F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

F5 and Ivanti are both solutions in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category. F5 is ranked #1 with an average rating of 9.2, while Ivanti is ranked #17. F5 holds a 11.6% mindshare in ADC, compared to Ivanti’s 2.5% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of F5 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Ivanti users who would recommend it.

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Man...

Read 124 F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) reviews

13,951 Views
9,068 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Ivanti Virtual Web Applicat...

1,897 Views
1,119 Comparison Views

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Man...

Ivanti Virtual Web Applicat...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 2, 2026

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager and Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall compete in traffic management and web security. F5 BIG-IP LTM is favored for customer satisfaction, pricing, and support, while Ivanti's features are compelling.

Features: F5 BIG-IP LTM offers advanced load balancing, SSL offloading, and adaptive traffic management. Ivanti focuses on robust web application protection, including end-of-life security measures and comprehensive threat intelligence.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: F5 BIG-IP LTM is known for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. Ivanti presents a complex setup but benefits from solid technical support.

Pricing and ROI: F5 BIG-IP LTM has a higher setup cost but ensures a strong return on investment via its extensive features. Ivanti offers a lower initial cost with ROI linked to its specialized security features.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 918,614 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Man...

Ranking in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

124

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Ivanti Virtual Web Applicat...

Ranking in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

17th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Web Application Firewall (WAF) (44th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category, the mindshare of F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is 11.6%, down from 16.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] is 2.5%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)	11.6%
Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall	2.5%
Other	85.9%

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

Featured Reviews

edshyaa

Network Engineer at Stryker

Load balancing has improved traffic distribution and currently supports high availability upgrades

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) offers effective load balancing methods that help distribute traffic across our servers, whether we have two or several. This load balancing feature stands out as it is the fundamental work we do with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM). While I recognize there are many features, such as iRules, which I have not explored yet, we primarily work on VIPs, pool members, and traffic distribution. The load balancing algorithms' flexibility makes them very useful for our team, enabling us to choose different servers and manage load effectively. We use various methods based on user or application requirements, making the algorithms set up by F5 in the backend quite helpful. F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) positively impacts our organization primarily through its load balancing capabilities. We avoid traffic overload on individual servers by placing backend servers behind F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) VIP. This load balancing helps us manage traffic effectively. Since the configuration of the I-series, we have had smooth performance, and with the recent migration to the R-series, it is working faster than before, providing positive outcomes for our operations. Since moving to the R-series, I notice improved performance; it is user-friendly and handles traffic efficiently. The upgrading process is different as we create tenants and a main host. R-series has better CPU and memory, leading to higher throughput with minimal downtime, making it a significant improvement over the I-series.

Read full review

Mike Duffy

Consultant at a consultancy with 1-10 employees

Good feature set and is simple to deploy

In terms of what needs improvement, the price could be lowered. We've tried to deploy more of them but our purchasing department has said that they're way too expensive and they would prefer to use something else. We sort of stopped deploying them because of that. There are additional costs to the standard licensing. There are bandwidth prices. The feature set is quite good. We've been told to stop using them because of the price. If they can do something to address that I believe it would be better. On the latest version they've got a community edition, which is quite a good bandwidth, but in essence, it's to address the entry-level price. When you get to 10 gig bandwidth, it's way too expensive.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The application firewall is a very good feature."

"I think F5's tech support may be better than Citrix's because they mainly focus on the ADC product, but Citrix support covers Hypervisor, XenMobile, FAS, and ADC. And from my experience, sometimes, we face some issues that Citrix cannot handle."

"I was able to simply and quickly set up the WAF rules and security, and also set up easily complex policies and rules which gave me some great features to redirect."

"Stable and scalable network traffic management solution for applications. It has good performance."

"For our internal use we went with F5 because it's the best tool."

"We use it to publicly deliver applications."

"Our experience has been a positive one."

"F5 supports better features, from load balancing to security and application visibility."

More F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) pros

"The most valuable aspect of this solution is that it is simple to deploy. The deployment took us ten minutes."

Cons

"A more intuitive interface would be helpful."

"I would like to see better integration."

"There should be more logging improvements on F5. The logging features are too limited and do not give us a solid understanding of what's happening."

"The solution is scalable."

"F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager could improve by having an FNI feature for a single source to multi-domain load balancing."

"The solution could improve the documentation."

"The cost of the solution is pretty high. It would be ideal if it was more reasonable."

"When WAF is enabled, you can see a decrease in performance."

More F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) cons

"In terms of what needs improvement, the price could be lowered. We've tried to deploy more of them but our purchasing department has said that they're way too expensive and they would prefer to use something else."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If you are planning to use security features, better to go for strong hardware and the best bundle license, which is great for web security."

