Fortinet FortiToken vs Thales Authenticators comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Fortinet and Thales are both solutions in the Authentication Systems category. Fortinet is ranked #6 with an average rating of 9.0, while Thales is ranked #15. Fortinet holds a 2.1% mindshare in AS, compared to Thales’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Fortinet users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Thales users who would recommend it.

Fortinet FortiToken

Read 32 Fortinet FortiToken reviews

4,887 Views
4,154 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Thales Authenticators

Read 5 Thales Authenticators reviews

2,686 Views
2,310 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Fortinet FortiToken

Thales Authenticators

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

Thales Authenticators and Fortinet FortiToken are popular choices for authentication solutions. Thales Authenticators seems to have the upper hand for its comprehensive feature set, while Fortinet FortiToken is praised for its overall effectiveness and ease of use.

What features are offered by Thales Authenticators in comparison to Fortinet FortiToken?

Thales Authenticators supports a wide range of authentication methods and offers strong security measures. It also provides flexible deployment models. Fortinet FortiToken is known for its simplicity and integration capabilities, focusing on ease of use and straightforward deployment processes. Thales offers diverse features, whereas Fortinet aims for a more user-friendly approach.

What areas of improvement can be found in Thales Authenticators in comparison to Fortinet FortiToken?

Users suggest Thales Authenticators could benefit from streamlined administration to reduce complexity, enhanced multi-device support, and a more intuitive interface. Fortinet FortiToken could improve its multi-device functionality, interface design, and add more advanced features to match Thales' comprehensive offerings.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of Thales Authenticators in comparison to Fortinet FortiToken?

Thales Authenticators offers various deployment models that can be complex for larger organizations, but their customer service is responsive and helpful. Fortinet FortiToken is praised for its straightforward deployment process and reliable customer service, making it easier to set up compared to Thales.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with Thales Authenticators in comparison to Fortinet FortiToken?

Thales Authenticators has a higher setup cost but offers a substantial ROI due to its robust features. Fortinet FortiToken also has a significant setup cost and provides reliable ROI. Thales requires a larger initial investment for greater long-term returns, while Fortinet offers steady returns on investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Fortinet FortiToken vs. Thales Authenticators Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiToken vs. Thales Authenticators

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fortinet FortiToken

Ranking in Authentication Systems

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Thales Authenticators

Ranking in Authentication Systems

15th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Authentication Systems category, the mindshare of Fortinet FortiToken is 2.1%, down from 4.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Thales Authenticators is 1.9%, down from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Authentication Systems Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Fortinet FortiToken	2.1%
Thales Authenticators	1.9%
Other	96.0%

Authentication Systems

Featured Reviews

Sutjipto Budiman

Director at Widya Presisi Solusi

Secure remote access has protected our intranet and supports straightforward integration

We use Fortinet and their products. I understand your points about Fortinet FortiToken. It is easy to integrate Fortinet FortiToken with solutions such as FortiGate, FortiAuthenticator, or FortiCloud. The integration is relatively straightforward and easy. Fortinet FortiToken is easier to use than Fortinet FortiToken as a separate piece of equipment or separate tool. The Fortinet FortiToken mobile application makes it easier to receive tokens on my smartphone. We tested the VPN option and another one combined with FortiClient, the antivirus, and web filtering, which are the most useful features in Fortinet FortiToken. Fortinet has another product that is more complete, but I think the price is not compatible for small businesses such as ours. I can recommend Fortinet FortiToken to other users, and I am totally satisfied with it. My company is a reseller of Fortinet, and my clients purchase the product directly from me rather than through the AWS Marketplace or other platforms. I mainly work within the Fortinet environment, and for this environment, Fortinet FortiToken would be the best choice. Overall, I would rate this product an eight.

Read full review

Gustavo Merighi

Automation and Telecommunications Analyst at Grupo Energisa

Has an easy-to-use management interface and a straightforward initial setup process

Our primary use cases include multifactor authentication for VPN connections and access to security tools like jump servers and firewalls. We also use it to enhance security measures in an enterprise environment The most valuable feature is the YAML 2.0 integration. It has an easy-to-use…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Fortinet FortiToken provides security and authenticates that the right external people are working with a company's system."

"The FortiAuthenticator and FortiToken are unquestionably the simplest multi-factor authentication solution to implement."

