Cisco Enterprise Routers vs Juniper MX Series Routers comparison

Cisco Enterprise Routers vs. Juniper MX Series Routers

Download the complete report

Helped 868,759 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Enterprise Routers

Ranking in Routers

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

109

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Juniper MX Series Routers

Ranking in Routers

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Carrier Grade Network Address Translation (CGNAT) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Routers category, the mindshare of Cisco Enterprise Routers is 18.9%, down from 24.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Juniper MX Series Routers is 13.0%, up from 12.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Routers Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Cisco Enterprise Routers	18.9%
Juniper MX Series Routers	13.0%
Other	68.1%

Routers

Featured Reviews

Donald Ochanda

Technical Manager at Network Security and Crypto

Long-term reliability and high performance ensure seamless operations in challenging environments

Regarding the Wi-Fi connection and setup, we need superior coverage because our market has extensive vegetation. When setting up Cisco Enterprise Routers Wi-Fi in institutions such as campuses, there are always challenges. People often opt for Ubiquiti, not because of their features, but because of the Wi-Fi signal stability. Cisco Enterprise Routers has made improvements in making configurations more user-friendly with dashboards. However, they need to do more as many people prefer simpler configurations rather than using CMD or CLI. The process of procuring Cisco Enterprise Routers equipment through channel partners needs improvement. The partners are limited compared to other products. It's cheaper to purchase Cisco Enterprise Routers equipment from the UK than from a local distributor. When purchased off-channel, the equipment is much cheaper than through the channel. This affects our ability to compete in government tenders where price is crucial, even when we can provide warranty, licenses, and renewability.

Read full review

Patrick Anaku

Senior Network Engineer at Roke Telkom

Performance excels with reliable uptime and robust features

The best features of Juniper MX Series Routers include their performance, which is quite good for us in terms of hardware performance. The Junos OS, the software, is stable, and we don't have many issues with the Juniper system itself. They have numerous features that allow us to deliver services, be it Layer 2 connectivity to customers, Layer 3 connectivity, data center connectivity, or even security features. Hardware performance has been a top-notch reason why we chose Juniper in the beginning, especially the MX series, which performs well in terms of network uptime and we don't encounter many failures. We have had a bad experience here and there with the ACX series, and their network performance is not so great compared to MX, so we have mostly done away with the ACX and only use MX at some of the core sites. I have seen a return on investment from the solution. Initially, we deployed MX80s on the network, and since our company has been in operation since 2006, from that point we used MX80s until around 2016 when we upgraded most of them to MX204s. From our experience, once we buy an MX204, we don't have issues with it; we have never had to replace an MX204 on the network. Once we deploy it, it works until we decide to upgrade the capacity. The return on investment is significant, as once we buy it, we have no worries about performance.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The commands are easy to understand."

"Solution is stable."

"I haven't assessed it in that way, they provided us with excellent service. We had very few issues."

"Cisco Enterprise Routers are easy to use and the performance is good."

"The most valuable feature is that we can specify the routing policies for our traffic."

"The most valuable features are that it is easy to use, it is easy to configure, and manage."

"Cisco Enterprise Routers is reliable and secure."

"One of the most valuable features of this solution is performance."

More Cisco Enterprise Routers pros

"The solution is quite stable. We've found it to be very good. There aren't bugs, glitches, or crashes."

"Juniper MX Series Routers are easy to configure and easy to back up."

"The most valuable features for us were related to our transition into MPLS technology, specifically for BPN and VPN services."

"Juniper Enterprise Routers is very flexible."

"On the SRX, the firewall is very easy to configure, especially when you want to filter out traffic."

"I would say it is very user-friendly."

"For the Juniper MX Series Routers, it plays a crucial role in our network. They offer numerous features, enabling multiple connections and handling various reports. The routers efficiently manage the number of switched fabric codes and process features based on the specific switch requirements. Previously, I utilized them for processing and addressing customer-side concerns. The routers have excellent documentation, making it easy to resolve any issues that may arise. It's excellent for customization, especially in tailoring the Windows configuration environment. Overall, dealing with this solution has been straightforward and efficient."

