Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
FME Logo

Top 10 FME Alternatives

Vendor: Safe Software
4.3 out of 5
Leave a review

Top FME Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to FME based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC), Azure Data Factory, and SSIS. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

FME surpasses its competitors by offering robust data integration capabilities and support for hundreds of formats, enabling seamless transformation and automation processes that enhance productivity and operational efficiency for organizations of all sizes.

Safe Software Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Safe Software, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
FME Logo
FME Logo
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)
4.0 out of 5
IDMC is ideal for enterprises seeking cloud scalability and data governance. In comparison, FME is perfect for managing spatial data with format flexibility. A tech buyer might choose IDMC for cloud benefits, while FME is chosen for its ease-of-use and rapid deployment.
Download FME vs. Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) Report
Informatica IDMC involves a more complex setup cost compared to FME, which offers a simpler and more cost-effective initial setup. FME's straightforward integration may appeal to organizations looking to minimize setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Informatica IDMC involves a more complex setup cost compared to FME, which offers a simpler and more cost-effective initial setup. FME's straightforward integration may appeal to organizations looking to minimize setup expenses.
FME Logo
Azure Data Factory
4.0 out of 5
FME Logo
Azure Data Factory
4.0 out of 5
FME excels in spatial data transformation, offering advanced capabilities for geospatial data needs. In comparison, Azure Data Factory provides extensive cloud integration, supporting diverse data sources and scalable infrastructure, appealing to tech buyers prioritizing flexibility and comprehensive cloud-based data management.
Download Azure Data Factory vs. FME Report
FME has a lower setup cost than Azure Data Factory, making it a more budget-friendly choice for initial implementation, while Azure Data Factory offers a more robust suite of advanced features that can justify its higher setup expense.
View comparison
Pricing
FME has a lower setup cost than Azure Data Factory, making it a more budget-friendly choice for initial implementation, while Azure Data Factory offers a more robust suite of advanced features that can justify its higher setup expense.
FME Logo
SSIS
3.8 out of 5
FME Logo
SSIS
3.8 out of 5
SSIS excels in Microsoft integration and cost-effectiveness, making it ideal for existing Microsoft users. In comparison, FME appeals to those needing versatile data transformations, offering extensive spatial data support and flexibility for diverse data sources, albeit with higher initial costs and complexity.
Download FME vs. SSIS Report
SSIS has a lower setup cost making it attractive for those needing budget-friendly options, whereas FME incurs a higher initial investment but offers advanced features, emphasizing a premium experience for users who prioritize feature-rich solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
SSIS has a lower setup cost making it attractive for those needing budget-friendly options, whereas FME incurs a higher initial investment but offers advanced features, emphasizing a premium experience for users who prioritize feature-rich solutions.
FME Logo
FME Logo
Informatica PowerCenter
4.0 out of 5
Informatica PowerCenter is ideal for complex data workflows with extensive ETL capabilities. In comparison, FME attracts users with its versatility in spatial data and diverse formats. Informatica requires more setup but offers robust support, while FME provides quick deployment and efficient configuration.
Download FME vs. Informatica PowerCenter Report
Informatica PowerCenter involves high setup costs, while FME is more cost-effective with lower initial expenses, highlighting a significant cost difference.
View comparison
Pricing
Informatica PowerCenter involves high setup costs, while FME is more cost-effective with lower initial expenses, highlighting a significant cost difference.
FME Logo
Qlik Talend Cloud
4.0 out of 5
FME Logo
Qlik Talend Cloud
4.0 out of 5
Qlik Talend Cloud offers intuitive tools, seamless connectivity, and real-time analytics, appealing to those seeking flexible pricing and effortless deployment. In comparison, FME provides advanced spatial data transformation and specialized formats, ideal for businesses needing tailored solutions despite more complex deployment and higher costs.
Download FME vs. Qlik Talend Cloud Report
