Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

GFI LanGuard vs Microsoft Configuration Manager comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 12, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
1.0
GFI LanGuard enhances security, compliance, and ROI by streamlining patch management, identifying vulnerabilities, and providing actionable insights.
Sentiment score
1.0
Microsoft Configuration Manager enhances productivity and efficiency, with users valuing its operational streamlining despite Mac support challenges.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
4.0
GFI LanGuard's customer service is generally quick and helpful, though some users in certain regions face challenges.
Sentiment score
5.5
Microsoft Configuration Manager's customer support is generally effective, with better experiences from higher-tier and premier support options.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.7
GFI LanGuard is scalable and adaptable, supporting various workloads and platforms, suitable for small to large organizations.
Sentiment score
7.1
Microsoft Configuration Manager efficiently scales across environments, supports high user numbers, integrates with Intune, and aids cloud transitions.
The product is suitable for our size, handling 800 devices.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.3
GFI LanGuard is highly stable, with improved functionality and minimal issues, even during server updates, rated eight out of ten.
Sentiment score
6.9
Microsoft Configuration Manager is stable and reliable, requiring configuration and maintenance, with issues often stemming from external factors.
There were misconfigurations by our team rather than issues with the product itself.
 

Room For Improvement

GFI LanGuard requires enhancements in LAN expansion, Linux docs, cloud support, custom software, asset tracking, and additional features.
Microsoft Configuration Manager needs a streamlined interface, better integration, enhanced automation, improved scalability, and simplified remote management.
 

Setup Cost

GFI LanGuard offers competitive patch management pricing, with costs around $1,000 to $2,500 annually and discounts for Gold partners.
Microsoft Configuration Manager is costly, especially for setup and licensing, but justified by robust features and integration capabilities.
The setup cost is considered sufficient.
 

Valuable Features

GFI LanGuard excels in vulnerability assessment, patch management, ease of use, integration, resource efficiency, asset tracking, and endpoint control.
Microsoft Configuration Manager streamlines IT processes with automation, integration, scalability, and comprehensive system management features for enterprises.
The product valuable for deployment recovery.
 

Categories and Ranking

GFI LanGuard
Ranking in Patch Management
13th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.6
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Configuration Man...
Ranking in Patch Management
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
83
Ranking in other categories
Software Distribution (1st), Server Monitoring (6th), Configuration Management (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of GFI LanGuard is 2.2%, down from 3.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Configuration Manager is 12.4%, down from 17.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Patch Management
 

Featured Reviews

Ted Mbugua - PeerSpot reviewer
Highly stable, quick support, and useful modules
My advice to others wanting to implement this solution is you do not have to be very technical to use it. When installing it, you only need to click next. Additionally, the support is helpful and knowledgeable. Their technical documentation is easily accessible. I rate GFI LanGuard an eight out of ten.
MikeNelson2 - PeerSpot reviewer
Deployment recovery works well but requires configuration improvements
While I do not use the product frequently, many issues were due to configuration rather than the product itself. I cannot give an exact recommendation as it is not my area of responsibility. The team that uses it finds it adequate. It is presently good enough for us not to investigate other options. Overall, I rate the product a six out of ten.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Photography Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Government
11%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
How does Ansible compare to Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (SCCM)?
Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager takes knowledge and research to properly configure. The length of time that the set up will take depends on the kind of technical architecture that your org...
How to choose between ManageEngine Desktop Central and Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (formerly SCCM)?
ManageEngine Desktop Central is very easy to set up, is scalable, stable, and also has very good patch management. What I like most about ManageEngine is that I can log on to every PC very easily a...
What do you like most about SCCM?
One of the standout features of SCCM is its application management capabilities. It allows us to create packages efficiently and deploy them to specific groups within our network. This streamlined ...
 

Also Known As

LanGuard
Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager, System Center Configuration Manager (SCCM ), Microsoft SMS
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

BayView Medical Clinic, FrugalBrothers Software, Zaw, National Theatre, American Red Cross
Bank Alfalah Ltd., Wªrth Handelsges.m.b.H, Dimension Data, Japan Business Systems, St. Lucie County Public Schools, MISC Berhad
Find out what your peers are saying about GFI LanGuard vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.