"It is very stable and scalable."

More Juniper MX Series Routers pros

Cons

"Due to the sanctions on our country, we can't get outside help directly from Cisco. We need to handle the implementation ourselves."

"Sometimes, I find it hard to learn how some features of the router work. So, these are the issues that may arise when a user might not have knowledge about the product."

"They need to improve cost efficiency."

"The configuration needs improvement. Most routers, like HP or Aruba, use a UI interface. Those solutions are similar and uniform. It's easier for us compared to Cisco because with Cisco you are not using normal commands. They need to enhance the UI to make it more usable."

"Their software-defined paradigm requires significant improvement."

"The only other thing we struggled with from time to time is when we were configuring access points through a controller."

"The installation can be difficult, Cisco equipment is professional-grade and it requires someone with the skills and knowledge to do it."

"The solution could be more secure."

More Cisco Enterprise Routers cons

"Finding market expertise is hard."

"In terms of what could be improved, they could extend the software warranty to be for its lifetime, as well. At the moment, the software warranty is limited, I think to one year."

"The solution could improve by providing enhancements to built-in SDN or SDWAN."

"The initial setup is not easy."

"The solution could improve reliability and it needs more functions."

"Most IT equipment now has graphical interfaces, and there is a need for the Juniper routers to have a more intuitive web interface."

"The pricing is a bit too high."

"Currently, I don't have specific concerns or ideas for improvement. Regarding functionalities, I appreciate the user interface of Juniper Elite. Additionally, I'm exploring the use of Juniper Routers in a Parliament environment, particularly with Baragon, and so far, I find it to be a valuable feature. We're currently facing an issue as we're in the process of building and dealing with the software, specifically transitioning from R2 to RC. It's like when there is an update in the routers, and in the process, there are chances to end up losing some of your settings. The challenge arises because the recommended configurations for RC do not align with our features, necessitating a reevaluation of many features. It would have been more efficient if the initial recommendation had been for RC, avoiding the need to redo our research. This has resulted in a loss of time for us, and we've encountered this situation multiple times."

More Juniper MX Series Routers cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is reasonable."

"Cisco is mid-tier in terms of pricing and quite affordable by most enterprises."

"For a boost performance license, the cost is $2,000 to $2,500. There is an additional cost for more scalability."

"I rate the product's price a six or seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is extremely expensive, and ten is very cheap."

"The cost of this solution is very low compared to other products."

"The cost of this solution is a little bit high compared to others."

"I like the price of the solution."

"The licensing fee is okay and matches industry standards, which is the benchmark."

More Cisco Enterprise Routers pricing and cost advice

"The pricing of Juniper MX Series Routers is okay compared to other technologies."

"$300 to $400 is the hardware cost and for licensing cost, it may be around, for support and all, $100 per year."

"I would rate the pricing model a seven out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. It is not cheap."

"The solution is more expensive compared to other solutions."

"There is a license for this solution and the price is very competitive. The cost is less expensive than some competitors, such as Cisco. There are additional costs for support licenses."

"The prices for Juniper MX Series Routers are reasonable."

"The price of this solution is better than other competitors, such as Cisco. We receive a lot of discounts which make the price less expensive and attractive."

"An additional license can be purchased for support of a next-generation firewall."

More Juniper MX Series Routers pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Routers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

868,759 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Performing Arts

Educational Organization

University

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	46
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	42

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

How do Cisco Enterprise routers compare with Mikrotik routers and switches?

Cisco Enterprise Routers are very stable and easy to use. They offer a very solid performance and are very secure. They also have a very good, long lifespan. We feel the command configuration is ve...

What do you like most about Cisco Enterprise Routers?

The most valuable feature of the solution is that it makes it possible for users to use encryption and decryption since our company aims to achieve transparency, and without it, the other system on...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Enterprise Routers?

The pricing is not cheap. When we provide quotations to clients, they often comment on the expense. However, we recommend the solution, and after procurement, all clients are satisfied with Cisco E...

What do you like most about Juniper MX Series Routers?

For the Juniper MX Series Routers, it plays a crucial role in our network. They offer numerous features, enabling multiple connections and handling various reports. The routers efficiently manage ...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Juniper MX Series Routers?

