


Fortinet FortiEDR and WatchGuard Firebox are strong competitors in the cybersecurity category. Fortinet FortiEDR holds the upper hand in healthcare IT due to its comprehensive dashboard and integration with FortiGate, contributing to improved threat response and management efficiency.
Features: Fortinet FortiEDR offers a comprehensive dashboard with next-generation firewall capabilities and robust integration with FortiGate, making it valuable for quick threat detection and healthcare IT. WatchGuard Firebox provides user-friendly management with Active Directory integration, a WebGUI for easy setup, and strong VPN and proxy support for effective security management.
Room for Improvement: Fortinet FortiEDR needs better cloud capabilities, enhanced real-time vulnerability detection, and better UX for Mac environments to minimize false positives. WatchGuard Firebox could benefit from improved advanced reporting, stronger third-party integrations, and addressing the learning curve in management setup.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fortinet FortiEDR supports deployment across on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments. Its customer service is well-received, though there are calls for faster response times after acquiring enSilo. WatchGuard Firebox offers flexible deployment options with a user-friendly approach for on-premises and hybrid installations. Its customer service is praised for responsiveness but could improve in expedited technical support.
Pricing and ROI: Fortinet FortiEDR is considered cost-effective, offering significant ROI through reduced threat management costs, though some find it expensive. WatchGuard Firebox is praised for affordability, especially with discounts on bundled services, making it a cost-effective solution for small and midsize enterprises. Both solutions provide reliable security investments over time.
They appreciate the rich telemetry data from the solution, as it provides in-depth threat identification.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks helps to reduce my total cost of ownership significantly.
In Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, most of the remediation is automated and the accuracy is quite good.
From a security standpoint, preventing even a single major security incident or prolonged outage can represent significant cost savings.
I do not see any return on investment after WatchGuard Firebox implementation in terms of cost reductions.
Reduced incidents and easier management helped lower operational cost.
The technical support from Palo Alto deserves a mark of ten because they reach out within an hour whenever assistance is needed.
There is no back and forth, and they know what we are asking for and come up with the best resolution for a solution.
If any of these services are missed, it becomes a problem in terms of support tickets, follow-up, or special configuration that needs to be done in the system.
The technical support from Fortinet is excellent.
For setting up some proper solutions for issues at the customer site, it can take about one week.
I believe the support from Fortinet is very good based on my experiences asking for help.
On a scale of one to 10, I would rate the technical support of the WatchGuard Firebox a 10.
When comparing WatchGuard Firebox with other vendors such as Fortinet, SonicWall, Palo Alto, and Sophos, WatchGuard Firebox performs competitively.
Most of the time, support engineers are knowledgeable and able to assist effectively with firewall configuration issues, VPN troubleshooting, firmware updates, and security-related concerns.
You can onboard 10,000 endpoints in just hours, which demonstrates the excellent scalability of this product.
Activating the newly purchased licenses is instantaneous, allowing installations without adjustments since it's cloud-based.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks can be expanded anytime by purchasing another license without any issues related to scalability.
When implemented in a Fortinet environment with an existing firewall, FortiAnalyzer, and FortiManager, it is straightforward to install and scale by adding more EDR for endpoints.
I can give it nine points in terms of scalability.
Overall, WatchGuard Firebox offers strong scalability for SMBs, MSPs, branch offices, and hybrid environments while keeping deployment and management relatively straightforward.
The user interface and features compared to newer firewalls are not up to the mark, which includes functionalities such as filtering, web filtering, threat protection, user identity, and UTM features that need improvement.
You can choose different models based on throughput and features, which makes it easy to support growing environments.
Cortex remains fast and responsive, even with increasing data and alerts.
The thresholds we've seen on our firewall boxes at some instances reached 80% to 85%, but even at that level of utilization, we don't observe any latency or any issues reported with respect to accessing the application.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks can be trusted completely.
After that, I stopped scanning the Cisco AnyConnect and switched to Fortinet VPN. Everything worked fine afterward.
For stability, I would give it a score of ten, as we are not having any issues with that currently.
I have just one WatchGuard Firebox unit that is licensed, and I have no bugs on it, so I am happy with that.
Once properly configured, the platform handles VPN connectivity, traffic inspection, and security services constantly, even in multi-site environments with remote users.
There are issues with traffic hitting the firewall, which could indicate performance problems related to throughput.
