Fujitsu vs Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform comparison

Fujitsu and Hitachi Vantara are both solutions in the NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays category. Fujitsu is ranked #17 with an average rating of 7.0, while Hitachi Vantara is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.1. Fujitsu holds a 0.8% mindshare in N, compared to Hitachi Vantara’s 7.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Fujitsu users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Hitachi Vantara users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 5, 2024

Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform and Fujitsu are top contenders in the enterprise data storage market. Fujitsu has the upper hand in feature offerings and comprehensive data management, while Hitachi is noted for cost efficiency and customer satisfaction.

Features: Hitachi focuses on performance optimization, automated tiering, and robust integration with virtual environments. Fujitsu is distinguished by its advanced data protection, cloud-compatible hybrid models, and granular management capabilities, offering superior compatibility and innovative data protection for complex infrastructures.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fujitsu offers seamless deployment with strong support throughout the setup process, enhancing user confidence. Hitachi provides a quick setup but lacks the depth of ongoing support, whereas Fujitsu's comprehensive customer service and deployment ease contribute to higher user reliability and satisfaction.

Pricing and ROI: Hitachi proposes competitive initial costs with strong ROI, offering scalable solutions for varied budgets. Fujitsu incurs higher upfront expenses, justified through high-performance outputs and extensive feature offerings. Despite Hitachi's affordability, Fujitsu's superior long-term value and feature-rich packages make it a worthy investment for seeking organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed Fujitsu vs. Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Fujitsu vs. Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays category, the mindshare of Pure FlashArray X NVMe is 4.2%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Fujitsu is 0.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform is 7.8%, up from 7.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform	7.8%
Pure FlashArray X NVMe	4.2%
Fujitsu	0.8%
Other	87.2%

NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays

Featured Reviews

Jaehoon Oh

Chief Technology Officer at Lambda256

Supports efficient storage management through volume snapshots and offers reliable non-disruptive upgrades

I have no specific improvements to suggest for Pure FlashArray X NVMe at this time. The performance statistics could be enhanced. I can see the performance statistics in the Pure Storage console, but it does not show the performance by 4K byte unit. It displays IOPS and bandwidth, but IOPS is about real use, and I want to know how many IOPS are currently running in 4K byte units. I cannot see that IOPS because most storage systems report their performance by 4K byte unit. I want to see Pure Storage performance by 4K byte unit to compare with other storage or other internal NVMe SSD.

Read full review

Alexander Kühn

Senior Project Manager Varna Information Technology / Owner at Varna Informationstechnology EOOD

Easy to use, but price is an area that needs to be improved

The question you have to ask yourself these days would be whether you need classical SAN storage or do you want to go with a modern approach like SaaS-based storage. If you want classical storage, Fujitsu is still a good product. If you want to be safer and work with off the shelf hardware,then go with NetApp. Don't pay the markup price charged by big storage vendors. My company has not faced any issues with the product's integration capabilities. The tool is basically used as a block device, so it's quite easy and simple at what it does. I rate the tool a seven out of ten.

Read full review

ANAND V

Associate Vice President at Federal Bank Ltd

Reliable and secure storage solution supports core banking operations effectively

The replication technology that Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform uses is quite older, and the replication methodology they employ for data between the data center and the production and standby database shows no significant improvement in that particular field. With respect to storage administration, I'd like to see more clarity on the encryption side; data being stored in an encrypted manner is essential, but the customer or end-user doesn't understand which encryption is being used and doesn't have a direct view stating that their data is encrypted using AES 256 or DES, or whatever standard they follow. This lack of transparency may not be acceptable during audits.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We're able to get higher-density workloads on the same infrastructure, and we have a smaller physical footprint. The performance is excellent – during our test the bottlenecks are never on the X array, it just keeps picking up the pace to match what you need. The real-time visibility is a differentiator in my opinion."

"The standout features for us in Pure FlashArray X NVMe are its robust DDoS protection, seamless transparent failover, and failback capabilities ensuring high availability."

"Pure FlashArray X NVMe helps to improve our processing speed. It is user-friendly and easy to use."

"On a scale of one to ten, I rate Pure FlashArray as ten."

"It offers competitive performance, and the Evergreen storage model of Pure fits well with my organization."

"The database workloads are pretty fast because I frequently move data from here to there."

"The solution is scalable."

"Offers excellent features like efficient data reduction, a reliable SafeMode, and a great support model for continuous assistance and updates."

More Pure FlashArray X NVMe pros

"The solution's most valuable features stem from the DX series and the all-flash storage system."

"It stands out for its affordability and the ability to provide unified storage."

