Fortra's Intermapper vs TruView comparison

Fortra and NETSCOUT are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Fortra is ranked #80, while NETSCOUT is ranked #64 with an average rating of 5.0. Fortra holds a 0.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to NETSCOUT’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Fortra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NETSCOUT users who would recommend it.

Fortra's Intermapper

Read 4 Fortra's Intermapper reviews

1,573 Views
1,510 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

TruView

Read 17 TruView reviews

1,732 Views
1,645 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Fortra's Intermapper

TruView

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

TruView and Fortra's Intermapper are competing in network management and monitoring. Fortra's Intermapper holds the upper hand due to its network flexibility and integration capabilities.

Features: TruView highlights comprehensive network performance analytics, intuitive data presentation, and advanced data visualization. Fortra's Intermapper emphasizes flexibility in monitoring devices, real-time network mapping, and superior integration capabilities.

Room for Improvement: TruView could benefit from easier deployment processes, enhanced integration options, and cost-effective setups. Fortra's Intermapper might improve by refining customer support, expanding its analytics capabilities, and offering a more detailed performance breakdown.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TruView involves more initial setup, contrasted with Fortra's straightforward deployment. TruView provides robust customer service, whereas Fortra focuses on seamless troubleshooting and assistance.

Pricing and ROI: TruView has a higher initial cost but offers a promising long-term ROI through detailed insights. Fortra's Intermapper presents a budget-friendly setup, potentially yielding lower ROI compared to the analytics provided by TruView.

To learn more, read our detailed Fortra's Intermapper vs. TruView Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Fortra's Intermapper vs. TruView

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,221 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fortra's Intermapper

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

80th

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

TruView

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

64th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Fortra's Intermapper is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TruView is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
TruView	0.5%
Fortra's Intermapper	0.5%
Other	99.0%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Andrian Lubimov

SVP of Networking and Operations at Skywire Networks

It tremendously cuts down our troubleshooting timeframe, but needs advanced SLA monitoring and reporting

They can do a better job with SLA reporting. It does some basic reporting, but it really doesn't offer the ability to monitor devices by groups, customers, or carrier to give an overall health performance of specifically-defined environments. That's where HelpSystems Intermapper could have done a better job. I would love to see advanced SLA monitoring and reporting in this solution. They already have a lot of ingredients. They already have SNMP polling. It is really about what people are looking for from SLA monitoring, especially someone who looks at the network topology. You want to see your endpoints. You want to see half of your endpoints by simply analyzing ICMP or SNMP-based availability of your endpoints. Having an ability to define your group and how you bring devices into your group would be a huge benefit.

Read full review

Zotex

Network Engineer at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees

Monitors traffic, analyzes flows, tracks packets, and measures bandwidth across our network

We use TruView primarily for network performance analysis and monitoring. It helps us track traffic, flows, packets, and bandwidth to understand our network's condition and detect any anomalies or attacks. However, the product's age limits its advanced features for performance analysis. The main advantage lies in its low cost and reliable functionality, as we have a permanent license and do not require support. Real-time monitoring in TruView is somewhat limited, as there is a delay of about five minutes in data updates, making it less effective for immediate insights.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features are its: log history, real-time monitoring capabilities, accuracy - the number of false positives is very low, and the mapping features."

"The solution has a couple of features which are really interesting; it's not a fancy or expensive solution but we wanted to have a cost effective one and it's doing its job pretty well."

"Put Intermapper in as your base to start from, hands-down."

"The graphical alerting with the ability to obtain a quick overview of a monitored device is my favorite feature."

