Microsoft Entra ID vs Red Hat Single Sign On comparison

Microsoft and Red Hat are both solutions in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.7, while Red Hat is ranked #10 with an average rating of 9.5. Microsoft holds a 24.5% mindshare in SSO, compared to Red Hat’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Entra ID

Read 235 Microsoft Entra ID reviews

23,813 Views
6,668 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Red Hat Single Sign On

Read 5 Red Hat Single Sign On reviews

967 Views
967 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Entra ID

Red Hat Single Sign On

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Microsoft Entra ID and Red Hat Single Sign On are two popular authentication solutions. Microsoft Entra ID has the upper hand in integrations and ease of use, while Red Hat Single Sign On is favored for its flexibility and customization options.

Features: Microsoft Entra ID is known for seamless integration with other Microsoft services, strong security features, and straightforward setup. Red Hat Single Sign On is flexible, highly customizable, and open-source.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Entra ID could benefit from enhanced reporting features, more flexible pricing options, and better documentation. Red Hat Single Sign On needs improved documentation, a more intuitive setup process, and streamlined deployment steps.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Entra ID is praised for its quick deployment and robust customer support. Red Hat Single Sign On's deployment can be more complex, but it has strong community support.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Entra ID users find value in its subscription pricing model with a higher perceived ROI. Red Hat Single Sign On users appreciate the lower initial setup cost and the open-source licensing model.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Entra ID vs. Red Hat Single Sign On Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID vs. Red Hat Single Sign On

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Entra ID

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

235

Ranking in other categories

Authentication Systems (1st), Identity Management (IM) (2nd), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (1st), Access Management (1st), Microsoft Security Suite (2nd)

Red Hat Single Sign On

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

10th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Entra ID is 24.5%, down from 25.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat Single Sign On is 2.2%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Single Sign-On (SSO)

Featured Reviews

Bahram Piri

Chief Executive Officer & Founder at IDmelon Technologies

Security focus and seamless implementation increase platform productivity

Microsoft Entra ID can be improved in many ways, and there's a big wish list.If we're focusing on security, something that I definitely expect is improvement in the UI and UX for frontline workers. This is important, especially for non-tech savvy individuals. It is something Microsoft Entra ID could do to improve for a wider audience. It's important to focus on the frontline workers since they are non-tech savvy individuals. They are not like those back-office engineering C-level employees who are constantly dealing with computers, and we need to build a specific user experience and user interface for them to handle this stuff. That's something I expect Microsoft to focus on more for Microsoft Entra ID.

Read full review

Giovanni Baruzzi

Owner at Syntlogo GmbH

A stable and flexible solution with some basic capabilities

I set up Red Hat Single Sign-On in half an hour. I had to install a single sign-on solution for a customer. I reviewed a list of all available products, which were no more than fifty, and analyzed them. I chose it because it was convincing, modern, and based on technology from 2015. I put my trust in this product, and after nine years, I feel confident in my decision. Deploying this solution usually takes half an hour. You need an operating system running, then deploy the packages and prepare the interfaces. I rate the initial setup a ten out of ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I like is that I can go anywhere, at any time, and to any client premise, and I can simply log in to the admin panel and can serve any of my clients."

"Let's say we decide that our users need to have MFA, multi-factor authentication. It is very easy to implement that with Azure Active Directory."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to set up conditional access, where you can enforce users to connect using multifactor authentication."

"Microsoft Entra ID efficiently responds to numerous requests, and we have not faced significant connectivity issues, making it reliable."

"The integration with all Microsoft services and external applications is crucial. Microsoft Entra ID has helped the company with user identities, user device management, and endpoint management. Integration capabilities are significant."

"Configuring the domain and setting it up in the Azure portal is just three clicks to be honest."

"It's simple to create groups or accounts and to add users. There are several options for dynamic groups."

"The benefits of using this solution were realized straightaway."

More Microsoft Entra ID pros

"The product’s most valuable feature is its ability to assign only one password for the user at a false value."

"Red Hat SSO has a lot of very concise, well laid out documentation, which is available in the free edition as well."

