Foglight for Virtualization vs IBM Turbonomic comparison

Quest Software and IBM are both solutions in the Virtualization Management Tools category. Quest Software is ranked #9 with an average rating of 9.0, while IBM is ranked #4 with an average rating of 9.0. Quest Software holds a 3.4% mindshare in VM, compared to IBM’s 11.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Quest Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Foglight for Virtualization

Read 2 Foglight for Virtualization reviews

221 Views
219 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Turbonomic

Read 205 IBM Turbonomic reviews

6,311 Views
1,262 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Foglight for Virtualization

IBM Turbonomic

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 23, 2025

Foglight for Virtualization and IBM Turbonomic provide virtualization management solutions. IBM Turbonomic leads with comprehensive features and automation capabilities, while Foglight for Virtualization is more cost-effective and offers strong support.

Features: Foglight for Virtualization includes robust monitoring, performance analytics, and resource usage optimization. IBM Turbonomic features advanced automation, strategic planning, and seamless scaling. IBM Turbonomic's enhanced automation focus makes it particularly valuable in feature execution.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Foglight for Virtualization ensures straightforward deployment with an emphasis on integration and customer support. IBM Turbonomic may require complex setup but offers strong service support for initial configurations, contributing to a richer implementation experience.

Pricing and ROI: Foglight for Virtualization is priced competitively, offering a quick ROI through efficient management and savings. IBM Turbonomic requires a higher initial investment but delivers significant long-term operational efficiency and resource optimization, leading to substantial ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Virtualization Management Tools Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Virtualization Management Tools

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Foglight for Virtualization

Ranking in Virtualization Management Tools

9th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM Turbonomic

Ranking in Virtualization Management Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

205

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Migration (6th), Cloud Management (5th), IT Financial Management (1st), IT Operations Analytics (5th), Cloud Analytics (1st), Cloud Cost Management (1st), AIOps (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Virtualization Management Tools category, the mindshare of Foglight for Virtualization is 3.4%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Turbonomic is 11.9%, down from 12.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Virtualization Management Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
IBM Turbonomic	11.9%
Foglight for Virtualization	3.4%
Other	84.7%

Virtualization Management Tools

Featured Reviews

Waleed Masad

Technical Manager at METS

Easy-to-setup product with efficient data migration features

Many customers consider Quest Foglight for Virtualization a critical tool for migrations or new projects. In particular, one noteworthy case involved a bank that made Foglight integration a prerequisite. Some customers now rely 100% entirely on Foglight for their daily operations The product is…

Read full review

Dan Ambrose

Infrastructure Engineer 4 at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

Helps visibility, bridges the data gap, and frees up time

We use IBM Turbonomic in a hybrid cloud environment. Although it supports multi-cloud capabilities, we currently operate in a single-cloud setting. Turbonomic offers visibility into our environment's performance, spanning across applications, underlying infrastructure, and protection resources. The visibility and analytics help to bridge the data gap between disparate IT teams such as applications and infrastructure. This is important for awareness collaboration, cost saving, and helping to design and improve our application. Enhanced visibility and data analytics have contributed to a significant reduction in our mean time to resolve. Tools like Turbonomic provide crucial visualization and insights, empowering us to make data-driven decisions instead of relying on assumptions as we did before. This newfound transparency translates to a massive improvement, going from complete darkness to having a clear 100 percent view of the situation. Although our applications are not optimized for the cloud we have seen some improvement in response time. IBM Turbonomic empowers us to achieve more with fewer people thanks to automation. Previously, customers frequently contacted us requesting resource increases to resolve issues. Now, we have a tool that allows us to objectively assess their needs, leading to a deeper understanding of our applications. This solution also generates significant cost savings in the cloud and optimizes hardware utilization within our data centers. Its AI algorithm intelligently allocates servers on hosts, maximizing efficiency without compromising performance. By fine-tuning resource allocation without causing performance bottlenecks, Turbonomic extends the lifespan of existing hardware, postponing the need for new purchases. This effectively stretches our capital expenditure budget. We started to see the benefits of IBM Turbonomic within the first 60 days. IBM is a fantastic partner. Their tech support has been outstanding, and the product itself is excellent - a very solid offering. By automating resource management with Turbonomic, our engineers are freed up to focus on more strategic initiatives like innovation and ongoing organizational projects. Previously, manually adding resources was a time-consuming process that interrupted workflows. Now, automation handles scaling efficiently, saving us thousands of man-hours and significant costs. It has illuminated the need for SetOps. It has highlighted areas of overspending, and the actions we've taken have demonstrated significant cost savings. IBM Turbonomic has positively impacted our overall application performance. IBM Turbonomic has helped reduce both CAPEX and OPEX. It has also significantly reduced cloud build times.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product is stable and easy to set up. It provides minimum false alarms."