Qlik Talend Cloud has a higher setup cost compared to FME, highlighting a notable difference in initial investment requirements for these solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Qlik Talend Cloud has a higher setup cost compared to FME, highlighting a notable difference in initial investment requirements for these solutions.
FME Logo
FME Logo
Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
4.0 out of 5
Oracle Data Integrator excels in handling large data volumes efficiently, making it ideal for enterprises using Oracle technologies. In comparison, FME's strength in spatial data transformation supports rapid, specialized workflows, appealing to industries needing diverse data format processing despite higher costs.
Download FME vs. Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) Report
Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) involves significant setup costs, whereas FME offers a more affordable implementation process. This notable price disparity highlights FME's budget-friendly approach.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) involves significant setup costs, whereas FME offers a more affordable implementation process. This notable price disparity highlights FME's budget-friendly approach.
FME Logo
FME Logo
IBM InfoSphere DataStage
3.9 out of 5
FME excels in competitive pricing and efficient customer support, making it ideal for straightforward integration. In comparison, IBM InfoSphere DataStage offers a robust feature set for complex enterprise tasks, appealing to those prioritizing extensive capabilities and scalability over simplicity.
Download FME vs. IBM InfoSphere DataStage Report
FME has lower setup costs compared to IBM InfoSphere DataStage, which often requires a more significant initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
FME has lower setup costs compared to IBM InfoSphere DataStage, which often requires a more significant initial investment.
FME Logo
Oracle GoldenGate
4.1 out of 5
FME Logo
Oracle GoldenGate
4.1 out of 5
FME offers data transformation flexibility and affordable pricing, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, Oracle GoldenGate provides real-time data replication and robust features, suited for complex environments. Buyers may choose FME for simpler deployment or Oracle GoldenGate for advanced capabilities.
Download FME vs. Oracle GoldenGate Report
FME has a lower setup cost compared to Oracle GoldenGate, offering a more affordable initial investment, while Oracle GoldenGate’s higher setup cost reflects its extensive feature set and robust capabilities for larger enterprise solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
FME has a lower setup cost compared to Oracle GoldenGate, offering a more affordable initial investment, while Oracle GoldenGate’s higher setup cost reflects its extensive feature set and robust capabilities for larger enterprise solutions.
FME Logo
Fivetran
4.1 out of 5
FME Logo
Fivetran
4.1 out of 5
FME is favored for cost-effectiveness and strong support services with powerful data transformation and compatibility. In comparison, Fivetran offers cloud-based integration and automation, simplifying deployment. A tech buyer might choose FME for savings or Fivetran for its efficiency.
Download FME vs. Fivetran Report
FME's setup cost is often seen as customizable and potentially higher due to its comprehensive features, while Fivetran offers a more straightforward and cost-effective pricing model suitable for rapid deployment and minimal initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
FME's setup cost is often seen as customizable and potentially higher due to its comprehensive features, while Fivetran offers a more straightforward and cost-effective pricing model suitable for rapid deployment and minimal initial expenses.
FME Logo
SAP Data Services
4.0 out of 5
FME Logo
SAP Data Services
4.0 out of 5
SAP Data Services excels in enterprise data integration and transformation with robust support, appealing to large-scale environments. In comparison, FME's flexible transformation features and broad data format support make it ideal for geographical data tasks, offering agility and cost-effectiveness for diverse needs.
Download FME vs. SAP Data Services Report
SAP Data Services involves higher setup costs, while FME offers a more budget-friendly implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
SAP Data Services involves higher setup costs, while FME offers a more budget-friendly implementation.
FME Logo
Denodo
4.0 out of 5
FME Logo
Denodo
4.0 out of 5
Denodo excels in real-time data access and governance, appealing to enterprises needing seamless integration. In comparison, FME shines with its spatial data transformation abilities and supports diverse formats, making it ideal for organizations requiring advanced spatial data handling in complex projects.
Download Denodo vs. FME Report