"F5 pricing is too high, compared to Citrix."

"We have found the pricing and licensing on AWS to be competitive."

"Security should be involved in any base license. When you bring on F5, you only have default license. Then, the ASM product license has to be purchased. It would be great if F5 could include the ASM in the base license."

"The price of F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is too high."

"It could be priced a little less, especially on the virtual side. It gets a bit expensive, but you get what you pay."

"The tool is a bit expensive."

"It is a little pricey. I wish the pricing was cheaper, but I wish the pricing was cheaper for everything."

More F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

918,614 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

17%

Construction Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	62
Midsize Enterprise	32
Large Enterprise	86

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with F5 BIG-IP?

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) could improve file upload speeds when opening cases and attaching files; sometimes, downloading files like QKView takes time, depending on size. I expect faste...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for F5 BIG-IP?

My main use case for F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is placing our applications on F5 and the backend servers on the pool. We also regularly renew SSL certificates before they expire, usuall...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)?

The product is costly. I would rate the price a five out of ten.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiADC vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)

Compared 8% of the time

NetScaler vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)

Compared 7% of the time

HAProxy vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)

Compared 6% of the time

A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)

Compared 5% of the time

More F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Competitors

HAProxy vs Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL]

Compared 11% of the time

NGINX App Protect vs Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

Radware Alteon vs Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL]

Compared 9% of the time

NetScaler vs Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL]

Compared 9% of the time

Ivanti Virtual Application Delivery Controller (vADC) vs Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

More Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)

October 2026

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) report

Download F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

October 2026

Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] report

Download Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall [EOL] product report

Also Known As

F5 BIG-IP, BIG-IP LTM, F5 ASM, Viprion, F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition , Crescendo Networks Application Delivery Controller, BIG IP

Pulse vWAF, Pulse Virtual Traffic Manager

Overview

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) specializes in load balancing, iRules, and application security. It provides flexibility and stability, supporting SSL offloading and enhancing application performance and reliability with low downtime.

F5 BIG-IP LTM is designed for efficient traffic management and security. Its intuitive interface allows users to customize traffic through iRules and ensures stable application delivery. Its performance stability and ability to inspect TLS traffic, along with web application firewall features, make it preferred for consistent application delivery. While praised for its capabilities, users note its challenges with complex configuration and management. Calls for streamlined processes, training, support, better logging, and cloud integration highlight areas for improvement.

What are the key features of F5 BIG-IP LTM?

Load Balancing: Distributes HTTP and HTTPS traffic to ensure high availability.
iRules: Allows for customized traffic management.
Application Security: Includes TLS inspection and web application firewall capabilities.
SSL Offloading: Reduces server load by handling SSL processing.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Performance Stability: Ensures high reliability and less downtime.
Flexibility: Offers customizable traffic management through iRules.
Security: Provides strong protection against application attacks.
Network Management Efficiency: Simplifies traffic distribution and infrastructure management.

F5 BIG-IP LTM is widely used in industries requiring robust application delivery and security, such as finance and healthcare. It supports load balancing and traffic management across different environments and acts as a reverse proxy, helping companies secure their infrastructure against cyber threats while facilitating high availability and scalability.

Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall offers robust security to protect web applications from vulnerabilities, ensuring data integrity and compliance with standards.

It provides advanced security features designed to safeguard applications against modern threats. Customizable and flexible, it supports diverse environments without requiring major infrastructure changes. This enhances agility and allows for tailored protection strategies to suit specific business contexts.

What are the key features of Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall?

Threat Detection: Identifies and mitigates potential threats with precision.
Data Compliance: Ensures adherence to data protection regulations.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing organizational demands.
Centralized Management: Simplifies the administration and monitoring of security settings.

What benefits should users look for in the reviews?

Improved Security Posture: Enhanced protection against vulnerabilities leads to fewer breaches.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces expenses associated with security incidents.
Operational Agility: Accelerates deployment and reduces configuration time.
User Satisfaction: Positive reviews indicate reliability and ease of use.

Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall is implemented across multiple industries, including finance and healthcare, to ensure sensitive data remains secure and operations comply with industry regulations. Its ability to adapt to sector-specific challenges makes it a valued tool for IT professionals seeking advanced protection without sacrificing performance.

Ivanti

Sample Customers

Riken, TransUnion, Tepco Systems Administration, Daejeon University, G&T Bank, Danamon, CyberAgent Inc.

Gilt Groupe

Buyer's Guide

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about F5, HAProxy, NetScaler and others in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC). Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

918,614 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) vendors.

We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.