"What is really cool about HelpSystems InterMapper is that because of its SNMP base, you can integrate all different makes and models on the same map. You, of course, can have more than one map, but you have an option to have visibility into the entire network from one centralized system. You can monitor IPs, routers, radios, DC power plants, and UPS. You can do it all from one network management and monitoring solution. That's what really makes HelpSystems Intermapper great. Another great thing about HelpSystems InterMapper is that you can really bundle different probes under one device. You can have a bundled device. You can monitor the physical status of a host based on the IP availability. You can also monitor services and actually see if anything happens. You can quickly determine whether it is the application layer, host layer, or network layer. HelpSystems Intermapper gives such a unique representation of a network. Ever since we started using HelpSystems InterMapper, we don't have to document everything in a detailed format and store it somewhere. Right now, it is really a combination of network topology, network monitoring, and network analyzing. So, in my opinion, it is awesome. When you have your SNMP topology defined, you don't require a dedicated NMS engineer to manage your system, which is another great thing about HelpSystems InterMapper. I see how our operators get so excited by having the ability to map a device or interface and connect interfaces together. HelpSystems InterMapper is also very operator friendly; not just user friendly, but also operator friendly. This is a unique feature, and it works really great."

"It's all today portal-based which is a good feature for us."

"Right now, it is really a combination of network topology, network monitoring, and network analyzing, so, in my opinion, it is awesome."

"It's a nice graphical interface, a nice map, that relates Layer 1 to Layer 3, virtually instantly, to the Helpdesk support staff. It provides a default place to get critical information so we can deploy our staff."

"We use TruView primarily for network performance analysis and monitoring. It helps us track traffic, flows, packets, and bandwidth to understand our network's condition and detect any anomalies or attacks. However, the product's age limits its advanced features for performance analysis. The main advantage lies in its low cost and reliable functionality, as we have a permanent license and do not require support. Real-time monitoring in TruView is somewhat limited, as there is a delay of about five minutes in data updates, making it less effective for immediate insights."

"The most valuable feature for us was the ability to monitor sites and get a nice overview of all the data in a single view."

"It gives us the ability to determine the root of a problem or a network, whether it's on the network side, the database, application server, or server infrastructure."

"Visual TruView helped our network team respond to potential issues before they became larger ones."

"TruView takes only minutes to install."

Cons

"It's a smaller solution so tools are not as advanced as you would find in a larger solution"

"They can do a better job with SLA reporting. It does some basic reporting, but it really doesn't offer the ability to monitor devices by groups, customers, or carrier to give an overall health performance of specifically-defined environments. That's where HelpSystems Intermapper could have done a better job. I would love to see advanced SLA monitoring and reporting in this solution. They already have a lot of ingredients. They already have SNMP polling. It is really about what people are looking for from SLA monitoring, especially someone who looks at the network topology. You want to see your endpoints. You want to see half of your endpoints by simply analyzing ICMP or SNMP-based availability of your endpoints. Having an ability to define your group and how you bring devices into your group would be a huge benefit."

"I'd love to see more of the network management side of it coming back into it."

"I have seen instances where Intermapper does not seem to recover from network changes."

"I'd love to see more of the network management side of it coming back into it. If we were able to run scripts to bounce ports on switches, that would be great. It's asking a lot, but it's actually very doable because I do it through scripting into other products. If we could incorporate that directly into Intermapper, that would be fantastic."

"It's a smaller solution so tools are not as advanced as you would find in a larger solution"

"I can't give them quite a 10, because from time to time, I'll work with the folks who, not that they're not good, but there are some who are just phenomenal."

"Whilst Citrix could be handled better like their nGenius product line (which does an excellent job) it copes with the centralised type of deployment TruView covers."

"We have faced delays in data retrieval and the lack of support due to the product being out of service."

"One area that could be improved is the reporting features. In the version transformation from ten to eleven, the platform changed from a Windows-based platform to a Linux-based platform. As a result, the previous reporting feature using Crystal Reports was no longer available. Instead, we had to generate PDF dashboard reports, which were not as flexible."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

18%

Construction Company

11%

University

Recreational Facilities/Services Company

Comms Service Provider

21%

Construction Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Transportation Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with TruView?

We have faced delays in data retrieval and the lack of support due to the product being out of service.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for TruView?

We use TruView to monitor traffic, analyze flows, track packets, and measure bandwidth across our network. This helps us gain insights into our network's performance, detect any anomalies or attack...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering TruView?

Overall, I would rate TruView a nine out of ten. I would recommend it for mid-sized organizations, particularly those with fewer than two thousand people, as it offers flexible licensing without de...

