extreme Networks is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.5, while Juniper is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.6. Extreme Networks holds a 1.5% mindshare in R, compared to Juniper’s 13.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Extreme Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Juniper users who would recommend it.
ExtremeRouting
Read 6 ExtremeRouting reviews
  • 181 Views
  • 156 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Juniper MX Series Routers
Read 34 Juniper MX Series Routers reviews
  • 1,700 Views
  • 1,462 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 7, 2025

ExtremeRouting and Juniper MX Series Routers compete in the network infrastructure space. Data comparisons indicate that Juniper MX Series Routers shine with superior features, appealing to those prioritizing high-performance capabilities.

Features: ExtremeRouting stands out with its intuitive configuration tools, comprehensive monitoring capabilities, and stable performance during demonstrations. Juniper MX Series Routers offer advanced scalability, robust security features, and exceptional policy management capabilities, making them suitable for complex network requirements.

Room for Improvement: ExtremeRouting could enhance its feature set to better compete with larger infrastructure demands and improve integration with third-party systems. General software stability and device interoperability are other areas for potential growth. Juniper MX Series Routers may benefit from simplified initial deployment, better cost management strategies, and streamlined configuration processes to reduce setup complexity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ExtremeRouting provides a straightforward deployment model and reliable customer assistance, allowing organizations to integrate rapidly. Juniper MX Series Routers, while more intricate during initial deployment, offer a comprehensive support model that enhances customer satisfaction through improved performance and reliability.

Pricing and ROI: ExtremeRouting is favored for its lower setup costs and quicker ROI, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. Juniper MX Series Routers require a higher initial investment, but promise significant long-term value through performance improvements, potentially offering a better ROI for those willing to invest initially.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed ExtremeRouting vs. Juniper MX Series Routers Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
ExtremeRouting vs. Juniper MX Series Routers
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ExtremeRouting
Ranking in Routers
7th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Juniper MX Series Routers
Ranking in Routers
3rd
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
34
Ranking in other categories
Carrier Grade Network Address Translation (CGNAT) (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Routers category, the mindshare of ExtremeRouting is 1.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Juniper MX Series Routers is 13.2%, up from 11.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Routers
 

Featured Reviews

Imran Taiyeb Ali - PeerSpot reviewer
A scalable tool that needs to improve its support, software resiliency, and software stability
The support team is not technically that strong. The previous company that owned the product, Nortel, went bankrupt, after which the transition phase of the product didn't go smoothly. Avaya did not do well with the product's design and engineering after taking the product over from Nortel, after which Avaya decided to outsource the tool to my company, meaning we have worked as a vendor with third-party access to the tool in the name of Avaya. The support was very bad initially, but my company could fix the problems of the customers on time since we had better communication skills than technical-solving skills due to our limitations related to the area of device engineering. When it comes to a feature of the product, my company could enable it for the customers or users of the product. If, by any chance, my company found a bug in the tool, then it was a hectic task for our support team to deal with it since it took months to fix it. Currently, Extreme Networks takes care of the support part, and it might have improved. I rate the technical support a four out of ten.
Read full review
Kushtrim Arifi - PeerSpot reviewer
Highly scalable, especially suitable for complex and large-scale network deployments
The "Commit" feature stands out. When you try to commit commands, you have some options like sandbox config, leaving those temporary for 60 seconds. This feature allows you to commit configuration changes to the candidate configuration, and then review them for errors before committing them to the active configuration. Another feature that I like is the integration with Cisco routers. This allows you to connect Juniper MX routers to Cisco routers and have them work together seamlessly. We never have interoperability issues.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"What I like about Extreme Routing is its impressive performance."
"Provides a good redundancy technique."
"It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The routing protocol is the solution's most valuable aspect."
"Looking at the robustness, I do not know whether it would be carrier grade – let's say for hundreds of thousands of users – but it certainly doesn't balk at 10,000 users or less."
"It is very easy to set up."
"The most valuable feature is the standard routing protocol."
"On the SRX, the firewall is very easy to configure, especially when you want to filter out traffic."
"The performance is good."
"Juniper MX Series Routers are easy to configure and easy to back up."
"Juniper Switches is stable, easy to use, flexible, and has good performance. Also, the technology is good. It has a lifetime warranty and the prices are also very good."
"We are able to easily build chassis with Juniper MX Series Routers."
"I think that the extensions are very valuable. The way you can test the configuration before applying that configuration permanently is very helpful. The rollback configuration is also very useful."
"Juniper Enterprise Routers is very flexible."
More Juniper MX Series Routers pros
 

