Falcon LogScale vs ManageEngine Log360 comparison

CrowdStrike and ManageEngine are both solutions in the Log Management category. CrowdStrike is ranked #33 with an average rating of 8.3, while ManageEngine is ranked #25 with an average rating of 8.8. CrowdStrike holds a 0.9% mindshare in Log Management, compared to ManageEngine’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of CrowdStrike users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of ManageEngine users who would recommend it.

Falcon LogScale

Read 8 Falcon LogScale reviews

1,406 Views
1,378 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ManageEngine Log360

Read 19 ManageEngine Log360 reviews

3,550 Views
2,059 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Falcon LogScale

ManageEngine Log360

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

ManageEngine Log360 and Falcon LogScale compete in log management, with Falcon LogScale providing advanced analytics and scalability, making it a preferred choice despite Log360's affordability and support.

Features: ManageEngine Log360 includes integrated threat intelligence, compliance reporting, and straightforward deployment. Falcon LogScale provides advanced analytics, superior scalability, and enhanced data insights.

Room for Improvement: ManageEngine Log360 can improve dashboard customization, speed of processing, and scalability enhancements. Falcon LogScale could benefit from easier setup, better third-party integration, and simpler user interface adjustments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ManageEngine Log360 is straightforward to deploy with responsive customer service. Falcon LogScale offers competent support but presents complexity during deployment.

Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine Log360 offers favorable pricing with a good ROI. Falcon LogScale, although costlier, justifies its price with an impressive feature set and scalability resulting in satisfactory ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Falcon LogScale vs. ManageEngine Log360 Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Falcon LogScale vs. ManageEngine Log360

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Falcon LogScale

Ranking in Log Management

33rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ManageEngine Log360

Ranking in Log Management

25th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (22nd), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Falcon LogScale is 0.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ManageEngine Log360 is 1.3%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ManageEngine Log360	1.3%
Falcon LogScale	0.9%
Other	97.8%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Oluwajuwon Olorunlona

Cyber Security Engineer at eprocessconsulting

Advanced threat hunting has improved visibility and has simplified custom query automation

CrowdStrike is ahead of the game. If I may say anything about Falcon LogScale to improve the services, I would talk about the way you develop parsers. The documentation should be more straightforward. It is not easy to quickly find the documentation, especially if you are using CrowdStrike. Most customers use Falcon LogScale because of CrowdStrike. The documentation of Falcon LogScale is not on the CrowdStrike portal just like the rest of Falcon documentation. I usually find that the main Falcon LogScale documentation is found on the Falcon LogScale website itself. I think there should be a link or direct documentation within the CrowdStrike pages. It is not necessarily a fault. If you find where the documentation resides, you can trace it to what they are doing. However, for the ease of use for Falcon administrators, the same documentation on the Falcon LogScale portal should be on the CrowdStrike dashboard.

Read full review

Md Abdul Hakim

System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited

Integration capabilities impress while room for improvement exists in cloud compatibility

1. Enhanced Cloud Integration Current Gap: Log360 lacks native integration with Microsoft Intune and cloud-based Active Directory (Azure AD), limiting visibility for organizations transitioning to hybrid or fully cloud environments. Requested Improvements: Direct Intune Log Collection: Ability to ingest and correlate logs from Intune-managed devices to monitor compliance, device health, and security policies. Azure AD Deep Integration: Support for Azure AD audit logs, conditional access events, and identity protection alerts to provide end-to-end visibility. Cloud Workload Monitoring: Extend coverage to SaaS applications (e.g., Microsoft 365, AWS, GCP) for unified threat detection. Why It Matters: Many clients have migrated from on-prem AD to cloud-first setups this year. Without cloud-native log collection, critical security events (e.g., rogue Intune policies or Azure AD breaches) go unmonitored. 2. Improved Automation and Response Current Gap: Limited automated remediation (e.g., auto-isolating compromised devices) forces manual intervention. Requested Features: Playbook Automation: Pre-built workflows to auto-resolve common issues (e.g., disabling users after brute-force attacks). SOAR Integration: APIs to connect with SIEM/SOAR platforms (e.g., Splunk, Palo Alto Cortex) for escalated threat response.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I have only heard the best about CrowdStrike's support."

"One of the key features is the fast search functionality, enabling us to get results within a few seconds."

"The biggest advantages of Falcon LogScale are the speed at which the queries return to you and the ease of use."

"Falcon LogScale offers excellent features, with scalability being the most notable, and the search speed stands out to me as particularly good."

"The fast search and index-free data retention are very valuable."

"Falcon LogScale's insights give you a lot of information that an expert already thought would be valuable for you."

"It offers the capability to view live log ingestion directly from the console which means you can seamlessly manage live log data ingestion alongside accessing and analyzing older data from the past."

"Falcon LogScale seems to be a better option with better visibility when it comes to the dashboard and the kill chain process, including the attack surface."

"The most valuable features for us are the application logs monitoring and the dashboard, which provides a single-pane view of all the ongoing activities."

"ManageEngine Log360 is not difficult to deploy."

"You can have all of the logs from servers to network and it gets sent out to the correct owners. This is very helpful."

"My main objective for using ManageEngine Log360 is its powerful and real-time capabilities for managing security and other tasks efficiently."

"We haven't had any stability issues."

"The reports that you can run are really nice."

"The solution could be improved by including XDR, remediation and Sandbox."