See all answers

Comparisons

SolarWinds VoIP & Network Quality Manager vs Fortra's Intermapper

Compared 19% of the time

ConnectWise RMM vs Fortra's Intermapper

Compared 14% of the time

Nmap vs Fortra's Intermapper

Compared 11% of the time

Zabbix vs Fortra's Intermapper

Compared 8% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Fortra's Intermapper

Compared 6% of the time

More Fortra's Intermapper Competitors

OmniPeek vs TruView

Compared 13% of the time

NetFort LANGuardian vs TruView

Compared 9% of the time

PingPlotter vs TruView

Compared 9% of the time

ClearSight Analyzer vs TruView

Compared 9% of the time

More TruView Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

April 2026

Download Fortra's Intermapper product report

Buyer's Guide

TruView

April 2026

Download TruView product report

Also Known As

HelpSystems Intermapper

No data available

Overview

Fortra's Intermapper offers real-time network mapping and monitoring, ideal for IT teams seeking a reliable visualization and alerting tool to maintain uptime and connectivity.

Ideal for IT environments, Fortra's Intermapper provides dynamic and intuitive network mapping capabilities. Known for its ability to display an up-to-date graphical view of IT infrastructure, this solution enables proactive monitoring through instant alerts and performance insights. It helps IT teams swiftly address potential issues, ensuring consistent connectivity and performance.

What are the key features of Fortra's Intermapper?

Real-Time Network Mapping: Displays live network status for immediate infrastructure insight.
Customizable Alerts: Allows personalized notifications for targeted problem-solving.
Performance Monitoring: Tracks metrics to preemptively identify potential disruptions.
Cross-Platform Compatibility: Supports different operating systems for wider usability.
Historical Data Maintenance: Retains past network data for trend analysis and reporting.

Which benefits or ROI can users expect from Fortra's Intermapper?

Improved Network Visibility: Enhances understanding of network status and layout.
Faster Issue Resolution: Real-time alerts and monitoring minimize downtime.
Cost Efficiency: By reducing outages, operational costs decrease significantly.
Enhanced User Experience: Stable networks boost overall end-user satisfaction.

In industries such as healthcare, finance, and education, Fortra's Intermapper is a vital tool for maintaining high network performance and reliability. It plays a crucial role in environments where uptime is critical, ensuring that network issues are resolved swiftly to support essential operations.

Fortra

TruView streamlines data analytics by offering comprehensive features that empower users to efficiently manage and interpret large datasets. It is designed for those who seek precision and depth in their analytics tools.

TruView is a versatile analytics tool tailored for expert users who require detailed insights and powerful data processing capabilities. It is crafted to accommodate extensive data volumes, offering flexible integration options and customizable analytics for precise decision-making. TruView is recognized for its speed and accuracy, supporting users in achieving data-driven insights efficiently.

What are the valuable features of TruView?

Advanced Data Processing: Efficiently handles large datasets without compromising speed.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailors visualizations to meet specific analytical needs.
Seamless Integration: Connects easily with existing data systems for smoother transitions.
Real-time Analytics: Provides up-to-date insights for prompt decision-making.
Comprehensive Reporting: Generates detailed reports for effective data interpretation.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Beneficial return on investment through efficient data management.
User Satisfaction: High ratings for reliability and precision from expert users.
Scalability: Adapts to growing data needs without performance loss.
Improved Decision Making: Facilitates timely and informed business decisions.
Time-Saving: Reduces time spent on data analysis with streamlined processes.

TruView's implementation varies across industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail, where it provides tailored solutions to meet sector-specific demands. In finance, it enhances risk assessment and investment strategies. Healthcare facilities leverage it for patient data analytics, while retailers use it to understand consumer behavior and optimize inventory management.

NETSCOUT

Sample Customers

Greater Media Detroit, University of British Columbia, Don's Farm Supply

FloraHolland, Miami-Dade Public Library System, Southeastern Freight Lines, Valdosta State University, Everett Clinic, Bioreference, Key Information Systems, ACER, Odeabank A.S.

Buyer's Guide

Fortra's Intermapper vs. TruView

April 2026

Free Report: Fortra's Intermapper vs. TruView

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortra's Intermapper vs. TruView and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fortra's Intermapper vs. TruView report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.