No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Logo

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) pros and cons

Vendor: F5
4.1 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) provides excellent load-balancing capabilities and enhances application security, including features like ASM for WAF.
F5 BIG-IP LTM offers versatile and powerful customization through iRules, enabling advanced traffic routing and inspection.
F5 BIG-IP LTM excels in scalability and stability, handling high workloads seamlessly, and ensuring reliable performance.
F5 BIG-IP LTM's integration with major platforms like AWS and Oracle PeopleSoft enhances compatibility and deployment efficiency.
F5 BIG-IP LTM's comprehensive support and professional services ensure quick issue resolutions and continuous service improvement.

CONS

F5 should improve cloud integration to align with industry trends in cloud-native solutions.
Training resources and access could be enhanced to aid in user proficiency and understanding.
Logging and monitoring functionalities need improvement for better data visibility and alerts.
The pricing of F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) should be more competitive to accommodate different budgets.
Technical support services could be faster and more effective to address user concerns promptly.
 

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Pros review quotes

edshyaa - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Engineer at Stryker
Mar 2, 2026
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) positively impacts our organization primarily through its load balancing capabilities, helping us avoid traffic overload on individual servers and manage traffic effectively, and since moving to the R-series, I notice improved performance as it is user-friendly, handles traffic efficiently, and offers better CPU and memory for higher throughput with minimal downtime.
PT
Security Analyst at IBM
Dec 9, 2025
The impact of SSL offloading on reducing server load and latency is very much positive because whatever traffic we receive, we encrypt at our F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) level, which has definitely reduced the additional load and SSL decryption load on the servers, so it has very much helped us and it is very smooth; it will not take much time and will not impact our regular traffic.
Bonieber  Orofeo - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Manager at Chong Hua Hospital
Mar 14, 2025
One of the most beneficial features of F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is its ability to identify compromised traffic and its capabilities in authentication.
Learn what your peers think about F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2026.
893,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer2407128 - PeerSpot reviewer
Information Security Consultant-Risk at a computer retailer with 11-50 employees
Jun 3, 2024
There were a lot of good features. The most beneficial for maintaining server health included the algorithms for the virtual IP, which segment traffic between servers, authentication profiles, and many other things.
RJ
General Manager at Seriti Resources
Sep 27, 2023
It offers features Kemp doesn't provide. For example, there are predefined templates for handling Office 365. You can download them for automatic configuration.
reviewer2380533 - PeerSpot reviewer
Solutions Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Nov 12, 2024
I have never faced any stability issues with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM).
Nawapol Boonlerd - PeerSpot reviewer
Information Security Engineer at BigFish Enterprise Ltd.
Aug 29, 2024
The most valuable features of the solution are in the area of DDoS and WAF.
Ritesh-Bakhru - PeerSpot reviewer
Major Account Manager at Check Point Software
Jan 18, 2024
F5 Big-IP Local Traffic Manager has better modular features especially LTM, which according to the clients, is very beneficial. Most of the users opt for a combination of big IP LTM and WAF which helps them to leverage application load balancing and enhance application security many-fold.
Richard Polyak - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr. Architect at NBC Universal
Jun 21, 2022
The feature I find the most valuable is the support infrastructure.
Mahmoud-Yassin - PeerSpot reviewer
Head of IT Infrastructure and Security Operations at United Arab Bank
Mar 9, 2023
F5's attack signatures and automation are the most valuable features. The disaster recovery capabilities are also excellent. You don't need to do anything. It has automatic failover from production.
 

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Cons review quotes

edshyaa - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Engineer at Stryker
Mar 2, 2026
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) could improve file upload speeds when opening cases and attaching files; sometimes, downloading files like QKView takes time, depending on size.
PT
Security Analyst at IBM
Dec 9, 2025
I have encountered an issue with technical support; not all the time, but a few times we have observed that we have not received proper support or on-time support, and sometimes the person assisting us is not properly skilled, but we have only observed this issue very few times.
Bonieber  Orofeo - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Manager at Chong Hua Hospital
Mar 14, 2025
The price needs improvement as it is quite costly.
Learn what your peers think about F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2026.
893,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer2407128 - PeerSpot reviewer
Information Security Consultant-Risk at a computer retailer with 11-50 employees
Jun 3, 2024
In the LTM solution, it would be beneficial to have more algorithms for traffic segmentation or the ability to create user-defined algorithms rather than being restricted to predefined ones.
RJ
General Manager at Seriti Resources
Sep 27, 2023
In terms of pricing, it could be more competitive.
reviewer2380533 - PeerSpot reviewer
Solutions Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Nov 12, 2024
One improvement could be updating the user interface (UI).
Nawapol Boonlerd - PeerSpot reviewer
Information Security Engineer at BigFish Enterprise Ltd.
Aug 29, 2024
I wouldn't recommend the tool to small companies, considering its high price and the infrastructure needs of small businesses.
Ritesh-Bakhru - PeerSpot reviewer
Major Account Manager at Check Point Software
Jan 18, 2024
There is a need for a more modular version to concentrate on the current monolithic structure of both the virtual and hardware versions.
Richard Polyak - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr. Architect at NBC Universal
Jun 21, 2022
A more hybrid approach would be beneficial for users.
Mahmoud-Yassin - PeerSpot reviewer
Head of IT Infrastructure and Security Operations at United Arab Bank
Mar 9, 2023
LTM's cloud capabilities could be improved. Cloud providers all offer load balancing, but you can't get the same level of security. F5's cloud service is still not on par with its on-prem service.