FME vs Talend Open Studio [EOL] comparison

Safe Software and Qlik are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Additionally, 100% of Safe Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Qlik users who would recommend it.

FME

Read 7 FME reviews

2,622 Views
2,019 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Talend Open Studio [EOL]

Read 51 Talend Open Studio [EOL] reviews

98% willing to recommend

FME

Talend Open Studio [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 18, 2025

FME and Talend Open Studio are competing in the data integration sector. Talend Open Studio generally has the upper hand due to its open-source flexibility and cost-effectiveness, while FME excels in data transformation capabilities.

Features: FME is known for its user-friendly interface, eliminating the need for extensive coding, and providing extensive format support with over 400 file formats. It integrates well with various systems and excels in handling geospatial data. Talend Open Studio provides powerful ETL functionalities with the ability to create custom ETL jobs, has extensive connectors supporting over 900 components, and offers a drag-and-drop interface. Its integration and data stewardship capabilities make it highly effective for data quality management.

Room for Improvement: FME could benefit from enhancements in its cost structure and offering more customizable options for users requiring tailored solutions. Its reliance on specific plugins limits flexibility in certain use cases. Talend Open Studio could improve in easing its initial setup complexity and reducing the technical expertise required for deployment. Offering more detailed documentation and expanding commercial support could significantly benefit users navigating its features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: FME's deployment is straightforward, often praised for efficient setup and provides traditional customer service. Talend Open Studio requires more initial setup and technical knowledge due to its open-source nature but offers flexibility in deployment. It relies mainly on community support, which provides a collaborative environment but lacks the directness of traditional customer service.

Pricing and ROI: FME's pricing is perceived as higher, yet it delivers strong ROI with its expansive format support and advanced transformation capabilities. Talend Open Studio, being open-source, is a cost-effective solution without initial license fees, appealing to budget-conscious organizations. Its long-term savings and flexibility offer significant ROI, particularly for enterprises with skilled technical teams.

To learn more, read our detailed Data Integration Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

FME

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (28th)

Talend Open Studio [EOL]

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Gert Booysen

Software Solutions Leader at GE Vernova

Extensive format support and reliable integration enhance data management while new pricing model requires reassessment

I haven't had any input or requirements from any customers that are not currently covered, so I don't have any additional needs that were identified or raised to me. Regarding pricing, with the model changes that they've implemented a while back, it actually made it more expensive to use, especially on the server side. They changed the licensing model, and that made customers think it is overpriced. Some customers were actually looking at alternatives. Pricing with the model changes was perceived negatively. I work primarily with enterprise customers, Vodacom, Eskom, so it's tier-one customers. For small customers, this solution is a bit too expensive. They don't really use it and just do direct integration on smaller implementations. This is basically used by tier-one customers. FME is still able to save time and money for clients. It's still a good investment. Regarding similar products to FME, GE developed a product called Data Fabric. That is a real-time operational integration platform, Data Fabric Network Connect, which is a GE Grid OS product. It is actually more expensive than FME, but the purpose is different as it's operational. The vendor in this case is GE, and it's a company that we bought that used to be called Greenbird. In current use scenarios, FME is still leading compared to Data Fabric. The GE product has a different application.

Read full review

Sushrit Moundekar

Program Manager at InfoCepts

Has supported building flexible data pipelines and streamlined ETL orchestration

There should be a dedicated support team for Talend Open Studio. We do have a support team, but at times it is critical for us to fix certain things within one or two hours. Usually, the support team takes some 12 hours, which is the standard edition of support. If we could have round-the-clock support, we would be able to resolve many issues which we encounter during the development part. The initial setup for Talend Open Studio is a little complex. We need to have a dedicated person who has an understanding of Talend Open Studio as a tool. It takes some level of expertise, so it is not an easy process, but once we have a dedicated associate who is knowledgeable in that particular field, it becomes comparatively easier.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"FME is spatially aware and understands how to deal with the conversion of spatial objects and their attributes."

"From my reseller perspective, the best features in FME are the ease of operation and the fact that it works."

"All spatial features are unrivaled, and the possibility to execute them based on a scheduled trigger, manual, e-mail, Websocket, tweet, file/directory change or virtually any trigger is most valuable."

"We make minor subtle changes to the workbenches to improve it. We can share the workbenches. We don't have to use GitHub or anything else."

"It has a very friendly user interface. You don't need to use a lot of code. For us that's the most important aspect about it. Also, it has a lot of connectors and few forms. It has a strong facial aspect. It can do a lot of facial analysis."

"The most valuable feature of FME is the graphical user interface. There is nothing better. It is very easy to debug because you can see all steps where there are failures. Overall the software is easy to optimize a process."

"It has standard plug-ins available for different data sources."

"There are many architectures: hybrid, cloud, and on-prem."

"Talend Studio has the ability to use it to ensure data quality."

"Talend can connect to multiple data sources, including relational data sources, ERP, CRM, and others."

"The most valuable feature of Talend Open Studio is the tMap component. There is a lot of functionality in one component."

"This is a user-friendly solution that is easy to use."

"I can connect with different databases such as Oracle Database or SQL Server. It allows you to extract the data from one database to another. I can structure the data by filtering and mapping the fields. It is very user-friendly. You need to know the basics of SQL development or SQL queries, and you can use this tool."

"The product's initial setup phase was easy."

"The data integration aspect of the solution is excellent."

More Talend Open Studio [EOL] pros

Cons

"The one thing that always appears in the community is the ability to make really easy loops to loop through data efficiently. That needs to be added at some point."