"With Turbonomic, we were able to reduce our ESX cluster size and save money on our maintenance and license renewals. It saved us around $75,000 per year but it's a one-time reduction in VMware licensing. We don't renew the support. The ongoing savings is probably $50,000 to $75,000 a year, but there was a one-time of $200,000 plus."

"The tool provides the ability to look at the consumption utilization over a period of time and determine if we need to change that resource allocation based on the actual workload consumption, as opposed to how IT has configured it. Therefore, we have come to realize that a lot of our workloads are overprovisioned, and we are spending more money in the public cloud than we need to."

"We can manage multiple environments using a single pane of glass, which is something that I really like."

"It has automated a lot of things. We have saved 30 to 35 percent in human resource time and cost, which is pretty substantial. We don't have a big workforce here, so we have to use all the automation we can get."

"Rightsizing is valuable. Its recommendations are pretty good."

"My favorite part of the solution is the automation scheduling. Being able to choose when actions happen, and how they happen..."

"The most valuable features are the cluster utilization reports and the resource capacity planning. We can simulate how much capacity we can add to the current resources. The individual DM reports and VM-facing recommendations report are also helpful."

"We've saved hundreds of hours. Most of the time those hours would have to be after hours as well, which are more valuable to me as that's my personal time."

More IBM Turbonomic pros

Cons

"Quest Foglight for Virtualization's integration needs enhancement."

"In Azure, it's not what you're using. You purchase the whole 8 TB disk and you pay for it. It doesn't matter how much you're using. So something that I've asked for from Turbonomic is recommendations based on disk utilization. In the example of the 8 TB disk where only 200 GBs are being used, based on the history, there should be a recommendation like, "You can safely use a 500 GB disk." That would create a lot of savings."

"I do not like Turbonomic's new licensing model. The previous model was pretty straightforward, whereas the new model incorporates what most of the vendors are doing now with cores and utilization. Our pricing under the new model will go up quite a bit. Before, it was pretty straightforward, easy to understand, and reasonable."

"Turbonomic can modernize the look and feel, making it more user-friendly to access and obtain information."

"Recovering resources when they're not needed is not as optimized as it could be."

"We don't use Turbonomic for FinOps and part of the reason is its cost reporting. The reporting could be much more robust and, if that were the case, I could pitch it for FinOps."

"If they would educate their customers to understand the latest updates, that would help customers... Also, there are a lot of features that are not available in Turbonomic. For example, PaaS component optimization and automation are still in the development phase."

"I would love to see Turbonomic analyze backup data. We have had people in the past put servers into daily full backups with seven-year retention and where the disk size is two terabytes. So, every single day, there is a two terabyte snapshot put into a Blob somewhere. I would love to see Turbonomic say, "Here are all your backups along with the age of them," to help us manage the savings by not having us spend so much on the storage in Azure. That would be huge."

"The automation area could be improved, and the generic reports are poor. We want more details in the analysis report from the application layer. The reports from the infrastructure layer are satisfactory, but Turbonomic won't provide much information if we dig down further than the application layer."

More IBM Turbonomic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is affordable."

"I know there have been some issues with the billing, when the numbers were first proposed, as to how much we would save. There was a huge miscommunication on our part. Turbonomic was led to believe that we could optimize our AWS footprint, because we didn't know we couldn't. So, we were promised savings of $750,000. Then, when we came to implement Turbonomic, the developers in AWS said, "Absolutely not. You're not putting that in our environment. We can't scale down anything because they coded it." Our AWS environment is a legacy environment. It has all these old applications, where all the developers who have made it are no longer with the company. Those applications generate a ton of money for us. So, if one breaks, we are really in trouble and they didn't want to have to deal with an environment that was changing and couldn't be supported. That number went from $750,000 to about $450,000. However, that wasn't Turbonomic's fault."

"The product is fairly priced right now. Given its capabilities, it is excellently priced. We think that the product will become self-funding because we will be able to maximize our resources, which will help us from a capacity perspective. That should save us money in the long run."

"We felt the pricing was very fair for the product. It is in no way prohibitive for larger deployments, unlike other similar product on the market."

"We see ROI in extended support agreements (ESA) for old software. Migration activities seem to be where Turbonomic has really benefited us the most. It's one click and done. We have new machines ready to go with Turbonomic, which are properly sized instead of somebody sitting there with a spreadsheet and guessing. So, my return on investment would certainly be on currency, from a software and hardware perspective."

"Contact the Turbonomic sales team, explain your needs and what you're looking to monitor. They will get a pre-sales SE on the phone and together work up a very accurate quote."

"The pricing is in line with the other solutions that we have. It's not a bargain software, nor is it overly expensive."

"I consider the pricing to be high."

"You should understand the cost of your physical servers and how much time and money you are spending year over year on expanding your virtual farm."

More IBM Turbonomic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtualization Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	41
Midsize Enterprise	57
Large Enterprise	147

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Quest Foglight for Virtualization?

The product is stable and easy to set up. It provides minimum false alarms.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Quest Foglight for Virtualization?