"It is easier to deploy than are other SIEMs, which is great. You can also get an overview of your environment, which is very handy."

More ManageEngine Log360 pros

Cons

"KQL is a bit challenging for us."

"The price could be lower."

"There are some overlapping features found in multiple tools."

"CrowdStrike support is not good."

"One area of Falcon LogScale that I think could be improved is that it is a bit complex."

"The integration could improve."

"That is a difficult question regarding Falcon LogScale. That is really a question for the professionals, and I am not a professional, so I do not know."

"The matter of the data retention needs to be addressed."

"Most times log sheets are not assigned well."

"While ManageEngine Log360 is a significant improvement, there could be enhancements in terms of integrating more user-friendly training materials and better deployment documentation."

"On the logging system, there's a local on-client side that is encrypted, and there's one that is not encrypted. It is only for diagnostical purposes. However, both being encrypted would be very valuable for some audits."

"On the PostgreSQL side, it was not parsing much, which required a lot of manual work."

"It's difficult to find which conditions have been applied to a report because they are provided by default by ManageEngine. However, with other SIEMs if you want to create a report, they provide details, like which conditions are triggering certain reports. This needs to be there in ManageEngine. It would be good to know which parameter has been applied to the report that is updating the system."

"Their technical support should be improved."

"The support needs improvement."

More ManageEngine Log360 cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"There is a cost for each feature used."

"My client has a yearly license. I think the cost is not expensive compared to that of other SIEMs, given the service it is providing."

"Its pricing is definitely huge compared to some of the other SIEMs. Its price should be improved."

"Affordable pricing is provided by the solution."

"ManageEngine Log360 is expensive compared to other products."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Government

10%

Media Company

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Falcon LogScale?

I have not worked on that particular part, but regarding improvement, KQL seems to be quite complicated and we have to brush up on that if we want to become an expert on it. KQL is a bit challengin...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Falcon LogScale?

I work as a security consultant for customers. I am currently working on multiple solutions including Trend Micro, CrowdStrike, and Microsoft. I have over 14 years of overall experience, but I woul...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Falcon LogScale?

When it comes to Falcon LogScale, it is better compared to Microsoft. When we talk about scaling it from one to ten, I would give it somewhere around nine, especially in terms of retention. It is c...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine Log360?

The price is suitable from a perspective of different pricing options. We already have an ongoing project where some features analytics can be escaped, and companies can manage their budgets carefu...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ManageEngine Log360?

ManageEngine Log360 could provide more in-depth insights, particularly in reporting. Some other solutions provide deeper insights into issues, especially when generating reports. More detailed insi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ManageEngine Log360?

ManageEngine Log360 is being used for database monitoring and as a SIEM solution.

See all answers

Comparisons

Elastic Stack vs Falcon LogScale

Compared 13% of the time

Logsign Next-Gen SIEM vs Falcon LogScale

Compared 9% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Falcon LogScale

Compared 9% of the time

Grafana Loki vs Falcon LogScale

Compared 7% of the time

Graylog Enterprise vs Falcon LogScale

Compared 3% of the time

More Falcon LogScale Competitors

ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 15% of the time

Fortinet FortiSIEM vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 8% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 6% of the time

SIEMStorm vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 5% of the time

Sentinel vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 4% of the time

More ManageEngine Log360 Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Log Management

February 2026

Download Falcon LogScale product report

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine Log360

March 2026

Download ManageEngine Log360 product report

Overview

Falcon LogScale is a modern log management tool that offers robust features for organizations seeking efficient log analysis. It provides high-speed log ingestion and query capabilities, enabling detailed insights into system performance and security events.

Falcon LogScale provides an efficient way for IT teams to handle massive volumes of log data. Its architecture supports rapid ingestion and real-time querying, making it ideal for security and operational analytics. With customizable search capabilities, it allows deep analysis to detect anomalies and troubleshoot issues effectively. Users appreciate its scalability and performance-driven approach, making it suitable for large infrastructures.

What are the most important features of Falcon LogScale?

High-Speed Log Ingestion: Manages vast amounts of log data swiftly and efficiently.
Real-Time Querying: Enables quick analysis and insights into current data.
Scalability: Designed to grow with the expanding needs of large organizations.
Customizable Searching: Offers granular search options for precise data examination.

What benefits or ROI should be anticipated?

Enhanced Operational Efficiency: Streamlines log analysis processes.
Improved Security Posture: Identifies security threats quickly through powerful search and alert capabilities.
Cost-Effective Scaling: Offers scalable solutions that grow with business needs.
Time Savings: Reduces time spent on log data management and analysis.

Falcon LogScale is particularly beneficial in industries requiring detailed compliance reporting and real-time threat detection, such as finance and healthcare. It's implemented to support security operations and incident response teams by providing timely insights and operational efficiencies.

CrowdStrike

Log360 is your one-stop solution for all log management and network security challenges. It is an integrated solution that combines EventLog Analyzer and ADAudit Plus into a single console to help you manage your Active Directory auditing and network security easily.

ManageEngine

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

First Mountain Bank, TRA, Citadel Group, OnPoint Financial Corp, Florida Dept. of Transportation

Buyer's Guide

Falcon LogScale vs. ManageEngine Log360

March 2026

Free Report: Falcon LogScale vs. ManageEngine Log360

Find out what your peers are saying about Falcon LogScale vs. ManageEngine Log360 and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Falcon LogScale vs. ManageEngine Log360 report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.