Cons

"Some of the latest protocols are unavailable."
"It's not evolving as quickly as we would like it to."
"The solution is far too unstable. It's completely unreliable."
"The support, software resiliency, and software stability are areas of concern where improvements are required."
"My advice for those looking into ExtremeRouting is: right now all switch manufacturers are backed up for months. If you're looking to implement quickly, I would say shop around a bit because it might be difficult."
"One area for improvement with Extreme Routing is the need for more accessible and comprehensive training."
"Better documentation to assist with implementation would be helpful."
"Enhancing the capacity would be a welcome improvement."
"In terms of improvement, I would like for it to effectively protect against the broadcast storms, multicast storms, and DDoS attacks."
"The setup was a bit complex."
"The documentation needs to be updated to reflect the changes made in the latest update."
"Juniper Enterprise Routers could improve by adding a graphical user interface(GUI). They do not have one. Most of our team has to have a background or expertise in Juniper. When compared to other solutions, they have a GUI. It will be easier for new team members to get familiar with, configure, or set up the router. Additionally, adding some monitoring tools would help us."
"Currently, I don't have specific concerns or ideas for improvement. Regarding functionalities, I appreciate the user interface of Juniper Elite. Additionally, I'm exploring the use of Juniper Routers in a Parliament environment, particularly with Baragon, and so far, I find it to be a valuable feature. We're currently facing an issue as we're in the process of building and dealing with the software, specifically transitioning from R2 to RC. It's like when there is an update in the routers, and in the process, there are chances to end up losing some of your settings. The challenge arises because the recommended configurations for RC do not align with our features, necessitating a reevaluation of many features. It would have been more efficient if the initial recommendation had been for RC, avoiding the need to redo our research. This has resulted in a loss of time for us, and we've encountered this situation multiple times."
"The initial setup is not easy."
More Juniper MX Series Routers cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have no issues with the price."
"An additional license can be purchased for support of a next-generation firewall."
"The pricing of Juniper MX Series Routers is okay compared to other technologies."
"The prices for Juniper MX Series Routers are reasonable."
"I would rate the pricing model a seven out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. It is not cheap."
"We have to pay for the device and licensing. The support service requires additional costs."
"The price of this solution is better than other competitors, such as Cisco. We receive a lot of discounts which make the price less expensive and attractive."
"$300 to $400 is the hardware cost and for licensing cost, it may be around, for support and all, $100 per year."
"There is a license for this solution and the price is very competitive. The cost is less expensive than some competitors, such as Cisco. There are additional costs for support licenses."
More Juniper MX Series Routers pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Routers solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
11%
University
9%
Financial Services Firm
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ExtremeRouting?
It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
See all answers
What needs improvement with ExtremeRouting?
I think that all the devices included in Avaya fall under Extreme Networks currently. I am not sure how much Extreme Networks has changed ExtremeRouting, but I think it is in a better condition tha...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for ExtremeRouting?
My company uses ExtremeRouting for a big LAN environment, where there is a need for ERS switches, including Extreme Networks Core Switches and chassis, so the product is like a big cabinet to reduc...
See all answers
What do you like most about Juniper MX Series Routers?
For the Juniper MX Series Routers, it plays a crucial role in our network. They offer numerous features, enabling multiple connections and handling various reports. The routers efficiently manage ...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Juniper MX Series Routers?
I would rate it around a three. While I'm not deeply involved in pricing discussions, I believe it is comparatively more affordable than Cisco.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Juniper MX Series Routers?
The areas of Juniper MX Series Routers that have room for improvement include the port count; for instance, the MX204 has only four 40G or 100G ports, which is quite limited. While I know there are...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

