Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs Red Hat Single Sign On comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Fortinet and Red Hat are both solutions in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category. Fortinet is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.5, while Red Hat is ranked #18. Fortinet holds a 3.8% mindshare in SSO, compared to Red Hat’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Fortinet users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator

Read 65 Fortinet FortiAuthenticator reviews

12,299 Views
4,428 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Red Hat Single Sign On

Read 5 Red Hat Single Sign On reviews

1,720 Views
1,703 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator

Red Hat Single Sign On

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and Red Hat Single Sign On compete in the identity and access management category. Fortinet FortiAuthenticator seems to have the upper hand in pricing and customer support, while Red Hat Single Sign On is superior in features and security.

Features: Fortinet FortiAuthenticator offers robust multi-factor authentication, seamless network environment integration, and reliable user validation. Red Hat Single Sign On provides effortless integration with enterprise applications, advanced security protocols, and an extensive feature set that users find versatile.

Room for Improvement: Fortinet FortiAuthenticator needs better documentation, enhanced reporting features, and more comprehensive user guides. Red Hat Single Sign On requires improved configuration options, more intuitive management tools, and streamlined user interfaces to simplify the setup process.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fortinet FortiAuthenticator deployment is straightforward but has mixed feedback on customer service responsiveness. Red Hat Single Sign On offers a user-friendly deployment experience with proactive customer support that users find reliable.

Pricing and ROI: Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is viewed as cost-effective with good ROI. Red Hat Single Sign On is higher in cost but justified by its comprehensive features and substantial security benefits, making its value proposition align with pricing.

To learn more, read our detailed Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs. Red Hat Single Sign On Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs. Red Hat Single Sign On

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 919,894 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Authentication Systems (5th), Identity Management (IM) (14th), Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) (2nd)

Red Hat Single Sign On

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

18th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category, the mindshare of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is 3.8%, down from 5.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat Single Sign On is 1.5%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Single Sign-On (SSO) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator	3.8%
Red Hat Single Sign On	1.5%
Other	94.7%

Single Sign-On (SSO)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2848395

Technical Business Development Manager at a outsourcing company with 501-1,000 employees

Multi-factor security has improved device protection but still needs broader application coverage

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator could be improved in its cost structure. Although it is not expensive, other solutions offer more value for less money. Cisco Duo provides better value in this regard and connects to web applications much more easily, scaling effectively in that sense. While I have never used Cisco Duo to secure other devices in IoT environments, I know Cisco Duo is capable of doing so, whereas Fortinet FortiAuthenticator cannot. Additionally, Cisco Duo is also cheaper. These are the main reasons why we switched away from Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, as it was very limited compared to other solutions available. Fortinet FortiAuthenticator was primarily missing the ability to scale to web applications.

Read full review

Giovanni Baruzzi

Owner at Syntlogo GmbH

A stable and flexible solution with some basic capabilities

I set up Red Hat Single Sign-On in half an hour. I had to install a single sign-on solution for a customer. I reviewed a list of all available products, which were no more than fifty, and analyzed them. I chose it because it was convincing, modern, and based on technology from 2015. I put my trust in this product, and after nine years, I feel confident in my decision. Deploying this solution usually takes half an hour. You need an operating system running, then deploy the packages and prepare the interfaces. I rate the initial setup a ten out of ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It made things much easier for dealing with users BYOD for our secured wireless networks."

"This is a cost effective and flexible solution."

"The solution is stable; I installed it two years ago, and we rarely check the internet for changes because it's really stable and we don't have problems."

"The tool's most valuable features are push notifications and integration with the FortiGate firewall. Push notifications provide an instant acceptance mechanism. When customers try to access SSL VPN, the solution sends a push notification to their mobile phone, and they can easily approve the access. The integration with FortiGate firewall is very easy if our customers use FortiGate for their firewall."

"The response from Fortinet is very fast."

"The product's initial setup phase was easy. It is also easy to deploy."

"FortiAuthenticator is really good software that integrates very well with Fortinet products."

"The technical support for FortiAuthenticator is excellent."

More Fortinet FortiAuthenticator pros

"Good support for single sign-on protocols."

