Fivetran vs SnapLogic comparison

Fivetran and SnapLogic are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Fivetran is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.8, while SnapLogic is ranked #21 with an average rating of 7.3. Fivetran holds a 2.2% mindshare in DI, compared to SnapLogic’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Fivetran users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of SnapLogic users who would recommend it.

Fivetran

Read 25 Fivetran reviews

3,228 Views
2,319 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

SnapLogic

Read 24 SnapLogic reviews

2,461 Views
1,692 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Fivetran

SnapLogic

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

SnapLogic and Fivetran are competing products in the data integration space. SnapLogic seems to have the upper hand in flexibility and support, while Fivetran's feature set provides significant ROI.

Features: SnapLogic provides a user-friendly drag-and-drop interface with extensive connectors for complex data workflows. Its low-code environment makes it easy for non-developers to build integrations using snaps. The platform also offers robust customization capabilities, allowing users to write their own scripts if needed. Fivetran excels in automated pipeline management, ensuring minimal manual intervention. It offers reliable data synchronization, only syncing necessary changes, which makes it efficient. The integration with transformation tools such as dbt enhances its utility for end-to-end data management.

Room for Improvement: SnapLogic could improve by enhancing its speed for large-scale operations and providing more granular control over execution environments. Simplifying the initial learning curve and offering more pre-built connectors could further strengthen its position. Fivetran could focus on expanding its customization options, allowing users to tweak configurations more freely. Greater control over scheduling and data extraction processes is necessary, as well as reducing reliance on external transformation tools to provide more built-in options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SnapLogic supports flexible deployments across cloud, on-premise, and hybrid environments, with responsive customer service. It is easy to implement, with straightforward initial setup and configuration. Fivetran simplifies deployment with automated setups optimized for cloud environments, offering intuitive interfaces. However, it might lack the customization flexibility available in SnapLogic due to its highly automated nature.

Pricing and ROI: SnapLogic offers adaptable pricing, appealing to enterprises seeking flexibility. Its pricing structure promises a good ROI owing to its comprehensive feature suite. In contrast, Fivetran's cost reflects its robust feature set, providing significant ROI through dependable data management and minimal maintenance. Fivetran's scalability is advantageous, allowing cost-effectiveness as data volume increases, justifying its pricing tier.

To learn more, read our detailed Fivetran vs. SnapLogic Report (Updated: February 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. SnapLogic

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fivetran

Ranking in Data Integration

12th

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Replication (3rd)

SnapLogic

Ranking in Data Integration

21st

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (15th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Fivetran is 2.2%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SnapLogic is 1.5%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Erik Jones

Head of BI and Analytics at HyperScience

Solution reduces time-to-value; high ROI

Fivetran has room for improvement in data pipeline observability. The Fivetran logs are fairly basic, compared to, for example, the insight Fivetran gives into helping users understanding the performance of data pipelines. So I think their observability into the pipeline itself could be improved. In addition, Fivetran is in the very early stages of allowing other companies to access its metadata API, but that's something that could use improvement, and I know that they're working on right now. We use a separate tool for "reverse ETL", which is the opposite of what Fivetran does; it pushes data from your data warehouse back out to business applications. If Fivetran pulls data from those same applications, they should also enable users to push it back. I would love to do both ETL and reverse ETL in the same tool. It would be nice if Fivetran offered both their regular offering plus the reverse ETL option as well.

Read full review

VinethSuresh

Senior Data Analyst at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees

Achieves rapid results in data migration and has an intuitive user interface

I find SnapLogic to be user-friendly, especially for beginners with limited experience in data engineering or ETL. The interface is interactive, allowing me to quickly learn how to run pipelines and achieve production-ready results swiftly. This agility translates to cost savings, especially for smaller projects and proofs of concept, as less time and effort are needed to deliver results.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Making the decision to implement Fivetran was supported by the fact that they have better connectors than other competitors."

"SysTrack load is the best feature."

"The product has some seamless connectors, which are readily available."

"The most valuable feature of Fivetran is that it only synchronizes what needs to be synchronized."