Denodo's setup costs can be substantial depending on the implementation, whereas FME offers more predictable setup expenses, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Denodo's setup costs can be substantial depending on the implementation, whereas FME offers more predictable setup expenses, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
FME Logo
Alteryx Designer
3.9 out of 5
FME Logo
Alteryx Designer
3.9 out of 5
FME excels in geospatial data handling, offering diverse formats and conversion tools ideal for spatial data needs. In comparison, Alteryx Designer provides strong analytical capabilities, making it suitable for enterprises seeking advanced analytics and reduced manual processing through its extensive built-in tools.
Download Alteryx Designer vs. FME Report
FME offers a simpler initial setup with lower costs, while Alteryx Designer demands a higher setup investment but provides a more comprehensive toolset.
View comparison
Pricing
FME offers a simpler initial setup with lower costs, while Alteryx Designer demands a higher setup investment but provides a more comprehensive toolset.
FME Logo
FME Logo
Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics
4.0 out of 5
Pentaho offers budget-friendly pricing and strong customer support, appealing to organizations seeking cost-effective integration. In comparison, FME provides extensive data format handling and automation, attracting buyers needing flexibility and advanced features, despite its higher initial cost.
Download FME vs. Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics Report
Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics requires a lower setup cost compared to FME, which may involve higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics requires a lower setup cost compared to FME, which may involve higher initial expenses.
FME Logo
FME Logo
Ab Initio Co>Operating System
4.4 out of 5
Ab Initio Co>Operating System is known for its robust scalability and data processing capabilities, fitting for large enterprise projects. In comparison, FME stands out with its data conversion flexibility and adaptable integration across formats, offering a more streamlined deployment and cost-effective long-term ROI.
Download Ab Initio Co>Operating System vs. FME Report
The setup cost for Ab Initio Co>Operating System is higher compared to FME, which offers more affordable initial investment options.
View comparison
Pricing
The setup cost for Ab Initio Co>Operating System is higher compared to FME, which offers more affordable initial investment options.
FME Logo
FME Logo
SAS Data Management
4.3 out of 5
SAS Data Management provides excellent integration with strong governance and quality control suitable for compliance-focused organizations. In comparison, FME excels in spatial data handling and extensive transformations, ideal for industries needing geo-processing and versatile data format management.
Download FME vs. SAS Data Management Report
SAS Data Management has a complex setup cost structure, whereas FME offers a simpler and more straightforward fee. SAS might require a higher initial investment compared to FME, which could impact budget considerations for businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
SAS Data Management has a complex setup cost structure, whereas FME offers a simpler and more straightforward fee. SAS might require a higher initial investment compared to FME, which could impact budget considerations for businesses.
FME Logo
FME Logo
IBM Cloud Pak for Data
4.0 out of 5
FME offers competitive pricing with excellent geospatial integration, appealing to niche industries. In comparison, IBM Cloud Pak for Data provides a comprehensive AI and analytics suite, appealing to enterprises seeking advanced data insights. FME's ease of deployment contrasts with IBM's higher setup complexity.
Download FME vs. IBM Cloud Pak for Data Report
FME offers a lower setup cost compared to IBM Cloud Pak for Data, which entails a more significant initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
FME offers a lower setup cost compared to IBM Cloud Pak for Data, which entails a more significant initial investment.
FME Logo
FME Logo
WSO2 Enterprise Integrator
3.8 out of 5
FME excels in spatial data transformation with intuitive workflows and supports multiple formats, appealing to those focusing on geospatial data. In comparison, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator offers scalability with robust API management and data analytics, ideal for comprehensive integration needs despite a higher cost.
Download FME vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator Report
FME's setup cost is straightforward and lower, while WSO2 Enterprise Integrator demands a higher setup cost but offers more extensive integration capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
FME's setup cost is straightforward and lower, while WSO2 Enterprise Integrator demands a higher setup cost but offers more extensive integration capabilities.
FME Logo
Zapier
4.2 out of 5
FME Logo
Zapier
4.2 out of 5
