No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
Kong Gateway Enterprise Logo

Kong Gateway Enterprise pros and cons

Vendor: Kong
4.0 out of 5

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

Kong Gateway Enterprise excels at combining an intrusion prevention system with firewall and antivirus capabilities.
It features excellent plugin support, notably OIDC, Rate Limiting, and Lambda functions, enhancing its flexibility and utility.
The platform offers significant benefits in authentication and authorization, especially with role-based access control (RBAC).
Its capability to seamlessly integrate with various security tools boosts its overall value.
Kong Gateway Enterprise demonstrates remarkable speed, stability, and resiliency, especially under heavy usage.

CONS

OS upgrades are infrequent and bulky, and the software version upgrade process should be improved.
Integration with existing tools is challenging, requiring more effort than implementing MuleSoft or Azure APIM.
Pricing is a significant concern, with costs starting at hundreds of thousands of dollars, necessitating improvements in pricing strategies.
Kong Enterprise should include policy features available in other management systems and improve live tracing capabilities.
Technical support team response time needs improvement, and Kong Enterprise would benefit from enhanced documentation.
 

Kong Gateway Enterprise Pros review quotes

ES
Enterprise Architect at El Al
May 12, 2025
Based on my experience, I would definitely recommend Kong Gateway Enterprise to other people.
KS
Business Consultant at Ernst & Young
Feb 1, 2026
Kong Gateway Enterprise is quite comprehensive.
RY
Engineer at Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
Jun 5, 2024
Kong Gateway helped to improve performance. It's good enough for our users.
Learn what your peers think about Kong Gateway Enterprise. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2026.
893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.
ASHOK YADAV - PeerSpot reviewer
Solutions Architect at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Jun 26, 2024
It offers a wide range of plugins that we leverage, including OIDC, Rate Limiting, Lambda functions, and more.
Sudhanshu Dev - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Principal DevOps Engineer at barq
Oct 15, 2024
Kong's most valuable features are its lightweight performance when handling millions of requests and the ability to write custom plugins to enhance security, such as end-to-end encryption, even in the open-source version.
Rav Bangalore - PeerSpot reviewer
GenAI Strategist at Wipro Limited
May 9, 2024
The solution's technical support is good and fast in terms of responsiveness and problem-solving skills.
AV
Dev lead at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
May 2, 2024
The features I like include ease of operation and implementation in a cloud environment, the dashboarding features for API statistics, and the user-friendly developer portal.
Paramesh Ande - PeerSpot reviewer
Pega Solution Architect at Rabobank
Sep 4, 2023
The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it seamlessly supports a vast number of tools.
Karthick Sampangi - PeerSpot reviewer
Practice Head - Enterprise Integration & Process Automation at Happiest Minds Technologies
Aug 25, 2023
Protocol transformation is the most valuable feature of Kong Enterprise.
Yogesh Khandelwal - PeerSpot reviewer
Api Solution Architecture Lead at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
Feb 28, 2024
The most valuable feature of Kong Enterprise is its capability to integrate with various security tools.
 

Kong Gateway Enterprise Cons review quotes

ES
Enterprise Architect at El Al
May 12, 2025
More plugins for additional integrations would be helpful and openness for traditional development languages, such as .NET, because many enterprises are looking for .NET solutions or incorporating with .NET solutions.
KS
Business Consultant at Ernst & Young
Feb 1, 2026
For us, implementing Kong Gateway Enterprise with existing infrastructures and the cloud in tandem requires more effort than implementing MuleSoft or Azure APIM or AWS.
RY
Engineer at Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
Jun 5, 2024
The main challenge, in my opinion, is the price. It's difficult to convince our management to approve the budget to purchase it from our vendor. There are no technical problems.
Learn what your peers think about Kong Gateway Enterprise. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2026.
893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.
ASHOK YADAV - PeerSpot reviewer
Solutions Architect at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Jun 26, 2024
The software version upgrade process should be improved.
Sudhanshu Dev - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Principal DevOps Engineer at barq
Oct 15, 2024
The open-source version of Kong does not support a dashboard, which would be very helpful.
Rav Bangalore - PeerSpot reviewer
GenAI Strategist at Wipro Limited
May 9, 2024
From an improvement perspective, the product should offer more readily available connectors and also allow for more seamless AI integrations.
AV
Dev lead at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
May 2, 2024
The ease of billing is lost when Kong is not available directly on the Azure marketplace. This is one area where they can improve.
Paramesh Ande - PeerSpot reviewer
Pega Solution Architect at Rabobank
Sep 4, 2023
Kong Enterprise fails to provide live tracing of the APIs, which is possible nowadays.
Karthick Sampangi - PeerSpot reviewer
Practice Head - Enterprise Integration & Process Automation at Happiest Minds Technologies
Aug 25, 2023
The solution should include policy features that are available in other solutions like MuleSoft API manager but missing in Kong Enterprise.
Yogesh Khandelwal - PeerSpot reviewer
Api Solution Architecture Lead at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
Feb 28, 2024
The technical support team's response time needs to be improved.