No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Microsoft UAG [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?
The compared F5 and Microsoft solutions aren't in the same category. F5 is ranked #1 in ADC , with an average rating of 9.2, and holds a 11.4% mindshare in the category. Additionally, 83% of F5 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Man...
Read 124 F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) reviews
  • 14,944 Views
  • 9,415 Comparison Views
83% willing to recommend
Microsoft UAG [EOL]
Read 7 Microsoft UAG [EOL] reviews
    83% willing to recommend
     

    Comparison Buyer's Guide

    Download the report
    Executive Summary
    We performed a comparison between F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) and Microsoft UAG [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

    Find out what your peers are saying about F5, HAProxy, NetScaler and others in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC).

    DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
    To learn more, read our detailed Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) Report (Updated: October 2026).
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
    October 2026
    Download the complete report
    Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

    Review summaries and opinions

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Categories and Ranking

    F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Man...
    Average Rating
    8.2
    Reviews Sentiment
    6.8
    Number of Reviews
    124
    Ranking in other categories
    Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) (1st)
    Microsoft UAG [EOL]
    Average Rating
    8.2
    Number of Reviews
    7
    Ranking in other categories
    No ranking in other categories
     

    Featured Reviews

    edshyaa - PeerSpot reviewer
    edshyaa
    Network Engineer at Stryker
    Load balancing has improved traffic distribution and currently supports high availability upgrades
    F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) offers effective load balancing methods that help distribute traffic across our servers, whether we have two or several. This load balancing feature stands out as it is the fundamental work we do with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM). While I recognize there are many features, such as iRules, which I have not explored yet, we primarily work on VIPs, pool members, and traffic distribution. The load balancing algorithms' flexibility makes them very useful for our team, enabling us to choose different servers and manage load effectively. We use various methods based on user or application requirements, making the algorithms set up by F5 in the backend quite helpful. F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) positively impacts our organization primarily through its load balancing capabilities. We avoid traffic overload on individual servers by placing backend servers behind F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) VIP. This load balancing helps us manage traffic effectively. Since the configuration of the I-series, we have had smooth performance, and with the recent migration to the R-series, it is working faster than before, providing positive outcomes for our operations. Since moving to the R-series, I notice improved performance; it is user-friendly and handles traffic efficiently. The upgrading process is different as we create tenants and a main host. R-series has better CPU and memory, leading to higher throughput with minimal downtime, making it a significant improvement over the I-series.
    Read full review
    it_user3483 - PeerSpot reviewer
    it_user3483
    Senior Consultant at Unify Square
    Forefront Unified Access Gateway delivers anywhere access to corporate resources in secure and highly customizable ways
    *Review updated on April 17, 2014 As you can read on the Microsoft TechNet blog ( http://bit.ly/J2Jcni ) UAG has entered the final part of its lifecycle. "Mainstream support will continue through April 14, 2015, and extended support will continue through April 14, 2020." The features you used in…
    Read full review

    Quotes from Members

    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
     

    Pros

    "I have Big-IP change and control manager, which give me the roll back option. Therefore, I can view the last things which happened on the device."
    "We plan to create packages of services from which it will be possible to build comprehensive tailor-made solutions."
    "What we like best about this solution is its stability. It is extremely stable."
    "Routing and load balancing are its most valuable features."
    "Our experience has been a positive one."
    "The load balancing is very good."
    "In summary, this is a very good product and we are actively suggesting it to our customers."
    "What I thought was going to take me two months, I had done in about two weeks."
    More F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) pros
    "Our remote users can securely logon to our corporate network (Copnet) from any part of the world without compromising the integrity of the corporate resources."
    "UAG is an affordable software solution available in the market."
    "We were able to setup an SSTP VNP, application access portal and desktop access from one gateway."
    "The capability of employees to work from anywhere in the world on the corporate network only a laptop with an internet connection and correct username/password are enough to be connected"
    "UAG makes it easier for organizations to deliver secure remote access to their applications and resources, and improve employee and partner productivity."
     

    Cons

    "We would like to see load balancing between the cloud and the on-premise, a straightforward deployment feature."
    "BIG-IP LTM's sandboxing integration could be improved."
    "The pricing of the product is a bit too high."
    "Active-Standby sync has to be made automatic."
    "The auto logout feature after three minutes is terrible. I wish they would make that longer, since it is not a feature that we can change."
    "There are not very many areas for improvement, but the price is high."
    "There are some aspects of F5 BIG-IP that could be improved, the main one being virtual machine support. We have seen that even with the virtual editions, there are some things that we would like to do that are currently not possible with virtual machines."
    "With the new pricing model, ROI was low, hence we switched."
    More F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) cons
    "Though UAG is a breakthrough in SSL VPN, it still lags in some fronts, like authentication control process in VPN."
    "Cross site single sign-on, not working between two UAG servers."
    "Trunks are slightly difficult to configure."
    "You cannot implement UAG on a single server. This makes it not ideal for small businesses."
    "UAG: once above 50 users it was hardly able to work"
     

