Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Ping Identity Platform vs Red Hat Single Sign On comparison

Ping Identity and Red Hat are both solutions in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category. Ping Identity is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3, while Red Hat is ranked #14 with an average rating of 9.0. Ping Identity holds a 5.6% mindshare in SSO, compared to Red Hat’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Ping Identity users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.
Ping Identity Platform
Read 30 Ping Identity Platform reviews
  • 6,348 Views
  • 2,666 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Red Hat Single Sign On
Read 5 Red Hat Single Sign On reviews
  • 1,069 Views
  • 1,069 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Ping Identity Platform and Red Hat Single Sign On are frequently compared solutions in the identity and access management space. Red Hat Single Sign On stands out owing to its robust features, making it a worthwhile investment for many users.

Features: Ping Identity Platform offers comprehensive authentication capabilities, adaptive MFA, and risk analysis. Red Hat Single Sign On provides seamless integration with multiple applications, efficient session management, and integrative flexibility.

Room for Improvement: Ping Identity Platform could improve its documentation, simplify its configuration complexity, and enhance its scalability. Red Hat Single Sign On needs better customer support, improved scalability, and enhanced deployment documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ping Identity Platform is challenging to deploy, requiring significant time and expertise, with responsive but sometimes slow customer service. Red Hat Single Sign On is easier to deploy with quicker setup times, though its customer service needs enhancements for faster support.

Pricing and ROI: Ping Identity Platform has high initial setup costs but offers a favorable long-term ROI due to its advanced capabilities. Red Hat Single Sign On is perceived as more cost-effective initially, with satisfactory ROI driven by its strong feature set.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Ping Identity Platform vs. Red Hat Single Sign On Report (Updated: March 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Ping Identity Platform vs. Red Hat Single Sign On
March 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 884,933 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Ping Identity Platform
Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)
4th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
30
Ranking in other categories
Authentication Systems (7th), Data Governance (10th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (6th), Access Management (4th), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (3rd), Directory Servers (1st)
Red Hat Single Sign On
Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)
14th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category, the mindshare of Ping Identity Platform is 5.6%, down from 8.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat Single Sign On is 1.9%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Single Sign-On (SSO) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Ping Identity Platform5.6%
Red Hat Single Sign On1.9%
Other92.5%
Single Sign-On (SSO)
 

Featured Reviews

SV
Shruthi R Varikoti
Senior ServiceNow Developer at Wells Fargo
Generative AI automates access reviews and provides workflow efficiencies
I work with Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC), IT Service Management (ITSM), and Customer Service Management (CSM) modules of ServiceNow. My project is related to cybersecurity. I have touched on generative AI and integrations like SOAP APIs. I have used the Ping Identity Platform for seamless…
Read full review
Giovanni Baruzzi - PeerSpot reviewer
Giovanni Baruzzi
Owner at Syntlogo GmbH
A stable and flexible solution with some basic capabilities
I set up Red Hat Single Sign-On in half an hour. I had to install a single sign-on solution for a customer. I reviewed a list of all available products, which were no more than fifty, and analyzed them. I chose it because it was convincing, modern, and based on technology from 2015. I put my trust in this product, and after nine years, I feel confident in my decision. Deploying this solution usually takes half an hour. You need an operating system running, then deploy the packages and prepare the interfaces. I rate the initial setup a ten out of ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The mobile biometric authentication option improved user experience. It's always about security because, with two-factor authentication, it's always a separate device verifying the actual user logging in."
"The soundness of the solution is its most valuable feature. For example, if you are in our corporate network, you can log on without any traffic interfering."
"I would recommend PingFederate as an IAM solution for its no-code environment, single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, bidirectional services, and advanced features."
"It offers robust features and customization options that justify the cost."
"It is a scalable solution...It is a stable solution."
"Ping Identity Platform can provide a solution for both workforce identity and access management and also for consumer identity and access management, which is CIAM."
"It's convenient for users to log in through Ping using the Kerberos adapter because it doesn't require them to authenticate again."
"It provides ease of connecting all our devices."
More Ping Identity Platform pros
"The product’s most valuable feature is its ability to assign only one password for the user at a false value."
"Good support for single sign-on protocols."
"It is very easy to scale and use as you want."
"Red Hat SSO integrates well with our other solutions. Using OIDC protocols and ITL integration, employees can authenticate with Red Hat SSO and access our microservices."
"Red Hat SSO has a lot of very concise, well laid out documentation, which is available in the free edition as well."
"The solution is flexible and has the same basic capabilities right out of the box. The most important feature of this product is that it is a Red double-sided product. One side is a well-known open-source project; the other is a Red Hat commercial product. The commercial product benefits from all the experience and contributions of the community, making it a very well-developed product."
 