"Improvements could be made to mapping presentations."

"We are looking at the possibility of using Glue instead of FME, using the native AWS product."

"FME's price needs improvement for the African market."

"FME can improve the geographical transformation. I've had some problems with the geographical transformations, but it's probably mostly because I'm not the most skilled geographer in-house. The solution requires some in-depth knowledge to perform some functions."

"To get a higher rating, it would have to improve the price and the associated scalability. These are the main issues."

"Inter-version compatibility is a problem, and migration projects between versions are required."

"The only other thing is that you have to integrate into an API gateway. We're in Azure, so we use Microsoft Azure Gateway. It doesn't come with its own gateway, which is another sort of big plus side that we saw in Boomi. Talend isn't quite there yet with the API gateway."

"It gets the job done but it's a bit slow."

"The product could be more intuitive."

"The solution needs more integrations."

"It doesn't have the ability to keep the repository of the source code (visual pipeline). It can be integrated with Git."

"The physical appearance of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"Having additional training materials, such as a video tutorial, would be an improvement."

More Talend Open Studio [EOL] cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product's price is reasonable."

"FME Server used to cost £10,000; now it can cost over £100,000."

"We used the standard licensing for our use of FME. The cost was approximately €15,000 annually. We always welcome less expensive solutions, if the solution could be less expensive it would be helpful."

"It is an open-source tool which means it is a free solution."

"For Talend Open Studio, there is a need to make yearly payments towards the licensing cost. Talend Open Studio is a bit expensive, in my opinion."

"Talend is free and you can download it."

"We are using the free version of the tool, because the enterprise version is a little expensive."

"It does the job well for nothing — without cost. That's the advantage of this product."

"It is an open-source product."

"Talend Open Studio is priced too high."

"The cost for one year for the ETL tools, not for the big data, is 6K per year. It is a good price."

More Talend Open Studio [EOL] pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

32%

Energy/Utilities Company

13%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	18

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with FME?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for FME?

The use cases for FME are mainly integration to the GE Smallworld product. GE Smallworld is a GE product, and we are using it to integrate with other third-party products into GE Smallworld and ADM...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering FME?

The overall rating for FME is eight out of ten, and I prefer the feedback to be anonymous. My job title is Senior Solutions Architect.

See all answers

How does Talend Open Studio compare with AWS Glue?

We reviewed AWS Glue before choosing Talend Open Studio. AWS Glue is the managed ETL (extract, transform, and load) from Amazon Web Services. AWS Glue enables AWS users to create and manage jobs in...

See all answers

What do you like most about Talend Open Studio?

It is easy to use and covers most of the functions needed. We can use the code without any extra effort. The open source is very good. They have the same commercials with additional connectors. The...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Talend Open Studio?

The setup cost is expensive, so there are considerations.

See all answers

Comparisons

Azure Data Factory vs FME

Compared 13% of the time

SSIS vs FME

Compared 9% of the time

Alteryx Designer vs FME

Compared 6% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs FME

Compared 5% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs FME

Compared 4% of the time

More FME Competitors

Informatica PowerCenter vs Talend Open Studio [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

SSIS vs Talend Open Studio [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

IBM InfoSphere DataStage vs Talend Open Studio [EOL]

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) vs Talend Open Studio [EOL]

Compared 4% of the time

dbt vs Talend Open Studio [EOL]

Compared 3% of the time

More Talend Open Studio [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

FME

February 2026

Download FME product report

Buyer's Guide

Talend Open Studio [EOL]

January 2026

Download Talend Open Studio [EOL] product report

Also Known As

No data available

Open Studio

Overview

FME is the data integration platform with the best support for spatial data. Run workflows on the desktop or deploy them in a server or cloud environment.

Safe Software

Talend Open Studio [EOL] is a user-friendly data integration tool that offers comprehensive ETL capabilities with extensive connector options. Its open-source nature and integration with a range of data sources make it a versatile choice for data integration tasks.

Talend Open Studio [EOL] provides flexibility and scalability for data integration by supporting relational and NoSQL databases. It is Java-based, allowing customization and data quality features, backed by community support. Challenges include limitations in scheduling and monitoring, technical support, resource consumption, and version control. The complex installation process and need for better documentation and easier use for beginners are notable issues. Despite these, it remains a strong option for connecting legacy applications, building data warehouses, and automating processes with data migration, synchronization, transformation, and loading from ERP systems, APIs, and databases like PostgreSQL, Oracle, and SQL Server.

What are the standout features of Talend Open Studio [EOL]?

User-friendly interface: Easy to navigate and reduces the learning curve.
ETL capabilities: Powerful features for extracting, transforming, and loading data.
Connector options: Extensive connections with multiple data sources.
Customization: Java-based for tailored functionality.
Data quality support: Facilitates clean and accurate data integration.
Open-source and community support: Benefits from collective enhancements and fixes.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

Flexibility: Supports multiple data sources and integration needs.
Scalability: Efficiently handles increased data and complex projects.
Cost-effectiveness: Open-source nature reduces software costs.
Community resources: Access to shared knowledge and solutions.

Talend Open Studio [EOL] is implemented across sectors like telecom, finance, and real estate for managing data flows, constructing information hubs, and enhancing business intelligence. Companies utilize it for data migration, synchronization, and transformation, ensuring efficient data integration in diverse applications.

Qlik

Sample Customers

Shell, US Department of Commerce, PG&E, BC Hydro, City of Vancouver, Enel, Iowa DoT, San Antonio Water System

Almerys, BF&M, Findus

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, IBM and others in Data Integration. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.