Gloo Platform vs MuleSoft API Manager comparison

Solo.io and Salesforce are both solutions in the API Management category. Solo.io is ranked #26 with an average rating of 8.0, while Salesforce is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.9. Solo.io holds a 0.7% mindshare in APIM, compared to Salesforce’s 4.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Solo.io users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Salesforce users who would recommend it.

Gloo Platform

Read 2 Gloo Platform reviews

782 Views
782 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

MuleSoft API Manager

Read 60 MuleSoft API Manager reviews

7,619 Views
7,543 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Gloo Platform

MuleSoft API Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Gloo Platform and MuleSoft API Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Gloo Platform vs. MuleSoft API Manager Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Gloo Platform vs. MuleSoft API Manager

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Gloo Platform

Ranking in API Management

26th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

MuleSoft API Manager

Ranking in API Management

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Gloo Platform is 0.7%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MuleSoft API Manager is 4.2%, down from 4.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
MuleSoft API Manager	4.2%
Gloo Platform	0.7%
Other	95.1%

API Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer2813076

Software Engineer at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees

Unified API gateway has reduced tool sprawl and has improved traffic control and observability

I give Gloo Platform a rating of 10 out of 10 because I genuinely appreciate it; it has all the features and requirements that I need. I give it a 10 because it fits my use case perfectly, enabling me to achieve my objectives, and I genuinely appreciate the Gloo Platform community and the people there. Regarding Gloo Platform's AI capabilities, I find them beneficial because they recently added agentic features and many AI capabilities that I find helpful. The accuracy and reliability of Gloo Platform's AI features is mostly consistent, although sometimes it does experience hallucinations. If you need a solution that provides management for your APIs along with features such as rate limiting, mTLS, and other functionalities, I would recommend Gloo Platform; it is truly excellent. I rated this review 10 out of 10.

Read full review

D.Rajesh Kumar

Enterprise Architect at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Improved Integration Efficiency and Potential for Further Enhancements in Monitoring and User Experience

The policies in MuleSoft API Manager are significant features. We get the policies by default, with more than 25 out-of-the-box policies. If any additional requirement exists specific to the customer, there is a custom policy framework. We can build the policy according to our requirement, and deploy and enable it at the API Manager level to consume across different business groups, environments, or organizations altogether within the platform. Developing the custom policy is not challenging; you just need to follow the custom policy framework to implement. The custom policy and the different levels of SLAs of the API Manager are notable. Regarding the monitoring side of the API Manager, MuleSoft provides substantial monitoring with logs, offering search capability, raw data accessibility, and different subscriptions. With the top tier, integration with third-party platforms such as ELK or Splunk becomes unnecessary because all search capabilities, dashboards, and functional monitoring can be built within the platform itself. This is excellent from the monitoring perspective, and there have been recent improvements focusing on observability. For DevOps, if you want to make your continuous integration and continuous deployment effective, irrespective of the tool, there are options to integrate. For example, you can use the Maven plugin, platform APIs, or CLI to build your end-to-end DevOps cycle.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"You don't need many frameworks or other things to run Glue."

"Gloo Platform's features are optimal for my use case because I have numerous applications and microservices running, requiring rate limiting and traffic management integrated into one platform, which proves very beneficial."

"We have all the policies available via drag and drop. It made it very easy."

"MuleSoft has given the API solution a 3-tiered architecture. This means that there are multiple channels available in one application. The usability is very high."

"We have not seen many tickets which tells us it is very stable."

"We use it heavily because Azure offers better pricing than its competitors."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"The most valuable features of the solution for securing APIs stem from the tool's ability to allow users to deploy policies."

"My primary use case is investigating the pros and cons of different platforms for the benefit of the application lifecycle."

"Anypoint API Manager's most valuable feature is its connectors."

More MuleSoft API Manager pros

Cons

"I sometimes face issues with integration."

"It can offer workflows, orchestration, and webhooks."

"Better documentation to help explain each of the features would be really helpful."

"My advice to others is they will need strong technical support for this solution, however, they do not provide good support."

"The cost for using MuleSoft is approximately $500,000 USD per year. It includes various subscriptions like the signature success plan and platinum subscriptions, making it a costly infrastructure."

"I would like to see more automation. Operations are done manually. It should also automate in the operation."

"It is not a very scalable solution."

"The pricing is a bit expensive."

"Mulesoft doesn't provide a complete stack. For example, it doesn't have BPM/Workflow, BAM, or Identity Management products."

More MuleSoft API Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"If one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the product price as six and a half to seven."

"The pricing is quite reasonable and affordable."

"The product's main drawback is its cost. It's expensive for our company, and their recent change in pricing strategy last year complicated things further. That's the only thing we're not happy with."

"The solution looks more expensive on the surface because it builds all the functions into one core component or into an integrated suite of components."

"I think that it is pretty expensive."

"I want MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager to be cheaper because when you scale up, it becomes very costly. Price-wise, I'd give it a seven out of ten."