"The solution is flexible and has the same basic capabilities right out of the box. The most important feature of this product is that it is a Red double-sided product. One side is a well-known open-source project; the other is a Red Hat commercial product. The commercial product benefits from all the experience and contributions of the community, making it a very well-developed product."

"It is very easy to scale and use as you want."

"Good support for single sign-on protocols."

"Red Hat SSO integrates well with our other solutions. Using OIDC protocols and ITL integration, employees can authenticate with Red Hat SSO and access our microservices."

Cons

"Microsoft support has some room for improvement. I avoid contacting them because it can be time-consuming. They don't necessarily find the solution, but you have to be on call for them to connect and do things on your system remotely. You have to schedule a time to meet with them, and it's somewhat inconvenient."

"The robustness of the conditional access feature of the zero trust strategy to verify users is adequate but not comprehensive."

"Azure AD could be more robust and adopt a saturated model, where they can offer unlimited support for a multi-cloud environment."

"The solution has not saved costs. While we’ve eliminated some tools, there are some other features that we are dependent on as admin, which are not yet integrated with Azure AD."

"In my opinion, Microsoft sometimes releases products too early without providing enough documentation. Our team works with innovative solutions like verified ID, identity governance ,and lifecycle workflow. When we started with lifecycle workflows, we had only two integrated worklows. Still, we couldn't find much of the information we needed in the documentation about our use case or how to leverage IDs in our proof of concept."

"Sometimes, level-one support lacks the immediate information needed, causing delays in receiving appropriate support."

"The thing that is a bit annoying is the inability to nest groups. Because we run an Azure hybrid model, we have nested groups on-premise which does not translate well. So, we have written some scripts to kind of work around that. This is a feature request that we have put in previously to be able to use a group that is nested in Active Directory on-premise and have it handled the same way in Azure."

"Azure Active Directory could be made easier to use. We have large amounts of data and storage. We are looking for video files and media content for applications, we will think about options, such as cloud storage or a CDN."

More Microsoft Entra ID cons

"They could provide more checks and balances to find out if there have been any security lapses, e.g., if somebody is trying to break into the system. Some other products have these detection mechanisms in case someone is trying to hack into the system or find out a user's passwords."

"The product’s technical support services could be better."

"Security could be improved."

"Red Hat publishes much more and communicates its actions and plans. They could provide words, maps, and other resources."

"Red Hat SSO's architecture could be updated."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are four different levels of subscription including the free level, one that includes the Office 365 applications, the Premium 1 (P1) level, and the Premium 2 (P2) level."

"The solution can be cheaper."

"If you have a different IDP today, I would take a close look at what your licensing looks like, then reevaluate the licensing that you have with Microsoft 365, and see if you're covered for some of this other stuff. Folks sometimes don't realize that, "Oh, I'm licensed for that service in Azure." This becomes one of those situations where you have the "aha" moment, "Oh, I didn't know we can do that. Alright, let's go down this road." Then, they start to have conversations with Microsoft to see what they can gain. I would recommend that they work closely with their TAM, just to make sure that they are getting the right level of service. They may just not be aware of what is available to them."

"We pay a yearly license. Licenses are very expensive."

"As a nonprofit, we have A5 licenses for nonprofits in education, so we at least have some reduced costs."

"For a small business buying individual licenses, it is an affordable solution."

"The product's price is in the midrange."

"I don't pay for it. Going by how I feel, I see the prices for any MFA solution going down because the more different alternatives there are, the cheaper things should be. Microsoft Authenticator app would be the preferred application, but there are too many ways to implement MFA. I don't know how much it cost, but the price should go down."

More Microsoft Entra ID pricing and cost advice

"It is a low cost product. This product can be used by non-profit organizations or universities, when they don't want to invest a lot of money."

"If you want support, that is when you use the paid version. There are different support categories that you can pay for, which provide different support levels. E.g., there is a quick response if you pay a higher amount, where the response time is within a few hours."

"The license is around $8000 USD."

"Red Hat Single Sign On is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

18%

Government

17%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Duo Security compare with Microsoft Authenticator?