"The solution is flexible and has the same basic capabilities right out of the box. The most important feature of this product is that it is a Red double-sided product. One side is a well-known open-source project; the other is a Red Hat commercial product. The commercial product benefits from all the experience and contributions of the community, making it a very well-developed product."

"Red Hat SSO has a lot of very concise, well laid out documentation, which is available in the free edition as well."

"The product’s most valuable feature is its ability to assign only one password for the user at a false value."

"Red Hat SSO integrates well with our other solutions. Using OIDC protocols and ITL integration, employees can authenticate with Red Hat SSO and access our microservices."

"It is very easy to scale and use as you want."

"I like that the solution is open source and you can use a commercial edition of it without any charge."

Cons

"Their technical staff needs improvement because they take too much time to resolve issues."

"The integration with third-party tools must be better."

"The only issue I encounter is that when not using FortiAuthenticator for an extended period, it's typical to encounter some obstacles in the configuration process that you need to address."

"I don't have any issues with this solution, but it may need a better, more user-friendly interface or better design of the platform."

"They could expand FortiAuthenticator's capabilities to accommodate a broader range of environments."

"We had some stability issues. Our first LBS unit wouldn't work properly the first time and that wasted a lot of time."

"The GUI has some shortcomings and can be made better. The GUI is not great."

"Other features that would improve the product are a single sign-on where people can use their Gmail ID to log-in, etc."

More Fortinet FortiAuthenticator cons

"Security could be improved."

"The product’s technical support services could be better."

"Red Hat publishes much more and communicates its actions and plans. They could provide words, maps, and other resources."

"They could provide more checks and balances to find out if there have been any security lapses, e.g., if somebody is trying to break into the system. Some other products have these detection mechanisms in case someone is trying to hack into the system or find out a user's passwords."

"I think they could provide additional features in terms of users trying to manipulate the system with regard to security."

"Red Hat SSO's architecture could be updated."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"FAC is an affordable solution for Middle Range (200E/400E) and also needs a package of mobility agents (2,000) perpetual."

"It is usually cheap. Without a license, you can use some basic features. You can buy a 20-year license and implement the solution once."

"I rate the price of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator a three out of five."

"It costs more to license the high-availability option."

"You can pay as you go with them. You purchase a base license and add to it as needed."

"The platform is cost-effective as it does not require a separate license for SD-WAN functionality."

"I rate the product price as two or three on a one-to-ten scale, where one is expensive, and ten is cheap."

"I would rate the pricing a four out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. It is not that costly. It is cheap, easy to manage, easy to install, and easy to configure."

More Fortinet FortiAuthenticator pricing and cost advice

"The license is around $8000 USD."

"If you want support, that is when you use the paid version. There are different support categories that you can pay for, which provide different support levels. E.g., there is a quick response if you pay a higher amount, where the response time is within a few hours."

"Red Hat Single Sign On is expensive."

"It is a low cost product. This product can be used by non-profit organizations or universities, when they don't want to invest a lot of money."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

919,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

Government

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	38
Midsize Enterprise	19
Large Enterprise	11

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortinet FortiAuthenticator?

My experience with Fortinet FortiAuthenticator's pricing found the pricing to be good. There are better solutions available in the market. Overall, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is an inexpensive sol...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Fortinet FortiAuthenticator?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Fortinet FortiAuthenticator?

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator was implemented as a multi-factor authentication solution to serve as a second barrier for accessing and unlocking devices. However, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator was limi...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Cisco Duo vs Fortinet FortiAuthenticator

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Fortinet FortiAuthenticator

Compared 5% of the time

Fortinet FortiNAC vs Fortinet FortiAuthenticator

Compared 4% of the time

Fortinet FortiToken vs Fortinet FortiAuthenticator

Compared 3% of the time

Microsoft Active Directory vs Fortinet FortiAuthenticator

Compared 3% of the time

More Fortinet FortiAuthenticator Competitors

Auth0 Platform vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 21% of the time

Okta Platform vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 19% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 7% of the time

OneLogin by One Identity vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 6% of the time

Atlassian Crowd vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 3% of the time

More Red Hat Single Sign On Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator

October 2026

Download Fortinet FortiAuthenticator product report

Buyer's Guide

Single Sign-On (SSO)

October 2026

Download Red Hat Single Sign On product report

Also Known As

FortiAuthenticator

Red Hat Single Sign-On, Red Hat SSO, RH SSO, RH-SSO

Overview

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator enhances security through intuitive management and integration capabilities, offering two-factor authentication and seamless connectivity with FortiGate, LDAP, and AD. It provides robust OTP features and operates efficiently across diverse environments.

