Gloo Platform vs Kong Gateway Enterprise comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Solo.io and Kong are both solutions in the API Management category. Solo.io is ranked #23 with an average rating of 10.0, while Kong is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.0. Solo.io holds a 0.8% mindshare in APIM, compared to Kong’s 3.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Solo.io users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Kong users who would recommend it.

Gloo Platform

Read 3 Gloo Platform reviews

1,129 Views
1,129 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kong Gateway Enterprise

Read 26 Kong Gateway Enterprise reviews

7,507 Views
7,507 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Gloo Platform

Kong Gateway Enterprise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Gloo Platform and Kong Gateway Enterprise based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Gloo Platform vs. Kong Gateway Enterprise Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Gloo Platform vs. Kong Gateway Enterprise

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,924 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Gloo Platform

Ranking in API Management

23rd

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Kong Gateway Enterprise

Ranking in API Management

13th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Gloo Platform is 0.8%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kong Gateway Enterprise is 3.6%, down from 7.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Kong Gateway Enterprise	3.6%
Gloo Platform	0.8%
Other	95.6%

API Management

Featured Reviews

Hiten Nandasana

Angular developer at Flourish software

Centralized traffic control has improved monitoring and simplified our Kubernetes API management

Gloo Platform features include Kubernetes-native API gateways, routing control, API routing, and seamless integration with various environments. It supports multi-clusters and hybrid cloud deployments, which are the most valuable features for Gloo Platform. Our requirements in our organization are fully satisfied by these features, so we really appreciate using Gloo Platform. Since I have been using Gloo Platform, I have noticed benefits from implementing API Gateway capabilities and controlling traffic routing. I can say that we are saving time, especially regarding control traffic routing, data monitoring, and improving observability of Kubernetes applications. These are the most valuable assets for our organization.

Read full review

KuntalSaha

Business Consultant at Ernst & Young

Modernization projects have progressed well but documentation and security guidance still need work

Bringing in additional features to Kong Gateway Enterprise would not necessarily help it. Improving the existing features, increasing security, and adding robustness would be more beneficial. The focus should be on stabilizing the product, improving it, and increasing the documentation. Kong should focus on how the product can be self-onboarded or self-implemented, as this would ease and help customers significantly. The necessary deployment of Kong Gateway Enterprise, API management, and guidance on how customers can use it or improve that area would be helpful. Security is a major concern, especially with new security architecture coming into place. These are the areas that should be prioritized. Beyond these areas, I do not see anything lacking. Kong Gateway Enterprise is quite comprehensive.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Gloo Platform's features are optimal for my use case because I have numerous applications and microservices running, requiring rate limiting and traffic management integrated into one platform, which proves very beneficial."

"Organizations are highly recommended to use Gloo Platform because it will have a great impact on their organization."

"You don't need many frameworks or other things to run Glue."

"Kong Enterprise comes with some ready plug-ins, which is very good for the customers."

"The tool's feature that I find most beneficial is rate limiting. In our usage, especially in the financial sector, we prioritize limiting API usage. This is crucial because we provide APIs to other companies and must ensure they adhere to their allocated usage limits. Without rate limiting, there's a risk of excessive usage, which could result in significant costs."

"Kong Gateway helped to improve performance. It's good enough for our users."

"Kong Enterprise is a good API gateway and API management product which is based on lightweight and high-performance software."

"Kong enterprise has significantly enhanced our ability to manage and secure our Microservices. Its most valuable feature is monitoring."

"The price is reasonable compared to that of alternative solutions."

"It offers a wide range of plugins that we leverage, including OIDC, Rate Limiting, Lambda functions, and more."

"We use the solution for load-balancing, caching, and rate-limiting APIs."

More Kong Gateway Enterprise pros

Cons

"I sometimes face issues with integration."

"Mainly, I would say they need to improve the updates. The updates of the OS for Fortinet seem to require a lot of bandwidth."

"Because it is open-source, it should be less expensive than others."

"Kong is meant for north-south communications, so it will be interesting to see what solutions they can come up with in the realms of east-west communications, service-to-service communications, and Zero Trust architecture. I believe that if they can provide for these areas, then they will be able to solve the overall integration and security concerns for microservices architecture in general."

"The motivation to move to Enterprise edition is still license and cost based."

"The ease of billing is lost when Kong is not available directly on the Azure marketplace. This is one area where they can improve."

"Understanding the configurations and knowing what needs to be done can be a bit difficult initially."

"The software version upgrade process should be improved."

"The technical support team's response time needs to be improved."

More Kong Gateway Enterprise cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It's expensive in Thailand (10 million baht, in Thai currency)."

