

ForgeRock and Oracle Identity Governance compete in the identity management space, with Oracle being slightly superior due to its extensive features.
Features: ForgeRock focuses on scalability and flexibility, supporting hybrid environments with comprehensive access management and integration capabilities. Oracle, on the other hand, offers advanced analytics and role management, coupled with robust compliance features.
Room for Improvement: ForgeRock could enhance its advanced analytics and governance features, improve integration with third-party analytics tools, and expand its compliance reporting. Oracle may benefit from simplifying its deployment process, enhancing cloud compatibility, and improving its intuitive user interface.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ForgeRock facilitates deployment through its intuitive model and flexible integration options, enhancing user experience. Oracle, despite its complex setup, is supported by extensive documentation and support services that assist in deployment challenges.
Pricing and ROI: ForgeRock offers a budget-friendly approach with a quick implementation time that results in faster ROI. Oracle, although involving higher initial costs, justifies this through its extensive feature set, which can potentially provide a high return on investment over time.
On a B2B level, it opened up the market for TomTom to sell its services in a more efficient way to car companies.
We can use a Linux image from ForgeRock with different systems, applications, websites, and mobile apps to create various types of access for users.
I can definitely see that fewer employees are needed compared to using different SaaS applications.
It is able to save time and money as everything is automated: user access provisioning, password policy management, and reporting.
The support portals offer comprehensive documentation, troubleshooting guides, and community forums that have been helpful for resolving common issues independently.
For standard support tickets, response times were very decent, and the support team was helpful in identifying configuration issues, especially with authentication trees, token settings, and directory replications.
The customer support is very flexible and supportive, particularly in the area of automation and customer deployments.
I do have dedicated support called the PUMA support, and they are providing excellent service.
The team is not very knowledgeable and takes too long to respond.
While they are familiar with me, the team is not large enough, which impacts their availability.
The access management layer is stateless, so I can scale horizontally by adding more nodes behind a load balancer as traffic increases.
The platform provides flexible authentication trees, enabling us to design custom MFA flows tailored for different user groups and risk profiles.
We scaled up with ForgeRock. My team received an award for implementing it for a 60 million customer base, which was the largest implementation at that time.
ForgeRock supports integration with legacy systems in our organization by offering a wide range of connectors and APIs.
ForgeRock is very stable because it manages access, authentication, and authorization effectively.
ForgeRock needs to focus on low-code, no-code solutions that allow for drag-and-drop functionality with good orchestration.
It would be better if they were available for support whenever the customer needs it, especially during migration or go-live time periods.
The main area is complexity. ForgeRock is extremely flexible, but the learning curve can be steep.
Incorporating AI to reduce manual work would be beneficial.
Oracle Identity Governance is a thick, heavy application and has fewer application connectors compared to SailPoint, which offers a large number of out-of-box connectors, making integration easier.
Improvements could include making Oracle Identity Governance a simpler plug-and-play product.
The pricing, setup cost, and licensing are very straightforward, which is a good success.
One has to spend considerable time trying to understand the different modules and different needs for those modules on the licensing front.
They sell the solution cheaply, but setting up and maintaining it becomes very expensive.
If you want to implement it at full scale, it's not an entry-level product; it's an enterprise-class product and it is expensive.
Oracle Identity Governance is very expensive.
Centralized management makes the biggest difference because it allows us to define, update, and enforce security and compliance rules from a single location.
ForgeRock positively impacts our organization as we manage a large number of users with ease, providing a standard IAM solution that simplifies our processes.
ForgeRock has positively impacted my organization by allowing us to migrate from the older system to the newer ForgeRock component, enabling us to go live with many products across geographies, enhancing security as it is all cloud-based, and with the company taking care of availability, it has reduced costs for the company.
The reporting function and Identity Audit function help with compliance, as they provide access review certification, segregation of duties, and a reporting feature.
The features I find most effective in Oracle Identity Governance include size and scale management, which is good for large organizations.
The solution's capabilities in provisioning, de-provisioning, terminations, and transfers are excellent.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| ForgeRock | 3.1% |
| Oracle Identity Governance | 2.6% |
| Other | 94.3% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 15 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 18 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 23 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 46 |
ForgeRock offers robust integration, customization, and identity management with support for SAML, OAuth 2.0, and DevOps readiness, ensuring enhanced security and scalability.
ForgeRock stands out in identity and access management featuring flexible authentication flows, risk-based authentication, centralized policy management, and comprehensive data protection. Its open-source foundation and cloud capabilities allow versatility and ease of use. While it provides excellent user path orchestration through the Journey feature, challenges exist in integration support and user-friendly customization. Improved documentation and streamlined interfaces are necessary to overcome deployment complexities. Additionally, the cost and support model may be burdensome for smaller organizations.
What are the key features?ForgeRock is widely utilized in industries like telecommunications, insurance, and open banking for secure user authentication and access management. It supports microservice authentications, customer identity management, single sign-on, and multi-factor authentication, integrating effectively with existing infrastructures to enhance security and user experience.
Oracle Identity Governance offers centralized identity management with features like lifecycle management and integration with other Oracle offerings. It ensures secure governance and efficient user access, catering to large organizations.
Oracle Identity Governance is known for its comprehensive lifecycle management, centralizing identity activities. It automates provisioning, de-provisioning, and self-service password reset, which enhances compliance capabilities and security. The platform supports integration with HR and custom applications, enabling efficient user access management. Although challenged by complexity and infrastructure requirements, which create a steep learning curve, it provides scalable solutions crucial for telecom, finance, and healthcare sectors. Users note its outdated interface and difficulty in setup. Cost remains a consideration accompanied by limited automation support.
What are the key features of Oracle Identity Governance?In industries like telecom, finance, and healthcare, Oracle Identity Governance is deployed to streamline user onboarding, access provisioning, and role management. It enhances operational efficiency with multi-factor authentication and integration capabilities that align with large-scale user management needs.
We monitor all Identity Management (IM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.