"Fortinet FortiToken has a lot of RADIUS functionality."

"Its ease of use is most valuable. It is simple to use and can be deployed out-of-the-box. It is quite a mature product with all the required features."

"FortiToken is a cost-effective solution compared to other solutions, such as Cisco."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its mobile application. It is particularly beneficial as it eliminates the need for hardware management."

"FortiToken helps us meet compliance requirements where applications or any authentication needs to use two factors."

"The solution is great for security, it is easy to implement, the deployment is quick and simple, it is stable and reliable, and the cost isn't too high."

More Fortinet FortiToken pros

"The most valuable feature of SafeNet Authentication Manager is authentication."

"The solution has helped our organization by allowing all users to connect securely."

"The solution is scalable and stable."

"The technical support services are good."

"We use this solution to log into virtual machines like VMware and VMware Horizon."

"I like how the solution allows me to support different types of hardware tokens and integrate with OTP."

Cons

"FortiToken should provide enhanced SMS services for those users who do not have smartphones."

"I would rate Fortinet FortiToken a six out of ten."

"Configuration can be confusing due to the lack of community and context-sensitive help. We've had to rely on technical support, which slows down the setup process."

"Support is a pain point in Bangladesh because there aren't many experienced Fortinet engineers in this country. It's easier to find one certified in Cisco, Palo Alto, or Juniper."

"I would like to see the product improvements in dynamic VLAN pooling. Specifically, when users are assigned different VLANs based on their SSID, ensuring no unintended lateral traffic between users would enhance security and efficiency."

"Fortinet FortiToken should improve its push notifications."

"They could enhance synchronization with mobile applications, and addressing minor issues with authentication could further improve user experience."

"It needs a lot of coupling with their other Fortinet products. To implement FortiToken, I most probably need to couple it with FortiAuthenticator for full implementation. An RSA token can be used with many devices, whereas Fortinet FortiToken is always linked to only one FortiGate device. If I want to reuse the token across five or six FortiGates, I would have to get the FortiAuthenticator product. I can't use one token to connect to different FortiGates, and I need to get another product to enable this functionality. They should also improve the support for their mobile client. There should be a more detailed roadmap for the operating systems being supported. Some of our users were using an old iOS iPhone, and they were forced to get a newer phone because FortiToken didn't support that version of iOS. Similarly, there may be a version of Android that is not supported, so the users need to change the phone. This was one of the reasons why our deployment took longer."

More Fortinet FortiToken cons

"I'd like to see integration with other platforms."

"The solution should allow for support of multi-tenant architecture."

"The scalability could improve, we have a lot of downtimes two years ago; this was in the cloud environment, because we purchased SafeNet Authentication Manager as a cloud service, and sometimes it was down for two or three hours."

"The problem with SafeNet is that it's not integrated with Microsoft 365."

"The product could be improved by adding more features for sending tokens via SMS or phone calls."

"The stability could improve."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."

"From an Indian perspective, it's definitely costlier."

"The solution’s price is good."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is the cheapest, and ten is the highest, I rate the pricing an eight."

"The solution’s pricing is moderate and reasonable."

"I would rate the pricing as an eight out of ten. We purchased the solution at a reasonable price in 2019."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."

"The platform's licensing cost is reasonable for our organization."

More Fortinet FortiToken pricing and cost advice

"There is an annual licensing fee."

"Thales is more expensive than its competitors."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

11%

Construction Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	9

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Fortinet FortiToken?

Fortinet FortiToken is not easy to change because after installing it on one person, it can be transferred to another, but we need support and cannot self-manage it. If we could self-manage transfe...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Fortinet FortiToken?

Fortinet FortiToken is primarily used for VPN access to the internet, which is the main use case for my clients and me.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Fortinet FortiToken?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs Fortinet FortiToken

Compared 12% of the time

Yubico YubiKey vs Fortinet FortiToken

Compared 9% of the time

Cisco Duo vs Fortinet FortiToken

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Fortinet FortiToken

Compared 6% of the time

RSA Authentication Manager vs Fortinet FortiToken

Compared 5% of the time

More Fortinet FortiToken Competitors

Yubico YubiKey vs Thales Authenticators

Compared 12% of the time

Certificate Lifecycle Manager vs Thales Authenticators

Compared 9% of the time

RSA Authentication Manager vs Thales Authenticators

Compared 6% of the time

Atalla Hardware Security Module vs Thales Authenticators

Compared 4% of the time

Okta Platform vs Thales Authenticators

Compared 4% of the time

More Thales Authenticators Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiToken