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is designed to streamline two-factor and multi-factor authentication processes across diverse network environments. Its seamless integration with Active Directory optimizes secure user management and enhances VPN security. It facilitates multi-domain authentication and serves as a comprehensive identity and access management tool. Organizations leverage its capabilities for VPN and network access while utilizing tokens for increased security. Its single sign-on feature aids in simplifying identity management and authorization, supporting extensive network and application security demands. However, improvements could be made to its outdated interface, pricing strategy, and better integration with third-party applications. Streamlined command line configurations and bolstered technical support would enhance user experience further.

What are the key features of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator?

Simple FSSO configuration: Provides easy setup for secure single sign-on.
Flexible two-factor authentication: Offers varied authentication methods to enhance security.
Seamless integration: Works effortlessly with LDAP, AD, and FortiGate systems.
Intuitive management: Features a user-friendly interface for efficient management.
Robust OTP features: Supports diverse credentials for One-Time Passwords.

What benefits should users expect from Fortinet FortiAuthenticator?

Enhanced security: Through detailed logs and strong authentication measures.
Cost-effective management: Reduces administrative overhead and operational costs.
Global operation support: Provides reliable service worldwide.
Centralized management: Increases efficiency across devices and platforms.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and education, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is implemented to secure sensitive data and streamline access management. Its integration capabilities support compliance requirements, while its authentication features ensure authorized access across platforms, enhancing both security and operational efficiency.

Fortinet

Red Hat Single Sign On is an open-source platform offering fast, scalable, and customizable SSO solutions. It supports popular protocols and integrates with social logins and enterprise solutions to provide seamless authentication across applications.

Red Hat Single Sign On provides fast and flexible authentication, enhancing security across different applications. It supports standardized SSO protocols like OpenID Connect and integrates easily with multiple platforms. Its open-source nature, backed by Red Hat's commercial support, allows community contributions and adaptable capabilities. However, it could improve its integration with Windows products and enhance its security features, including detection mechanisms and audit reports. Scalability and documentation are key areas for development, and users seek advanced tracking for unauthorized access attempts.

What are the key features of Red Hat Single Sign On?

Open Source: Community-driven with extensive documentation and flexibility for customization.
SSO Protocol Support: Compatible with standard protocols like OpenID Connect for seamless integration.
Social Login Integration: Easily integrates with social platforms, enhancing user experience.
Scalable Design: Efficiently handles authentication across multiple clusters.
Commercial Support: Backed by Red Hat for professional support and reliability.

What benefits or ROI should be evaluated when considering Red Hat Single Sign On?

Enhanced Security: Streamlined processes reduce risk, ensuring secure access across applications.
Flexibility: Open-source nature offers adaptable functionality for diverse requirements.
Community Contributions: Benefits from continuous improvements and new features.
Cost-Effective: Transition from Keycloak to paid subscription offers robust capabilities.

Industries, especially those requiring robust security and scalability, implement Red Hat Single Sign On to manage authentication. It integrates with enterprise solutions and identity providers, streamlining login processes and reducing complexities. Organizations appreciate its adaptability when transitioning from Keycloak, experiencing enhanced application authentication and password security.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

Black Gold Regional Schools, Amadeus Hospitality, Jefferson County, Chunghwa Telecom, City of Boroondara, Dimension Data

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs. Red Hat Single Sign On

September 2026

Free Report: Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs. Red Hat Single Sign On

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs. Red Hat Single Sign On and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

919,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs. Red Hat Single Sign On report.

See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.

We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.