"Fivetran's most valuable feature is replication."

"For us, Fivetran has been able to scale both in terms of the data we bring into our warehouse and the amount of data that we use as well."

"The general data ingestion is valuable. It's used for a lot of data. It provides about 90% of the data we use in our data warehouse without needing data engineering."

"The solution is stable. We've never faced any stability issues."

More Fivetran pros

"The product is easy to use and has many connectivity options."

"What I found most valuable in SnapLogic is the ETL feature, particularly the Transform Snap Pack, for example, any kind of reading or writing on Transform Snaps. Other than that, all the third-party connectivity tools such as the SAP Snap Pack, Salesforce Snap Pack, Workday Snap Pack, even the ServiceNow Snap Pack, I find all those are pretty useful in SnapLogic."

"The vendor handles the maintenance of the solution"

"The solution is easy to implement and easy to use. It's basically just drag and drop."

"The solution could improve its API management."

"The solutions ability to connect "snaps" or components to the graphic user interface is very intuitive, prevents errors, and makes implementations easy."

"By using snaps instead of functions in code, you can see the building blocks of the integration visually. This helps a lot."

"Despite having no prior experience in SnapLogic, we managed to build, test, and prepare it for release in just three hours, handling heavy data efficiently."

More SnapLogic pros

Cons

"Fivetran should add more connectors because its competitors, like Airbyte, have more connectors."

"The customization could improve because Fivetran gives more thought to people who don't want to manage analytics workflows rather than engineers who want to be able to customize pipelines more thoroughly."

"More connectors are needed for exotic, popular, and rising star portals."

"This solution needs to improve its real-time data and transformation availability."

"We experience cost issues because Fivetran is charged on a usage basis. When you reach a certain level, the tool should focus on reducing the costs. The solution is expensive when you are moving gigabytes and petabytes of data. It should also focus more on REST APIs and webhooks."

"I would like Fivetran to implement additional resource monitoring and restriction policies."

"We use a separate tool for "reverse ETL", which is the opposite of what Fivetran does; it pushes data from your data warehouse back out to business applications. If Fivetran pulls data from those same applications, they should also enable users to push it back. I would love to do both ETL and reverse ETL in the same tool."

"There is not a lot of options to customize the pipeline, and the cost is high."

More Fivetran cons

"Ultra Pipelines provides real-time ingestion but it needs some adjustment."

"Connecting to data behind enterprise firewalls has been tricky."

"SnapLogic sits somewhere in the middle. It doesn’t offer enough easy canned integrations for its users like some of the easier to use integration apps."

"I don't think the support has better knowledge about technologies and tool support. There were lots of times when we had an issue, and it took me quite a long time to explain the problem. I feel like some of the support staff don't know their product well."

"While it performs well, there is some room for improvement in this area."

"The biggest issue we have faced in our company with SnapLogic is regarding the EDI format"

"They should expand in terms of features for SaaS-based market requirements in different sectors."

"One of the areas for improvement in SnapLogic is that the connectors for some of the applications should be more available in terms of testing in the dev environment. Another area for improvement is that the logging should be standardized, for example, the integration with an ELK stack should be required out-of-the-box, so you can ship the log and have it in the ELK stack. There should be integration with ELK stack for the log shipping."

More SnapLogic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is affordable."

"The pricing model is okay and mid to large companies will not have an issue with it."

"I've heard that the license for HVR is a bit costly compared to its competitors, but since it's reliable and efficient, I think the customer shouldn't be bothered about the cost."

"The product is reasonably expensive"

"In the first year, we were given a very good discount. It was approximately 20,000 Euros per year. In the third year, we purchased credit for two years and the price was 33,000 Euros per year."

"I rate the pricing a six out of ten."

"Fivetran is very expensive, and its database-driven pricing model is outdated."

"I would say they're a little bit on the expensive side, and their contract process is not particularly good, but there is a lot of potential flexibility."

More Fivetran pricing and cost advice

"SnapLogic is not expensive. It's reasonably priced."