"Our customers have a lot of concerns about the increased pricing. The customer feels MuleSoft is very costly, and they are also exploring other integration tools for a lesser price. Maybe we should retain the existing customers by offering some discounts. At least the existing customers can be retained this way. This is regarding the licensing part only because customers based out of North America and Europe have shown many concerns recently. They are a bit concerned about pricing."

"When it comes to determining price, the pre-sales team interacts with the customer's primary integration team and the price is negotiated based on the specific usage of the system."

More MuleSoft API Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

23%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Legal Firm

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	44

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Gloo Platform?

I sometimes face issues with integration. For example, integrating third-party services or other services not part of Glue takes a lot of time because there's not much content available on the inte...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Gloo Platform?

We have many microservices written in Glue, which trigger based on certain events. The Glue service is responsible for containerizing and running them over the cloud. We use Glue for various purpos...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Gloo Platform?

Glue is not mandatory. It's an option. If you have the learning capability to learn Glue quickly, you can go for it. But there are other alternatives where you will find many articles, study materi...

See all answers

How does Kong Enterprise compare with Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager?

The Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager was designed with its users in mind. Though it is a reasonably complex piece of software, it is easy to install and upgrade. While there are different things that ...

See all answers

How does Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager compare with Amazon API Gateway?

I have found that Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager is the best integration tool out there for API management. It is easy to implement and learn; it provides several options for deployment, (including ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager?

When it comes to pricing, I find it always expensive. The pricing is high, which is the biggest point where some customers are hesitant about adopting it, and their deployment strategy is also more...

See all answers

Comparisons

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Gloo Platform

Compared 30% of the time

Coralogix vs Gloo Platform

Compared 18% of the time

Traefik Enterprise vs Gloo Platform

Compared 17% of the time

Gravitee vs Gloo Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Layer7 API Management vs Gloo Platform

Compared 8% of the time

More Gloo Platform Competitors

Apigee vs MuleSoft API Manager

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Azure API Management vs MuleSoft API Manager

Compared 11% of the time

WSO2 API Manager vs MuleSoft API Manager

Compared 6% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs MuleSoft API Manager

Compared 6% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs MuleSoft API Manager

Compared 5% of the time

More MuleSoft API Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

API Management

June 2026

Download Gloo Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft API Manager

June 2026

Download MuleSoft API Manager product report

Also Known As

No data available

Anypoint API Manager

Overview

Gloo Platform is a versatile API and microservices management tool known for its robust security, seamless integration, and advanced traffic handling capabilities. It effectively bolsters organizational efficiency by improving workflows and reducing manual tasks through automation. Users value its support for multiple languages, comprehensive analytics, and its ability to enhance service mesh implementations for better network management.

Solo.io

MuleSoft API Manager offers a user-friendly platform with comprehensive integration capabilities, strong security, and scalable architecture. It's designed to streamline API management and development processes through robust analytics and a rich interface.

MuleSoft API Manager stands out with its lightweight design, offering extensive connector libraries and ease of applying policies via drag-and-drop functionality. Its robust analytics enhance operational efficiency. Users can implement custom policies, benefit from advanced integration needs like OAuth authentication, and manage extensive API inventories. While facing challenges like high costs and complex upgrades, MuleSoft API Manager is vital for managing APIs across sectors, supporting data exchange between systems such as SAP and Salesforce, and modernizing legacy systems.

What are the standout features of MuleSoft API Manager?

Lightweight Design: Ensures easy deployment and usability.
Robust API Management: Provides strong capability in handling API processes.
Strong Security: Offers extensive protection for API applications.
Scalable Architecture: Supports growth and adaptation to changing needs.
Comprehensive Integration Options: Facilitates seamless data exchange.
Extensive Library of Connectors: Enhances flexibility and connectivity.
Ease of Applying Policies: Simplifies management with intuitive drag-and-drop functions.
Robust Analytics: Aids in monitoring and operational efficiency.
Custom Policies: Supports advanced integration with OAuth authentication.

What benefits and ROI should reviewers consider?

Usability: Promotes ease of use for technical teams.
Integration Efficiency: Accelerates connections to essential systems.
Security: Ensures data integrity and protection.
Scalability: Provides potential for growing business needs.
Policy Management: Simplifies and enforces compliance across APIs.

MuleSoft API Manager is widely implemented in sectors seeking to integrate services like SAP and Salesforce quickly and securely. Its use in automating processes and enhancing API governance makes it a go-to API gateway. Organizations rely on it to modernize systems and manage interconnectivity, facilitating traffic control and robust policy management.

Salesforce

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Coca-Cola, Splunk, Citrix, UCSF, Vertu, State of Colorado, National Post, TiVo, Deakin, LLS, Oldcastle Precast, ParcelPoint, Justice Systems, Ube, Sumitomo Corporation, PacificComp, University of Witwatersrand, Groupe Initiatives, Camelot, Panviva

Buyer's Guide

Gloo Platform vs. MuleSoft API Manager

June 2026

Free Report: Gloo Platform vs. MuleSoft API Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Gloo Platform vs. MuleSoft API Manager and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Gloo Platform vs. MuleSoft API Manager report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.