"Basically, my company uses the tool's open-source version."

"Kong Enterprise is cheaper than Apigee. I rate its pricing as four out of ten."

"Kong Enterprise's pricing is at par compared to the other technologies."

"The product is reasonably priced because it goes by the SaaS model."

"There are many factors that influence the price of Kong Enterprise, such as scale, licenses, and usage."

"I don't have any information on licensing costs currently."

"Kong Enterprise's pricing is reasonable for our company size."

More Kong Gateway Enterprise pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Construction Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Government

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Large Enterprise	20

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Gloo Platform?

Since I have been using Gloo Platform, our features and functionality fully satisfy our needs, so I do not think there are any improvements needed for this platform. It is fully compatible with our...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Gloo Platform?

I primarily use Gloo Platform to manage APIs and implement API Gateway capabilities, control traffic routing, and improve observability across Kubernetes applications. These are the main use cases ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Gloo Platform?

My advice to others is that any user using Kubernetes API gateways and API management will see improvements in traffic control. Organizations are highly recommended to use Gloo Platform because it ...

See all answers

How does Kong Enterprise compare with Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager?

The Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager was designed with its users in mind. Though it is a reasonably complex piece of software, it is easy to install and upgrade. While there are different things that ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kong Enterprise?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Kong Enterprise?

Our primary use cases for Kong Gateway Enterprise are modernizations, migrations, and digitalizations of financial institutions. These are the primary areas we are looking for.

See all answers

Comparisons

Coralogix vs Gloo Platform

Compared 19% of the time

Traefik Enterprise vs Gloo Platform

Compared 19% of the time

Gravitee vs Gloo Platform

Compared 9% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs Gloo Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Layer7 API Management vs Gloo Platform

Compared 7% of the time

More Gloo Platform Competitors

Microsoft Azure API Management vs Kong Gateway Enterprise

Compared 11% of the time

Apigee vs Kong Gateway Enterprise

Compared 10% of the time

Apache APISIX vs Kong Gateway Enterprise

Compared 8% of the time

WSO2 API Manager vs Kong Gateway Enterprise

Compared 8% of the time

IBM webMethods Hybrid Integration vs Kong Gateway Enterprise

Compared 3% of the time

More Kong Gateway Enterprise Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Gloo Platform

September 2026

Download Gloo Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Kong Gateway Enterprise

September 2026

Download Kong Gateway Enterprise product report

Overview

Gloo Platform is a versatile API and microservices management tool known for its robust security, seamless integration, and advanced traffic handling capabilities. It effectively bolsters organizational efficiency by improving workflows and reducing manual tasks through automation. Users value its support for multiple languages, comprehensive analytics, and its ability to enhance service mesh implementations for better network management.

Solo.io

Kong Gateway Enterprise is an advanced API management platform offering seamless integration, robust security features, and flexible deployment options for modern enterprises needing efficient API handling.

Kong Gateway Enterprise stands out with its plugin-based network services and ease of implementation in Kubernetes environments. It delivers robust API governance, impressive rate limiting, and customization with Lua scripts. Enhanced with high-performance handling and AI-driven functionality, it supports efficient API monetization. It also ensures competitive pricing, scalability, and strong community support.

What are the key features of Kong Gateway Enterprise?

Plugin-Based Services: Allows easy customization and integration.
Security: Delivers comprehensive API security options.
Rate Limiting: Offers control over API traffic for better performance.
Deployment Flexibility: Supports cloud environments effortlessly.
AI Integration: Enhances functionality with AI-driven applications.

What benefits and ROI should users consider in Kong Gateway Enterprise?

Ease of Use: Simplifies API management tasks.
Scalability: Supports growth with robust infrastructure.
Customizability: Tailors API management with Lua scripts.
Community Support: Offers strong resources and collaboration opportunities.
API Monetization: Enables revenue opportunities through efficient management.

Organizations across finance, IoT, manufacturing, and e-commerce sectors implement Kong Gateway Enterprise to streamline microservices deployment and integration. It manages API security and traffic while providing observability and scalability. The platform enables integration with IDPs and other systems, securing extensive API ecosystems.

Kong

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Cargill, Zillow, Ferrari, WeWork, Healthcare.gov, Yahoo! Japan, Giphy, SkyScanner

Buyer's Guide

Gloo Platform vs. Kong Gateway Enterprise

September 2026

Free Report: Gloo Platform vs. Kong Gateway Enterprise

Find out what your peers are saying about Gloo Platform vs. Kong Gateway Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Gloo Platform vs. Kong Gateway Enterprise report.

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.