I would rate it around a three. While I'm not deeply involved in pricing discussions, I believe it is comparatively more affordable than Cisco.

What needs improvement with Juniper MX Series Routers?

The areas of Juniper MX Series Routers that have room for improvement include the port count; for instance, the MX204 has only four 40G or 100G ports, which is quite limited. While I know there are...

MikroTik Routers and Switches vs Cisco Enterprise Routers

Comparisons

Compared 45% of the time

Huawei Enterprise Routers vs Cisco Enterprise Routers

Compared 21% of the time

HPE Enterprise Routers vs Cisco Enterprise Routers

Compared 12% of the time

OneAccess Enterprise Routers vs Cisco Enterprise Routers

Compared 9% of the time

MikroTik Cloud Router Switch vs Cisco Enterprise Routers

Compared 3% of the time

More Cisco Enterprise Routers Competitors

ACX Series Routers vs Juniper MX Series Routers

Compared 28% of the time

MikroTik Routers and Switches vs Juniper MX Series Routers

Compared 19% of the time

A10 Networks Thunder CGN vs Juniper MX Series Routers

Compared 15% of the time

Huawei Enterprise Routers vs Juniper MX Series Routers

Compared 14% of the time

Nokia Virtualized Service Router vs Juniper MX Series Routers

Compared 5% of the time

More Juniper MX Series Routers Competitors

Product Reports

Cisco Enterprise Routers

Download Cisco Enterprise Routers product report

Juniper MX Series Routers

Download Juniper MX Series Routers product report

Also Known As

No data available

Juniper Enterprise Routers, MX Series, Junos Address Aware

Overview

The high-performance Cisco Enterprise Routers are the market leader due to their breadth of advanced support for LAN/WAN services, redundancy, reliability, and performance.

Cisco

Juniper MX Series Routers are designed for high throughput with flexible MPLS configuration and robust policy management, offering reliability and scalability for enterprise needs. They feature seamless Cisco integration, strong performance driven by the Trio chipset, and user-friendly management.

Known for their exceptional performance, Juniper MX Series Routers enable enterprises and ISPs to expand network connectivity and efficiency. Their reliable hardware supports tasks like border routing and internet connectivity, catering to high-performance networking and automation. Trio chipset technology ensures stability, while interchangeable line cards maintain top-level performance. These routers are favored for their easy configuration and robust support, though improvements in pricing, VPN compatibility, and stronger DDoS protection are needed. Users seek additional cloud integration, enhanced security features, and expanded port options on models like the MX204.

What are the key features of Juniper MX Series Routers?

High Throughput: Ensures fast and efficient network data transfer.
Flexible MPLS Configuration: Adapts seamlessly to varied network environments.
Robust Policy Management: Provides extensive control over network traffic policies.
Seamless Cisco Integration: Simplifies operations for mixed equipment environments.
Trio Chipset Technology: Boosts performance and ensures network stability.
User-Friendly Interface: Facilitates easy configuration and management.

What benefits should users evaluate?

Scalability: Supports growing network needs without compromising performance.
Reliability: Offers consistent and dependable network operations.
Support and Documentation: Access to comprehensive resources for efficient management.
Performance: Maintains high levels of throughput and stability for enterprise needs.
Automation Support: Streamlines network operations for greater efficiency.

In industries like telecommunications and data centers, Juniper MX Series Routers are widely implemented to manage complex networking tasks such as VPNs, MPLS, and BGP deployments. Service providers often rely on these routers for backbone roles, benefitting from their performance and scalability to maintain robust and efficient network infrastructures.

Juniper

Sample Customers

Aegean Motorway, Boingo, Chartwell School, Children's Hospital of Orange County , Department of Justice, Explorer Pipeline, Linz AG, National Rugby League, New South Wales Rural Fire Service, Telecom Italia, Transwestern

AARNet Pty Ltd, Allegro Networks, Atlantech Online, Availity, Baloise Insurance, Black Lotus, CATV, Blue Box

Cisco Enterprise Routers vs. Juniper MX Series Routers