Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Fortinet FortiAnalyzer vs Grafana Loki comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Fortinet FortiAnalyzer
Ranking in Log Management
8th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
103
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Grafana Loki
Ranking in Log Management
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
8.0
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is 2.0%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Grafana Loki is 8.7%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Log Management
 

Featured Reviews

Manikandan Kannan - PeerSpot reviewer
Simplifying log management by displaying detailed access information
The most valuable feature of Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is its ability to simplify and display logs clearly, providing details like which IPs are accessing the system, the destination, and the policies applied. This visualization and detail make managing logs more straightforward. In conjunction with our VMware setup, Fortinet FortiAnalyzer enhances organizational efficiency, meeting the standard log retention period for up to a year.
CarlosPimentel - PeerSpot reviewer
Efficient log filtering enhances quick network troubleshooting
We use Grafana Loki for various verticals including manufacturing, finance, health, and aerospatial sectors. It primarily helps in monitoring security and access to devices. Grafana dashboards are used to track access success and failure and audit commands issued on devices Loki significantly…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It has a simplified and user-friendly interface."
"The dashboard of Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is outstanding with very detailed information."
"The report templates are valuable. It works very well, and integrations also work well."
"FortiAnalyzer's best feature is centralized log analysis. It's based on SQL database, so I can fully customize my report, chart-wise and log-wise, and can create as many reports as I want without any limit."
"The installation process for Fortinet FortiAnalyzer was very smooth, taking around two to three hours to deploy."
"The solution provides good standardized reports and is easy to troubleshoot."
"The feature I find most useful is the handy dashboard."
"The log analysis and reporting are both quite good."
"The tool can be used in multi-cluster environments."
"There are new features like that pilot code and things like that for profiling."
"The effectiveness of filters is pivotal for optimizing the search process and extracting the specific information we need from the extensive log data."
"We are using Grafana Loki as a database for real-time metrics."
"I appreciate the capability to process logs from microservices and seamlessly integrate them into Grafana."
"The best feature of Grafana Loki is that it integrates well with our other tool."
"Loki also utilizes the same service discovery mechanism as used by Prometheus. So, whatever labeled metadata you see in Prometheus, you have the exact same metadata in the Loki system. Given this level of intricacy and the attempt to address these challenges, I firmly believe that Loki deserves praise for the work."
"The most valuable part of Loki is the ability to filter logs by keywords and devices."
 

Cons

"When it comes to pushing logs to a SIEM, most of the time we have some issues when it comes to filtering."
"I believe that its technical support is the only aspect that requires significant improvement."
"The deployment is complex and has room for improvement."
"The user interface could be a bit more user-friendly."
"The log view for syslog in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer could be improved. A more comprehensive dashboard for syslog would enhance its value."
"Fortinet FortiAnalyzer could improve the user interface, and the experience of users receiving the reports and tracking could be better."
"Their pricing model is not the best and needs work."
"The reports are good, but they are over-summarized."
"We face some bugs when we install the latest version of Grafana Loki."
"The platform's stability needs improvement."
"In Grafana Loki, the creation of metrics is not so easy, making it an area that could be made easier."
"It would be beneficial if Loki could directly access Windows Server logs or events directly from the servers."
"The solution's scalability depends on the team managing the Grafana instance."
"The solution has shortcomings regarding security monitoring-oriented features that need improvement."
"I do not see any areas for improvement at the moment."
"It's not intended for proprietary services, so you have to struggle with configuration a lot."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is not expensive when compared to other solutions like Palo Alto."
"The pricing is reasonable."
"I would rate the price of FortiAnalyzer as seven out of ten, with ten being the most expensive."
"We found the price of Fortinet FortiAnalyzer to be reasonable."
"t varies depending on your needs. However, after-sales support is expensive."
"It is acceptable for on-premises, but it is expensive for the cloud."
"I rate the product's price a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."
"In other countries, the product may seem cheap, but in Vietnam, the costs are high."
"The solution is open source."
"The cost is less than other paid services like CloudWatch."
"Grafana Loki is a free, open-source solution."
"Since we are using the open-source version of Grafana Loki, we are not paying anything for the solution."
"I find the licensing structure quite reasonable, as the free license effectively meets my requirements."
"You can use the free version of Grafana Loki on-premises."
"I use the solution's open-source version. Grafana Loki is a completely free solution for me."
"We use a free version."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.
851,823 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Fortinet FortiAnalyzer?
The reporting features, which offer customization, real-time insights, and compliance support, are particularly noteworthy aspects.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortinet FortiAnalyzer?
We pay roughly $5,000 for a solution that we needed specifically, but I do not remember the exact price. Overall, I find the pricing to be good compared to other tools in the market.
What needs improvement with Fortinet FortiAnalyzer?
The only area where it could improve is in providing better training for the tool. Some training would be beneficial, even though it's not entirely necessary for its usage.
What do you like most about Grafana Loki?
We are using Grafana Loki as a database for real-time metrics.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Grafana Loki?
We use the open-source version of Loki. The cloud version is competitively priced compared to other market solutions.
What needs improvement with Grafana Loki?
It would be beneficial if Loki could directly access Windows Server logs or events directly from the servers.
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

General Directorate of Information Technology
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet FortiAnalyzer vs. Grafana Loki and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
851,823 professionals have used our research since 2012.