    Pricing and Cost Advice

    "F5 BIG-IP can be expensive, although there are trial versions available which are helpful to find out if the solution is right for your company."
    "The price of F5 BIG-IP LTM could improve."
    "Purchasing through the AWS Marketplace was good. We chose to go through the AWS Marketplace because everything that we needed was a soft appliance. We needed something to work in Amazon, and this product was available there."
    "This product is costly from a licensing perspective considering its competitors."
    "When we purchased additional licenses for our other locations, we received a discount of between 20% and 25%."
    "In my view, the cost is somewhat on the higher side. There are discounts available, but I wouldn't say it's overpriced. It's not cheap either, and the value for money is a bit higher from that perspective."
    "Try to negotiate all the software features that you require upfront."
    "It is quite expensive as a product. Because it is very stable, it is also expensive."
    More F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) pricing and cost advice
    Information not available
    report
    See which vendors are best for you
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions are best for your needs.
    See recommendations
    920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
     

    Top Industries

    By visitors reading reviews
    Financial Services Firm
    13%
    Outsourcing Company
    12%
    Manufacturing Company
    8%
    Construction Company
    7%
    No data available
     

    Company Size

    By reviewers
    Large Enterprise
    Midsize Enterprise
    Small Business
    By reviewers
    Company SizeCount
    Small Business62
    Midsize Enterprise32
    Large Enterprise86
    By reviewers
    Company SizeCount
    Small Business3
    Midsize Enterprise1
    Large Enterprise3
     

    Questions from the Community

    What needs improvement with F5 BIG-IP?
    F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) could improve file upload speeds when opening cases and attaching files; sometimes, downloading files like QKView takes time, depending on size. I expect faste...
    See all answers
    What is your primary use case for F5 BIG-IP?
    My main use case for F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is placing our applications on F5 and the backend servers on the pool. We also regularly renew SSL certificates before they expire, usuall...
    See all answers
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)?
    The product is costly. I would rate the price a five out of ten.
    See all answers
    Ask a question
    Earn 20 points
     

    Comparisons

    Fortinet FortiADC vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Logo
    Fortinet FortiADC vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
    Compared 8% of the time
    NetScaler vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Logo
    NetScaler vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
    Compared 7% of the time
    HAProxy vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Logo
    HAProxy vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
    Compared 6% of the time
    A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Logo
    A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
    Compared 5% of the time
    Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Logo
    Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
    Compared 5% of the time
    More F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Competitors
    Symantec VIP Access Manager vs Microsoft UAG [EOL] Logo
    Symantec VIP Access Manager vs Microsoft UAG [EOL]
    Compared 27% of the time
    Ivanti Connect Secure vs Microsoft UAG [EOL] Logo
    Ivanti Connect Secure vs Microsoft UAG [EOL]
    Compared 24% of the time
    Citrix Gateway vs Microsoft UAG [EOL] Logo
    Citrix Gateway vs Microsoft UAG [EOL]
    Compared 15% of the time
    More Microsoft UAG [EOL] Competitors
     

    Product Reports

    Buyer's Guide
    F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
    October 2026
    F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) reportDownload F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) product report
    Buyer's Guide
    SSL VPN
    October 2026
    Microsoft UAG [EOL] reportDownload Microsoft UAG [EOL] product report
     

    Also Known As

    F5 BIG-IP, BIG-IP LTM, F5 ASM, Viprion, F5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition , Crescendo Networks Application Delivery Controller, BIG IP
    UAG, MS UAG [EOL]
     

    Overview

    F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) specializes in load balancing, iRules, and application security. It provides flexibility and stability, supporting SSL offloading and enhancing application performance and reliability with low downtime.

    F5 BIG-IP LTM is designed for efficient traffic management and security. Its intuitive interface allows users to customize traffic through iRules and ensures stable application delivery. Its performance stability and ability to inspect TLS traffic, along with web application firewall features, make it preferred for consistent application delivery. While praised for its capabilities, users note its challenges with complex configuration and management. Calls for streamlined processes, training, support, better logging, and cloud integration highlight areas for improvement.

    What are the key features of F5 BIG-IP LTM?
    • Load Balancing: Distributes HTTP and HTTPS traffic to ensure high availability.
    • iRules: Allows for customized traffic management.
    • Application Security: Includes TLS inspection and web application firewall capabilities.
    • SSL Offloading: Reduces server load by handling SSL processing.
    What benefits and ROI should users expect?
    • Performance Stability: Ensures high reliability and less downtime.
    • Flexibility: Offers customizable traffic management through iRules.
    • Security: Provides strong protection against application attacks.
    • Network Management Efficiency: Simplifies traffic distribution and infrastructure management.

    F5 BIG-IP LTM is widely used in industries requiring robust application delivery and security, such as finance and healthcare. It supports load balancing and traffic management across different environments and acts as a reverse proxy, helping companies secure their infrastructure against cyber threats while facilitating high availability and scalability.

    F5
    Forefront Unified Access Gateway (UAG) provides remote client endpoints with access to corporate applications, networks, and internal resources via a Web portal or site. Forefront UAG product documentation is organized into content categories. Use the topics in each category to help you design, plan, deploy, and administer your Forefront UAG servers.
    Microsoft
     

    Sample Customers

    Riken, TransUnion, Tepco Systems Administration, Daejeon University, G&T Bank, Danamon, CyberAgent Inc.
    Topocart, AAG, GeoAir, Blue Skies Consulting, Hiparc Geotecnologia, Peace Map
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
    October 2026
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about F5, HAProxy, NetScaler and others in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC). Updated: October 2026.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.