MikroTik Routers and Switches vs ExtremeRouting Logo
MikroTik Routers and Switches vs ExtremeRouting
Compared 100% of the time
More ExtremeRouting Competitors
ACX Series Routers vs Juniper MX Series Routers Logo
ACX Series Routers vs Juniper MX Series Routers
Compared 29% of the time
MikroTik Routers and Switches vs Juniper MX Series Routers Logo
MikroTik Routers and Switches vs Juniper MX Series Routers
Compared 22% of the time
Huawei Enterprise Routers vs Juniper MX Series Routers Logo
Huawei Enterprise Routers vs Juniper MX Series Routers
Compared 16% of the time
A10 Networks Thunder CGN vs Juniper MX Series Routers Logo
A10 Networks Thunder CGN vs Juniper MX Series Routers
Compared 13% of the time
Cisco Enterprise Routers vs Juniper MX Series Routers Logo
Cisco Enterprise Routers vs Juniper MX Series Routers
Compared 8% of the time
More Juniper MX Series Routers Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Routers
August 2025
ExtremeRouting reportDownload ExtremeRouting product report
Buyer's Guide
Juniper MX Series Routers
August 2025
Juniper MX Series Routers reportDownload Juniper MX Series Routers product report
 

Also Known As

Avaya Enterprise Routers
Juniper Enterprise Routers, MX Series, Junos Address Aware
 

Overview

Avaya Enterprise Routers Ethernet Routing Switch 4000 Series is a Stackable Chassis system providing high-performance, convergence-ready and resilient Ethernet switching connectivity. Available as a range of models supporting 10/100/1000 switching and routing, Power-overEthernet, Powerover-Ethernet+ and 10 Gigabit Ethernet uplink options, the Ethernet Routing Switch 4000 Series is ideally suited for mainstream Wiring Closet and other network Edge deployments.
Extreme Networks

Juniper MX Series Routers are designed for high throughput with flexible MPLS configuration and robust policy management, offering reliability and scalability for enterprise needs. They feature seamless Cisco integration, strong performance driven by the Trio chipset, and user-friendly management.

Known for their exceptional performance, Juniper MX Series Routers enable enterprises and ISPs to expand network connectivity and efficiency. Their reliable hardware supports tasks like border routing and internet connectivity, catering to high-performance networking and automation. Trio chipset technology ensures stability, while interchangeable line cards maintain top-level performance. These routers are favored for their easy configuration and robust support, though improvements in pricing, VPN compatibility, and stronger DDoS protection are needed. Users seek additional cloud integration, enhanced security features, and expanded port options on models like the MX204.

What are the key features of Juniper MX Series Routers?
  • High Throughput: Ensures fast and efficient network data transfer.
  • Flexible MPLS Configuration: Adapts seamlessly to varied network environments.
  • Robust Policy Management: Provides extensive control over network traffic policies.
  • Seamless Cisco Integration: Simplifies operations for mixed equipment environments.
  • Trio Chipset Technology: Boosts performance and ensures network stability.
  • User-Friendly Interface: Facilitates easy configuration and management.
What benefits should users evaluate?
  • Scalability: Supports growing network needs without compromising performance.
  • Reliability: Offers consistent and dependable network operations.
  • Support and Documentation: Access to comprehensive resources for efficient management.
  • Performance: Maintains high levels of throughput and stability for enterprise needs.
  • Automation Support: Streamlines network operations for greater efficiency.

In industries like telecommunications and data centers, Juniper MX Series Routers are widely implemented to manage complex networking tasks such as VPNs, MPLS, and BGP deployments. Service providers often rely on these routers for backbone roles, benefitting from their performance and scalability to maintain robust and efficient network infrastructures.

Juniper
 

Sample Customers

Breakthrough Urban Ministries, Black Oak Casino, Glamorgan County Cricket Club, University of San Carlos, Holland Hall School, South Euclid Lyndhurst Schools, Prairie View Networking Academy, City of Troy, Ryerson University, Linamar, City of Redondo Beach, York Region District School Board
AARNet Pty Ltd, Allegro Networks, Atlantech Online, Availity, Baloise Insurance, Black Lotus, CATV, Blue Box
Buyer's Guide
ExtremeRouting vs. Juniper MX Series Routers
July 2025
Free Report: ExtremeRouting vs. Juniper MX Series Routers
Find out what your peers are saying about ExtremeRouting vs. Juniper MX Series Routers and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our ExtremeRouting vs. Juniper MX Series Routers report.
See our list of best Routers vendors.

We monitor all Routers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.