F5 Advanced WAF vs Radware Kubernetes WAF comparison

"The AOF solution provides numerous security features."

"The most valuable feature of F5 Advanced WAF is its grand unity of the implementation, where you have the freedom to configure based on how it affects your use case or your organization. With the default setting of implicit deny, you can gradually start defining and deploying the tool to align with your environment, whether it is outdated, recent, or futuristic. This allows you to customize the solution to protect you from threat actors. You have the ability to define what the advanced threat act should do - whether it should alert, deny, or both - and it will deliver based on your configuration. Unlike other online solutions, F5 Advanced WAF provides flexibility to deliver to your unique environment the way you want."

"The most valuable feature is that it is secure."

"Provides good protection from attacks."

"The most valuable features of F5 Advanced WAF are the security features and the protection."

"One of the most valuable features is the Local Traffic Manager."

"F5 Advanced WAF has very good stability and scalability. Its initial setup was straightforward."

"The solution's most valuable features include application DDoS protection, bot blocking, and HTTP header verifications."

"I would give Radware Kubernetes WAF a rating of 10 out of 10."

"This solution can be made more user-friendly."

"They should work on the virtualization of NGINX."

"The interface is old-looking, it's not modern, which is why it's not always comfortable to use."

"One thing that can be improved, is to increase the quantity over predefine policy."

"Nevertheless, F5 products are generally considered to be hard to deploy."

"Compatibility with multiple cloud environments needs improvement. Both stability and scalability need to be improved."

"Most customers encounter stability issues with the product's Big-IP logs."

"The product could be more user-friendly, particularly the user interface for administrators."

"If Radware provides a separate web service like those offered by vendors such as F5 and Imperva, that would be better."

"There are different licenses available to use F5 Advanced WAF, such as BT, ASM, and LPM."

"After buying the program, you just pay for the support every year."

"There is a perpetual license that comes with your hardware. There is also an additional fee for support."

"F5 bundles up services and the bundle is what you pay for rather than individual components."

"Pricing for this solution is higher than average."

"It is expensive. Its price should be better. Its licensing is on a yearly basis. Its licensing is also based on the model. There are no additional costs."

"F5 Advanced WAF pricing structure should be adjusted to meet the need of small to medium-sized companies."

"Its price is fair. We have done a couple of deals where they were able to give some kind of discount to the customers. The price was initially high for the customers, but after a couple of negotiations, it came within their budget. They were happy with that."