Improving reporting and dashboard customization, along with the addition of real-time and exportable reports, would help SOC teams greatly.
The inclusion of this feature would allow the application of DLP policies alongside antivirus policies via a single agent and console, making it more competitive as other OEMs often offer DLP solutions as part of their antivirus products.
If the per GB data could be provided at a certain level free of cost or at the same cost which the customer is taking for the entire bundle, that would be better.
Fortinet could consider reducing the minimum order quantity for EDR, currently set at 500 pieces.
It gives good visibility and control over the traffic, and the UI makes it easy to manage policies and respond quickly when something comes up.
Some improvements in threat intelligence integrations and SIEM integration as an out-of-the-box context would be beneficial.
The cost for renewal after three years is 75% of the hardware cost, which is a significant problem.
The pricing on SentinelOne is far more reasonable and cheaper than Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks.
I would say it is definitely not a cheap product, considering how mature it is and how scalable all Palo Alto products are together.
Compared to CrowdStrike, which is very costly, and SentinelOne, which is also very costly, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is a medium cost-efficient solution.
It's reasonably priced compared to other vendors' similar products.
The pricing is moderate; I cannot label it as cheap, but it is moderate compared to other main solutions.
When we tried to renew the Palo Alto license, the cost was beyond any reasonable range.
Fortinet is more expensive than WatchGuard.
I find WatchGuard Firebox to be cost-effective.
It incorporates AI for normal behavior detection, distinguishing unusual operations.
The product provides automation responses in case of a threat attack, severity assessments, centralized manageability, and comprehensive compliance features, resulting in reduced costs.
It includes machine learning to easily analyze data and detect complex threats across endpoints, networks, or clouds.
The four pillars of the solution are security access via VPN, ZTNA, attack surface protection, and automatic incident response, integrating with Fortinet Security Fabric.
This is especially relevant for government projects where the SD-WAN solution is within their private network, not touching the Internet or any other access.
The Firebox offers valuable features such as network security, URL filtering, UTM features, intrusion prevention and detection, and authentication.
The features of WatchGuard Firebox are most valuable for maintaining network security.
Some of the best features of WatchGuard Firebox in my experience are its ease of management, strong VPN capabilities, and integrated security services.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks | 3.7% |
| WatchGuard Firebox | 1.3% |
| Fortinet FortiEDR | 2.4% |
| Other | 92.6% |



| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 46 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 21 |
| Large Enterprise | 54 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 104 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 30 |
| Large Enterprise | 17 |
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.
Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.
What are the key features of Cortex XDR?Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.
Fortinet FortiEDR integrates with FortiGate, offering advanced antivirus and AI-driven behavioral analysis, automatic incident response, and strong scalability in endpoint security. It's especially noted for ease of deployment and a user-friendly interface.
Fortinet FortiEDR provides robust security features such as firewall and ransomware prevention. Its centralized management console simplifies operations, and customizable settings enhance user experience. It excels in granular threat control and effective threat intelligence for endpoint security and zero-day threat mitigation. The system is valued for its stability and comprehensive data analysis. However, increased cloud security, SASE capabilities, and better intelligence features are needed. Some users find challenges with high resource consumption, user interface, and false positives, while seeking improved cloud functions, SIEM integration, and broader attack surface protection.
What are the key features of Fortinet FortiEDR?Organizations utilize Fortinet FortiEDR for endpoint security across banking, education, and elder care sectors, integrating it with Fortinet firewalls. It detects and blocks unauthorized software and controls lateral movement, aiding in anomaly detection and threat hunting. It ensures network visibility and assists in incident response within diverse infrastructures.
WatchGuard Firebox is a high-performance firewall known for its ease of setup, offering robust security with layered protection and centralized management capabilities.
WatchGuard Firebox stands out for its intuitive management and high throughput, addressing security needs with features like VPN, web filtering, and threat detection. Its centralized control and reporting abilities, along with Active Directory integration, make it popular among varied organizations. Its user-friendly interface and ongoing updates enhance usability and reliability. However, there's a call for better cloud-based administration, scalability, and improved integration with third-party vendors.
What are the key features of WatchGuard Firebox?WatchGuard Firebox is implemented across industries to secure internet gateways and protect data in multi-site businesses. Its applications span from Unified Threat Management (UTM) and intrusion prevention to compliance support in business environments requiring secure connectivity through VPNs.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.