The product is affordable. I rate the pricing a seven out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Quest Foglight for Virtualization?

Quest Foglight for Virtualization's integration needs enhancement.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Turbonomic?

It offers different scenarios. It provides more capabilities than many other tools available. Typically, its price is set as a percentage of the consumption of some of our customers' services. The ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Turbonomic?

The implementation could be enhanced.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Turbonomic?

We use IBM Turbonomic to automate our cloud operations, including monitoring, consolidating dashboards, and reporting. This helps us get a consolidated view of all customer spending into a single d...

See all answers

Comparisons

VMware Aria Operations vs Foglight for Virtualization

Compared 40% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Foglight for Virtualization

Compared 26% of the time

More Foglight for Virtualization Competitors

VMware Aria Operations vs IBM Turbonomic

Compared 8% of the time

Densify vs IBM Turbonomic

Compared 6% of the time

Spot by Flexera vs IBM Turbonomic

Compared 5% of the time

Azure Cost Management vs IBM Turbonomic

Compared 4% of the time

Cloudability vs IBM Turbonomic

Compared 4% of the time

More IBM Turbonomic Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Virtualization Management Tools

January 2026

Download Foglight for Virtualization product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM Turbonomic

January 2026

Download IBM Turbonomic product report

Also Known As

VKernel vScope Explorer, vOPS Server, Vizioncore

Turbonomic, VMTurbo Operations Manager

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Quest Software

IBM

Overview

Foglight for Virtualization optimizes and monitors virtual environments, offering insights into performance and resource allocation to enhance virtualization management efficiency.

Designed to provide IT professionals with robust capabilities, Foglight for Virtualization aids in monitoring performance, managing resources, and troubleshooting. It delivers comprehensive analytics that helps identify issues before they impact operations, thereby supporting proactive management of virtual infrastructures. As virtualization becomes crucial in IT infrastructure, having a tool like Foglight that ensures high efficiency and minimal downtime is invaluable.

What are the valuable features of Foglight for Virtualization?

Comprehensive Analytics: Provides detailed insights into virtual environments, facilitating informed management decisions.
Resource Optimization: Ensures efficient allocation of resources by identifying underused and overused assets.
Performance Troubleshooting: Quickly pinpoints issues impacting virtual environment performance.
Capacity Planning: Aids in predicting future needs to prevent resource shortages.
Cross-Platform Support: Manages diverse virtualization platforms within a single dashboard.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlines operations by reducing diagnostic and troubleshooting time.
Cost Savings: Optimizes resource utilization, leading to decreased hardware and energy expenses.
Scalability: Supports growth by providing adaptable management solutions for expanding virtual environments.
Enhanced Performance: Ensures smooth operations with proactive management and monitoring.
Reduced Downtime: Minimizes interruptions by resolving performance issues promptly.

This tool is implemented across sectors like finance, healthcare, and education, where managing virtualized environments efficiently is crucial. Users in these industries rely on Foglight for its ability to adapt to specific requirements and maintain high standards of performance in complex infrastructures.

Quest Software

IBM Turbonomic offers automation, planning, and right-sizing recommendations to streamline resource management, improve efficiencies, and optimize costs across virtualized environments and cloud platforms.

IBM Turbonomic is valued for its capability to optimize resource allocation and monitor virtual environments efficiently. It facilitates automated decision-making in VM sizing, load balancing, and cost optimization for both on-premises and cloud deployments. Users can leverage insights for workload placement, ensure peak performance assurance, and effectively right-size across VMware and Azure. The ongoing transition to HTML5 aims to improve visual and navigational ease, while expanded reporting features are anticipated. Opportunities for improved training, documentation, and integrations enhance platform usability and functionality.

What Are the Key Features?

Automation: Streamlines resource allocation and VM management.
Planning Tools: Supports capacity management and growth projections.
Right-Sizing: Optimizes VM configurations for efficient resource use.
Customizable Dashboards: Provides quick insights into environment health.
Reporting Capabilities: Offers valuable data for informed decision-making.
Cloud Integration: Ensures cost-effective resource utilization.

What Benefits Should Be Looked For?

Performance Enhancement: Improves application performance efficiency.
Cost Reduction: Minimizes operational expenses through optimizations.
Infrastructure Efficiency: Maximizes use of IT infrastructure resources.

In finance, IBM Turbonomic aids in maintaining platform efficiency during market fluctuations. Healthcare organizations leverage its capability for resource optimization during high-demand periods to enhance patient care support. Retailers use it for planning in peak seasons, ensuring resources align with fluctuating demand to maintain performance continuity.

IBM

Sample Customers

Unimat, AeroM_xico Delta TechOps

IBM, J.B. Hunt, BBC, The Capita Group, SulAmérica, Rabobank, PROS, ThinkON, O.C. Tanner Co.

Buyer's Guide

Virtualization Management Tools

January 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, Nutanix, Veeam Software and others in Virtualization Management Tools. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Virtualization Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Virtualization Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.