No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

GitGuardian Platform vs Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Portal comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

GitGuardian Platform
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
44
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (6th), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (5th)
Kaspersky Threat Intelligen...
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (29th)
 

Mindshare comparison

GitGuardian Platform and Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Portal aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. GitGuardian Platform is designed for Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) and holds a mindshare of 3.4%, up 1.0% compared to last year.
Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Portal, on the other hand, focuses on Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP), holds 1.7% mindshare, up 1.2% since last year.
Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
GitGuardian Platform3.4%
Saviynt Identity Cloud12.1%
Veza8.8%
Other75.7%
Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM)
Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Portal1.7%
Recorded Future6.0%
Anomali4.1%
Other88.2%
Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)
 

Featured Reviews

SE
Consultant at a consultancy with 201-500 employees
Continuous secret monitoring has improved our incident response and protected exposed credentials
One area for improvement in GitGuardian Platform would be reducing false positives and making alert prioritization even more precise for larger environments; more customization around notifications and remediation workflows would also help teams avoid alert fatigue as the number of repositories grows. Regarding improvements needed for GitGuardian Platform, I would appreciate more flexibility in integrations, especially with different DevOps, ticketing, and security tools used across enterprise environments; while the UI is generally easy to use, better customization of dashboards and alert views would make it easier to manage a large number of repositories. I chose eight out of ten for GitGuardian Platform mainly because there is still room for improvement in enterprise integrations and customization; for larger environments, better alert prioritization, dashboard flexibility, and integration with more DevOps and security tools would strengthen the overall experience. The main areas we discussed primarily cover everything, but beyond those, I would appreciate more granular role-based controls and easier customization of alert workflows, especially for larger teams where different groups may need different levels of visibility and access.
Abdelrahman Hussein - PeerSpot reviewer
CTI & Threat Hunter at Telecom Egypt
Provides useful real-time threat intelligence features but has limited capabilities
We use the product to search for IoCs. It is a good tool, but we do not use all its capabilities. We have only done a POC of the product. The real-time threat intelligence features are useful. The tool has good capabilities. It has a database of IoCs The solution is limited. I have been using…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the alerts when secrets are leaked and we can look at particular repositories to see if there are any outstanding problems. In addition, the solution's detection capabilities seem very broad. We have no concerns there."
"The reduction of security leaks since we implemented GitGuardian Platform has been drastic and we have brought the indicator down to zero percent of secrets revealed within the code."
"Transferring code from another platform to GitGuardian enabled us to see open passwords in old repositories and enabled us to clean them well and create a barrier against security leaks."
"Previously, secrets would be leaked and nobody would ever hear about it, but now we actually have alerts and the opportunity to follow up with researchers to deal with these problems, turning something that had the potential to take an hour out of someone's day into a quick, easy, minimal, and more effective process."
"GitGuardian Internal Monitoring has helped increase our secrets detection rate by several orders of magnitude."
"GitGuardian Platform has improved our security posture by giving us better visibility into exposed secrets across repositories."
"What I appreciate the most about GitGuardian Platform is its efficiency when triggering our pipeline and notifying us if secrets have been exposed, such as APIs, variables, our database, or anything being exposed."
"The most valuable feature is the general incident reporting system."
"The solution improved our overall security posture."
"The real-time threat intelligence features are useful."
 

Cons

"One area that could be improved is reducing false positives and making it easier to quickly understand the context and severity of a detected secret."
"I would rate GitGuardian Platform a seven out of ten because I appreciate it; it is not the best tool, but it is above other tools."
"One improvement that I'd like to see is a cleaner for Splunk logs. It would be nice to have a middle man for anything we send or receive from Splunk forwarders. I'd love to see it get cleaned by GitGuardian or caught to make sure we don't have any secrets getting committed to Splunk logs."
"They could give a developer access to a dashboard for their team's repositories that just shows their repository secrets. I think more could be exposed to developers."
"I would improve GitGuardian Platform by reducing false positives and streamlining remediation."
"The biggest challenge my team has faced so far with GitGuardian Platform is integration, specifically integrating it to everything."
"I rate GitGuardian Platform a nine out of ten because there is a slight learning curve in integration, and I would have preferred integration with AI-native development workflows."
"The areas that have room for improvement involve the missing feature to add custom detectors for the GitGuardian Platform, which would help us check if internal secrets are still valid or not."
"More insights would be helpful. We have multiple solutions for threat intelligence. If someone has a bigger view or full eye on all the incidents, it will be beneficial."
"The solution is limited."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The internal side is cheap per user. It is annual pricing based on the number of users."
"It could be cheaper. When GitHub secrets monitoring solution goes to general access and general availability, GitGuardian might be in a little bit of trouble from the competition, and maybe then they might lower their prices. The GitGuardian solution is great. I'm just concerned that they're not GitHub."
"With GitGuardian, we didn't need any middlemen."
"I compared the solution to a couple of other solutions, and I think it is very competitively priced."
"It's a bit expensive, but it works well. You get what you pay for."
"You get what you pay for. It's one of the more expensive solutions, but it is very good, and the low false positive rate is a really appealing factor."
"The pricing and licensing are fair. It isn't very expensive and it's good value."
"It's fairly priced, as it performs a lot of analysis and is a valuable tool."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) solutions are best for your needs.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
17%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Construction Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Outsourcing Company
17%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Healthcare Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business26
Midsize Enterprise11
Large Enterprise30
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?
It's competitively priced compared to others. Overall, the secret detection sector is expensive, but we are happy with the value we get.
What needs improvement with GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?
GitGuardian Platform does what it is designed to do, but it still generates many false positives. We utilize the automated playbooks from GitGuardian Platform, and we are enhancing them. We will pr...
What is your primary use case for GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?
Our current use cases for GitGuardian Platform involve monitoring external and internal GitHub and GitLab, Bitbucket, and other code repositories that it supports for secrets.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

GitGuardian Internal Monitoring, GitGuardian Public Monitoring
Kaspersky Threat Intelligence
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Backed by a $50M Series C raised in February 2026 (Insight Partners, Quadrille Capital) and trusted by 600K+ developers, GitGuardian is the #1 most-installed security app on the GitHub Marketplace. Enterprises including Snowflake, ING, BASF, Datadog, Bouygues Telecom, Euronext, and Orange Business rely on the platform.
Telefonica, VimpelCom, Monclick, Ezenta
Find out what your peers are saying about One Identity, Astrix Security, Entro Security and others in Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM). Updated: October 2026.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.