"For Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform, the most valuable features are its performance, reliability, scalability, data protection, and a hundred percent data availability guarantee. Additionally, it offers storage virtualization with both internal and external options."

"It is a very stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The product has great data storage performance with a 100% data security and availability guarantee."

"Data optimization, compression, and deduplication are the most important features for us."

"I am happy about the storage system and availability."

"The biggest benefit of the Hitachi platform is 100 percent storage uptime. It's also highly cost-effective."

"The product provides a good storage space."

"The customer service and support are reasonably good. The environment I work in, there always remains an element of surprise, and there are restrictions. But Hitachi has good technical people."

More Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform pros

Cons

"I want to see Pure Storage not only be for fast storage, but I want to see it be for the entire data center."

"Every time I think of something that needs to improve, they're one step ahead, which I love. The only area I wish to see improve, I believe is coming, is in the FlashBlade product. Blade implementation fell short on a few of the services."

"In the next release, I would like to see real-time analytics for further insight into consumption models."

"In the future, I would like to see integration with enterprise backup systems."

"There are some challenges with data encryption and reduction."

"In terms of what needs improvement, the dashboard and management could be simplified."

"The tool's portfolio is minimal. It is expensive."

"There is room for improvement in catering to midrange storage needs, especially for customers seeking Enterprise-class features."

More Pure FlashArray X NVMe cons

"The graphical interface is somewhat lacking, and it doesn't cover all the necessary tasks, often requiring users to resort to the command line for completion."

"The product's prices are an area of concern where improvements are required."

"The initial setup was difficult, as we don't have access to assistance. We had some issues around configuration. We needed to know things like what kind of rate is the best, or what kind of replication is ideal. We had to seek out answers online to get the information we needed."

"The life-cycle of the Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform G Series is too short. We only had approximately four or five years out of the solution before it was rendered its end of life."

"We moved away from this product because we were looking for an all-flash solution, and with our G1500 at the time, perhaps two years ago, they were just proposing more of the same technology."

"The software has always been lagging a bit compared to the newer features. It usually takes a cycle for it to catch up."

"Hitachi should offer a distinct overview of the various storage choices."

"The interface management and monitoring need improvement. Although I receive emails from Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform, I find the management aspect not as good as their hardware."

"One problem is that there are too many management tools for the F Series and for all the other Hitachi storage systems. There are four or five such solutions. Maybe these could be combined in the future."

"They should look at the cost because there are other vendors who offer the same cost with more features."

More Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's pricing is cheap; I rate it a six to seven out of ten. Most of our sales are not subscription-based. We sell the hardware, and customers keep using it. They only renew the service part annually. The support can be a bit pricey, but the solution is more cost-effective than anything else out there."

"With VMware, we pay $300,000 annually."

"Pretty much everything that you need is licensed when you buy the product. Licensing to me is different than the maintenance cost, but they can bleed into one another. We buy the product, and we expect three years of support bundled into what we negotiate on our storage arrays. I would start to see maintenance costs going into the fourth year, but we're not there yet."

"Pure FlashArray X NVMe’s pricing is cheaper than other products."

"Its price could be better. It is not too expensive, but it is the high-end cost. It is kind of a Rolls-Royce. You pay a lot, but you get a lot out of it. So, the price pressure on the way down would be great, but at the end of the day, if you need to do the work, you just pay for it."

"The licensing is on a yearly basis."

"Our licensing fees are $500,000+ USD."

"As far as the licensing costs, everything is included in the license."

More Pure FlashArray X NVMe pricing and cost advice

"The entry-level midrange model from Fujitsu is cost-effective for our target market"

"There is a need to make yearly payments towards the licensing charges associated with the product."

"The product is reasonably priced."

"It is cheap. It is not very expensive. If you decide to expand the system, the cost is pretty low as compared to other vendors, such as Dell."

"I would like to see better pricing and more discounts."

"The costs were primarily in line with every other vendor at the time."

"It is expensive as compared to other vendors, but its price is good if you are looking for stability, reliability, performance, and security."

"The price of the solution is reasonable compared to others, such as Dell EMC."

"The price of the solution is reasonable. However, I have not done extensive comparative research on the price. If you want to upgrade the size of the disc you will need to purchase a license that accounts for the size."

"In our company, we only pay towards the licensing charges associated with Forcepoint, as Hitachi is considered to be a third-party product for us."

More Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

No data available

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	12

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	28

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Pure FlashArray X NVMe?

Pure FlashArray X NVMe helps to improve our processing speed. It is user-friendly and easy to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Pure FlashArray X NVMe?

The price of Pure FlashArray X NVMe is very expensive, though I do not know the actual price because I am using the E...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Pure FlashArray X NVMe?

