Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs ManageEngine IT360 comparison

The compared Gigamon and ManageEngine solutions aren't in the same category. Gigamon is ranked #11 in EM , with an average rating of 8.3, and holds a 2.2% mindshare in the category. ManageEngine is ranked #95 in NMS , and holds a 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Gigamon users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ManageEngine users who would recommend it.

Gigamon Deep Observability ...

Read 9 Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline reviews

4,535 Views
136 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ManageEngine IT360

Read 5 ManageEngine IT360 reviews

1,183 Views
615 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Gigamon Deep Observability ...

ManageEngine IT360

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline and ManageEngine IT360 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, BMC Helix, IBM and others in Event Monitoring.

To learn more, read our detailed Event Monitoring Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Event Monitoring

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Gigamon Deep Observability ...

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (41st), Event Monitoring (11th), Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (34th), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (41st), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (32nd), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (27th), Network Packet Broker (NPB) (1st), Network Detection and Response (NDR) (16th)

ManageEngine IT360

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (95th), IT Asset Management (29th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (68th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Network Management solutions, they serve different purposes. Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline is designed for Event Monitoring and holds a mindshare of 2.2%, up 0.5% compared to last year.
ManageEngine IT360, on the other hand, focuses on Network Monitoring Software, holds 0.4% mindshare, up 0.1% since last year.

Event Monitoring Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline	2.2%
ServiceNow IT Operations Management	11.7%
OpsRamp	9.6%
Other	76.5%

Event Monitoring

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
ManageEngine IT360	0.4%
Zabbix	5.7%
SolarWinds NPM	3.4%
Other	90.5%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

TuanNguyen13

Senior Relationship Banker at Joint stock Commercial Bank for Foreign Trade of V

Experience boosts operational efficiency while performance sees room for improvement

I don't have specific information on whether it was purchased on the AWS marketplace or somewhere else. I am working with Dynatrace Operator. I am also working with Algosec, Alluvio, CrowdStrike, Firemon, Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline, and other solutions. I think it's a good tool, and I am satisfied with it. We have not stored cloud workloads with Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline yet; we are still on-premises. The technical support takes about one to two hours to respond, which is acceptable. I am satisfied with the scalability of the product. The interface is good.

Read full review

Ziyad Moghalis

It manager at PTC (Public Telecomuncation Corporation)

Good monitoring and alerting capability, and it is easy to deploy

This solution is good for configuration management. The monitoring capability is easy to use and it can be done without any training. ManageEngine is easy to deploy. It is easy to identify and collect information from all of the nodes on the network. The alerting capability is good and it will send out emails.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a good product. It provides network visibility, which is important. Gigamon can bring some optimizations to my network. It is helpful for security inspection, and it makes my firewall work fast because my firewall doesn't have to do the inspection of the SSL connections, for example."

"The most valuable feature is NetFlow."

"The solution is straightforward to set up."

"The Pipeline's Comprehensive Insights into data flows have helped improve operational efficiency and security."

"It offers straightforward integration."

"The tool's most valuable feature is the encryption feature. From a security perspective, the solution hasn't significantly strengthened our security posture. However, it has greatly improved performance by streamlining encryption processes and avoiding encryption at multiple layers. This has also simplified troubleshooting, as we can whitelist certain processes."

"The most valuable feature for improving network visibility with Gigamon is the packet filtering capability."

"It has high stability."

"It is easy to identify and collect information from all of the nodes on the network."

"The product helps users stay on top of gaining insight into the active directory, permissions and security sets, and user group policy changes."

"The technical support is good."

Cons

"It only inspects a specific kind of traffic. There should be different kinds of use cases."

"In terms of improvement, while the initial setup is not overly complicated, we did encounter a few issues."

"They should increase the solution's cluster capacity."

"Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline needs to improve its performance. I face issues with performance because we use SPAN, and the SPAN traffic is not good."

"The security should be improved."

"The Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline should have a feature showing the traffic flow within its platform. Currently, customers have to use separate tools for monitoring, which is inconvenient. If it had its visibility feature, it would make monitoring easier and more complete without needing extra tools."

"The graphical user interface could be improved."

"Its filtering feature needs improvement."

"We would like to have support for integration with ServiceDesk."

"The ManageEngine features could improve to show graphs of the traffic and network utility."

"The product could use more intelligence, automation and general availability of product information."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is highly-priced."

"The solution's price is reasonable."

"I would rate the solution as expensive, around an eight or nine out of ten. There are other competitive solutions available."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Event Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline?

The most valuable feature for improving network visibility with Gigamon is the packet filtering capability.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline?

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline needs to improve its performance. I face issues with performance because we use SPAN, and the SPAN traffic is not good. They need to improve their performance.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline?

I am working with Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline and Firemon, and I have been working with it for a year.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Ixia Network Packet Brokers vs Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline

Compared 9% of the time

Cisco Nexus Dashboard Data Broker vs Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline

Compared 7% of the time

Niagara Packet Brokers vs Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline

Compared 5% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline

Compared 4% of the time

Arista Data ANalyZer vs Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline

Compared 4% of the time

More Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline Competitors

Netreo vs ManageEngine IT360

Compared 16% of the time

Kentik vs ManageEngine IT360

Compared 10% of the time

Alluvio AppResponse vs ManageEngine IT360

Compared 10% of the time

eG Enterprise vs ManageEngine IT360

Compared 9% of the time

Ixia Network Packet Brokers vs ManageEngine IT360

Compared 9% of the time

More ManageEngine IT360 Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Event Monitoring

January 2026

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline report

Download Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

February 2026

Download ManageEngine IT360 product report

Also Known As

Gigamon, GigaSecure

IT360

Overview

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline is a comprehensive network visibility solution that provides real-time insights into network traffic. It offers SSL inspection and mobile network monitoring for traffic monitoring purposes. The solution optimizes networks, aids in security inspection, and improves firewall performance. It is praised for its performance, power, straightforward integration, stability, and ease of initial setup.

With Gigamon, organizations can gain complete visibility into their network traffic, identify potential threats, and take proactive measures to prevent them. The solution is ideal for organizations of all sizes, including enterprises, service providers, and government agencies.

Gigamon

With IT360 you will deliver services efficiently with maximum scalability. Service providers can now accurately manage the SLAs and release new services faster with features like Multi-tenancy, High Availability, Enterprise level systems and Datacenter monitoring, Remote site monitoring and Customer and site-specific dashboards.

ManageEngine

Sample Customers

Amica Insurance, College of William & Mary, Gamma, IntercontinentalExchange, OppenheimerFunds

Khimji Ramdas, RME Global, Bank of Namibia, DORMA, PMSI, National Commodities Exchange, EMA, Redstone, First Source

Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, BMC Helix, IBM and others in Event Monitoring. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Event Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.