October 2026

Download Fortinet FortiToken product report

Buyer's Guide

Authentication Systems

October 2026

Download Thales Authenticators product report

Also Known As

No data available

Gemalto Ezio, Ezio, Gemalto Authenticators, SafeNet Authentication Manager

Overview

Fortinet FortiToken enhances security with two-factor authentication and mobile app integration, facilitating easy implementation and cost-effective perpetual licenses, integrating well with FortiAuthenticator to streamline VPN security.

FortiToken provides robust security through push-button authentication and time-based OTPs, making it an effective tool for managing both hard and soft tokens. It ensures server access security and VPN security with seamless integration to Fortinet platforms like FortiGate. Though improvements in integration with other solutions and enhanced reporting are noted, FortiToken remains a critical asset for organizations seeking simplified management of authentication processes. Migrating existing systems may pose challenges, and improvements in mobile app support and synchronization could enhance user experience.

What are the crucial features of Fortinet FortiToken?

Two-Factor Authentication: Offers added security through a secondary verification step.
Mobile App Integration: Seamlessly integrates with mobile devices for secure access.
Cost-Effective Perpetual Licenses: Provides economical solutions compared to competitors.
Push Notifications: Streamlines VPN security through instant authentication feedback.
Time-Based OTPs: Generates secure temporary codes for authentication purposes.

What benefits are highlighted in user reviews?

Easy Implementation: Streamlined process for quick deployment.
User-Friendliness: Simple management of tokens by users.
Secure Connectivity: Enhances security for remote and internal networks.
High Compatibility: Works effectively with Fortinet platforms, including FortiGate.

Fortinet FortiToken is particularly popular in sectors requiring high-security protocols, such as finance and healthcare. Companies use FortiToken to implement multi-factor authentication for VPN access in demanding environments, ensuring secure access to resources. This enhances remote work security and internal user operations by providing an additional layer of authentication.

Fortinet

Thales Authenticators offer robust support for hardware tokens, OTP integration, and PKI. With SafeNet Authentication Manager's authentication, they deliver exceptional stability and scalability.

Users of Thales Authenticators benefit from extensive multifactor authentication capabilities, crucial for VPN connections and accessing security tools like jump servers and firewalls. They deploy Thales on hybrid cloud setups, enhancing security in enterprise environments. The solution facilitates login into virtual machines such as VMware and VMware Horizon and utilizes SafeNet Authentication Manager's version 9.0 for local authentication. However, there is potential for improvement, including multi-tenant architecture support, better Microsoft 365 integration, and streamlined security processes to reduce redundancy.

What are the key features of Thales Authenticators?

Hardware Token Support: Extensive support for various hardware tokens enhances security.
OTP Integration: Offers robust OTP integration for additional authentication layers.
PKI Support: Provides Public Key Infrastructure support for secure operations.
SafeNet Authentication Manager: Features advanced authentication capabilities.
User-friendly Management: Simplified management interface aids in effortless control.
YAML 2.0 Integration: Facilitates smooth integration with YAML standards.
Scalability: Designed to handle expanding enterprise demands effectively.

What are the benefits and ROI to consider when reviewing Thales Authenticators?

Enhanced Security: Strengthens protection for sensitive enterprise operations.
Scalability: Capably supports growing needs without degradation in performance.
Operational Stability: Delivers consistent reliability across deployments.
Improved Authentication: Offers comprehensive multifactor authentication capabilities.

Thales Authenticators are deployed across diverse industries to enhance security infrastructures. In finance, they are crucial for safeguarding transactional processes while in healthcare, they protect patient data and ensure compliance with regulatory standards. Education institutions use Thales to secure student information systems and facilitate secure online learning environments.

Thales

Sample Customers

Black Gold Regional Schools, Amadeus Hospitality, Jefferson County, Chunghwa Telecom, City of Boroondara, Dimension Data

Standard Chartered Bank (SCB)

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiToken vs. Thales Authenticators

November 2026

Free Report: Fortinet FortiToken vs. Thales Authenticators

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet FortiToken vs. Thales Authenticators and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fortinet FortiToken vs. Thales Authenticators report.

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.