FME offers complex data transformations and format support, suiting technical users needing advanced manipulation. In comparison, Zapier is ideal for non-technical users seeking quick automation with easy deployment and a vast app integration library, providing a cost-effective, user-friendly solution for fast ROI.
Download FME vs. Zapier Report
FME incurs a higher setup cost compared to Zapier's more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
FME incurs a higher setup cost compared to Zapier's more budget-friendly option.
FME Logo
WhereScape RED
4.1 out of 5
FME Logo
WhereScape RED
4.1 out of 5
WhereScape RED excels in automating data warehousing with templates and metadata-driven development, enhancing productivity. In comparison, FME provides broad format compatibility and spatial data support, appealing to those with diverse data transformation needs seeking flexibility over automation.
Download FME vs. WhereScape RED Report
Factor in the price of specialized consulting who know this product. They're hard to find and expensive.
ROI is at least 10 times.
View comparison
Pricing
Factor in the price of specialized consulting who know this product. They're hard to find and expensive.
ROI is at least 10 times.
FME Logo
MuleSoft Composer
3.9 out of 5
FME Logo
MuleSoft Composer
3.9 out of 5
FME offers robust data transformation with flexible pricing, ideal for geospatial integrations. In comparison, MuleSoft Composer supports seamless app connectivity with pre-built connectors, appealing to those needing broad integration networks. FME's ease of deployment suits smaller needs, whereas MuleSoft Composer justifies higher costs through advanced features.
Download FME vs. MuleSoft Composer Report
FME offers lower setup costs compared to MuleSoft Composer, which could impact initial budget considerations. The pricing of MuleSoft Composer reflects its advanced capabilities and integration features, differentiating it from FME in initial financial requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
FME offers lower setup costs compared to MuleSoft Composer, which could impact initial budget considerations. The pricing of MuleSoft Composer reflects its advanced capabilities and integration features, differentiating it from FME in initial financial requirements.
FME Logo
Qlik Compose
3.8 out of 5
FME Logo
Qlik Compose
3.8 out of 5
FME offers cost-effectiveness and user-friendly support, excelling in diverse data integrations with extensive format flexibility. In comparison, Qlik Compose focuses on robust data automation and real-time analytics, making it a strategic choice for optimizing data modeling and enhancing long-term efficiencies.
Download FME vs. Qlik Compose Report
FME offers an affordable setup cost, making it an attractive option, while Qlik Compose typically involves a higher initial expense, reflecting its robust features.
View comparison
Pricing
FME offers an affordable setup cost, making it an attractive option, while Qlik Compose typically involves a higher initial expense, reflecting its robust features.
FME Logo
FME Logo
SAS Data Integration Server
3.6 out of 5
SAS Data Integration Server offers superior scalability and advanced analytics, ideal for complex workflows. In comparison, FME's extensive format support and user-friendly interface provide flexibility. SAS excels in data management; meanwhile, FME is preferred for ease of use and adaptability.
Download FME vs. SAS Data Integration Server Report
SAS Data Integration Server incurs higher initial setup costs, whereas FME offers a more cost-effective setup option. Choose based on budgetary priorities and specific integration needs.
View comparison
Pricing
SAS Data Integration Server incurs higher initial setup costs, whereas FME offers a more cost-effective setup option. Choose based on budgetary priorities and specific integration needs.
FME Logo
Palantir Gotham
4.0 out of 5
FME Logo
Palantir Gotham
4.0 out of 5

The Palantir Gotham platform comprises a suite of capabilities for integrating many different data sources for secure, collaborative analysis. The platform serves as an enterprise knowledge base, containing the full record of an organization's collective analysis.

View comparison
FME Logo
CData Drivers
1 out of 5
FME Logo
CData Drivers
1 out of 5

Driver Technologies
Industry-Leading Connectivity with Analytics, Reporting, ETL Tools, and Custom Apps.

View comparison
FME Logo
Ikon
1 out of 5
FME Logo
Ikon
1 out of 5

Ikon by Keross is an orchestration platform that delivers on information integrity, confidentiality and availability.

View comparison
FME Logo
FME Logo
iWay Big Data Integrator
1 out of 5

iWay Big Data Integrator provides a simple interface that marshals Hadoop resources and standards to natively ingest, transform, cleanse, and manage data lakes.

View comparison

Related categories

Data Integration
Data Quality
Business Process Management (BPM)