I have no specific improvements to suggest for Pure FlashArray X NVMe at this time. The performance statistics could ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fujitsu?

There is a need to make yearly payments towards the licensing charges associated with the product.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Fujitsu?

In terms of Fujitsu, the classical storage systems are going to be obsolete in my point of view. With SaaS storage to...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Fujitsu?

I use the solution in my company to run the VM clusters with Fujitsu's database, as well as everything else we have i...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform?

The cost of Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform is reasonable compared to competitors, but it is dependent on the custom...

See all answers

What do you like most about Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform E990?

The product's reliability has been crucial for our company's operations.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform E990?

The centralized management console in Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform is not very comfortable and user-friendly. How...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dell PowerStore vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Compared 16% of the time

Dell PowerMax vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Compared 12% of the time

HPE Alletra Storage vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Compared 10% of the time

TrueNAS R-Series vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Compared 9% of the time

IBM FlashSystem vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Compared 5% of the time

More Pure FlashArray X NVMe Competitors

Hitachi VSP E Series vs Fujitsu

Compared 30% of the time

Dell PowerStore vs Fujitsu

Compared 27% of the time

More Fujitsu Competitors

Dell PowerStore vs Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform

Compared 10% of the time

NetApp AFF vs Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform

Compared 9% of the time

IBM FlashSystem vs Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform

Compared 8% of the time

HPE Alletra Storage vs Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Pure Storage FlashArray vs Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform

Compared 6% of the time

More Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Pure FlashArray X NVMe

January 2026

Download Pure FlashArray X NVMe product report

Buyer's Guide

NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays

January 2026

Download Fujitsu product report

Buyer's Guide

Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform

January 2026

Download Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform product report

Also Known As

Pure FlashArray//X NVMe, Pure FlashArray//X, FlashArray//X

No data available

Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform F Series, 5000 Series, E Series, N Series, G Series

Overview

Pure Storage FlashArray//X is the world’s first enterprise-class, all-NVMe flash storage array. It represents a new class of storage – shared accelerated storage, which is a term coined by Gartner – that delivers major breakthroughs in performance, simplicity, and consolidation.

Pure Storage

Fujitsu offers advanced technological solutions tailored to industry-specific demands. Recognized for robust performance and reliability, it facilitates a wide range of applications, providing users with flexibility and enhanced productivity across different sectors.

Fujitsu stands out as a leader in technology, integrating cutting-edge innovations that drive efficiency and elevate performance. Its offerings cover diverse areas, ensuring adaptability and seamless integration. Users benefit from its comprehensive approach, which combines state-of-the-art features with user-focused enhancements, addressing needs such as scalability and security.

What are the most important features of Fujitsu?

Scalability: Fujitsu allows for flexible scaling to address varying demands.
Security: Incorporates strong security protocols to protect data and systems.
Reliability: Known for dependable performance in demanding environments.
Flexibility: Supports diverse applications and integrates smoothly with existing setups.

What benefits or ROI can Fujitsu provide?

Increased Efficiency: Streamlines processes to save time and resources.
Cost Reduction: Lowers operational costs through optimized resource use.
Enhanced Productivity: Facilitates uninterrupted workflows, boosting output.
Data Protection: Offers robust measures for safeguarding sensitive information.

Fujitsu finds applications in industries such as healthcare, finance, and manufacturing, where its adaptability and security features are critical. In healthcare, its technology supports patient data management and operational efficiency. In finance, it ensures secure transactions, while in manufacturing, it enhances workflow processes and data analysis capabilities.

Fujitsu

RETHINK YOUR DEFINITION OF SPEED AND PERFORMANCE

With adaptive, guaranteed data reduction and a 100% data-availability guarantee, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform F series helps you tackle complicated business challenges. Hitachi Data Systems (HDS) VSP F series delivers up to 4.8M IOPS with sub-millisecond response times.
Featuring legendary Hitachi reliability, VSP F series arrays are backed by the industries only 100% availability guarantee. For these reasons, 80% of the Fortune 500 choose Hitachi all-flash arrays to accelerate the performance of mission-critical applications like Oracle, SAP, Virtualization, Microsoft apps etc. With over 350 patents in flash technology, Hitachi’s innovative mix of flash hardware and software accelerates ROI with enterprise-class reliability and performance.

Hitachi Vantara

Sample Customers

Fremont Bank, Judson ISD, The Nielsen Company

Information Not Available

Turkcell, Owens Corning, Region Nord, Net Credit Financial Group (NFC Group), Russian Railways

Buyer's Guide

Fujitsu vs. Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform

December 2025

Free Report: Fujitsu vs. Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Fujitsu vs. Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fujitsu vs. Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform report.

See our list of best NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays vendors.

We monitor all NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.