Cons

"Currently, the main integration is SAML-based, but other integration methodologies need to be supported."
"They could enhance the product's device tracking for better zero-trust security would be beneficial. Currently, it tracks IPs well but lacks detailed device information, which is crucial from a security standpoint."
"PingID should put a little more effort into making a pretty self-explanatory deck about their tech features and the services they offer."
"We can choose a drop-down to search for which certificate we have to create, which is difficult."
"It requires some expertise to set up and manage."
"Notifications and monitoring are two areas with shortcomings in the solution that need improvement."
"From the improvement perspective, they could bring IGA capability, which right now they only have in their SaaS offering."
"PingID would benefit from a better user interface for integration."
More Ping Identity Platform cons
"Red Hat publishes much more and communicates its actions and plans. They could provide words, maps, and other resources."
"Security could be improved."
"The product’s technical support services could be better."
"Red Hat SSO's architecture could be updated."
"They could provide more checks and balances to find out if there have been any security lapses, e.g., if somebody is trying to break into the system. Some other products have these detection mechanisms in case someone is trying to hack into the system or find out a user's passwords."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Ping offers flexible pricing that's not standardized."
"The platform's value justifies the pricing, especially considering its security features and scalability."
"The product is costly."
"The tool is quite affordable."
"PingID's pricing is pretty competitive."
"Ping Identity Platform is not very expensive."
"The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap."
"Compared to some SaaS-based solutions, the platform is relatively cost-effective."
More Ping Identity Platform pricing and cost advice
"The license is around $8000 USD."
"If you want support, that is when you use the paid version. There are different support categories that you can pay for, which provide different support levels. E.g., there is a quick response if you pay a higher amount, where the response time is within a few hours."
"Red Hat Single Sign On is expensive."
"It is a low cost product. This product can be used by non-profit organizations or universities, when they don't want to invest a lot of money."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
22%
Retailer
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
Government
17%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
11%
University
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise20
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about PingFederate?
PingFederate is very flexible. We can do many customizations, and it also provides an SDK to tailor it to our specific requirements. There are also numerous plugins available. I've worked with tool...
See all answers
What needs improvement with PingFederate?
It requires some expertise to set up and manage. Also, having dedicated support is helpful. It's not something anyone can just set up and run without assistance – ideally, a team using PingFederate...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for PingFederate?
We use PingFederate to provide SSO (Single Sign-On) solutions to enterprise applications. We support protocols like SAML (Security Assertion Markup Language), OAuth, and OpenID Connect. For example...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Hat Single Sign On?
I rate the product’s pricing a five out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Red Hat Single Sign On?
Red Hat publishes much more and communicates its actions and plans. They could provide words, maps, and other resources. Scalability could be improved, too. It could provide more documentation.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Red Hat Single Sign On?
Earlier, customers used to authenticate the user before they used the application. With the help of Single Sign On, the customer logs in and uses all of the customer's applications without authenti...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra ID vs Ping Identity Platform Logo
Microsoft Entra ID vs Ping Identity Platform
Compared 11% of the time
Microsoft Active Directory vs Ping Identity Platform Logo
Microsoft Active Directory vs Ping Identity Platform
Compared 6% of the time
Okta Platform vs Ping Identity Platform Logo
Okta Platform vs Ping Identity Platform
Compared 6% of the time
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Ping Identity Platform Logo
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Ping Identity Platform
Compared 5% of the time
ForgeRock vs Ping Identity Platform Logo
ForgeRock vs Ping Identity Platform
Compared 5% of the time
More Ping Identity Platform Competitors
Okta Platform vs Red Hat Single Sign On Logo
Okta Platform vs Red Hat Single Sign On
Compared 19% of the time
Microsoft Entra ID vs Red Hat Single Sign On Logo
Microsoft Entra ID vs Red Hat Single Sign On
Compared 14% of the time
Auth0 Platform vs Red Hat Single Sign On Logo
Auth0 Platform vs Red Hat Single Sign On
Compared 13% of the time
AWS IAM Identity Center vs Red Hat Single Sign On Logo
AWS IAM Identity Center vs Red Hat Single Sign On
Compared 11% of the time
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs Red Hat Single Sign On Logo
Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs Red Hat Single Sign On
Compared 5% of the time
More Red Hat Single Sign On Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Ping Identity Platform
March 2026
Ping Identity Platform reportDownload Ping Identity Platform product report
Buyer's Guide
Single Sign-On (SSO)
March 2026
Red Hat Single Sign On reportDownload Red Hat Single Sign On product report
 

Also Known As

Ping Identity (ID), PingFederate, PingAccess, PingOne, PingDataGovernance, PingDirectory, OpenDJ
Red Hat Single Sign-On, Red Hat SSO, RH SSO, RH-SSO
 

Overview

IDENTITY DEFINED SECURITY PLATFORM delivers a unified, standards-based platform that can be deployed as SaaS, software or both and can scale to handle millions of identities. From multi-factor authentication and single sign-on to access security, directory and data governance, our capabilities work together to give employees, partners and customers secure access to cloud, mobile and enterprise applications, securing and streamlined everything from sign-on to sign-off and everywhere in between.
Ping Identity

Red Hat is the world’s leading provider of enterprise open source solutions, using a community-powered approach to deliver high-performing Linux, cloud, container, and Kubernetes technologies.

Red Hat
 

Sample Customers

Equinix, Land O'Lakes, CDPHP, Box, International SOS, Opower, VSP, Chevron, Truist, Academy of Art University, Northern Air Cargo, Repsol
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Ping Identity Platform vs. Red Hat Single Sign On
March 2026
Free Report: Ping Identity Platform vs. Red Hat Single Sign On
Find out what your peers are saying about Ping Identity Platform vs. Red Hat Single Sign On and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Ping Identity Platform vs. Red Hat Single Sign On report.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.

We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.