"By scaling the solution incrementally the cost is controlled and more beneficial to the client."

"From the ROI perspective, the price is extremely high"

"I used the free trial."

"It is a higher initial cost than other easy-to-use integration apps."

"They have pricing/usage tiers that are easy to move up or down."

"The pricing is okay."

"When comparing it with solutions like Apigee or MuleSoft, it still offers better value."

More SnapLogic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

27%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

25%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What's the deal with the HVR software acquisition?

As a user of HVR Software I followed this deal closely. Fivetran is apparently trying to establish more in its sector and by buying an already established data replication software, they become som...

See all answers

Does HVR Software provide reliable insights?

I honestly can't think of another data replication software that can give you better statistics and insight than HVR Software. There's the feature for topology and statistics and both of them can ...

See all answers

How much traffic can HVR Software handle?

As someone who works at a company where a high volume of information is replicated and has tried several data replication softwares, I can tell you that you're looking at the right one. HVR Softwar...

See all answers

What do you like most about SnapLogic?

Despite having no prior experience in SnapLogic, we managed to build, test, and prepare it for release in just three hours, handling heavy data efficiently.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SnapLogic?

I am quite happy with the solution and do not have specific requirements at the moment. I tend to frequently communicate with SnapLogic to ask for additional features, and they have been responsive...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SnapLogic?

I mainly use it for data integration and some API tasks.

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS Database Migration Service vs Fivetran

Compared 16% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs Fivetran

Compared 14% of the time

Qlik Replicate vs Fivetran

Compared 8% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs Fivetran

Compared 7% of the time

AWS Glue vs Fivetran

Compared 5% of the time

More Fivetran Competitors

AWS Glue vs SnapLogic

Compared 16% of the time

IBM InfoSphere DataStage vs SnapLogic

Compared 8% of the time

Alteryx Designer vs SnapLogic

Compared 6% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs SnapLogic

Compared 5% of the time

SSIS vs SnapLogic

Compared 5% of the time

More SnapLogic Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran

March 2025

Download Fivetran product report

Buyer's Guide

SnapLogic

March 2025

Download SnapLogic product report

Also Known As

No data available

DataFlow

Overview

Fivetran, the global leader in data movement, is trusted by companies like OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon and Spotify to centralize data from SaaS applications, databases, files, and other sources into cloud destinations, including data lakes. With high-performance pipelines, seamless interoperability, and enterprise-grade security, Fivetran empowers organizations to modernize their data infrastructure, power analytics and AI, ensure compliance, and achieve transformative business outcomes. Learn more at Fivetran.com

Fivetran

The SnapLogic Intelligent Integration Platform uses AI-powered workflows to automate all stages of IT integration projects – design, development, deployment, and maintenance – whether on-premises, in the cloud, or in hybrid environments. The platform’s easy-to-use, self-service interface enables both expert and citizen integrators to manage all application integration, data integration, API management, B2B integration, and data engineering projects on a single, scalable platform. With SnapLogic, organizations can connect all of their enterprise systems quickly and easily to automate business processes, accelerate analytics, and drive transformation.

SnapLogic

Sample Customers

Autodesk, Condé Nast, JetBlue, Morgan Stanley, OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon, SpotifyNational Australia Bank, Saks, Cemex, Okta, Dropbox, Pitney Bowes, World Fuel Services,Lufthansa, AutoZone, ASICS, ASOS, Coupa, Databricks, Hermes, New Relic, Intercom,Canva, Honeywell, Square, DocuSign, Nandos, Oldcastle Infrastructure

Adobe, ADP, BlackBerry, Bonobos, Box, Capital One, Dannon, Eero, Endo, Gensler, HCL, HP, Grovo, HIS, iRobot, Leica, Merck, Sans, Target, Verizon, Vodafone, Yelp, Yahoo!

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. SnapLogic

February 2025

Free Report: Fivetran vs. SnapLogic

Find out what your peers are saying about Fivetran vs. SnapLogic and other solutions. Updated: February 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fivetran vs. SnapLogic report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.