No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Fischer Identity – Governance vs Imanami GroupID comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Fischer Identity – Governance
Average Rating
6.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Identity Management (IM) (46th)
Imanami GroupID
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
User Provisioning Software (16th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (35th), Active Directory Management (15th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Identity and Access Management solutions, they serve different purposes. Fischer Identity – Governance is designed for Identity Management (IM) and holds a mindshare of 0.6%, up 0.3% compared to last year.
Imanami GroupID, on the other hand, focuses on User Provisioning Software, holds 2.2% mindshare, up 1.1% since last year.
Identity Management (IM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Fischer Identity – Governance0.6%
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud9.2%
Microsoft Entra ID6.3%
Other83.9%
Identity Management (IM)
User Provisioning Software Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Imanami GroupID2.2%
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud19.1%
One Identity Manager9.3%
Other69.4%
User Provisioning Software
 

Featured Reviews

it_user186309 - PeerSpot reviewer
Identity Management Specialist at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Initial setup was a bit complex because we needed to implement lots of workflows.
Self-service Workflow building Audit For the time when we have to implement re-certification for special accounts this was the best for our requirements. It would be better to have a PowerShell connector Documentation can be improved Performance tuning should be better I have been working on…
GV
Senior application Security Engineer at OneDigital Health and Benefits
Shows group analytics with good UI but needs improvement in GPO
The solution helps with group analytics.  Imanami GroupID's UI is good.  The product's implementation is complex. It should also work on GPO.  I have been using the solution for two years.  I rate the tool's stability an eight out of ten.  I rate Imanami GroupID's scalability an eight out of…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"For the time when we have to implement re-certification for special accounts this was the best for our requirements."
"For each job code, we go through and determine the access they're supposed to have to the system, and based on that job code, we use the query tool so that anybody who is in this job code gets these groups added to them, or conversely, if they change job codes, it removes the ones that they shouldn't have and adds the one they should, which runs every night so that the next day everybody has the job codes they're supposed to have."
"I have found the overall features to be useful."
"Imanami GroupID's UI is good."
 

Cons

"Performance tuning should be better."
"The mobile application needs to be improved and there should be chatbox features to allow users to easily reach out for assistance."
"I'd like to see a better user interface. It works, but it is clunky. There should be better import and export of LDAP queries and better management tools."
"The product's implementation is complex. It should also work on GPO."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The price of the solution is reasonable."
"It is on a yearly basis, and it has the product license fee and the support for it. So, there is the licensing fee, and there is the annual maintenance that includes the support. I don't remember exactly, but we're probably paying somewhere in the neighborhood of $20,000 to $30,000 for it per year. We've got a pretty large implementation of it, and for the amount that we do, it is a pretty good deal. I would rate it a four out of five in terms of pricing."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity Management (IM) solutions are best for your needs.
902,456 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Construction Company
18%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Media Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

Fischer Identity, Fischer International Fischer Identity Suite, Fischer Identity Suite
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Maryland Institute College of Art
Grant Thornton LLP
Find out what your peers are saying about One Identity, SailPoint, Microsoft and others in Identity Management (IM). Updated: June 2026.
902,456 professionals have used our research since 2012.