We switched to Duo Security for identity verification. We’d been using a competitor but got the chance to evaluate Duo for 30 days, and we could not be happier. Duo Security is easy to configure a...

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure Active Directory?

It is very simple. The Active Directory functions are very easy for us. Its integration with anything is very easy. We can easily do third-party multifactor authentication.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Active Directory?

Our experience with the pricing, setup costs, and licensing of Microsoft Entra ID involves leveraging Microsoft 365 E5 licensing, so it's included. Being included in Microsoft licensing makes it mu...

See all answers

What do you like most about Red Hat Single Sign On?

The product’s most valuable feature is its ability to assign only one password for the user at a false value.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Hat Single Sign On?

I rate the product’s pricing a five out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Hat Single Sign On?

Red Hat publishes much more and communicates its actions and plans. They could provide words, maps, and other resources. Scalability could be improved, too. It could provide more documentation.

See all answers

Comparisons

Google Cloud Identity vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 8% of the time

Amazon Cognito vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 5% of the time

Okta Workforce Identity vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 5% of the time

Auth0 vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Entra ID Competitors

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 18% of the time

AWS IAM Identity Center vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 13% of the time

Ping Identity Platform vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 12% of the time

Okta Workforce Identity vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 11% of the time

Auth0 vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 11% of the time

More Red Hat Single Sign On Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID

August 2025

Download Microsoft Entra ID product report

Buyer's Guide

Single Sign-On (SSO)

August 2025

Download Red Hat Single Sign On product report

Also Known As

Azure AD, Azure Active Directory, Azure Active Directory, Microsoft Authenticator

Red Hat Single Sign-On, Red Hat SSO, RH SSO, RH-SSO

Interactive Demo

Microsoft

Demo not available

Red Hat

Overview

Microsoft Entra ID is used for extending on-premises Active Directory to the cloud, managing application access, enabling multi-factor authentication, and single sign-on. It facilitates policy enforcement and secure access, ensuring centralized identity management across cloud and on-premises resources.

Organizations utilize Microsoft Entra ID for robust user and group management, identity synchronization, and conditional access. Its seamless integration with third-party apps, scalability, and support for remote work make it a preferred choice. The admin center streamlines identity and access tasks, enhancing efficiency and security with features like privileged identity management and audit logs.

What are the key features of Microsoft Entra ID?

Single Sign-On: Simplifies user access to multiple applications with one login.
Multifactor Authentication: Enhances security by requiring additional verification.
Conditional Access: Establishes policies that determine how users' access cloud apps.
Integration: Easily integrates with various third-party applications.
User Identity Protection: Safeguards user identities from threats.
Privileged Identity Management: Manages elevated access to sensitive resources.
Audit Logs: Provides thorough activity logs for oversight and compliance.

What benefits should users look for in Microsoft Entra ID reviews?

Enhanced Security: Offers strong multifactor authentication and identity protection.
Administrative Efficiency: Simplifies identity and access management tasks.
Scalability: Supports growing user bases and remote work environments.
Integration Capabilities: Compatible with numerous third-party applications.
User-Friendly Interface: Makes managing user identities straightforward.

Microsoft Entra ID implementation varies across industries. Tech firms leverage it for secure, scalable access management, while healthcare organizations utilize its identity protection features to safeguard patient data. Educational institutions adopt Entra ID for streamlined user management and policy enforcement, ensuring secure access for students and staff across on-premises and cloud resources.

Microsoft

Red Hat is the world’s leading provider of enterprise open source solutions, using a community-powered approach to deliver high-performing Linux, cloud, container, and Kubernetes technologies.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

Microsoft Entre ID is trusted by companies of all sizes and industries including Walmart, Zscaler, Uniper, Amtrak, monday.com, and more.

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID vs. Red Hat Single Sign On

July 2025

Free Report: Microsoft Entra ID vs. Red Hat Single Sign On

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Entra ID vs. Red Hat Single Sign On and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Entra ID vs. Red Hat Single Sign On report.

See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.

We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.